Although political ideology has been examined extensively as a predictor of individual differences, it has been absent in the interpersonal relationships literature. Political ideology may have strong effects on friendship patterns because of its polarizing nature. Findings among actual friendship groups (Study 1) indicated a degree of similarity in peers’ political ideology alignments, but also suggested that liberals and conservatives were comfortable with some level of bipartisanship among their friends. In an experimental condition with hypothetical peers (Study 2), individuals’ political ideology predicted their reported friendship potential (perceived similarity and desire for friendship) with gay-affirming and gay-disapproving peers whose ideologies were not explicitly indicated. This effect of political ideology on friendship potential was significant over and above the effect predicted by individuals’ similarity or dissimilarity on sexual minority attitudes with these peers. Findings highlight the overarching relevance of political ideology as a factor that contributes to friendship patterns.
AikenL. S.WestS. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
2.
BarlowF. K.LouisW. R.HewstoneM. (2009). Rejected! Cognitions of rejection and intergroup anxiety as mediators of the impact of cross-group friendships on prejudice. British Journal of Social Psychology, 48, 389–405.
3.
ByrneD. (1971). The attraction paradigm. New York, NY: Academic Press.
4.
ChambersJ. R.BaronR.InmanM. L. (2006). Misperceptions in intergroup conflict: Disagreeing about what we disagree about. Psychological Science, 17, 38–45. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01662.x10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01662.x
5.
CoffmanD. L.MacCallumR. C. (2005). Using parcels to convert path analysis models into latent variable models. Multivariate Behavioural Research, 40, 235–259. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr4002_410.1207/s15327906mbr4002_4
6.
CornelisI.van HielA. (2006). The impact of cognitive styles on authoritarianism based conservatism and racism. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 28, 37–50. doi: 10.1207/s15324834basp2801_410.1207/s15324834basp2801_4
7.
CottrellC. A.NeubergS. L.LiN. P. (2007). What do people desire in others? A sociofunctional perspective on the importance of different valued characteristics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 208–231. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.92.2.20810.1037/0022-3514.92.2.208
8.
CurrariniS.JacksonM.PinP. (2010). Identifying the roles of race-based choice and chance in high school friendship network formation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107, 4857–4861. doi: 10.1073/pnas.091179310710.1073/pnas.0911793107
9.
FestingerL. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7, 117–140. doi: 10.1177/00187267540070020210.1177/001872675400700202
10.
GoslingS. D.VazireS.SrivastavaS.JohnO. P. (2004). Should we trust web-based studies? A comparative analysis of six preconceptions about Internet questionnaires. American Psychologist, 59, 93–104. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.59.2.9310.1037/0003-066X.59.2.93
11.
HaslamN.LevyS. R. (2006). Essentialist beliefs about homosexuality: Structure and implications for prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 471–485. doi: 10.1177/014616720527651610.1177/0146167205276516
12.
HerekG. M. (1988). Heterosexuals’ attitudes toward lesbians and gay men: Correlates and gender differences. Journal of Sex Research, 25, 451–477. doi: 10.1080/0022449880955147610.1080/00224498809551476
13.
HuL.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55. doi: 10.1080/1070551990954011810.1080/10705519909540118
JostJ. T. (2006). The end of the end of ideology. American Psychologist, 61, 651–670. doi: 10.1037/ 0003-066X.61.7.65110.1037/ 0003-066X.61.7.651
16.
JostJ. T.GlaserJ.KruglanskiA. W.SullowayF. J. (2003). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 339–375. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.129.3.33910.1037/0033-2909.129.3.339
17.
KandelD. B. (1978). Homophily, selection, and socialization in adolescent friendships. American Journal of Sociology, 84, 427–436. doi: 10.1086/22679210.1086/226792
18.
KaoG.JoynerK. (2004). Do race and ethnicity matter among friends? Activities among interracial, interethnic, and intraethnic adolescent friends. The Sociological Quarterly, 45, 557–573. doi: 10.1111/j.1533-8525.2004.tb02303.x10.1111/j.1533-8525.2004.tb02303.x
19.
KlineR. B. (1998). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
20.
Lawrence v. Texas, 539 U.S. 558 (2003).
21.
LambertA.ChasteenA. L. (1997). Perceptions of disadvantage versus conventionality: Political values and attitudes toward the elderly versus Blacks. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 469–481. doi: 10.1177/014616729723500310.1177/0146167297235003
22.
LiuJ. H.LatanéB. (1998). The catastrophic link between the importance and extremity of political attitudes. Political Behavior, 20, 105–126. doi: 10.1023/A:102482872917410.1023/A:1024828729174
23.
McPhersonM.Smith-LovinL.CookJ. M. (2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 415–444. doi: 10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.41510.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.415
24.
MolinaL. E.WittigM. A. (2006). Relative importance of contact conditions in explaining prejudice reduction in a classroom context: Separate and equal?Journal of Social Issues, 62, 489–509. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4560.2006.00470.x10.1111/j.1540-4560.2006.00470.x
25.
NosekB. A.BanajiM.GreenwaldA. G. (2002). Harvesting implicit group attitudes and beliefs from a demonstration web site. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 6, 101–115. doi: 10.1037/1089-2699.6.1.10110.1037/1089-2699.6.1.101
26.
PettigrewT. F. (1998). Intergroup contact theory. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 65–85.
27.
PettigrewT. F.TroppL. R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 751–783. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.90.5.75110.1037/0022-3514.90.5.751
28.
PoteatV. P. (2007). Peer group socialization of homophobic attitudes and behavior during adolescence. Child Development, 78, 1830–1842. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01101.x10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01101.x
29.
PoteatV. P.MereishE. H. (in press). Ideology, prejudice, and attitudes toward sexual minority social policies and organizations. Political Psychology.
30.
PoteatV. P.SpaniermanL. B. (2010). Do the ideological beliefs of peers predict the prejudiced attitudes of other individuals in the group?Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 13, 495–514. doi: 10.1177/136843020935743610.1177/1368430209357436
31.
RokeachM. (1973). The nature of human values. New York, NY: Free Press.
32.
SprecherS.ReganP. C. (2002). Liking some things (in some people) more than others: Partner preferences in romantic relationships and friendships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 19, 463–481. doi: 10.1177/026540750201900404810.1177/0265407502019004048
33.
TajfelH.TurnerJ. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup conflict. In WorchelS.AustinW. G. (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7–24). Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall.
34.
TerryD. J.HoggM. A. (2001). Attitudes, behavior, and social context: The role of norms and group membership in social influence processes. In ForgasJ. P.WilliamsK. D. (Eds.), Social influence: Direct and indirect processes (pp. 253–270). Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
35.
TurnerR. N.HewstoneM.VociA. (2007). Reducing explicit and implicit outgroup prejudice via direct and extended contact: The mediating role of self-disclosure and intergroup anxiety. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 369–388. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.93.3.36910.1037/0022-3514.93.3.369
36.
UenoK. (2010). Patterns of cross-orientation friendships in high schools. Social Science Research, 3, 444–458. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2009.10.00110.1016/j.ssresearch.2009.10.001
