Three studies examined whether perceived increase in women’s “voice” (i.e., being heard and taken seriously about sexual assault) contributes to perceptions of bias against men. In Study 1, both men and women who perceived women to have a greater voice related to sexual assault, perceived greater victimization of men. This relationship was stronger for relatively conservative participants. In Study 2, relatively conservative (but not relatively liberal) participants who read about #MeToo perceived greater men’s victimization than those in the control condition. Study 3 examined responses to perceiving that men are victimized by #MeToo. For relatively conservative (but not liberal) men, perceptions of men’s victimhood led to less willingness to work alone with a woman and less willingness to combat sexual assault (relative to a control condition). Thus, while the #MeToo movement brings awareness of issues of sexual assault, it also generates a backlash among the more conservative, and may accentuate gender disparities.
BlackM. C.BasileK. C.BreidingM. J.SmithS. G.WaltersM. L.MerrickM. T.ChenJ.StevensM. R. (2011). The national intimate partner and sexual violence survey (NISVS): 2010 summary report. National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
6.
BoboL. D. (1999). Prejudice as group position: Microfoundations of a sociological approach to racism and race relations. Journal of Social Issues, 55, 445–472. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00127
7.
BoboL.HutchingsV. L. (1996). Perceptions of racial group competition: Extending Blumer’s theory of group position to a multiracial social context. American Sociological Review, 61, 951–972. https://doi.org/10.2307/2096302
ClarkL. M.LewisD. J. (1977). Rape: The price of coercive sexuality. Women’s Press.
11.
CostaM.BriggsT.ChahalA.FriedJ.GargR.KrizS.LeiL.MilneA.SlaytonJ. (2020). How partisanship and sexism influence voters’ reactions to political# MeToo scandals. Research & Politics. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053168020941727
12.
CraigM. A.RichesonJ. A. (2014). More diverse yet less tolerant? How the increasingly diverse racial landscape affects White Americans’ racial attitudes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40, 750–761. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167214524993
13.
CraigM. A.RichesonJ. A. (2017). Information about the US racial demographic shift triggers concerns about anti-White discrimination among the prospective White “minority.”PLoS ONE, 12, Article e0185389. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0185389
DixonJ.LevineM.ReicherS.DurrheimK. (2012). Beyond prejudice: Are negative evaluations the problem and is getting us to like one another more the solution?Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 35, 411–425. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X11002214
FergusonC. E.MalouffJ. M. (2016). Assessing police classifications of sexual assault reports: A meta-analysis of false reporting rates. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 45, 1185–1193. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-015-0666-2
19.
GohJ. X.Bandt-LawB.CheekN. N.SinclairS.KaiserC. R. (2021). Narrow prototypes and neglected victims: Understanding perceptions of sexual harassment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000260
20.
GraceS.LloydC.SmithL. J. (1992). Rape: From recording to conviction. Home Office.
HayesA. F. (2017). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (2nd ed.). Guilford Publications.
JackmanM. R. (1994). The velvet glove: Paternalism and conflict in gender, class, and race relations. University of California Press.
27.
JostJ. T.BanajiM. R. (1994). The role of stereotyping in system-justification and the production of false consciousness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.1994.tb01008.x
28.
JostJ. T.BurgessD. (2000). Attitudinal ambivalence and the conflict between group and system justification motives in low status groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 293–305. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167200265003
29.
JostJ. T.HunyadyO. (2002). The psychology of system justification and the palliative function of ideology. European Review of Social Psychology, 13, 111–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463280240000046
30.
JostJ. T.HunyadyO. (2005). Antecedents and consequences of system-justifying ideologies. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 260–265. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00377.x
31.
JostJ. T.KendeA. (2020). Setting the record straight: System justification and rigidity-of-the-right in contemporary Hungarian politics. International Journal of Psychology, 55, 96–115. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12631
32.
JostJ. T.KrochikM.GaucherD.HennesE. P. (2009). Can a psychological theory of ideological differences explain contextual variability in the contents of political attitudes?Psychological Inquiry, 20, 183–188. https://doi.org/10.1080/10478400903088908
33.
JostJ. T.KruglanskiA. W.GlaserJ.SullowayF. J. (2003). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 339–375. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.129.3.339
34.
JostJ. T.MajorB. (2001). The psychology of legitimacy: Emerging perspectives on ideology, justice, and intergroup relations. Cambridge University Press.
35.
JostJ. T.NosekB. A.GoslingS. D. (2008). Ideology: Its resurgence in social, personality, and political psychology. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3, 126–136. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6916.2008.00070.x
36.
KaiserC. R.HagiwaraN.MalahyL. W.WilkinsC. L. (2009). Group identification moderates attitudes toward ingroup members who confront discrimination. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 770–777. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2009.04.027
KilpatrickD. G.ResnickH. S.RuggieroK. J.ConoscentiL. M.McCauleyJ. (2007). Drug-facilitated, incapacitated, and forcible rape: A national study (Report by the Medical University of South Carolina). National Crime Victims Research & Treatment Center. https://www.ojp.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/219181.pdf
39.
KuchynkaS. L.BossonJ. K.VandelloJ. A.PuryearC. (2018). Zero-sum thinking and the masculinity contest: Perceived intergroup competition and workplace gender bias. Journal of Social Issues, 74, 529–550. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12281
LambertA. J.RaichleK. (2000). The role of political ideology in mediating judgments of blame in rape victims and their assailants: A test of the just world, personal responsibility, and legitimization hypotheses. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 853–863. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167200269010
42.
LernerM. J. (1980) The Belief in a Just World. In: The Belief in a Just World. Perspectives in Social Psychology. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-0448-5_2
43.
LeungR.WilliamsR. (2019). #MeToo and intersectionality: An examination of the #MeToo movement through the R. Kelly scandal. Journal of Communication Inquiry, 43, 349–371. https://doi.org/10.1177/0196859919874138
LucariniA.SuitnerC.BrownR.CraigM. A.KnowlesE. D.Salvador CasaraB. G. (2020). The #MeToo late effect: Victim blame and trust denial for sexual harassment not immediately reported. Personality and Individual Differences, 167, Article 110240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.110240
McCoyS. K.MajorB. (2007). Priming meritocracy and the psychological justification of inequality. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 341–351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2006.04.009
49.
MebaneM. E.AielloA.FrancescatoD. (2020). Political gender gap and social dominance orientation. Psycho-social aspects of human sexuality and ethics. IntechOpen, 1–15.
O’BrienL. T.CrandallC. S. (2005). Perceiving self-interest: Power, ideology, and maintenance of the status quo. Social Justice Research, 18, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-005-3368-4
PattonT. O.Snyder-YulyJ. (2007). Any four Black men will do: Rape, race, and the ultimate scapegoat. Journal of Black Studies, 37, 859–895. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021934706296025
SidaniusJ.LevinS.FedericoC. M.PrattoF. (2001). Legitimizing ideologies: The social dominance approach. In JostJ. T.MajorB. (Eds.), The psychology of legitimacy: Emerging perspectives on ideology, justice, and intergroup relations (pp. 307–331). Cambridge University Press.
63.
SidaniusJ.PrattoF. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. Cambridge University Press.
UllmanS. E. (2010). Talking about sexual assault: Society’s response to survivors. American Psychological Association.
66.
UnzuetaM. M.EverlyB. A.GutiérrezA. S. (2014). Social dominance orientation moderates reactions to Black and White discrimination claimants. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 54, 81–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2014.04.005
Van der LindenS.PanagopoulosC. (2019). The O’Reilly factor: An ideological bias in judgments about sexual harassment. Personality and Individual Differences, 139, 198–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.11.022
69.
WilkinsC. L.HirschA. A.KaiserC. R.InklesM. P. (2017). The threat of racial progress and the self-protective nature of perceiving anti-White bias. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 20(6), 801–812. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430216631030
70.
WilkinsC. L.KaiserC. R. (2014). Racial progress as threat to the status hierarchy: Implications for perceptions of anti-White bias. Psychological Science, 25, 439–446. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613508412
71.
WilkinsC. L.WellmanJ. D.BabbittL. G.ToosiN. R.SchadK. D. (2015). You can win but I can’t lose: Bias against high-status groups increases their zero-sum beliefs about discrimination. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 57, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2014.10.008
72.
WilkinsC. L.WellmanJ. D.FlavinE. L.ManriqueJ. A. (2018). When men perceive anti-male bias: Status-legitimizing beliefs increase discrimination against women. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 19, 282–290. https://doi.org/10.1037/men0000097
73.
WilkinsC. L.WellmanJ. D.KaiserC. R. (2013). Status legitimizing beliefs increase positivity toward Whites who claim anti-White bias. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 1114–1119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2013.05.017
74.
WilkinsC. L.WellmanJ. D.SchadK. D. (2017). Reactions to anti-male sexism claims: The moderating roles of status-legitimizing belief endorsement and group identification. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 20, 173–185. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430215595109
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
