As the United States becomes more racially and ethnically diverse, interactions between Black people and other minority groups have become increasingly common. The present research examined how a perpetrator’s group membership affects judgments of employment discrimination against a Black victim. Four experiments (combined N = 1,016) tested predictions derived from the prototype model of discrimination. Participants reviewed a case file where a Black, Latino, Asian, or White manager rejected a Black job applicant. Attributions to discrimination were much stronger for a Latino, Asian, or White manager compared with a Black manager. Attributions to discrimination were slightly stronger for a White manager compared with an Asian or Latino manager; however, effect sizes for these differences were small. Attributions to discrimination were similar for the Asian and Latino managers. Whether the perpetrator had outgroup standing relative to the victim was the strongest factor influencing attributions to discrimination for a Black victim of employment discrimination.
AxtJ. R.EbersoleC. R.NosekB. A. (2014). The rules of implicit evaluation by race, religion, and age. Psychological Science, 25(9), 1804–1815. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614543801
2.
BallT. C.BranscombeN. R. (2019). When do groups with a victimized past feel solidarity with other victimized groups? In MalletR. K.MonteithM. J. (Eds.), Confronting prejudice and discrimination (pp. 73–92). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01879
3.
BaronR. S.BurgessM. L.KaoC. F. (1991). Detecting and labeling prejudice: Do female perpetrators go undetected?Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17(2), 115–123. https://doi.org/10.1177/014616729101700201
4.
BergsiekerH. B.SheltonJ. N.RichesonJ. A. (2010). To be liked versus respected: Divergent goals in interracial interactions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(2), 248–264. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018474
5.
BonamC. M.Nair DasV.ColemanB. R.SalterP. (2019). Ignoring history, denying racism: Mounting evidence for the Marley hypothesis and epistemologies of ignorance. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 10(2), 257–265. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617751583
BrewerM. B. (2019). Intergroup relations. In FinkelE.Baumeister’sR. (Eds.), Advanced social psychology: The state of the science (pp. 249–274). Oxford University Press.
8.
BrownC. S. (2006). Bias at school: Perceptions of racial/ethnic discrimination among Latino and European American children. Cognitive Development, 21(4), 401–419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2006.06.006
9.
BucchianeriM. M.CorningA. F. (2013). Disambiguating discriminatory acts of typical versus atypical perpetrators: The moderating role of need for cognitive closure. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 43, E293–E306. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12027
10.
CarterE. R.MurphyM. C. (2015). Group-based differences in perceptions of racism: What counts, to whom, and why?Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 9(6), 269–280. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12181
ConaginA.BarbinD.DemétrioC. G. B. (2008). Modifications for the Tukey test procedure and evaluation of the power and efficiency of multiple comparison procedures. Scientia Agricola, 65(4), 428–432.
14.
CorningA. F.BucchianeriM. M. (2010). Perceiving racism in ambiguous situations: Who relies on easy-to-use information?The Journal of Social Psychology, 150(3), 258–277. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224540903365398
15.
CraigM. A.RuckerJ. M.RichesonJ. A. (2018). The pitfalls and promise of increasing racial diversity: Threat, contact, and race relations in the 21st century. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 27(3), 188–193. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721417727860
16.
CribbieR. A. (2003). Pairwise multiple comparisons: New yardstick, new results. The Journal of Experimental Education, 71(3), 251–265. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220970309602065
17.
CrosbyF.ClaytonS.AlksnisO.HemkerK. (1986). Cognitive biases in the perception of discrimination: The importance of format. Sex Roles, 14(11–12), 637–646. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00287694
18.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.LangA. G.BuchnerA. (2007). G* Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191.
19.
FiskeS. T.TaylorS. E. (1991). Social cognition (2nd ed.). McGraw Hill.
20.
FlournoyJ. M.Prentice-DunnS.KlingerM. R. (2002). The role of prototypical situations in the perceptions of prejudice of African Americans. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32(2), 406–423. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2002.tb00222.x
21.
FunderD. C.OzerD. J. (2019). Evaluating effect size in psychological research: Sense and nonsense. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 2(2), 156–168. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245919847202
22.
GohJ. X.HallJ. A.RosenthalR. (2016). Mini meta-analysis of your own studies: Some arguments on why and a primer on how. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 10(10), 535–549. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12267
23.
GoodwinS. A.WilliamsK. D.Carter-SowellA. R. (2010). The psychological sting of stigma: The costs of attributing ostracism to racism. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46(4), 612–618. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2010.02.002
24.
InmanM. L.BaronR. S. (1996). Influence of prototypes on perceptions of prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(4), 727–739. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.4.727
25.
InmanM. L.HuertaJ.OhS. (1998). Perceiving discrimination: The role of prototypes and norm violation. Social Cognition, 16(4), 418–450. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.1998.16.4.418
26.
LalljeeM.LambR.AbelsonR. P. (1992). The role of event prototypes in categorization and explanation. European Review of Social Psychology, 3(1), 153–182. https://doi.org/10.1080/14792779243000050
27.
LedgerwoodA. (2019). New developments in research methods. In FinkelE. J.BaumeisterR. F. (Eds.), Advanced social psychology: The state of the science (pp. 39–61). Oxford University Press.
28.
LeeR. T.PerezA. D.BoykinC. M.Mendoza-DentonR. (2019). On the prevalence of racial discrimination in the United States. PLOS ONE, 14(1), e0210698. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0210698
29.
LitmanL.RobinsonJ.AbberbockT. (2017). TurkPrime.com: A versatile crowdsourcing data acquisition platform for the behavioral sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 49(2), 433–442. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428.016.0727.z
30.
MaD. S.CorrellJ.WittenbrinkB. (2015). The Chicago face database: A free stimulus set of faces and norming data. Behavior Research Methods, 47(4), 1122–1135.
31.
MajorB.QuintonW. J.McCoyS. K. (2002). Antecedents and consequences of attributions to discrimination: Theoretical and empirical advances. In ZannaM. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 34, pp. 251–330). Academic Press.
32.
MillsD.GalaA. C. (2012). Prototype use in perceptions of prejudice in interactions between Whites and Latinos. Psi Chi Journal of Psychological Research, 17(1), 10–18. https://doi.org/10.24839/2164-8204.jn17.1.10
O’BrienL. T.KiniasZ.MajorB. (2008). How status and stereotypes impact attributions to discrimination: The stereotype-asymmetry hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44(2), 405–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2006.12.003
35.
O’BrienL. T.MajorB.SimonS. (2012). Why did you choose that person over me? Ingroup rejection and attributions to discrimination. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(6), 1225–1233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2012.04.007
36.
PanX.DaytonC. M. (2005). Sample size selection for pair-wise comparisons using information criteria. Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods, 4(2), Article 27. https://doi.org/10.22237/jmasm/1130804760
Purdie-VaughnsV.EibachR. P. (2008). Intersectional invisibility: The distinctive advantages and disadvantages of multiple subordinate-group identities. Sex Roles, 59(5–6), 377–391. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-008-9424-4
39.
QuillianL.PagerD.HexelO.MidtbøenA. H. (2017). Meta-analysis of field experiments shows no change in racial discrimination in hiring over time. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 114(41), 10870–10875. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1706255114
40.
RemediosJ. D.SnyderS. H.LizzaC. A. (2016). Perceptions of women of color who claim compound discrimination: Interpersonal judgments and perceived credibility. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 19(6), 769–783. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430215591041
41.
RichardF. D.BondC. J.Stokes-ZootaJ. J. (2003). One hundred years of social psychology quantitatively described. Review of General Psychology, 7(4), 331–363. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.7.4.331
42.
RodinM. J.PriceJ. M.BrysonJ. B.SanchezF. J. (1990). Asymmetry in prejudice attribution. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 26(6), 481–504. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(90)90052-n
43.
RyanC. L.BaumanK. (2016). Educational attainment in the United States: 2015 (Report # P20-578). U.S. Department of Commerce, Economics and Statistics Administration, U.S. Census Bureau. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED572028.pdf
44.
SearsD. O.SavaleiV. (2006). The political color line in America: Many “peoples of color” or Black exceptionalism?Political Psychology, 27(6), 895–924.
45.
SidaniusJ.HudsonS. T. J.DavisG.BerghR. (2018). The theory of gendered prejudice: A social dominance and intersectionalist perspective. In MintzA.TerrisL. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of behavioral political science (Vol. 1, pp. 1–35). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190634131.013.11
46.
SidaniusJ.PrattoF. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of hierarchy and oppression. Cambridge University Press.
47.
SimonS.KiniasZ.O’BrienL. T.MajorB.BivolaruE. (2013). Prototypes of discrimination: How status asymmetry and stereotype asymmetry affect judgments of racial discrimination. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 35(6), 525–533. https://doi.org/10.1080/01973533.2013.823620
48.
SimonS.MossA. J.O’BrienL. T. (2019). Pick your perspective: Racial group membership and judgments of intent, harm, and discrimination. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 22(2), 215–232. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430217735576
49.
StrickhouserJ. E.ZellE.HarrisK. E. (2019). Ignorance of history and perceptions of racism: Another look at the Marley hypothesis. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 10(7), 977–985. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550618808863
50.
TajfelH.TurnerJ. C. (1985). An integrative theory of social conflict. In AustinW.WorchelS. (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7–24). Nelson Hall.
WarrenJ. W.TwineF. W. (1997). White Americans, the new minority? Non-blacks and the ever-expanding boundaries of whiteness. Journal of Black Studies, 28(2), 200–218.
53.
ZouL. X.CheryanS. (2017). Two axes of subordination: A new model of racial position. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 112(5), 696–717. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000080
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
