To gain insights into whether schools striving to improve intergroup dynamics should curb disliking or facilitate liking across students of different ethnic groups, the current study examines the associations between interpersonal affect and intergroup relations in multiethnic schools. Given (i.e., outgoing) peer nominations of liked and disliked grade-mates were coded by ethnicity in 26 public middle schools, including all Asian, Black, Latinx, and White students (N = 4,350). Controlling for earlier intergroup attitudes and the availability of ethnic ingroup and relevant outgroup grade-mates, multilevel analyses show that liking (but not disliking) of cross-ethnic grade-mates was associated with more positive attitudes toward that particular ethnic group. Implications of these findings for intergroup relations among adolescents in multiethnic schools are discussed.
AllportG. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.
2.
Audley-PiotrowskiS.SingerA.PattersonM. (2015). The role of the teacher in children’s peer relations: Making the invisible hand intentional. Translational Issues in Psychological Science, 1, 192–200. doi:10.1037/tps0000038
3.
BellmoreA. D.NishinaA.WitkowM. R.GrahamS.JuvonenJ. (2007). The influence of classroom ethnic composition on same- and other-ethnicity peer nominations in middle school. Social Development, 16, 720–740. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9507.2007.00404.x
4.
BlalockH. M. (1967). Toward a theory of minority-group relations. New York, NY: Capricorn Books.
5.
BogardusS. E. (1933). A social distance scale. Sociology & Social Research, 17, 265–271.
6.
BrewerM. B. (1999). The psychology of prejudice: Ingroup love and outgroup hate?Journal of Social Issues, 55, 429–444. doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00126
7.
BrownR.HewstoneM. (2005). An integrative theory of intergroup contact. In ZannaM. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 37, pp. 255–343). San Diego, CA: Elsevier Academic Press.
8.
ChenX.GrahamS. (2015). Cross-ethnic friendships and intergroup attitudes among Asian American adolescents. Child Development, 86, 749–764. doi:10.1111/cdev.12339
ChouR. S.FeaginJ. R. (2015). Myth of the model minority: Asian Americans facing racism (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
11.
ConchasG. Q.PérezC. C. (2003). Surfing the “model minority” wave of success: How the school context shapes distinct experiences among Vietnamese youth. New Directions for Youth Development, 2003, 41–56. doi:10.1002/yd.62
12.
DaviesK.TroppL. R.AronA.PettigrewT. F.WrightS. C. (2011). Cross-group friendships and intergroup attitudes: A meta-analytic review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 15, 332–351. doi:10.1177/1088868311411103
13.
EcholsL.GrahamS. (2013). Birds of a different feather: How do cross-ethnic friends flock together?Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 59, 461–488. doi:10.13110/merrpalmquar1982.59.4.0461
14.
Else-QuestN. M.MorseE. (2015). Ethnic variations in parental ethnic socialization and adolescent ethnic identity: A longitudinal study. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 21, 54–64. doi:10.1037/a0037820
15.
FeddesA. R.NoackP.RutlandA. (2009). Direct and extended friendship effects on minority and majority children’s interethnic attitudes: A longitudinal study. Child Development, 80, 377–390. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01266.x
16.
FestingerL. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
17.
FrankenbergE.HawleyG. S.EeJ.OrfieldG. (2017). Southern schools: More than a half- century after the civil rights revolution. Retrieved from UCLA The Civil Rights Project/Proyecto Derechos Civiles website: https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7sv5v2r1
18.
FrenchS. E.SeidmanE.AllenL.AberJ. L. (2006). The development of ethnic identity during adolescence. Developmental Psychology, 42, 1–10. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.42.1.1
19.
GaertnerS. L.DovidioJ. F. (2000). The aversive form of racism. In StangorC. (Ed.), Stereotypes and prejudice: Essential readings (pp. 289–304). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
20.
GielingM.ThijsJ.VerkuytenM. (2010). Tolerance of practices by Muslim actors: An integrative social-developmental perspective. Child Development, 81, 1384–1399. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01480.x
21.
GommansR.CillessenA. H. N. (2015). Nominating under constraints: A systematic comparison of unlimited and limited peer nomination methodologies in elementary school. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 39, 77–86. doi:10.1177/0165025414551761
22.
GrafS.PaoliniS.RubinM. (2014). Negative intergroup contact is more influential, but positive intergroup contact is more common: Assessing contact prominence and contact prevalence in five Central European countries. European Journal of Social Psychology, 44, 536–547. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2052
23.
GrahamS.EcholsL. (2018). Race and ethnicity in peer relations research. In BukowskiW. M.LaursenB.RubinK. H. (Eds.), Handbook of peer interactions, relationships, and groups (2nd ed., pp. 590–616). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
24.
GrossmanJ. M.CharmaramanL. (2009). Race, context, and privilege: White adolescents’ explanations of racial-ethnic centrality. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 38, 139–152. doi:10.1007/s10964-008-9330-7
25.
HagendoornL. (1995). Intergroup biases in multiple group systems: The perception of ethnic hierarchies. European Review of Social Psychology, 6, 199–228. doi:10.1080/14792779443000058
26.
HammJ. V. (2000). Do birds of a feather flock together? The variable bases for African American, Asian American, and European American adolescents’ selection of similar friends. Developmental Psychology, 36, 209–219. doi:10.1037//0012-1649.36.2.209
27.
HammJ. V.BrownB. B.HeckD. J. (2005). Bridging the ethnic divide: Student and school characteristics in African American, Asian-descent, Latino, and White adolescents’ cross-ethnic friend nominations. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 15, 21–46. doi:10.1111/j.1532-7795.2005.00085.x
28.
HarterS. (1993). Self and identity development. In FeldmanS. S.ElliotG. R. (Eds.), At the threshold: The developing adolescent (pp. 352–387). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
29.
JuvonenJ.KogachiK.GrahamS. (2017). When and how do students benefit from ethnic diversity in middle school?Child Development, 89, 1268–1282. doi:10.1111/cdev.12834
30.
KalogridesD.LoebS. (2013). Different teachers, different peers: The magnitude of student sorting within schools. Educational Researcher, 42, 304–316. doi:10.3102/0013189X13495087
31.
KillenM. (2007). Children’s social and moral reasoning about exclusion. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16, 32–36. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8721.2007.00470.x
32.
KillenM.MulveyK. L.HittiA. (2013). Social exclusion in childhood: A developmental intergroup perspective. Child Development, 84, 772–790. doi:10.1111/cdev.12012
33.
KnifsendC. A.JuvonenJ. (2014). Social identity complexity, cross-ethnic friendships, and intergroup attitudes in urban middle schools. Child Development, 85, 709–721. doi:10.1111/cdev.12157
34.
KnifsendC. A.JuvonenJ. (2017). Extracurricular activities in multiethnic middle schools: Ideal context for positive intergroup attitudes?Journal of Research on Adolescence, 27, 407–422. doi:10.1111/jora.12278
35.
LaFontanaK. M.CillessenA. H. N. (2002). Children’s perceptions of popular and unpopular peers: A multimethod assessment. Developmental Psychology, 38, 635–647. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.38.5.635
36.
NeemannJ.HubbardJ.MastenA. S. (1995). The changing importance of romantic relationship involvement to competence from late childhood to late adolescence. Development and Psychopathology, 7, 727–750. doi:10.1017/S0954579400006817
37.
Page-GouldE.Mendoza-DentonR. (2011). Friendship and social interaction with outgroup members. In TroppL. R.MalletR. K. (Eds.), Moving beyond prejudice reduction: Pathways to positive intergroup relations (pp. 139–158). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
38.
PaoliniS.HarwoodJ.RubinM. (2010). Negative intergroup contact makes group memberships salient: Explaining why intergroup conflict endures. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 1723–1738. doi:10.1177/0146167210388667
39.
PaoliniS.McIntyreK. (2019). Bad is stronger than good for stigmatized, but not admired outgroups: Meta-analytical tests of intergroup valence asymmetry in individual-to-group generalization experiments. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 23, 3–47. doi:10.1177/1088868317753504
40.
PettigrewT. F. (1997). Generalized intergroup contact effects on prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 173–185. doi:10.1177/0146167297232006
41.
PettigrewT. F. (1998). Intergroup contact theory. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 65–85. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.49.1.65
42.
PettigrewT. F.TroppL. R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 751–783. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.90.5.751
PlantE. A.DevineP. G. (1998). Internal and external motivation to respond without prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 811–832. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.75.3.811
45.
QuillianL.CampbellM. E. (2003). Beyond black and white: The present and future of multiracial friendship segregation. American Sociological Review, 68, 540–566. doi:10.2307/1519738
46.
RastogiR.JuvonenJ. (2019). Interminority friendships and intergroup attitudes across middle school: Quantity and stability of Black–Latino ties. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 48, 1619–1630. doi:10.1007/s10964-019-01044-9
47.
RichesonJ. A.TrawalterS. (2008). The threat of appearing prejudiced and race-based attentional biases. Psychological Science, 19, 98–102. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02052.x
48.
RosenbloomS. R.WayN. (2004). Experiences of discrimination among African American, Asian American, and Latino adolescents in an urban high school. Youth & Society, 35, 420–451. doi:10.1177/0044118X03261479
49.
RutlandA.KillenM. (2015). A developmental science approach to reducing prejudice and social exclusion: Intergroup processes, social-cognitive development, and moral reasoning. Social Issues and Policy Review, 9, 121–154. doi:10.1111/sipr.12012
50.
SalinasC.Jr.LozanoA. (2017). Mapping and recontextualizing the evolution of the term Latinx: An environmental scanning in higher education. Journal of Latinos and Education, 18, 302–315. doi:10.1080/15348431.2017.1390464
51.
ScheepersP.GijsbertsM.CoendersM. (2002). Ethnic exclusionism in European countries: Public opposition to civil rights for legal migrants as a response to perceived ethnic threat. European Sociological Review, 18, 17–34. doi:10.1093/esr/18.1.17
52.
StarkT. H.FlacheA.VeenstraR. (2013). Generalization of positive and negative attitudes toward individuals to outgroup attitudes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 608–622. doi:10.1177/0146167213480890
53.
TajfelH.TurnerJ. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In AustinW. G.WorchelS. (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–48). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
54.
ThijsJ. (2017). Children’s evaluations of interethnic exclusion: The effects of ethnic boundaries, respondent ethnicity, and majority in-group bias. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 158, 46–63. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2017.01.005
55.
TroppL. R.PettigrewT. F. (2005). Relationships between intergroup contact and prejudice among minority and majority status groups. Psychological Science, 16, 951–957. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01643.x
56.
TurnerJ. C. (1985). Social categorization and the self-concept: A social cognitive theory of group behavior. In LawlerE. J. (Ed.), Advances in group processes: Theory and research (Vol. 2, pp. 72–121). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
57.
TurnerR. N.HewstoneM.VociA.PaoliniS.ChristO. (2007). Reducing prejudice via direct and extended cross-group friendship. European Review of Social Psychology, 18, 212–255. doi:10.1080/10463280701680297
58.
Van den BergY. H.CillessenA. H. (2015). Peer status and classroom seating arrangements: A social relations analysis. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 130, 19–34. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2014.09.007
59.
Van den BergY. H.SegersE.CillessenA. H. (2012). Changing peer perceptions and victimization through classroom arrangements: A field experiment. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 40, 403–412. doi:10.1007/s10802-011-9567-6
60.
VeenstraR.LindenbergS.MunniksmaA.DijkstraJ. K. (2010). The complex relation between bullying, victimization, acceptance, and rejection: Giving special attention to status, affection, and sex differences. Child Development, 81, 480–486. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01411.x
61.
VerkuytenM. (2007). Ethnic in-group favoritism among minority and majority groups: Testing the self-esteem hypothesis among preadolescents. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 37, 486–500. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2007.00170.x
62.
VerkuytenM.ThijsJ. (2013). Multicultural education and inter-ethnic attitudes. European Psychologist, 18, 179–190. doi:10.1027/1016-9040/a000152
63.
WölferR.SchmidK.HewstoneM.van ZalkM. (2016). Developmental dynamics of intergroup contact and intergroup attitudes: Long-term effects in adolescence and early adulthood. Child Development, 87, 1466–1478. doi:10.1111/cdev.12598
64.
WongP.LaiC. F.NagasawaR.LinT. (1998). Asian Americans as a model minority: Self-perceptions and perceptions by other racial groups. Sociological Perspectives, 41, 95–118. doi:10.2307/1389355
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
