This work addresses the study of factors that increase the persuasive efficacy of testimonial messages aimed at improving intergroup attitudes. The results of two online experiments (N = 840) on the effect of empathy with, and similarity to, the protagonist in personal stories designed to improve attitudes towards immigrants are presented. In both studies, participants were given instructions to induce a certain exposure condition (empathy vs. an objective or distanced perspective) immediately before reading a narrative whose protagonist was an immigrant with high or low similarity to the audience. The results of mediation analysis show that both empathy and similarity increased identification and narrative transportation, which in turn reduced counterarguing, thus resulting in a more positive attitude towards the outgroup and lower threat perception. The results are discussed in the context of research on narrative persuasion and the design of campaigns to reduce racism and xenophobia.
BanasJ. A.BessarabovaE.MasseyZ. B. (2020). Meta-analysis on mediated contact and prejudice. Human Communication Research, 46, 120–160. https://doi.org/10.1093/hcr/hqaa004
4.
BatsonC. D.BatsonJ. G.SlingsbyJ. K.HarrellK. L.PeeknaH. M.ToddR. M. (1991). Empathic joy and the empathy–altruism hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 413–426. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.61.3.413
5.
BatsonC. D.PolycarpouM. P.Harmon-JonesE.ImhoffH. J.MitchenerE. C.BednarL. L.HighbergerL. (1997). Empathy and attitudes: Can feeling for a member of a stigmatized group improve feelings toward the group?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 105–118. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.72.1.105
6.
BatsonC. D.SagerK.GarstE.KangM.RubchinskyK.DawsonK. (1997). Is empathy-induced helping due to self–other merging? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 495–509. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.73.3.495
BeyerA.MatthesJ. (2015). Attitudes toward illegal immigration and exposure to public service and commercial broadcasting in France, Norway, and the United States. International Journal of Communication, 9, 3264–3279. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/3165
9.
BilandzicH.BusselleR. (2013). Narrative persuasion. In DillardJ. P.ShenL. (Eds.), Persuasion: Developments in theory and practice (2nd ed., pp. 200–219). SAGE.
10.
BoyleM. P.SchmierbachM. (2015). Applied communication research methods. Routledge.
11.
BraddockK.DillardJ. P. (2016). Meta-analytic evidence for the persuasive effect of narratives on beliefs, attitudes, intentions, and behaviors. Communication Monographs, 83, 446–467. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2015.1128555
12.
BravermanJ. (2008). Testimonials versus informational persuasive messages: The moderating effect of delivery mode and personal involvement. Communication Research, 35, 666–694. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650208321785
13.
BrewerM. B. (1999). The psychology of prejudice: Ingroup love and outgroup hate?Journal of Social Issues, 55, 429–444. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00126
14.
ChungA. H.SlaterM. D. (2013). Reducing stigma and out-group distinctions through perspective-taking in narratives. Journal of Communication, 63, 894–911. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12050
15.
CohenJ. (2001). Defining identification: A theoretical look at the identification of audiences with media characters. Mass Communication & Society, 4, 245–264. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327825MCS0403_01
16.
CohenJ. (2009). Mediated relationships and media effects: Parasocial interaction and identification. In NabiR. L.OliverM. B. (Eds.), Media processes and effects (pp. 223–236). SAGE.
17.
CohenJ.Tal-OrN. (2017). Antecedents of identification: Character, text, and audiences. In HakemulderF.KuipersM. M.TanE. S.BálintK.DoicaruM. M. (Eds.), Narrative absorption (pp. 271–292). John Benjamins Publishing Company.
18.
CohenJ.Weimann-SaksD.Mazor-TregermanM. (2018). Does character similarity increase identification and persuasion? Media Psychology, 21, 506–528. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2017.1302344
19.
DahlstromM. F.NiederdeppeJ.GaoL.ZhuX. (2017). Operational and conceptual trends in narrative persuasion research: Comparing health- and non-health-related contexts. International Journal of Communication, 11, 4865–4885. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/6629/2202
20.
DaleK. R.Moyer-GuséE. (2020). Interdependence in mediated intergroup contact: Exploring the common ingroup identity model in a fictional narrative. Journal of Media Psychology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105/a000273
21.
DavisM. H.HullJ. G.YoungR. D.WarrenG. G. (1987). Emotional reactions to dramatic film stimuli: The influence of cognitive and emotional empathy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 126–133. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.52.1.126
22.
De GraafA. (2014). The effectiveness of adaptation of the protagonist in narrative impact: Similarity influences health beliefs through self-referencing. Human Communication Research, 40, 73–90. https://doi.org/10.1111/hcre.12015
23.
De GraafA. D.SandersJ.HoekenH. (2016). Characteristics of narrative interventions and health effects: A review of the content, form, and context of narratives in health-related narrative persuasion research. Review of Communication Research, 4, 88–131. https://doi.org/10.12840/issn.2255-4165.2016.04.01.011
24.
De GraafA.van LeeuwenL. (2017). The role of absorption processes in narrative health communication. In HakemulderF.KuipersM. M.TanE. S.BálintK.DoicaruM. M. (Eds.), Narrative absorption (pp. 271–292). John Benjamins Publishing Company.
25.
DovidioJ. F.JohnsonJ. D.GaertnerS. L.PearsonA. R.SaguyT.Ashburn-NardoL. (2010). Empathy and intergroup relations. In MikulincerM.ShaverP. R. (Eds.), Prosocial motives, emotions, and behavior: The better angels of our nature (pp. 393–408). American Psychological Association.
26.
EberlJ. M.MeltzerC. E.HeidenreichT.HerreroB.TheorinN.LindF.BerganzaR.BoomgaardenH. G.SchemerC.StrömbäckJ. (2018). The European media discourse on immigration and its effects: A literature review. Annals of the International Communication Association, 42, 207–223. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2018.1497452
27.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.BuchnerA.LangA.-G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149
28.
FaulknerJ.SchallerM.ParkJ. H.DuncanL. A. (2004). Evolved disease-avoidance mechanisms and contemporary xenophobic attitudes. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 7, 333–353. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430204046142
29.
FinlayK. A.StephanW. G. (2000). Improving intergroup relations: The effects of empathy on racial attitudes. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30, 1720–1737. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2000.tb02464.x
30.
FitzgeraldK.GreenM. C. (2017). Narrative persuasion. In HakemulderF.KuipersM. M.TanE. S.BálintK.DoicaruM. M. (Eds.), Narrative absorption (pp. 49–67). John Benjamins Publishing Company.
31.
GaertnerS. L.DovidioJ. F.AnastasioP. A.BachmanB. A.RustM. C. (1993). The common ingroup identity model: Recategorization and the reduction of intergroup bias. European Review of Social Psychology, 4, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/14792779343000004
32.
GreenM. C.BrockT. C. (2000). The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 701–721. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.79.5.701
33.
GreenM. C.SestirM. (2017). Transportation theory. In RösslerP.HoffnerC. A.van ZoonenLiesbet (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of media effects (pp. 1983–1996). John Wiley & Sons.
34.
HarwoodJ. (2010). The contact space: A novel framework for intergroup contact research. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 29, 147–177. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X09359520
35.
HayesA. F. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis (2nd ed.). The Guilford Press.
36.
HoekenH.KolthoffM.SandersJ. (2016). Story perspective and character similarity as drivers of identification and narrative persuasion. Human Communication Research, 42, 292–311. https://doi.org/10.1111/hcre.12076
37.
IgartuaJ. J.BarriosI. (2012). Changing real-world beliefs with controversial movies: Processes and mechanisms of narrative persuasion. Journal of Communication, 62, 514–531. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01640.x
38.
IgartuaJ. J.FrutosF. J. (2017). Enhancing attitudes toward stigmatized groups with movies: Mediating and moderating processes of narrative persuasion. International Journal of Communication, 11, 158–177. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/5779
39.
IgartuaJ. J.VegaJ. (2016). Identification with characters, elaboration, and counterarguing in entertainment-education interventions through audiovisual fiction. Journal of Health Communication, 21, 293–300. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2015.1064494
40.
IgartuaJ. J.WojcieszakM.KimN. (2019). How the interplay of imagined contact and first-person narratives improves attitudes toward stigmatized immigrants: A conditional process model. European Journal of Social Psychology, 49, 385–397. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2509
41.
KaufmanG. F.LibbyL. K. (2012). Changing beliefs and behavior through experience-taking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027525
42.
KerryN.AiringtonZ.MurrayD. R. (2020). Cultures of fear: Individual differences in perception of physical (but not disease) threats predict cultural neophobia in both immigrant and mainstream Americans. Evolutionary Psychological Science, 6, 335–345. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40806-020-00238-w
43.
KimM. (2019). When similarity strikes back: Conditional persuasive effects of character–audience similarity in anti-smoking campaign. Human Communication Research, 45, 52–77. https://doi.org/10.1093/hcr/hqy013
44.
KimM.ShiR.CappellaJ. N. (2016). Effect of character–audience similarity on the perceived effectiveness of antismoking PSAs via engagement. Health Communication, 31, 1193–1204. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2015.1048421
45.
KimN.KimH. K.WojcieszakM.IgartuaJ. J.LimC. M. (2020). The presence of the protagonist: Explaining narrative perspective effects through social presence. Media Psychology, 23, 891–914. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2019.1665548
LindsayR. M.EhrenbergA. S. (1993). The design of replicated studies. The American Statistician, 47, 217–228. https://doi.org/10.2307/2684982
48.
LipseyM. W. (1990). Design sensitivity: Statistical power for experimental research. SAGE.
49.
MazziottaA.MummendeyA.WrightS. C. (2011). Vicarious intergroup contact effects: Applying social-cognitive theory to intergroup contact research. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 14, 255–274. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430210390533
50.
Moyer-GuséE. (2008). Toward a theory of entertainment persuasion: Explaining the persuasive effects of entertainment-education messages. Communication Theory, 18, 407–425. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2008.00328.x
51.
Moyer-GuséE.ChungA. H.JainP. (2011). Identification with characters and discussion of taboo topics after exposure to an entertainment narrative about sexual health. Journal of Communication, 61, 387–406. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01551.x
52.
Moyer-GuséE.DaleK. (2017). Narrative persuasion theories. In RösslerP.HoffnerC. A.van ZoonenLiesbet (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of media effects (pp. 1345–1355). John Wiley & Sons.
53.
Moyer-GuséE.DaleK. R.OrtizM. (2019). Reducing prejudice through narratives: An examination of the mechanisms of vicarious intergroup contact. Journal of Media Psychology, 31, 185–195. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105/a000249
54.
Moyer-GuséE.NabiR. L. (2010). Explaining the effects of narrative in an entertainment television program: Overcoming resistance to persuasion. Human Communication Research, 36, 26–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2009.01367.x
MurrarS.BrauerM. (2019). Overcoming resistance to change: Using narratives to create more positive intergroup attitudes. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 28, 164–169. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721418818552
57.
NathansonA. I. (2003). Rethinking empathy. In BryantJ.Roskos-EwoldsenD.CantorJ. (Eds.), Communication and emotion: Essays in honor of Dolf Zillmann (pp. 107–130). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
NiederdeppeJ.KimH. K.LundellH.FaziliF.FrazierB. (2012). Beyond counterarguing: Simple elaboration, complex integration, and counterelaboration in response to variations in narrative focus and sidedness. Journal of Communication, 62, 758–777. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01671.x
60.
ParkS. Y. (2012). Mediated intergroup contact: Concept explication, synthesis, and application. Mass Communication and Society, 15, 136–159. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2011.558804
61.
PettigrewT. F.TroppL. R. (2008). How does intergroup contact reduce prejudice? Meta-analytic tests of three mediators. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 922–934. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.504
62.
PirlottA. G.MacKinnonD. P. (2016). Design approaches to experimental mediation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 66, 29–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.09.012
63.
RaneyA. A. (2003). Disposition-based theories of enjoyment. In BryantJ.Roskos-EwoldsenD.CantorJ. (Eds.), Communication and emotion: Essays in honor of Dolf Zillmann (pp. 61–84). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
64.
Rivera-NavarroJ.BreyE.FrancoM. (2020). Immigration and use of public spaces and food stores in a large city: A qualitative study on urban health inequalities. Journal of Migration and Health, 1–2, Article 100019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmh.2020.100019
65.
SaleemM.HawkinsI.WojcieszakM. E.RodenJ. (2019). When and how negative news coverage empowers collective action in minorities. Communication Research. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650219877094
66.
SestirM.GreenM. C. (2010). You are who you watch: Identification and transportation effects on temporary self-concept. Social Influence, 5, 272–288. https://doi.org/10.1080/15534510.2010.490672
67.
SlaterM. D.RounerD. (2002). Entertainment-education and elaboration likelihood: Understanding the processing of narrative persuasion. Communication Theory, 12, 173–191. https://doi.org/j.1468-2885.2002.tb00265.x
68.
TajfelH. (1982). Social identity and intergroup relations. Cambridge University Press.
69.
Tal-OrN.CohenJ. (2015). Unpacking engagement: Convergence and divergence in transportation and identification. Annals of the International Communication Association, 40, 33–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2015.11735255
70.
ToolanM. (2001). Narrative: A critical linguistic introduction. Routledge.
71.
TukachinskyR. (2014). Experimental manipulation of psychological involvement with media. Communication Methods and Measures, 8, 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2013.873777
72.
TurnerJ. C. (1985). Social categorization and the self-concept: A social cognitive theory of group behavior. In LawlerE. J. (Ed.), Advances in group processes: Theory and research (Vol. 2, pp. 77–121). JAI Press.
73.
TurnerJ. C.HoggM. A.OakesP. J.ReicherS. D.WetherellM. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Basil Blackwell.
74.
Van den HendeE. A.DahlD. W.SchoormansJ. P.SneldersD. (2012). Narrative transportation in concept tests for really new products: The moderating effect of reader–protagonist similarity. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 29, 157–170. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2012.00961.x
75.
VisintinE. P.VociA.PagottoL.HewstoneM. (2017). Direct, extended, and mass-mediated contact with immigrants in Italy: Their associations with emotions, prejudice, and humanity perceptions. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 47, 175–194. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12423
76.
WalterN.CohenJ. (2019). When less is more and more is less: The paradoxical metacognitive effects of counterarguing. Communication Monographs, 86, 377–397. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2019.1580378
77.
WojcieszakM.KimN. (2016). How to improve attitudes toward disliked groups: The effects of narrative versus numerical evidence on political persuasion. Communication Research, 43, 785–809. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650215618480
78.
WojcieszakM.KimN.IgartuaJ. J. (2020). How to enhance the effects of mediated intergroup contact? Evidence from four countries. Mass Communication and Society, 23, 71–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2019.1630444
79.
YanovitzkyI.GreeneK. (2009). Quantitative methods and causal inference in media effects research. In NabiR. L.OliverM. B. (Eds.), Media processes and effects (pp. 35–52). SAGE.
80.
ZillmannD. (1991). Empathy: Affect from bearing witness to the emotions of others. In BryantJ.ZillmannD. (Eds.), Responding to the screen: Reception and reaction processes (pp. 135–167). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
