The Olympics aim to promote peace and unity across the globe through sports. Ironically, however, we predicted that the Olympics could be associated with intergroup biases because the Olympics not only activate social/national identity as a citizen, but also highlight intense competition between countries. In support of this prediction, attitudes toward outgroups were negatively associated with international sporting events like the Olympics (Studies 1–2). Moreover, both behavioral intentions (Study 3) and actual behaviors (Study 4) toward outgroups were more negative during the Olympics than before the Olympics. During the Olympics, Koreans were less willing to donate money to help migrant workers and showed a tendency to discriminate against Southeast Asian job applicants. Interestingly, the association was observed for negatively stereotyped outgroups (e.g., Southeast Asians and Chinese), but not for favorably stereotyped outgroups (e.g., Canadians).
AdlerN. E.EpelE. S.CastellazzoG.IckovicsJ. R. (2000). Relationship of subjective and objective social status with psychological and physiological functioning: Preliminary data in healthy White women. Health Psychology, 19, 586–592. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.19.6.586
2.
BillingsA. C.BrownK. A.BrownN. A. (2013). 5,535 hours of impact: Effects of Olympic media on nationalism attitudes. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 57, 579–595. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2013.850591
3.
BorensteinM.HedgesL.HigginsJ.RothsteinH. R. (2009). Converting among effect sizes. In BorensteinM.HedgesL.HigginsJ.RothsteinH. R. (Eds.), Introduction to meta-analysis (pp. 45–49). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
4.
BourhisR. Y.SachdevI.GagnonA. (1994). Intergroup research with Tajfel matrices: Methodological notes. In ZannaM. P.OlsonJ. M. (Eds.), The psychology of prejudice: The Ontario Symposium (Vol. 7, pp. 209–232). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
5.
BrewerM. B. (1979). In-group bias in the minimal intergroup situation: A cognitive-motivational analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 307–324. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.86.2.307
6.
BrewerM. B. (1999). The psychology of prejudice: Ingroup love and outgroup hate?Journal of Social Issues, 55, 429–444. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00126
BrownR.AbramsD. (1986). The effects of intergroup similarity and goal interdependence on intergroup attitudes and task performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22, 78–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(86)90041-7
9.
CampbellD. T. (1965). Ethnocentric and other altruistic motives. In LevineD. (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation (pp. 283–311). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
10.
ChengS. Y.RosnerJ. L.ChaoM. M.PengS.ChenX.LiY.. . . ChiuC. Y. (2011). One world, one dream? Intergroup consequences of the 2008 Beijing Olympics. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 35, 296–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2010.07.005
11.
De ZavalaA. G.CislakA.WesolowskaE. (2010). Political conservatism, need for cognitive closure, and intergroup hostility. Political Psychology, 31, 521–541. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2010.00767.x
12.
DionK. L. (1973). Cohesiveness as a determinant of ingroup–outgroup bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 28, 163–171. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0035725
13.
DoesS.MentovichA. (2016). Rooting for the top dog: How social dominance motives shape group preference in intergroup competition. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 62, 24–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.09.002
14.
DollardJ.DoobL. W.MillerN. E.MowrerH. H.SearsR. R. (1939). Frusturation and aggression. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
15.
EllingA.van HilvoordeI.van den DoolR. (2014). Creating or awakening national pride through sporting success: A longitudinal study on macro effects in the Netherlands. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 49, 129–151. https://doi.org/10.1177/1012690212455961
16.
GriesP. H.CrowsonH. M.SandelT. (2010). The Olympic effect on American attitudes towards China: Beyond personality, ideology, and media exposure. Journal of Contemporary China, 19, 213–231. https://doi.org/10.1080/10670560903444181
17.
GuimondS.DambrunM. (2002). When prosperity breeds intergroup hostility: The effects of relative deprivation and relative gratification on prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 900–912. https://doi.org/10.1177/014616720202800704
18.
HargreavesJ. (1992). Olympism and nationalism: Some preliminary consideration. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 27, 119–135. https://doi.org/10.1177/101269029202700203
19.
HelmreichR. (1975). Applied social psychology: The unfulfilled promise. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1, 548–560. https://doi.org/10.1177/014616727500100402
HenryP. J. (2008). College sophomores in the laboratory redux: Influences of a narrow data base on social psychology’s view of the nature of prejudice. Psychological Inquiry, 19, 49–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/10478400802049936
22.
HensleyV.DuvalS. (1976). Some perceptual determinants of perceived similarity, liking, and correctness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 159–168. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.34.2.159
HoggM. A.TurnerJ. C. (1987). Intergroup behaviour, self-stereotyping and the salience of social categories. British Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 325–340. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.1987.tb00795.x
25.
ImY.-J. (2012). Comparative analysis of media on migrant workers in Korea: With an emphasis analysing Chosun Ilbo, Hankyoreh, Kyoungin and Busan Ilbo. Journal of Communication Science, 12, 419–456.
JostJ. T.BanajiM. R. (1994). The role of stereotyping in system justification and the production of false consciousness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.1994.tb01008.x
29.
JostJ. T.MajorB. (2001). The psychology of legitimacy: Emerging perspectives on ideology, justice, and intergroup relations. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
30.
JuH. (2018, February25). Canada, # 1 country that Koreans wish to immigrate to [in Korean]. JoongAng Ilbo News. Retrieved from http://news.joins.com/article/22394219/
31.
KangS. K.DeCellesK. A.TilcsikA.JunS. (2016). Whitened résumés: Race and self-presentation in the labor market. Administrative Science Quarterly, 61, 469–502. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839216639577
32.
KayA. C.JostJ. T. (2003). Complementary justice: Effects of “poor but happy” and “poor but honest” stereotype exemplars on system justification and implicit activation of the justice motive. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 823–837. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.5.823
33.
KimD.-S.KimD.-H.JungT.-Y. (2011). Cognition of Korean college students for six foreigner groups. The Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, 25, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.21193/kjspp.2011.25.1.001
34.
KimH.-J. (2008). The ethno-racial social distance. Journal of Social Research, 9, 255–282.
35.
KimS.-H. (2015). Social distance toward immigrants among Koreans. Journal of Contemporary Korean Studies, 2, 165–187.
36.
KingE. B.KnightJ. L.HeblM. R. (2010). The influence of economic conditions on aspects of stigmatization. Journal of Social Issues, 66, 446–460. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2010.01655.x
37.
Korea Immigration Service. (2018). Korea Immigration Service statistics 2017. Gwacheon, South Korea: Ministry of Justice.
38.
KostermanR.FeshbachS. (1989). Toward a measure of patriotic and nationalistic attitudes. Political Psychology, 10, 257–274. https://doi.org/10.2307/3791647
39.
KroschA. R.AmodioD. M. (2014). Economic scarcity alters the perception of race. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111, 9079–9084. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1404448111
40.
LemyreL.SmithP. M. (1985). Intergroup discrimination and self-esteem in the minimal group paradigm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 660–670. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.49.3.660
41.
LevinS.SidaniusJ. (1999). Social dominance and social identity in the United States and Israel: Ingroup favoritism or outgroup derogation?Political Psychology, 20, 99–126. https://doi.org/10.1111/0162-895x.00138
42.
LevineR. A.CampbellD. T. (1972). Ethnocentrism. New York, NY: Wiley.
43.
LiY. M.SakumaI.MurataK.FujishimaY.ChengW. M.ZhaiC. X.. . .KimJ. (2010). From international sports to international competition: Longitudinal study of the Beijing Olympic Games. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 13, 128–138. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-839x.2010.01308.x
44.
Marcus-NewhallA.PedersenW. C.CarlsonM.MillerN. (2000). Displaced aggression is alive and well: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 670–689. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.78.4.670
45.
Moss-RacusinC. A.DovidioJ. F.BrescollV. L.GrahamM. J.HandelsmanJ. (2012). Science faculty’s subtle gender biases favor male students. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109, 16474–16479. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1211286109
46.
MullenB.BrownR.SmithC. (1992). Ingroup bias as a function of salience, relevance, and status: An integration. European Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 103–122. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420220202
ParkS.-M.ChungK.-S. (2006). Study on prejudice towards minority groups. The Women’s Studies, 70, 5–26.
49.
RabbieJ. M.BenoistF.OosterbaanH.VisserL. (1974). Differential power and effects of expected competitive and cooperative intergroup interaction on intragroup and outgroup attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30, 46–56. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0036620
50.
RabbieJ. M.HorwitzM. (1969). Arousal of ingroup–outgroup bias by a chance win or loss. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 13, 269–277. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0028284
51.
Randolph-SengB.ReichD. A.DeMarreeK. G. (2012). On the nonconscious antecedents of social identification: Ingroup salience, outgroup salience, or both?Social Cognition, 30, 341–355. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2012.30.3.335
52.
ReicherS. D. (1984). The St. Pauls’ riot: An explanation of the limits of crowd action in terms of a social identity model. European Journal of Social Psychology, 14, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420140102
53.
ReicherS. D.PotterJ. (1985). Psychological theory as intergroup perspective: A comparative analysis of “scientific” and “lay” accounts of crowd events. Human Relations, 38, 167–189. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872678503800206
54.
ReisH. T.GoslingS. D. (2010). Social psychological methods outside the laboratory. In FiskeS. T.GilbertD. T.LindzeyG. (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 82–114). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
55.
RosnerJ. L.LiY.ChaoM. M.HongY. Y. (2010). One world, just a dream? Effects of the Beijing Olympic icon on perceived differences between Eastern and Western culture. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 13, 139–151. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-839x.2010.01309.x
SakamotoA.MurataK.TakakiE. (1999). The Barcelona Olympics and the perception of foreign nations: A panel study of Japanese university students. Journal of Sport Behavior, 22. 260–278.
59.
SherifM.HarveyO. J.WhiteB. J.HoodW.SherifC. (1961). Intergroup conflict and cooperation: The robbers cave experiment. Norman: University of Oklahoma Institute of Group Relations.
60.
SibleyC. G.DuckittJ. (2008). Personality and prejudice: A meta-analysis and theoretical review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12, 248–279. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868308319226
61.
SilvermanI. (1971). Crisis in social psychology: The relevance of relevance. American Psychologist, 26, 583–584. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0031445
TajfelH.BilligM. G.BundyR. P.FlamentC. (1971). Social categorization and intergroup behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology, 1, 149–178. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420010202
65.
TomlinsonA. (1996). Olympic spectacle: Opening ceremonies and some paradoxes of globalization. Media, Culture and Society, 18, 583–602. https://doi.org/10.1177/016344396018004005
Van HielA.PandelaereM.DuriezB. (2004). The impact of need for closure on conservative beliefs and racism: Differential mediation by authoritarian submission and authoritarian dominance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 824–837. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167204264333
ViechtbauerW. (2010). Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor package. Journal of Statistical Software, 36, 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v036.i03
70.
WannD. L.GrieveF. G. (2005). Biased evaluations of in-group and out-group spectator behavior at sporting events: The importance of team identification and threats to social identity. The Journal of Social Psychology, 145, 531–546. https://doi.org/10.3200/socp.145.5.531-546
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
