Backlash against the #MeToo movement: How women’s voice causes men to feel victimized

Abstract

Three studies examined whether perceived increase in women’s “voice” (i.e., being heard and taken seriously about sexual assault) contributes to perceptions of bias against men. In Study 1, both men and women who perceived women to have a greater voice related to sexual assault, perceived greater victimization of men. This relationship was stronger for relatively conservative participants. In Study 2, relatively conservative (but not relatively liberal) participants who read about #MeToo perceived greater men’s victimization than those in the control condition. Study 3 examined responses to perceiving that men are victimized by #MeToo. For relatively conservative (but not liberal) men, perceptions of men’s victimhood led to less willingness to work alone with a woman and less willingness to combat sexual assault (relative to a control condition). Thus, while the #MeToo movement brings awareness of issues of sexual assault, it also generates a backlash among the more conservative, and may accentuate gender disparities.

Keywords

antimale bias collective action #MeToo politics system justification

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alter

(2017, December 6). Republicans are less likely than Democrats to believe women who make sexual assault accusations: Survey. Time. https://time.com/5049665/republicans-democrats-believe-sexual-assault-accusations-survey/

Anderson

(2016). White rage: The unspoken truth of our racial divide. Bloomsbury Publishing.

Anderson

Toor

(2018). How social media users have discussed sexual harassment since #MeToo went viral. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2018/10/11/how-social-media-users-have-discussed-sexual-harassment-since-metoo-went-viral/

Björklund

Dahl

(2017). On queer funding, #metoo, and giving gay people a bad name. Lambda Nordica, 22, 7–13. https://www.lambdanordica.org/index.php/lambdanordica/article/view/503

Black

M. C.

Basile

K. C.

Breiding

M. J.

Smith

S. G.

Walters

M. L.

Merrick

M. T.

Chen

Stevens

M. R.

(2011). The national intimate partner and sexual violence survey (NISVS): 2010 summary report. National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Bobo

L. D.

(1999). Prejudice as group position: Microfoundations of a sociological approach to racism and race relations. Journal of Social Issues, 55, 445–472. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00127

Bobo

Hutchings

V. L.

(1996). Perceptions of racial group competition: Extending Blumer’s theory of group position to a multiracial social context. American Sociological Review, 61, 951–972. https://doi.org/10.2307/2096302

Burke

(2017, November 9). #MeToo was started for Black and brown women and girls. They’re still being ignored. The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-nation/wp/2017/11/09/the-waitress-who-works-in-the-diner-needs-to-know-that-the-issue-of-sexual-harassment-is-about-her-too/

Carlsen

Salam

Cain Miller

Ngu

Patel

J. K.

Wichter

(2018, October 29). #MeToo brought down 201 powerful men. Nearly half of their replacements are women. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2018/10/23/us/metoo-replacements.html

10.

Clark

L. M.

Lewis

D. J.

(1977). Rape: The price of coercive sexuality. Women’s Press.

11.

Costa

Briggs

Chahal

Fried

Garg

Kriz

Lei

Milne

Slayton

(2020). How partisanship and sexism influence voters’ reactions to political# MeToo scandals. Research & Politics. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053168020941727

12.

Craig

M. A.

Richeson

J. A.

(2014). More diverse yet less tolerant? How the increasingly diverse racial landscape affects White Americans’ racial attitudes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40, 750–761. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167214524993

13.

Craig

M. A.

Richeson

J. A.

(2017). Information about the US racial demographic shift triggers concerns about anti-White discrimination among the prospective White “minority.” PLoS ONE, 12, Article e0185389. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0185389

14.

Diamond

(2018, October 2). Trump says it’s ’a very scary time for young men in America. CNN. https://www.cnn.com/2018/10/02/politics/trump-scary-time-for-young-men-metoo/index.html

15.

Dixon

Levine

Reicher

Durrheim

(2012). Beyond prejudice: Are negative evaluations the problem and is getting us to like one another more the solution? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 35, 411–425. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X11002214

16.

Easley

(2018, February 26). Poll: Voters want Trump to do more to address violence against women. The Hill. https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/375628-poll-voters-say-trump-not-doing-enough-to-address-violence-against

17.

Eidelman

Crandall

C. S.

(2012). Bias in favor of the status quo. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 6, 270–281. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2012.00427.x

18.

Ferguson

C. E.

Malouff

J. M.

(2016). Assessing police classifications of sexual assault reports: A meta-analysis of false reporting rates. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 45, 1185–1193. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-015-0666-2

19.

Goh

J. X.

Bandt-Law

Cheek

N. N.

Sinclair

Kaiser

C. R.

(2021). Narrow prototypes and neglected victims: Understanding perceptions of sexual harassment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000260

20.

Grace

Lloyd

Smith

L. J.

(1992). Rape: From recording to conviction. Home Office.

21.

Grewal Law PLLC. (2020, June 9). How the #MeToo movement gave a voice to many [Blog post]. https://www.4grewallaw.com/blog/2020/june/how-the-metoo-movement-gave-a-voice-to-many/

22.

Hayes

A. F.

(2017). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (2nd ed.). Guilford Publications.

23.

Hesse

(2019, July 11). Commentary: The “Billy Graham rule” doesn’t honor your wife—it demeans her and all women. Chicago Tribune. https://www.chicagotribune.com/opinion/commentary/ct-opinion-billy-graham-rule-mississippi-governor-candidate-20190711-wbpifhmipjez5lfh6wp3msai4i-story.html

24.

Horowitz

J. M.

Parker

Stepler

(2017). Wide partisan gaps in U.S. over how far the country has come on gender equality. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2017/10/18/wide-partisan-gaps-in-u-s-over-how-far-the-country-has-come-on-gender-equality/

25.

Ipsos. (2018). Ipsos/NPR examine views on sexual harassment and assault. https://www.ipsos.com/en-us/news-polls/NPR-Sexual-Harassment-and-Assault

26.

Jackman

M. R.

(1994). The velvet glove: Paternalism and conflict in gender, class, and race relations. University of California Press.

27.

Jost

J. T.

Banaji

M. R.

(1994). The role of stereotyping in system-justification and the production of false consciousness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.1994.tb01008.x

28.

Jost

J. T.

Burgess

(2000). Attitudinal ambivalence and the conflict between group and system justification motives in low status groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 293–305. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167200265003

29.

Jost

J. T.

Hunyady

(2002). The psychology of system justification and the palliative function of ideology. European Review of Social Psychology, 13, 111–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463280240000046

30.

Jost

J. T.

Hunyady

(2005). Antecedents and consequences of system-justifying ideologies. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 260–265. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00377.x

31.

Jost

J. T.

Kende

(2020). Setting the record straight: System justification and rigidity-of-the-right in contemporary Hungarian politics. International Journal of Psychology, 55, 96–115. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12631

32.

Jost

J. T.

Krochik

Gaucher

Hennes

E. P.

(2009). Can a psychological theory of ideological differences explain contextual variability in the contents of political attitudes? Psychological Inquiry, 20, 183–188. https://doi.org/10.1080/10478400903088908

33.

Jost

J. T.

Kruglanski

A. W.

Glaser

Sulloway

F. J.

(2003). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 339–375. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.129.3.339

34.

Jost

J. T.

Major

(2001). The psychology of legitimacy: Emerging perspectives on ideology, justice, and intergroup relations. Cambridge University Press.

35.

Jost

J. T.

Nosek

B. A.

Gosling

S. D.

(2008). Ideology: Its resurgence in social, personality, and political psychology. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3, 126–136. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6916.2008.00070.x

36.

Kaiser

C. R.

Hagiwara

Malahy

L. W.

Wilkins

C. L.

(2009). Group identification moderates attitudes toward ingroup members who confront discrimination. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 770–777. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2009.04.027

37.

Kearl

(2018). The facts behind the #metoo movement: A national study on sexual harassment and assault. Stop Street Harassment; Raliance; UC San Diego Center on Gender Equity and Health. http://www.stopstreetharassment.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/Full-Report-2018-National-Study-on-Sexual-Harassment-and-Assault.pdf

38.

Kilpatrick

D. G.

Resnick

H. S.

Ruggiero

K. J.

Conoscenti

L. M.

McCauley

(2007). Drug-facilitated, incapacitated, and forcible rape: A national study (Report by the Medical University of South Carolina). National Crime Victims Research & Treatment Center. https://www.ojp.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/219181.pdf

39.

Kuchynka

S. L.

Bosson

J. K.

Vandello

J. A.

Puryear

(2018). Zero-sum thinking and the masculinity contest: Perceived intergroup competition and workplace gender bias. Journal of Social Issues, 74, 529–550. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12281

40.

Kulik

(2018). Explaining egalitarianism in gender-role attitudes. Asian Women, 34, 61–87. https://doi.org/10.14431/aw.2018.06.34.2.61

41.

Lambert

A. J.

Raichle

(2000). The role of political ideology in mediating judgments of blame in rape victims and their assailants: A test of the just world, personal responsibility, and legitimization hypotheses. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 853–863. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167200269010

42.

Lerner

M. J.

(1980) The Belief in a Just World. In: The Belief in a Just World. Perspectives in Social Psychology. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-0448-5_2

43.

Leung

Williams

(2019). #MeToo and intersectionality: An examination of the #MeToo movement through the R. Kelly scandal. Journal of Communication Inquiry, 43, 349–371. https://doi.org/10.1177/0196859919874138

44.

Levy

Mattsson

(2020). The effects of social movements: Evidence from #MeToo. SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3496903

45.

Lucarini

Suitner

Brown

Craig

M. A.

Knowles

E. D.

Salvador Casara

B. G.

(2020). The #MeToo late effect: Victim blame and trust denial for sexual harassment not immediately reported. Personality and Individual Differences, 167, Article 110240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.110240

46.

MacKinnon

C. A.

(2019, March 24). Where #MeToo came from, and where it’s going. The Atlantic. https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2019/03/catharine-mackinnon-what-metoo-has-changed/585313/

47.

Marshall

W. P.

(1986). Discrimination and the right of association. Northwestern University Law Review, 81, 68–88. https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/illlr81&i=77

48.

McCoy

S. K.

Major

(2007). Priming meritocracy and the psychological justification of inequality. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 341–351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2006.04.009

49.

Mebane

M. E.

Aiello

Francescato

(2020). Political gender gap and social dominance orientation. Psycho-social aspects of human sexuality and ethics. IntechOpen, 1–15.

50.

Morgan

R. E.

Kena

(2018). Criminal victimization, 2016: Revised. U.S. Department of Justice. https://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/cv16.pdf

51.

Moshinsky

Bar-Hillel

(2010). Loss aversion and status quo label bias. Social Cognition, 28, 191–204. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2010.28.2.191

52.

National Center for Injury Prevention and Control. (n.d.). Findings from the National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey: 2010–2012 state report. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/pdf/NISVS-StateReportFactsheet.pdf

53.

North

(2018, October 10). #HimToo, the online movement spreading myths about false rape allegations, explained. Vox. https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2018/10/10/17957126/himtoo-movement-pieter-hanson-tweet-me-too

54.

O’Brien

L. T.

Crandall

C. S.

(2005). Perceiving self-interest: Power, ideology, and maintenance of the status quo. Social Justice Research, 18, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-005-3368-4

55.

Onwuachi-Willig

(2018). What about #Ustoo?: The invisibility of race in the #Metoo movement. Race, Racism and the Law. https://racism.org/articles/intersectionality/gender/2146-what-about-ustoo-the-invisibility-of-race-in-the-metoo-movement

56.

Patton

T. O.

Snyder-Yuly

(2007). Any four Black men will do: Rape, race, and the ultimate scapegoat. Journal of Black Studies, 37, 859–895. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021934706296025

57.

Pew Research Center. (2018). Wide gender gap, growing educational divide in voters’ party identification. https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2018/03/20/wide-gender-gap-growing-educational-divide-in-voters-party-identification/

58.

Pflum

(2018, October 15). A year ago, Alyssa Milano started a conversation about #MeToo. These women replied. NBC News. https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/year-ago-alyssa-milano-started-conversation-about-metoo-these-women-n920246

59.

Rape, Abuse & Incest National Network (RAINN). (n.d.). Perpetrators of sexual violence: Statistics. https://www.rainn.org/statistics/perpetrators-sexual-violence

60.

Rennison

C. M.

(2002). Rape and sexual assault: Reporting to police and medical attention, 1992–2000. U.S. Department of Justice. https://www.ojp.gov/ncjrs/virtual-library/abstracts/rape-and-sexual-assault-reporting-police-and-medical-attention-1992

61.

Safronova

Halleck

(2019, May 23). These rape victims had to sue to get the police to investigate. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/23/us/rape-victims-kits-police-departments.html

62.

Sidanius

Levin

Federico

C. M.

Pratto

(2001). Legitimizing ideologies: The social dominance approach. In Jost

J. T.

Major

(Eds.), The psychology of legitimacy: Emerging perspectives on ideology, justice, and intergroup relations (pp. 307–331). Cambridge University Press.

63.

Sidanius

Pratto

(1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. Cambridge University Press.

64.

Smith

Zhang

Basile

K. C.

Merrick

Wang

Kresnow

Chen

(2015). National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey: 2015 data brief. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/datasources/nisvs/2015NISVSdatabrief.html

65.

Ullman

S. E.

(2010). Talking about sexual assault: Society’s response to survivors. American Psychological Association.

66.

Unzueta

M. M.

Everly

B. A.

Gutiérrez

A. S.

(2014). Social dominance orientation moderates reactions to Black and White discrimination claimants. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 54, 81–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2014.04.005

67.

Valenti

(2017). Mike Pence doesn’t eat alone with women. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/mar/31/mike-pence-doesnt-eat-alone-women-speaks-volumes

68.

Van der Linden

Panagopoulos

. (2019). The O’Reilly factor: An ideological bias in judgments about sexual harassment. Personality and Individual Differences, 139, 198–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.11.022

69.

Wilkins

C. L.

Hirsch

A. A.

Kaiser

C. R.

Inkles

M. P.

(2017). The threat of racial progress and the self-protective nature of perceiving anti-White bias. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 20(6), 801–812. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430216631030

70.

Wilkins

C. L.

Kaiser

C. R.

(2014). Racial progress as threat to the status hierarchy: Implications for perceptions of anti-White bias. Psychological Science, 25, 439–446. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613508412

71.

Wilkins

C. L.

Wellman

J. D.

Babbitt

L. G.

Toosi

N. R.

Schad

K. D.

(2015). You can win but I can’t lose: Bias against high-status groups increases their zero-sum beliefs about discrimination. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 57, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2014.10.008

72.

Wilkins

C. L.

Wellman

J. D.

Flavin

E. L.

Manrique

J. A.

(2018). When men perceive anti-male bias: Status-legitimizing beliefs increase discrimination against women. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 19, 282–290. https://doi.org/10.1037/men0000097

73.

Wilkins

C. L.

Wellman

J. D.

Kaiser

C. R.

(2013). Status legitimizing beliefs increase positivity toward Whites who claim anti-White bias. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 1114–1119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2013.05.017

74.

Wilkins

C. L.

Wellman

J. D.

Schad

K. D.

(2017). Reactions to anti-male sexism claims: The moderating roles of status-legitimizing belief endorsement and group identification. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 20, 173–185. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430215595109

75.

Wyatt

G. E.

(1992). The sociocultural context of African American and White American women’s rape. Journal of Social Issues, 48, 77–91. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1992.tb01158.x

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.07 MB