Increasing diversity and the anticipation of its resulting cultural change is raising vociferous protestations among White Americans. Here, we explore moderation and mediation of its intergroup implications. Among a nationally representative sample of White Americans, Study 1 (n = 2,257) revealed that living in a region that experienced a greater (vs. lesser) increase in racial diversity in recent years was associated with more anti-immigrant attitudes, but only among those who were highly White-identified. In an experiment, Study 2 (n = 420, White Americans) revealed that collective nostalgia (i.e., longing for the ingroup’s past) mediated the relation between anticipated cultural change resulting from shifting demographics and anti-immigrant attitudes, but only for those who were highly White-identified. Thus, anti-immigrant sentiment among White Americans in response to changing demographics and culture is seen primarily among those personally invested in their White racial identity, an effect partly explained by a longing for bygone days.
AbakoumkinG.WildschutT.SedikidesC.BakarouM. (2017). Nostalgia in response to group-based exclusion: The role of attachment-related avoidance. European Journal of Social Psychology, 47, 373–381. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2235
BaiH.FedericoC. (2021). White and minority demographic shifts, intergroup threat, and right-wing extremism. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 94, 104–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2021.104114
6.
BaldwinM.BiernatM.LandauM. J. (2015). Remembering the real me: Nostalgia offers a window to the intrinsic self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108, 128–147. http://doi.org/10.1037/a0038033
7.
BaldwinM.WhiteM. H.SullivanD. (2018). Nostalgia for America’s past can buffer collective guilt. European Journal of Social Psychology, 48, 433–446. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2348
8.
BlumerH. (1958). Race prejudice as a sense of group position. Pacific Sociological Review, 1, 3–7. https://doi.org/10.2307/1388607
9.
BoboL. D. (1999). Prejudice as group position: Microfoundations of a sociological approach to racism and race relations. Journal of Social Issues, 55, 445–472. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00127
CheungW.-Y.SedikidesC.WildschutT.TauschN.AnyanianA. H. (2017). Collective nostalgia is associated with stronger outgroup-directed anger and participation in ingroup-favoring collective action. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 5, 301–319. https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.v5i2.697
12.
ChristO.SchmidK.LolliotS.SwartH.StolleD.TauschN.Al RamiahA.WagnerU.VertovecS.HewstoneM. (2014). Contextual effect of positive intergroup contact on outgroup prejudice. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 111, 3996–4000. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1320901111
13.
CraigM. A.RichesonJ. A. (2014a). More diverse yet less tolerant? How the increasingly diverse racial landscape affects White Americans’ racial attitudes. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 40, 750–761. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167214524993
14.
CraigM. A.RichesonJ. A. (2014b). On the precipice of a “majority-minority” America: Perceived status threat from the racial demographic shift affects White Americans’ political ideology. Psychological Science, 25, 1189–1197. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614527113
15.
CraigM. A.RichesonJ. A. (2017). Information about the US racial demographic shift triggers concerns about anti-White discrimination among the prospective White “minority.” PLoS One, 12, Article e0185389. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0185389
16.
CraigM. A.RichesonJ. A. (2018). Hispanic population growth engenders conservative shift among non-Hispanic racial minorities. Social Psychological & Personality Science, 9, 383–392. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617712029
17.
CraigM. A.RuckerJ. M.RichesonJ. A. (2018). The pitfalls and promise of increasing racial diversity: Threat, contact, and race relations in the 21st century. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 27, 188–193. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721417727860
18.
CrispR. J.TurnerR. N. (2009). Can imagined interactions produce positive perceptions? Reducing prejudice through simulated social contact. American Psychologist, 64, 231–240. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014718
19.
DanboldF.HuoY. (2015). No longer “All-American”? Whites’ defensive reactions to their numerical decline. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 6, 210–218. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550614546355
20.
EarleM.HodsonG. (2019). Right-wing adherence and objective numeracy as predictors of minority group size perceptions and size threat reactions. European Journal of Social Psychology, 49, 760–777. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2538
21.
EarleM.HodsonG. (2020). Questioning White losses and anti-White discrimination in the United States. Nature Human Behaviour, 4, 160–168. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0777-1
22.
EssesV. M.HodsonG.DovidioJ. F. (2003). Public attitudes toward immigrants and immigration: Determinants and policy implications. In BeachC. M.GreenA. G.JeffreyG. R. (Eds.), Canadian immigration policy for the 21st century (pp. 507–535). John Deutsch Institute, Queen’s University.
GorodzeiskyA.SemyonovM. (2016). Not only competitive threat but also racial prejudice: Sources of anti-immigrant attitudes in European societies. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 28, 331–354. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edv024
25.
GravaniM.SouretiA.StathiS. (2018). Using nostalgia to reduce prejudice toward immigrants. European Journal of Social Psychology, 48, O168–O174. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2294
HewstoneM. (2015). Consequences of diversity for social cohesion and prejudice: The missing dimension of intergroup contact. Journal of Social Issues, 71, 417–438. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12120
28.
HodsonG.DhontK. (2015). The person-based nature of prejudice: Individual difference predictors of intergroup negativity. European Review of Social Psychology, 26, 1–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463283.2015.1070018
29.
HodsonG.DovidioJ. F.EssesV. M. (2003). Ingroup identification as a moderator of positive–negative asymmetry in social discrimination. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 215–233. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.141
30.
HodsonG.HarryH.MitchellA. (2009). Independent benefits of contact and friendship on attitudes toward homosexuals among authoritarians and highly identified heterosexuals. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 509–525. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.558
31.
HodsonG.HewstoneM. (Eds.). (2013). Advances in intergroup contact. Psychology Press.
32.
KaufmannE.GoodwinM. J. (2018). The diversity wave: A meta-analysis of the native-born White response to ethnic diversity. Social Science Research, 76, 120–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2018.07.008
33.
MacInnisC. C.HodsonG. (2019). Extending the benefits of intergroup contact beyond attitudes: When does intergroup contact predict greater collective action support?Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology, 3, 11–22. https://doi.org/10.1002/jts5.23
34.
MacInnisC. C.Page-GouldE. (2015). How can intergroup interaction be bad if intergroup contact is good? Exploring and reconciling an apparent paradox in the science of intergroup relations. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10, 307–327. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614568482
35.
MajorB.BlodornA.Major BlascovichG. (2018). The threat of increasing diversity: Why many White Americans support Trump in the 2016 presidential election. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 21, 931–940. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430216677304
36.
MartinovicB.JettenJ.SmeekesA.VerkuytenM. (2017). Collective memory of a dissolved country: Group-based nostalgia and guilt assignment as predictors of interethnic relations between diaspora groups from former Yugoslavia. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 5, 588–607. https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.v5i2.733
37.
MontgomeryJ. M.NyhanB.TorresM. (2018). How conditioning on posttreatment variables can ruin your experiment and what to do about it. American Journal of Political Science, 62, 760–775. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12357
38.
MorrisonK.PlautV.YbarraO. (2010). Predicting whether multiculturalism positively or negatively influences White Americans’ intergroup attitudes: The role of ethnic identification. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 1648–1661. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167210386118
39.
OuttenH.LeeT.Costa-LopesR.SchmittM.ValaJ. (2018). Majority group members’ negative reactions to future demographic shifts depend on the perceived legitimacy of their status: Findings from the United States and Portugal. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, Article 79. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00079
40.
OuttenH.SchmittM.MillerD.GarciaA. (2012). Feeling threatened about the future: Whites’ emotional reactions to anticipated ethnic demographic changes. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 14–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167211418531
41.
PettigrewT. F.TroppL. R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 751–783. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.90.5.751
42.
PutnamR. D. (2007). E pluribus unum: Diversity and community in the twenty-first century The 2006 Johan Skytte Prize Lecture. Scandinavian Political Studies, 30, 137–174. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9477.2007.00176.x
43.
QuillianL. (1995). Prejudice as a response to perceived group threat: Population composition and anti-immigrant and racial prejudice in Europe. American Sociological Review, 60, 586–611. https://doi.org/10.2307/2096296
44.
RamosM. R.BennettM. R.MasseyD. S.HewstoneM. (2019). Humans adapt to social diversity over time. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 117, 12244–12249. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1818884116
45.
SchmidK.Al RamiahA. A.HewstoneM. (2014). Neighborhood ethnic diversity and trust: The role of intergroup contact and perceived threat. Psychological Science, 25, 665–674. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613508956
SidaniusJ.PrattoF. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. Cambridge University Press.
48.
SmeekesA. (2015). National nostalgia: A group-based emotion that benefits the in-group but hampers intergroup relations. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 49, 54–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2015.07.001
49.
SmeekesA.JettenJ.VerkuytenM.WohlM. J. A.Jasinskaja-LahtiI.AriyantoA.AutinF.AyubN.BadeaC.BestaT.ButeraF.Costa-LopesR.CuiL.FantiniC.FinchilescuG.GaertnerL.GollwitzerM.GomezA.GonzalezR.. . . van der BlesA. M. (2018). Regaining in-group continuity in times of anxiety about the group’s future. Social Psychology, 49, 311–329. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000350
50.
SmeekesA.VerkuytenM.MartinovicB. (2015). Longing for the country’s good old days: National nostalgia, autochthony beliefs, and opposition to Muslim expressive rights. British Journal of Social Psychology, 54, 561–580. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12097
51.
StolleD.PetermannS.SchmidK.SchönwälderK.HewstoneM.VertovecS.SchmittT.HeywoodJ. (2013). Immigration-related diversity and trust in German cities: The role of intergroup contact. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 23, 279–298. https://doi.org/10.1080/17457289.2013.809350
52.
StolleD.SorokaS.JohnstonR. (2008). When does diversity erode trust? Neighborhood diversity, interpersonal trust and the mediating effect of social interactions. Political Studies, 56, 57–75. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2007.00717.x
53.
TajfelH.TurnerJ. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In AustinW. G.WorchelS. (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). Brooks/Cole.
54.
TaylorM. C. (1998). How White attitudes vary with the racial composition of local populations: Numbers count. American Sociological Review, 63, 512–535. https://doi.org/10.2307/2657265
55.
TurnerR.WildschutT.SedikidesC. (2012). Dropping the weight stigma: Nostalgia improves attitudes toward persons who are overweight. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 130–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2011.09.007
56.
TurnerR.WildschutT.SedikidesC. (2018). Fighting ageism through nostalgia. European Journal of Social Psychology, 48, 196–208. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2317
57.
TurnerR.WildschutT.SedikidesC.GheorghiuM. (2013). Combating the mental health stigma with nostalgia. European Journal of Social Psychology, 43, 413–422. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.1952
58.
WangY. A.RhemtullaM. (2021). Power analysis for parameter estimation in structural equation modeling: A discussion and tutorial. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 4, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920918253
59.
WildschutT.BruderM.RobertsonS.van TilburgW.SedikidesC. (2014). Collective nostalgia: A group-level emotion that confers unique benefits on the group. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107, 844–863. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037760
60.
WilsonJ.HugenbergK. (2010). When under threat, we all look the same: Distinctiveness threat induces ingroup homogeneity in face memory. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 1004–1010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2010.07.005
61.
WohlM.StefaniakA.SmeekesA. (2020). Days of future past: Concerns for the group’s future prompt longing for its past (and ways to reclaim it). Current Directions in Psychological Science, 29, 481–486. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721420924766
62.
ZárateM.ReynaC.AlvarezM. J. (2019). Cultural inertia, identity, and intergroup dynamics in a changing context. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 59, 175–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.aesp.2018.11.001
63.
ZárateM.ShawM. (2010). The role of cultural inertia in reactions to immigration on the U.S./Mexico border. Journal of Social Issues, 66, 45–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2009.01632.x
64.
ZárateM. A.ShawM.MarquezJ. A.BiagasD.Jr. (2012). Cultural inertia: The effects of cultural change on intergroup relations and the self-concept. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 634–645. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2011.12.014
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
