Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2022-9
Coronavirus conspiracy beliefs and distrust of science predict risky public health behaviours through optimistically biased risk perceptions in Ukraine,Turkey,and Germany
The present paper examines the extent to which conspiracy beliefs about the COVID-19 outbreak and distrust of epidemiological science are likely to predict optimistically biased risk perceptions at the individual and group levels. We explored the factor structure of coronavirus conspiracy beliefs and their associations with trust in science in predicting risk perceptions using survey data collected in Ukraine (N = 390), Turkey (N = 290), and Germany (N = 408). We further expected conspiracy beliefs and distrust of science to predict people’s willingness to attend public gatherings versus maintaining preventive physical distancing through optimistically biased risk perceptions. Metric noninvariance for key constructs across the samples was observed so the samples were analysed separately. In Ukraine, a two-factor structure of conspiracy beliefs was found wherein COVID-19 bioweapon (but not COVID-19 profit) beliefs were negatively associated with public gathering through optimistically biased individual risk perceptions. In Turkey and Germany, conspiracy beliefs showed a single-factor solution that was negatively associated with preventive distancing and positively related to public gathering through optimistically biased public risk metaperceptions. The hypothesis about the direct and indirect effects of trust in science on risky health behaviour was partially confirmed in all three samples. The observed discrepancies in our findings are discussed.
AbdulkareemS. A.AugustijnE. W.FilatovaT.MusialK.MustafaY. T. (2020). Risk perception and behavioral change during epidemics: Comparing models of individual and collective learning. PLoS ONE, 15, Article e0226483. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0226483
BedfordJ.FarrarJ.IhekweazuC.KangG.KoopmansM.NkengasongJ. (2019). A new twenty-first-century science for effective epidemic response. Nature, 575, 130–136. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1717-y
BogartL. M.WagnerG.GalvanF. H.BanksD. (2010). Conspiracy beliefs about HIV are related to antiretroviral treatment non-adherence among African American men with HIV. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, 53, 648–655. https://doi.org/10.1097/QAI.0b013e3181c57dbc
8.
BrewerN. T.ChapmanG. B.GibbonsF. X.GerrardM.McCaulK. D.WeinsteinN. D. (2007). Meta-analysis of the relationship between risk perception and health behavior: The example of vaccination. Health Psychology, 26, 136–145. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.26.2.136
9.
BrothertonR.FrenchC. C.PickeringA. D. (2013). Measuring belief in conspiracy theories: The Generic Conspiracist Beliefs Scale. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, Article 279. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00279
ChayinskaM.MinescuA. (2018). “They’ve conspired against us”: Understanding the role of social identification and conspiracy beliefs in justification of ingroup collective behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology, 48, 990–998. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2511
12.
CheungG. W.RensvoldR. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(2), 233–255. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5
13.
CruwysT.GreenawayK. H.FerrisL. J.RathboneJ. A.SaeriA. K.WilliamsE.ParkerS. L.ChangM. X.-L.CroftN.BingleyW.GraceL. (2020). When trust goes wrong: A social identity model of risk taking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000243
DaleS. K.BogartL. M.WagnerG. J.GalvanF. H.KleinD. J. (2016). Medical mistrust is related to lower longitudinal medication adherence among African-American males with HIV. Journal of Health Psychology, 21, 1311–1321. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105314551950
DillardA. J.MidboeA. M.KleinW. M. P. (2009). The dark side of optimism: Unrealistic optimism about problems with alcohol predicts subsequent negative event experiences. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35, 1540–1550. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167209343124
19.
DixonR. M.JonesJ. A. (2015). Conspiracist ideation as a predictor of climate-science rejection: An alternative analysis. Psychological Science, 26, 664–666. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614566469
20.
DryhurstS.SchneiderS. R.KerrJ.FreemanA. L. J.RecchiaG.van der BlesA. M.SpiegelhalterD.van der LindenS. (2020). Risk perceptions of COVID-19 around the world. Journal of Risk Research. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2020.1758193
21.
EarnshawV. A.BogartL. M.KlompasM.KatzI. T. (2019). Medical mistrust in the context of Ebola: Implications for intended care-seeking and quarantine policy support in the United States. Journal of Health Psychology, 24, 219–228. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105316650507
EptonT.HarrisP. R.KaneR.van KoningsbruggenG. M.SheeranP. (2015). The impact of self-affirmation on health-behavior change: A meta-analysis. Health Psychology, 34, 187–196. https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0000116
FreemanD.WaiteF.RosebrockL.PetitA.CausierC.EastA.JennerL.TealeA.-L.CarrL.MulhallS.BoldE.LambeS. (2020). Coronavirus conspiracy beliefs, mistrust, and compliance with government guidelines in England. Psychological Medicine. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291720001890
27.
FourieP.MeyerM. (2010). The politics of AIDS denialism: South Africa’s failure to respond. Ashgate Publishing.
ImhoffR.LambertyP. (2020, April14). A bioweapon or a hoax? The link between distinct conspiracy beliefs about the Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) outbreak and pandemic behavior. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 11(8), 1110–1118. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550620934692
33.
JolleyD.DouglasK. M. (2014). The effects of anti-vaccine conspiracy theories on vaccination intentions. PLoS ONE, 9, Article e89177. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0089177
34.
KalichmanS. C.EatonL. A.CherryC.KalichmanM. O. (2017). Medication beliefs mediate the association between medical mistrust and antiretroviral adherence among African Americans living with HIV/AIDS. Journal of Health Psychology, 22, 269–279. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105315600239
35.
Kyiv International Institute of Sociology (KIIS). (2020). Думки і погляди населення України щодо походження коронавірусу і його поширення у світі: травень-червень 2020 року [Opinions and views of the population of Ukraine on the origin of coronavirus and its distribution in the world: May–June 2020]. https://www.kiis.com.ua/?lang=ukr&cat=reports&id=952&page=1
36.
LambertyP.ImhoffR. (2018). Powerful pharma and its marginalized alternatives? Effects of individual differences in conspiracy mentality on attitudes toward medical approaches. Social Psychology, 49, 255–270. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000347
37.
LewandowskiS.OberauerK.GignacG. (2013). NASA faked the moon landing—Therefore (climate)science is a hoax: An anatomy of the motivated rejection of science. Psychological Science, 24, 622–633. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612457686
38.
ManiaciM. R.RoggeR. D. (2014). Caring about carelessness: Participant inattention and its effects on research. Journal of Research in Personality, 48, 61–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2013.09.008
39.
MilfontT. L.FischerR. (2010). Testing measurement invariance across groups: Applications in cross-cultural research. International Journal of Psychological Research, 3(1), 111–130. https://doi.org/10.21500/20112084.857
Open Science Collaboration. (2012). An open, large-scale, collaborative effort to estimate the reproducibility of psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7, 657–660. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612462588
R Core Team. (2018). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria [Computer software; R version 3.5.2]. https://www.R-project.org/
49.
RadcliffeN. M.KleinW. M. P. (2002). Dispositional, unrealistic and comparative optimism: Differential relations with the knowledge and processing of risk information and beliefs about personal risk. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 836–846. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167202289012
50.
RaudeJ.DebinM.SoutyC.GuerrisiC.TurbelinC.FalchiA.BonmarinI.PaolottiD.MorenoY.ObiC.DugganJ.WisniakA.FlahaultA.BlanchonT.ColizzaV. (2020). Are people excessively pessimistic about the risk of coronavirus infection?PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/364qj
ReynaV. F.NelsonW. L.HanP. K.DieckmannN. F. (2009). How numeracy influences risk comprehension and medical decision making. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 943–973. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017327
SeegerM. W.PechtaL. E.PriceS. M.LubellK. M.RoseD. A.SapruS.ChanskyM. C.SmithB. J. (2018). A conceptual model for evaluating emergency risk communication in public health. Health Security, 16, 193–203. https://doi.org/10.1089/hs.2018.0020
59.
ShepperdJ. A.KleinW. M. P.WatersE. A.WeinsteinN. D. (2013). Taking stock of unrealistic optimism. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8, 395–411. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691613485247
60.
SmithR. D. (2006). Responding to global infectious disease outbreaks: Lessons from SARS on the role of risk perception, communication and management. Social Science & Medicine, 63, 3113–3123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.08.004
61.
SwamiV.ColesR.StiegerS.PietschnigJ.FurnhamA.RehimS.VoracekM. (2011). Conspiracist ideation in Britain and Austria: Evidence of a monological belief system and associations between individual psychological differences and real-world and fictitious conspiracy theories. British Journal of Psychology, 102(3), 443–463. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.2010.02004.x.
62.
TaylorS. E.KemenyM. E.AspinwallL. G.SchneiderS. G.RodriguezR.HerbertM. (1992). Optimism, coping, psychological distress, and high-risk sexual behavior among men at risk for acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 460–473. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.63.3.460
63.
ThomasE. F.MavorK. I.McGartyC. (2012). Social identities facilitate and encapsulate action-relevant constructs: A test of the social identity model of collective action. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 15, 75–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430211413619
64.
Van BavelJ. J.BaickerK.BoggioP. S.CapraroV.CichockaA.CikaraM.CrockettM. J.CrumA. J.DouglasK. M.DruckmanJ. N.DruryJ.DubeO.EllemersN.FinkelE. J.FowlerJ. H.GelfandM.HanS.HaslamS. A.JettenJ.. . . WillerR. (2020). Using social and behavioural science to support COVID-19 pandemic response. Nature Human Behaviour, 4, 460–471. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-0884-z
65.
Van der LindenS. (2014). On the relationship between personal experience, affect and risk perception: The case of climate change. European Journal of Social Psychology, 44, 430–440. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2008
66.
Van der LindenS. (2015). The conspiracy-effect: Exposure to conspiracy theories (about global warming) decreases pro-social behavior and science acceptance. Personality and Individual Differences, 87, 171–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.07.045
67.
Van der LindenS.PanagopoulosC.AzevedoF.JostJ. T. (2020). The paranoid style in American politics revisited: Evidence of an ideological asymmetry in conspiratorial thinking. Political Psychology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/1111/pops.12681
68.
Van ProoijenJ.-W.DouglasK. M. (2017). Conspiracy theories as part of history: The role of societal crisis situations. Memory Studies, 10, 323–333. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750698017701615
WebbT. L.SheeranP. (2006). Does changing behavioral intentions engender behavior change? A meta-analysis of the experimental evidence. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 249–268. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.2.249
71.
WilliamsL.CollinsA. E.BauazeA.EdgeworthR. (2010). The role of risk perception in reducing cholera vulnerability. Risk Management, 12, 163–184. https://doi.org/10.1057/rm.2010.1
72.
WoodM. J.DouglasK. M.SuttonR. M. (2012). Dead and alive: Beliefs in contradictory conspiracy theories. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3, 767–773. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550611434786
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
