Who is most influential? Adolescents’ intergroup attitudes and peer influence within a social network

Abstract

Research has shown that adolescents’ intergroup attitudes are subject to friends’ influence, but it remains unknown if certain friends are more influential than others. Popular adolescents may be especially influential of their friends’ intergroup attitudes because they can set peer norms. We examined several indicators of popularity in social networks as possible determinants of social influence: sociometric popularity, prestige popularity, being a clique leader, and frequency of contact with friends. Longitudinal analysis of adolescents’ friendship networks (12–13 years, N = 837) allowed estimating influence of friends on adolescents’ intergroup attitudes, while controlling for the tendency of adolescents to befriend peers with similar intergroup attitudes. Results showed that adolescents’ intergroup attitudes changed in the direction of friends’ intergroup attitudes. Only peers who are popular in terms of having many friends (sociometric popular) were especially influential of their friends’ intergroup attitudes. These findings may inform future interventions aiming to reduce prejudice.

Keywords

intergroup attitudes popularity prejudice social influence social network analysis

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abrams

Hogg

M. A.

(2011). Social identification, self-categorization and social influence. European Review of Social Psychology, 1, 195–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/14792779108401862

Adler

P. A.

Adler

(1998). Peer power: Preadolescent culture and identity. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.

Andriessen

Fernee

Wittebrood

(2014). Perceived discrimination in the Netherlands. Retrieved from Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau website: http://www.scp.nl/english/Publications/Publications_by_year/Publications_2014/Perceived_discrimination_in_the_Netherlands

Ary

D. V.

Tildesley

Hops

Andrews

(1993). The influence of parent, sibling, and peer modeling and attitudes on adolescent use of alcohol. International Journal of the Addictions, 28, 853–880. https://doi.org/10.3109/10826089309039661

Bandura

(1977). Social learning theory. Oxford, UK: Prentice-Hall.

Benoit-Smullyan

(1944). Status, status types, and status interrelations. American Sociological Review, 9, 151–161. https://doi.org/10.2307/2086307

Berndt

T. J.

(1996). Transitions in friendship and friends’ influence. In Graber

J. A.

Brooks-Gunn

Petersen

A. C.

(Eds.), Transitions through adolescence: Interpersonal domains and context (pp. 57–84). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

Biddle

B. J.

Bank

B. J.

Marlin

M. M.

(1980). Parental and peer influence on adolescents. Social Forces, 58, 1057–1079. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/58.4.1057

Blanton

Christie

(2003). Deviance regulation: A theory of action and identity. Review of General Psychology, 7, 115–149.

10.

Block

(2015). Reciprocity, transitivity, and the mysterious three-cycle. Social Networks, 40, 163–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2014.10.005

11.

Boda

(2018). Social influence on observed race. Sociological Science, 5, 29–57. https://doi.org/10.15195/v5.a3

12.

Boda

Néray

(2015). Inter-ethnic friendship and negative ties in secondary school. Social Networks, 43, 57–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2015.03.004

13.

Bukowski

W. M.

Newcomb

A. F.

(1984). Stability and determinants of sociometric status and friendship choice: A longitudinal perspective. Developmental Psychology, 20, 941–952. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.20.5.941

14.

Cialdini

R. B.

Goldstein

N. J.

(2004). Social influence: Compliance and conformity. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 591–621. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.142015

15.

Cillessen

A. H. N.

Rose

A. J.

(2005). Understanding popularity in the peer system. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 102–105. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00343.x

16.

Coenders

Lubbers

Scheepers

Verkuyten

(2008). More than two decades of changing ethnic attitudes in the Netherlands. Journal of Social Issues, 64, 269–285. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2008.00561.x

17.

Crandall

C. S.

Eshleman

O’Brien

(2002). Social norms and the expression and suppression of prejudice: The struggle for internalization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 359–378. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.82.3.359

18.

Csardi

Nepusz

(2006). The igraph software package for complex network research. InterJournal, Complex Systems. Retrieved from http://igraph.org

19.

Dijkstra

J. K.

Cillessen

A. H. N.

Borch

(2013). Popularity and adolescent friendship networks: Selection and influence dynamics. Developmental Psychology, 49, 1242–1252. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030098

20.

Dijkstra

J. K.

Cillessen

A. H. N.

Lindenberg

Veenstra

(2010). Basking in reflected glory and its limits: Why adolescents hang out with popular peers. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 20, 942–958. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7795.2010.00671.x

21.

Dishion

T. J.

Piehler

T. F.

Myers

M. W.

(2008). Dynamics and ecology of adolescent peer influence. In Prinstein

M. J.

Dodge

K. A.

(Eds.), Understanding peer influence in children and adolescents (pp. 72–93). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

22.

Dovidio

J. F.

Love

Schellhaas

F. M. H.

Hewstone

(2017). Reducing intergroup bias through intergroup contact: Twenty years of progress and future directions. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 20, 606–620. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430217712052

23.

Flaspohler

P. D.

Elfstrom

J. L.

Vanderzee

K. L.

Sink

H. E.

Birchmeier

(2009). Stand by me: The effects of peer and teacher support in mitigating the impact of bullying on quality of life. Psychology in the Schools, 46, 636–649. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20404

24.

Frederickson

Turner

(2003). Utilizing the classroom peer group to address children’s social needs: An evaluation of the circle of friends intervention approach. The Journal of Special Education, 36, 234–245. https://doi.org/10.1177/002246690303600404

25.

Gest

S. D.

Graham-Bermann

S. A.

Hartup

W. W.

(2001). Peer experience: Common and unique features of number of friendships, social network centrality, and sociometric status. Social Development, 10, 23–40. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9507.00146

26.

Geven

Weesie

van Tubergen

(2013). The influence of friends on adolescents’ behavior problems at school: The role of ego, alter and dyadic characteristics. Social Networks, 35, 583–592. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2013.08.002

27.

Gortmaker

S. L.

Peterson

Wiecha

Sobol

A. M.

Dixit

Fox

M. K.

Laird

(1999). Reducing obesity via a school-based interdisciplinary intervention among youth: Planet health. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 153, 409–418. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpedi.153.4.409

28.

Hardin

C. D.

Conley

T. D.

(2001). A relational approach to cognition: Shared experience and relationship affirmation in social cognition. In Cognitive social psychology: The Princeton Symposium on the Legacy and Future of Social Cognition (pp. 3–17). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

29.

Hjerm

Eger

M. A.

Danell

(2018). Peer attitudes and the development of prejudice in adolescence. Socius, 4, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/2378023118763187

30.

Hjerm

Eger

M. A.

Danell

(2018). peer attitudes and the development of prejudice in adolescence. Socius, 4. https://doi.org/10.1177/2378023118763187

31.

Hogg

M. A.

Reid

S. A.

(2006). Social identity, self-categorization, and the communication of group norms. Communication Theory, 16, 7–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2006.00003.x

32.

Hogg

M. A.

Terry

D. I.

(2000). Social identity and self-categorization Processes in organizational contexts. Academy of Management Review, 25, 121–140. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2000.2791606

33.

Houlette

M. A.

Gaertner

S. L.

Johnson

K. M.

Banker

B. S.

Riek

B. M.

Dovidio

J. F.

(2004). Developing a more inclusive social identity: An elementary school intervention. Journal of Social Issues, 60, 35–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-4537.2004.00098.x

34.

Huisman

Steglich

(2008). Treatment of non-response in longitudinal network studies. Social Networks, 30, 297–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2008.04.004

35.

Juvonen

Galván

(2008). Peer influence in involuntary social groups: Lessons from research on bullying. In Prinstein

M. J.

Dodge

K. A.

(Eds.), Understanding peer influence in children and adolescents (pp. 225–244). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

36.

Kelman

H. C.

(1958). Compliance, identification, and internalization three processes of attitude change. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 2, 51–60. https://doi.org/10.1177/002200275800200106

37.

Kiesner

Maass

Cadinu

Vallese

(2003). Risk factors for ethnic prejudice during early adolescence. Social Development, 12, 288–308. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9507.00234

38.

Laninga-Wijnen

Harakeh

Steglich

Dijkstra

J. K.

Veenstra

Vollebergh

(2017). The norms of popular peers moderate friendship dynamics of adolescent aggression. Child Development, 88, 1265–1283. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12650

39.

Latané

Bourgeois

(2001). Dynamic social impact and the consolidation, clustering, correlation, and continuing diversity of culture. In Hogg

M. A.

Tindale

R. S.

(Eds.), Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Group processes (pp. 235–258). Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers Inc.

40.

Lease

A. M.

Kennedy

C. A.

Axelrod

J. L.

(2002). Children’s social constructions of popularity. Social Development, 11, 87–109. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9507.00188

41.

Leszczensky

Stark

T. H.

Flache

Munniksma

(2016). Disentangling the relation between young immigrants’ host country identification and their friendships with natives. Social Networks, 44, 179–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2015.08.001

42.

Lospinoso

J. A.

(2012). Statistical models for social network dynamics (PhD dissertation, University of Oxford, UK). Retrieved from http://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:d5ed9b9c-020c-4379-a5f2-cf96439ca37c

43.

Maguen

Armistead

(2006). Abstinence among female adolescents: Do parents matter above and beyond the influence of peers? American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 76, 260–264. https://doi.org/10.1037/0002-9432.76.2.260

44.

Maliepaard

Gijsberts

(2012). Moslim in Nederland. The Hague: Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau.

45.

Mardsen

P. V.

(2005). Recent developments in network measurement. In Carrington

P. J.

Scott

Wasserman

(Eds.), Models and methods in social network analysis (pp. 8–30). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

46.

Masson

C. N.

Verkuyten

(1993). Prejudice, ethnic identity, contact and ethnic group preferences among Dutch young adolescents. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 23, 156–168. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1993.tb01058.x

47.

McPherson

Smith-Lovin

Cook

J. M.

(2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 415–444. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.415

48.

Miklikowska

(2017). Development of anti-immigrant attitudes in adolescence: The role of parents, peers, intergroup friendships, and empathy. British Journal of Psychology, 108, 626–648. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12236

49.

Munniksma

Stark

T. H.

Verkuyten

Flache

Veenstra

(2013). Extended intergroup friendships within social settings: The moderating role of initial outgroup attitudes. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 16, 752–770. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430213486207

50.

Newcomb

A. F.

Bagwell

C. L.

(1995). Children’s friendship relations: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 306–347. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.117.2.306

51.

Osgood

D. W.

Ragan

D. T.

Wallace

Gest

S. D.

Feinberg

M. E.

Moody

(2013). Peers and the emergence of alcohol use: Influence and selection processes in adolescent friendship networks. Journal of Research on Adolescence: The Official Journal of the Society for Research on Adolescence, 23, 500–512. https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12059

52.

Paluck

E. L.

(2011). Peer pressure against prejudice: A high school field experiment examining social network change. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 350–358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2010.11.017

53.

Paluck

E. L.

Shepherd

(2012). The salience of social referents: A field experiment on collective norms and harassment behavior in a school social network. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103, 899–915. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030015

54.

Paluck

E. L.

Shepherd

Aronow

P. M.

(2016). Changing climates of conflict: A social network experiment in 56 schools. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113, 566–571. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1514483113

55.

Parkhurst

J. T.

Hopmeyer

(1998). Sociometric popularity and peer-perceived popularity: Two distinct dimensions of peer status. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 18, 125–144. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431698018002001

56.

Pettigrew

T. F.

Tropp

L. R.

Wagner

Christ

(2011). Recent advances in intergroup contact theory. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 35, 271–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2011.03.001

57.

Pickett

C. L.

Silver

M. D.

Brewer

M. B.

(2002). The impact of assimilation and differentiation needs on perceived group importance and judgments of ingroup size. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 546–558. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167202287011

58.

Poteat

V. P.

(2007). Peer group socialization of homophobic attitudes and behavior during adolescence. Child Development, 78, 1830–1842. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01101.x

59.

Raabe

Beelmann

(2011). Development of ethnic, racial, and national prejudice in childhood and adolescence: a multinational meta-analysis of age differences. Child Development, 82, 1715–1737. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01668.x

60.

Rambaran

A. J.

Dijkstra

J. K.

Stark

T. H.

(2013). Status-based influence processes: The role of norm salience in contagion of adolescent risk attitudes. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 23, 574–585. https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12032

61.

Rancourt

Prinstein

M. J.

(2010). Peer status and victimization as possible reinforcements of adolescent girls’ and boys’ weight-related behaviors and cognitions. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 35, 354–367. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpepsy/jsp067

62.

Ripley

R. M.

Snijders

T. A. B.

Boda

Vörös

Preciado

(2019). Manual for RSiena (Version April 9, 2019). Retrieved from https://www.cran.r-project.org/web/packages/RSiena/

63.

Rivas-Drake

Saleem

Schaefer

D. R.

Medina

Jagers

(2019). Intergroup contact attitudes across peer networks in school: Selection, influence, and implications for cross-group friendships. Child Development, 90, 1898�1916. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13061

64.

Rubin

K. H.

Bukowski

W. M.

Parker

J. G.

(1998). Peer interactions, relationships, and groups. In Damon

Lerner

R. M.

Eisenberg

(Eds.), Handbook of child psychology (Vol. 3, pp. 619–700). New York, NY: Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470147658.chpsy0310

65.

Salmivalli

Voeten

Poskiparta

(2011). Bystanders matter: Associations between reinforcing, defending, and the frequency of bullying behavior in classrooms. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 40, 668–676. https://doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2011.597090

66.

Sandstrom

M. J.

Cillessen

A. H. N.

(2006). Likeable versus popular: Distinct implications for adolescent adjustment. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 30, 305–314. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025406072789

67.

Savelkoul

Scheepers

van der Veld

Hagendoorn

(2012). Comparing levels of anti-Muslim attitudes across Western countries. Quality and Quantity, 46, 1617–1624. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-011-9470-9

68.

Schaefer

D. R.

Adams

Haas

S. A.

(2013). Social networks and smoking: Exploring the effects of peer influence and smoker popularity through simulations. Health Education & Behavior, 40, 24S–32S. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090198113493091

69.

Shepherd

Paluck

E. L.

(2015). Stopping the drama: Gendered influence in a network field experiment. Social Psychology Quarterly, 78, 173–193. https://doi.org/10.1177/0190272515581212

70.

Sherif

C. W.

(1953). Groups in harmony and tension: An integration of studies of intergroup relations. Oxford, UK: Harper & Brothers.

71.

Snijders

T. A. B.

(2011). Statistical models for social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 37, 131–153. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.012809.102709

72.

Snijders

T. A. B.

Baerveldt

(2003). A multilevel network study of the effects of delinquent behavior on friendship. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 27, 123–151.

73.

Snijders

T. A. B.

Steglich

C. E. G.

(2015). Representing Micro–Macro Linkages by Actor-based Dynamic Network Models. Sociological Methods & Research, 44, 222–271. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124113494573

74.

Snijders

T. A. B.

van de Bunt

G. G.

Steglich

C. E. G.

(2010). Introduction to stochastic actor-based models for network dynamics. Social Networks, 32, 44–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2009.02.004

75.

Stark

T. H.

(2015). Understanding the selection bias social network processes and the effect of prejudice on the avoidance of outgroup friends. Social Psychology Quarterly, 78, 127–150. https://doi.org/10.1177/0190272514565252

76.

Stark

T. H.

(2018). Collecting social network data. In Vannette

J. A.

Krosnick

J. A.

(Eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of Survey Research (pp. 241–254). Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54395-6_31

77.

Stark

T. H.

Flache

(2012). The double edge of common interest: Ethnic segregation as an unintended byproduct of opinion homophily. Sociology of Education, 85, 179–199. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038040711427314

78.

Stathi

Cameron

Hartley

Bradford

(2014). Imagined contact as a prejudice-reduction intervention in schools: The underlying role of similarity and attitudes. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 44, 536–546. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12245

79.

Statistics Netherlands (2017). Cultural minority pupil. Retrieved from https://www.cbs.nl/nl-nl/onze-diensten/methoden/begrippen?tab=h#id=herkomstgroepering

80.

Steglich

Sinclair

Holliday

Moore

(2012). Actor-based analysis of peer influence in A Stop Smoking in Schools Trial (ASSIST). Social Networks, 34, 359–369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2010.07.001

81.

Steglich

Snijders

T. A. B.

Pearson

(2010). Dynamic networks and behavior: Separating selection from influence. Sociological Methodology, 40, 329–393. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9531.2010.01225.x

82.

Steglich

Snijders

T. A. B.

West

(2006). Applying SIENA. Methodology, 2, 48–56. https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-2241.2.1.48

83.

Steinberg

Monahan

K. C.

(2007). Age differences in resistance to peer influence. Developmental Psychology, 43, 1531–1543. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.43.6.1531

84.

Steinberg

Silverberg

S. B.

(1986). The vicissitudes of autonomy in early adolescence. Child Development, 57, 841–851.

85.

Tajfel

(1982). Social psychology of intergroup relations. Annual Review of Psychology, 33, 1–39. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.33.020182.000245

86.

Thijs

Verkuyten

(2014). School ethnic diversity and students’ interethnic relations. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12032

87.

Turner

J. C.

(1982). Towards a cognitive redefinition of the social group. In Tajfel

(Ed.), Social identity and intergroup relations (pp. 15–40). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

88.

Turner

R. N.

Hewstone

Voci

Vonofakou

(2008). A test of the extended intergroup contact hypothesis: The mediating role of intergroup anxiety, perceived ingroup and outgroup norms, and inclusion of the outgroup in the self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 843–860. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0011434

89.

Valente

T. W.

(2012). Network interventions. Science, 337, 49–53. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1217330

90.

Valente

T. W.

Ritt-Olson

Stacy

Unger

J. B.

Okamoto

Sussman

(2007). Peer acceleration: Effects of a social network tailored substance abuse prevention program among high-risk adolescents. Addiction, 102, 1804–1815. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2007.01992.x

91.

van Zalk

M. H. W.

Kerr

van Zalk

Stattin

. (2013). Xenophobia and tolerance toward immigrants in adolescence: Cross-influence processes within friendships. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 41, 627–639. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-012-9694-8

92.

Vasta

(2007). From ethnic minorities to ethnic majority policy: Multiculturalism and the shift to assimilationism in the Netherlands. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 30, 713–740. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870701491770

93.

Veenstra

Dijkstra

J. K.

Kreager

D. A.

(2017). Pathways, networks, and norms: A sociological perspective on peer research. In Bukowski

W. M.

Laursen

Rubin (Eds.), Handbook of peer interactions, relationships and groups (pp. 45–63). New York: NY: Guilford.

94.

Verkuyten

Thijs

(2002). Racist victimization among children in The Netherlands: The effect of ethnic group and school. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 25, 310–331. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870120109502

95.

Verkuyten

Thijs

(2010). Religious group relations among Christian, Muslim and nonreligious early adolescents in the Netherlands. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 30, 27–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431609342984

96.

Vezzali

Hewstone

Capozza

Giovannini

Wölfer

(2014). Improving intergroup relations with extended and vicarious forms of indirect contact. European Review of Social Psychology, 25, 314–389. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463283.2014.982948

97.

Wasserman

Faust

(1994). Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

98.

Weerman

F. M.

(2011). Delinquent peers in context: A longitudinal network analysis of selection and influence effects. Criminology, 49, 253–286. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2010.00223.x

99.

Wölfer

Faber

N. S.

Hewstone

(2015). Social network analysis in the science of groups: Cross-sectional and longitudinal applications for studying intra- and intergroup behavior. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 19, 45–61. https://doi.org/10.1037/gdn0000021

100.

Wölfer

Hewstone

(2017). Beyond the dyadic perspective: 10 reasons for using social network analysis in intergroup contact research. British Journal of Social Psychology, 56, 609–617. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12195

101.

Wood

(2000). Attitude change: Persuasion and social influence. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 539–570. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.51.1.539

102.

Wright

S. C.

Aron

McLaughlin-Volpe

Ropp

S. A.

(1997). The extended contact effect: Knowledge of cross-group friendships and prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 73–90. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.73.1.73

103.

Zhou

Page-Gould

Aron

Moyer

Hewstone

(2018). The extended contact hypothesis: A meta-analysis on 20 years of research. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 23, 132–160. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868318762647

104.

Zorlu

Hartog

(2001). Migration and Immigrants: The Case of the Netherlands (Working Paper No. 01-042/3). Retrieved from https://www.econstor.eu/handle/10419/85952

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.86 MB

0.71 MB