We examined whether perspective-taking increased people’s recognition of institutional sexism in cases where evidence was in favor or against a woman’s claim. In Experiment 1, participants who took the perspective of a woman claiming institutional sexism made greater attributions to discrimination than participants who remained objective, but only if legitimate evidence of discrimination was presented. Experiment 2 replicates and extends Experiment 1 with a nonstudent, jury-eligible sample. The present research suggests perspective-taking does not bias people’s perceptions and may be an effective strategy for increasing recognition of legitimate claims of institutional sexism.
BatsonC. D.KleinT. R.HighbergerL.ShawL. L. (1995). Immorality from empathy-induced altruism: When compassion and justice conflict. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 1042–1054. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.68.6.1042
2.
BatsonC. D.PolycarpouM. P.Harmon-JonesE.ImhoffH. J.MitchenerE. C.BednarL. L.. . . HighbergerL. (1997). Empathy and attitudes: Can feeling for a member of a stigmatized group improve feelings toward the group?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 105–118. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.72.1.105
3.
BlodornA.O’BrienL. T.KordysJ. (2012). Responding to sex-based discrimination: Gender differences in perceived discrimination and implications for legal decision making. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 15, 309–424. doi:10.1177/1368430211427172
4.
BloomP. (2017). Empathy and its discontents. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 21, 24–31. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2016.11.004
5.
BonamC. M.VinoadharenN. D.ColemanB. R.SalterP. (2018). Ignoring history, denying racism: Mounting evidence for the Marley hypothesis and epistemologies of ignorance. Social Psychological and Personality Science. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/1948550617751583
CarterE. R.MurphyM. C. (2015). Group-based differences in perceptions of racism: What counts, to whom, and why?Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 9, 269–280. doi:10.1111/spc3.12181
8.
Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C.S. § 2000e (1964).
9.
CovingtonR. N.DeckerK. H. (2002). Employment law in a nutshell (2nd ed.). St. Paul, MN: West Group.
10.
DovidioJ. F.ten VergertM.StewartT. L.GaertnerS. L.JohnsonJ. D.EssesV. M.. . . PearsonA. R. (2004). Perspective and prejudice: Antecedents and mediating mechanisms. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 1537–1549. doi:10.1177/0146167204271177
EpleyN.KeysarB.van BovenL.GilovichT. (2004). Perspective taking as egocentric anchoring and adjustment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 327–339. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.87.3.327
13.
EyalT.SteffelM.EpleyN. (2018). Perspective mistaking: Accurately understanding the mind of another requires getting perspective, not taking perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 114, 547–571. doi:10.1037/pspa0000115
14.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.BuchnerA.LangA. G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 1149–1160. doi:10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149
15.
GalinskyA. D.KuG. (2004). The effects of perspective-taking on prejudice: The moderating role of self-evaluation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 594–604. doi:10.1177/0146167203262802
16.
GalinskyA. D.KuG.WangC. S. (2005). Perspective-taking and self–other overlap: Fostering social bonds and facilitating social coordination. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 8, 109–124. doi:10.1177/1368430205051060
17.
GarciaD. M.ReserA. H.AmoR. B.RedersdorffS.BranscombeN. R. (2005). Perceivers’ responses to in-group and out-group members who blame a negative outcome on discrimination. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 769–780. doi:10.1177/0146167204271584
18.
GohJ. X.RadA.HallJ. A. (2017). Bias and accuracy in judging sexism in mixed-gender social interactions. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 20, 850–866. doi:10.1177/1368430216638530
19.
HigginsJ. P. T.GreenS. (2011). Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions (Version 5.1.0). Retrieved from http://handbook.cochrane.org
20.
JarvisB. G. (2010). MediaLab (Version 2010) [Computer software]. New York, NY: Empirisoft Corporation.
21.
JostJ. T.BurgessD. (2000). Attitudinal ambivalence and the conflict between group and system justification motives in low status groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 293–305. doi:10.1177/0146167200265003
22.
KaiserC. R.DyrenforthP.HagiwaraN. (2006). Why are attributions to discrimination interpersonally costly? A test of system- and group-justifying motivations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 1523–1536. doi:10.1177/0146167206291475
23.
KaiserC. R.MillerC. T. (2001). Stop complaining! The social costs of making attributions to discrimination. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 254–263. doi:10.1177/0146167201272010
24.
KaiserC. R.MillerC. T. (2003). Derogating the victim: The interpersonal consequences of blaming events on discrimination. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 6, 227–237. doi:10.1177/13684302030063001
25.
KundaZ. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 480–498. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.480
26.
LedgerwoodA. (in press). New developments in research methods. In BaumeisterR. F.FinkelE. J. (Eds.), Advanced social psychology (2nd ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
27.
MajorB.SawyerP. J. (2009). Attributions to discrimination: Antecedents and consequences. In NelsonT. D. (Ed.), Handbook of prejudice, stereotyping, and discrimination (pp. 89–110). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
28.
NelsonJ. C.AdamsG.SalterP. S. (2013). The Marley hypothesis: Denial of racism reflects ignorance of history. Psychological Science, 24, 213–218. doi:10.1177/0956797612451466
29.
O’BrienL.BlodornA.AlsbrooksA.DubeR.AdamsG.NelsonJ. (2009). Understanding White Americans’ perceptions of racism in Hurricane Katrina-related events. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 12, 431–444. doi:10.1177/1368430209105047
30.
PaluckE. L.GreenD. P. (2009). Prejudice reduction: What works? A review and assessment of research and practice. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 339–367. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163607
31.
ShihM.WangE.Trahan BucherA.StotzerR. (2009). Perspective taking: Reducing prejudice towards general outgroups and specific individuals. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 12, 565–577. doi:10.1177/1368430209337463
32.
ShihM. J.StotzerR.GutiérrezA. S. (2013). Perspective-taking and empathy: Generalizing the reduction of group bias towards Asian Americans to general outgroups. Asian American Journal of Psychology, 4, 79–83. doi:10.1037/a0029790
33.
SimonS.MossA. J.O’BrienL. T. (2017). Pick your perspective: Racial-group membership and judgments of intent, harm, and discrimination. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/1368430217735576
34.
SwimJ. K.ScottE. D.SechristG. B.CampbellB.StangorC. (2003). The role of intent and harm in judgments of prejudice and discrimination. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 944–959. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.84.5.944
35.
ToddA. R.BodenhausenG. V.GalinskyA. D. (2012). Perspective taking combats the denial of intergroup discrimination. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 738–745. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2011.12.011
36.
ToddA. R.BodenhausenG. V.RichesonJ. A.GalinskyA. D. (2011). Perspective taking combats automatic expressions of racial bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 1027–1042. doi:10.1037/a0022308
37.
ToddA. R.BurgmerP. (2013). Perspective taking and automatic intergroup evaluation change: Testing an associative self-anchoring account. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104, 786–802. doi:10.1037/a0031999
38.
ToddA. R.GalinskyA. D. (2014). Perspective-taking as a strategy for improving intergroup relations: Evidence, mechanisms, and qualifications. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 8, 374–387. doi:10.1111/spc3.12116
39.
ToddA. R.GalinskyA. D.BodenhausenG. V. (2012). Perspective taking undermines stereotype maintenance processes: Evidence from social memory, behavior explanation, and information solicitation. Social Cognition, 30, 94–108. doi:10.1521/soco.2012.30.1.94
40.
UnzuetaM. M.EverlyB. A.GutiérrezA. S. (2014). Social dominance orientation moderates reactions to Black and White discrimination claimants. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 54, 81–88. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2014.04.005
41.
UnzuetaM. M.LoweryB. S. (2008). Defining racism safely: The role of self-image maintenance on White Americans’ conceptions of racism. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 1491–1497. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2008.07.011
42.
VescioT. K.SechristG. B.PaolucciM. P. (2003). Perspective taking and prejudice reduction: The mediational role of empathy arousal and situational attributions. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 455–472. doi:10.1002/ejsp.163
43.
WangC. S.KuG.TaiK.GalinskyA. D. (2014). Stupid doctors and smart construction workers: Perspective-taking reduces stereotyping of both negative and positive targets. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 5, 430–436. doi:10.1177/1948550613504968
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
