Double standard—that is, employing a separate set of norms according to the actor’s and observer’s identity—is common in various contexts, but has not been given much empirical attention in the context of violent conflicts. We introduce group entitlement as a predictor of moral double standard in intergroup conflict. Three studies were conducted to test our research hypothesis. In Study 1, (Jewish Israelis) group entitlement predicted more lenient punishment for ingroup transgressors compared with unspecified outgroup transgressors. In Study 2, (Jewish Israelis) group entitlement predicted lower support for basic human rights for outgroup members compared with ingroup members. Study 3 replicated the results of Study 2 in the context of White Americans and African Americans, and showed that when presented with false feedback indicating substantial double standard among White Americans, high-group-entitlement participants experienced lower levels of moral emotions regarding the purported gap and were less willing to amend their responses compared with low-group-entitlement respondents. Implications of group entitlement in various contexts, its relation to existing constructs, and potential implications are discussed.
AbramsD.HoustonD. M.van de VyverJ.VasiljevicM. (2015). Equality hypocrisy, inconsistency, and prejudice: The unequal application of the universal human right to equality. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 21, 28–46. https://doi.org/10.1037/pac0000084
2.
AbramsD.RandsleydeMouraG.TravaglinoG. A. (2013). A double standard when group members behave badly: Transgression credit to ingroup leaders. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105, 799–815. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033600
AllpressJ. A.BarlowF. K.BrownR.LouisW. R. (2010). Atoning for colonial injustices: Group-based shame and guilt motivate support for reparation. International Journal of Conflict and Violence, 4. https://doi.org/10.4119/ijcv-2816
5.
BanduraA.UnderwoodB.FromsonM. E. (1975). Disinhibition of aggression through diffusion of responsibility and dehumanization of victims. Journal of Research in Personality, 9, 253–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-6566(75)90001-X
6.
BerndsenM.ThomasE. F.McGartyC.BliucA. M.HendresD. M. (2017). Glorifying national identification increases schadenfreude about asylum seekers when they are a threat, not entitled to seek asylum, and blamed for their adversity. Comprehensive Results in Social Psychology, 2, 166–198. https://doi.org/10.1080/23743603.2017.1360573
BranscombeN. R.SlugoskiB.KappenD. M. (2004). The measurement of collective guilt: What it is and what it is not. In BranscombeN. R.DoosjeB. (Eds.), Collective guilt: International perspectives (pp. 16–34). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
9.
BraunM.OttenS.GordijnE. H. (2009). Did you really mean that? The role of group affiliations and ambiguity of negative intentions in aggressive interactions. Unpublished manuscript, University of Groningen, the Netherlands.
10.
BrownR.GonzálezR.ZagefkaH.ManziJ.ČehajićS. (2008). Nuestra culpa: Collective guilt and shame as predictors of reparation for historical wrongdoing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 75–90. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.94.1.75
BurchT. (2015). Skin color and the criminal justice system: Beyond Black–White disparities in sentencing. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 12, 395–420. https://doi.org/10.1111/jels.12077
13.
CampbellW. K.BonacciA. M.SheltonJ.ExlineJ. J.BushmanB. J. (2004). Psychological entitlement: Interpersonal consequences and validation of a self-report measure. Journal of Personality Assessment, 83, 29–45. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa8301_04
14.
Center on Juvenile and Criminal Justice. (2016). CJCJ in the news: Black people twice as likely to be arrested for pot in Colorado and Washington — Where it’s legal. Retrieved from http://www.cjcj.org/news/10232
15.
CichockaA. (2016). Understanding defensive and secure in-group positivity: The role of collective narcissism. European Review of Social Psychology, 27, 283–317. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463283.2016.1252530
16.
ClaassenC. (2016). Group entitlement, anger and participation in intergroup violence. British Journal of Political Science, 46, 127–148. https://doi.org/10.1017/S000712341400012X
CohrsJ. C.MaesJ.MoschnerB.KielmannS. (2007). Determinants of human rights attitudes and behavior: A comparison and integration of psychological perspectives. Political Psychology, 28, 441–469. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2007.00581.x
19.
ColeD. (1999). No equal justice: Race and class in the American criminal justice system (Vol. 1). New York, NY: The New Press.
20.
De ZavalaA. G.CichockaA.EidelsonR.JayawickremeN. (2009). Collective narcissism and its social consequences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 1074–1096. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016904
21.
DurrheimK.DixonJ.TredouxC.EatonL.QuayleM.ClackB. (2011). Predicting support for racial transformation policies: Intergroup threat, racial prejudice, sense of group entitlement and strength of identification. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 23–41. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.723
22.
EverettJ. A.FaberN. S.CrockettM. (2015). Preferences and beliefs in ingroup favoritism. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00015
23.
FasulaA. M.CarryM.MillerK. S. (2014). A multidimensional framework for the meanings of the sexual double standard and its application for the sexual health of young Black women in the US. The Journal of Sex Research, 51, 170–183. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2012.716874
24.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.BuchnerA.LangA. G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 1149–1160. http://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149
25.
GauselN.LeachC. W.VignolesV. L.BrownR. (2012). Defend or repair? Explaining responses to in-group moral failure by disentangling feelings of shame, rejection, and inferiority. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 941–960. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027233
26.
GibsonJ. L. (2006). Enigmas of intolerance: Fifty years after Stouffer’s communism, conformity, and civil liberties. Perspectives on Politics, 4, 21–34. https://doi.org/10.1017/S153759270606004X
27.
GoetteL.HuffmanD.MeierS. (2006). The impact of group membership on cooperation and norm enforcement. The American Economic Review, 96, 212–216. http://doi.org/10.1257/000282806777211658
28.
GrahamS.WeinerB.ZuckerG. S. (1997). An attributional analysis of punishment goals and public reactions to O. J. Simpson. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 331–346. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167297234001
29.
GrubbsJ. B.ExlineJ. J. (2016). Trait entitlement: A cognitive-personality source of vulnerability to psychological distress. Psychological Bulletin, 142, 1204–1226. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000063
30.
GuetzkowJ.FastI. (2016). How symbolic boundaries shape the experience of social exclusion: A case comparison of Arab Palestinian citizens and Ethiopian Jews in Israel. American Behavioral Scientist, 60, 150–171. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764215607581
31.
HalperinE.Canetti-NisimD.Hirsch-HoeflerS. (2009). The central role of group-based hatred as an emotional antecedent of political intolerance: Evidence from Israel. Political Psychology, 30, 93–123. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2008.00682.x
JordanJ. J.McAuliffeK.WarnekenF. (2014). Development of in-group favoritism in children’s third-party punishment of selfishness. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111, 12710–12715. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1402280111
34.
JostJ. T.HunyadyO. (2005). Antecedents and consequences of system-justifying ideologies. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 260–265. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00377.x
35.
KeyesK. M.VoT.WallM. M.CaetanoR.SugliaS. F.MartinsS.HasinD. (2015). Racial/ethnic differences in use of alcohol, tobacco, and marijuana: Is there a cross-over from adolescence to adulthood?Social Science & Medicine, 124, 132–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.11.035
LernerM. J.ClaytonS. (2011). Justice and self-interest: Two fundamental motives. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
38.
LernerM. J.SimmonsC. H. (1966). Observer’s reaction to the “innocent victim”: Compassion or rejection?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4, 203–210. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0023562
39.
LewinA. C.StierH.Caspi-DrorD. (2006). The place of opportunity: Community and individual determinants of poverty among Jews and Arabs in Israel. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 24, 177–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rssm.2006.04.002
40.
Lewin-EpsteinN.SemyonovM. (2019). The Arab minority in Israel’s economy: Patterns of ethnic inequality. New York, NY: Routledge.
41.
MajorB. (1994). From social inequality to personal entitlement: The role of social comparisons, legitimacy appraisals, and group membership. In BerkowitzL. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 26, pp. 293–355). New York, NY: Academic Press.
MearsD. P.CochranJ. C.LindseyA. M. (2016). Offending and racial and ethnic disparities in criminal justice: A conceptual framework for guiding theory and research and informing policy. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 32, 78–103. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043986215607252
44.
MendozaS. A.LaneS. P.AmodioD. M. (2014). For members only: Ingroup punishment of fairness norm violations in the ultimatum game. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 5, 662–670. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550614527115
45.
MilhausenR. R.HeroldE. S. (2002). Reconceptualizing the sexual double standard. Journal of Psychology & Human Sexuality, 13, 63–83. https://doi.org/10.1300/J056v13n02_05
46.
NoorM.ShnabelN.HalabiS.NadlerA. (2012). When suffering begets suffering: The psychology of competitive victimhood between adversarial groups in violent conflicts. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 16, 351–374. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868312440048
OttenS.GordijnE. H. (2014). Was it one of us? How people cope with misconduct by fellow ingroup members. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 8, 165–177. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12098
49.
PassiniS.MorselliD. (2017). Construction and validation of the Moral Inclusion/Exclusion of Other Groups (MIEG) Scale. Social Indicators Research, 134, 1195–1213. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-016-1458-3
50.
PhillipsL. T.LoweryB. S. (2015). The hard-knock life? Whites claim hardships in response to racial inequity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 61, 12–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.06.008
51.
PintoI. R.MarquesJ. M.LevineJ. M.AbramsD. (2010). Membership status and subjective group dynamics: Who triggers the black sheep effect?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 107–119. http://doi.org/10.1037/a0018187
52.
PlantE. A.DevineP. G. (1998). Internal and external motivation to respond without prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 811–832. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.75.3.811
53.
RoccasS.KlarY.LiviatanI. (2004). Exonerating cognitions, group identification, and personal values as predictors of collective guilt among Jewish-Israelis. In BranscombeN.DoosjeB. (Eds.), Collective guilt: International perspectives (pp. 130–147). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
54.
RoccasS.KlarY.LiviatanI. (2006). The paradox of group-based guilt: Modes of national identification, conflict vehemence, and reactions to the in-group’s moral violations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 698–711. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.91.4.698
55.
RosenhekZ. (1999). The exclusionary logic of the welfare state: Palestinian citizens in the Israeli welfare state. International Sociology, 14, 195–215. https://doi.org/10.1177/0268580999014002005
56.
RotellaK. N.RichesonJ. A. (2013). Motivated to “forget” the effects of in-group wrongdoing on memory and collective guilt. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 4, 730–737. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550613482986
SchillerB.BaumgartnerT.KnochD. (2014). Intergroup bias in third-party punishment stems from both ingroup favoritism and outgroup discrimination. Evolution and Human Behavior, 35, 169–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2013.12.006
59.
Schori-EyalN.KlarY.RoccasS.McNeillA. (2017). The shadows of the past: Effects of historical group trauma on current intergroup conflicts. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 43, 538–554. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0146167216689063
60.
ShepherdL.SpearsR.MansteadA. S. (2013). When does anticipating group-based shame lead to lower ingroup favoritism? The role of status and status stability. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 334–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2012.10.012
61.
SidaniusJ.PrattoF. (2001). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
62.
SmoohaS. (2002). The model of ethnic democracy: Israel as a Jewish and democratic state. Nations and Nationalism, 8, 475–503. https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-8219.00062
63.
SommersS. R.EllsworthP. C. (2000). Race in the courtroom: Perceptions of guilt and dispositional attributions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1367–1379. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167200263005
64.
StoufferS. (1992). Communism, conformity & civil liberties: A cross-section of the nation speaks its mind. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
VainapelS.WeiselO.ZultanR. I.ShalviS. (2019). Group moral discount: Diffusing blame when judging group members. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 32, 212–228. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.2106
VollhardtJ. R. (2012). Collective victimization. In TroppL. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of intergroup conflict (pp. 136–157). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
69.
WalkerI.SmithH. (Eds.). (2002). Relative deprivation: Specification, development and integration. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
70.
WarnerR. H.WohlM. J.BranscombeN. R. (2014). When do victim group members feel a moral obligation to help suffering others?European Journal of Social Psychology, 44, 231–241. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2010
71.
YudkinD. A.RothmundT.TwardawskiM.ThallaN.van BavelJ. J. (2016). Reflexive intergroup bias in third-party punishment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 145, 1448–1459. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000190
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
