Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The principle of discrimination states that soldiers are legitimate targets of violence in war, whereas civilians are not. Is this prescriptive rule reflected in the descriptive judgments of laypeople? In two studies (Ns = 300, 229), U.S. Mechanical Turk workers were asked to evaluate the character traits of either a soldier or a civilian. Participants also made moral judgments about scenarios in which the target individual (soldier or civilian) killed or was killed by the enemy in war. Soldiers were consistently viewed as more dangerous and more courageous than civilians (Study 1). Participants also viewed killing by (and of) soldiers as more permissible than killing by (and of) civilians, in line with the principle of discrimination (Study 1). Altering the war context to involve a clearly just and unjust side (in Study 2) did not appear to moderate the principle of discrimination in moral judgment, although soldiers and civilians on the just side were evaluated more positively overall. However, the soldiers on the unjust side of the war were not attributed greater courage than were civilians on the unjust side. Theoretical and practical implications of these descriptive findings are discussed.

Keywords

judgments of soldiers moral judgment person perception principle of discrimination stereotyping

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adelman

Leidner

Orazani

S. N.

(2017). Psychological contributions to philosophy: The cases of just war theory and nonviolence. In Demont-Biaggi

(Ed.), The nature of peace and the morality of armed conflict (pp. 267–291). Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.

Afghanistan Holdings Pty Ltd, Australian Broadcasting Corporation, & Screen Australia (Producers). (2015). Afghanistan: Inside Australia’s war (Series 1, Episode 1: Acts of war) [Documentary]. Available from https://itunes.apple.com/au/tv-season/afghanistan-inside-australias-war/id1091902660

Apuzzo

(2014, October 22). Blackwater guards found guilty in 2007 Iraq killings. The New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2014/10/23/us/blackwater-verdict.html?_r=0

Bain

Hirst

(2011, July). Dehumanizing our defenders: Perceptions of the military’s humanness and its consequences. Poster presented at the European Association of Social Psychology General Meeting, Stockholm, Sweden.

Bastian

Jetten

Chen

Radke

H. R.

Harding

J. F.

Fasoli

(2013). Losing our humanity: The self-dehumanizing consequences of social ostracism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 156–169. doi:10.1177/0146167212471205

Bastian

Laham

S. M.

Wilson

Haslam

Koval

(2011). Blaming, praising, and protecting our humanity: The implications of everyday dehumanization for judgments of moral status. British Journal of Social Psychology, 50, 469–483. doi:10.1348/014466610X521383

Becker

J. C.

Butz

D. A.

Sibley

C. G.

Barlow

F. K.

Bitacola

L. M.

Christ

. . . Sulz

(2017). What do national flags stand for? An exploration of associations across 11 countries. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 48, 335–352. doi:10.1177/0022022116687851

Benbaji

Falk

Feldman

(2015). Commonsense morality and the ethics of killing in war: An experimental survey of the Israeli population. The Law & Ethics of Human Rights, 9, 195–227. doi:10.2139/ssrn.2094022

Berinsky

A. J.

Huber

G. A.

Lenz

G. S.

(2012). Evaluating online labor markets for experimental research: Amazon.com’s Mechanical Turk. Political Analysis, 20, 351–368. doi:10.1093/pan/mpr057

10.

British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC). (2013, November 8). Marine guilty of Afghanistan murder. Retrieved from http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-24870699

11.

British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC). (2017, February 21). Israeli soldier gets 18 months for killing wounded Palestinian attacker. Retrieved from http://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-39037605

12.

Carnes

N. C.

Lickel

Janoff-Bulman

(2015). Shared perceptions: Morality is embedded in social contexts. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41, 351–362. doi:10.1177/0146167214566187

13.

Coady

C. A. J.

(2008). The status of combatants. In Rodin

Shue

(Eds.), Just and unjust warriors: The moral and legal status of soldiers (pp. 153–175). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

14.

Conway

Gawronski

(2013). Deontological and utilitarian inclinations in moral decision making: A process dissociation approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104, 216–235. doi:10.1037/a0031021

15.

Deakin

(2014). Naked soldiers and the principle of discrimination. Journal of Military Ethics, 13, 320–330. doi:10.1080/15027570.2014.991507

16.

Dill

Schubiger

(2018). Attitudes toward killing in war. Unpublished manuscript, London School of Economics, London, UK.

17.

Dörmann

(2003). The legal situation of “unlawful/unprivileged combatants.” International Review of the Red Cross, 85, 45–73. doi:10.1017/S0035336100103521

18.

Faul

Erdfelder

Lang

A. G.

Buchner

(2007). G* Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191. doi:10.3758/BF03193146

19.

Fiske

A. P.

Rai

T. S

. (2014). Virtuous violence: Hurting and killing to create, sustain, end, and honor social relationships. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

20.

French

S. E.

(2016). The code of the warrior: Exploring warrior values past and present. London, UK: Rowman & Littlefield.

21.

Gade

E. K.

(2010). Defining the non-combatant: How do we determine who is worthy of protection in violent conflict? Journal of Military Ethics, 9, 219–242. doi:10.1080/15027570.2010.510863

22.

Gerstein

(2001, September 26). Terror attacks spark cowardly debate. ABC News. Retrieved from http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/story?id=121312&page=1

23.

Giner-Sorolla

Leidner

Castano

(2012). Dehumanization, demonization, and morality shifting: Paths to moral certainty in extremist violence. In Hogg

M. A.

Blaylock

D. L.

(Eds.), Extremism and the psychology of uncertainty (pp. 165–182). New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.

24.

Goodwin

G. P.

Piazza

Rozin

(2014). Moral character predominates in person perception and evaluation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106, 148–168. doi:10.1037/a0034726

25.

Graham

Haidt

Nosek

B. A.

(2009). Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 1029–1046. doi:10.1037/a0015141

26.

Graves

(2000). Goodbye to all that. London, UK: Penguin. (Original work published 1929)

27.

Gray

H. M.

Gray

Wegner

D. M.

(2007). Dimensions of mind perception. Science, 315, 619. doi:10.1126/science.1134475

28.

Gray

Wegner

D. M.

(2009). Moral typecasting: Divergent perceptions of moral agents and moral patients. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 505–520. doi:10.1037/a0013748

29.

Haslam

Loughnan

(2014). Dehumanization and infrahumanization. Annual Review of Psychology, 65, 399–423. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115045

30.

Hayes

A. F.

(2012).PROCESS: A versatile computational tool for observed variable mediation, moderation, and conditional process modeling [White paper]. Retrieved from http://www.afhayes.com/public/process2012.pdf

31.

Henckaerts

J.-M.

Doswald-Beck

(2005). Customary international humanitarian law: Rules. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

32.

Hofmann

Wisneski

D. C.

Brandt

M. J.

Skitka

L. J.

(2014). Morality in everyday life. Science, 345, 1340–1343. doi:10.1126/science.1251560

33.

In what sense are terrorists cowards? (2001). Slate. Retrieved from http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/chatterbox/2001/09/in_what_sense_are_terrorists_cowards.html

34.

International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRD). (2014). International humanitarian law: Answers to your questions (ICRC Report No. 0703). Retrieved from https://www.icrc.org/eng/resources/documents/publication/p0703.htm

35.

International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC). (1977a). Article 48: Protocol additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and relating to the protection of victims of international armed conflicts (Protocol I), 8 June 1977. Retrieved from https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/applic/ihl/ihl.nsf/Article.xsp?action=openDocument&documentId=8A9E7E14C63C7F30C12563CD0051DC5C

36.

International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC). (1977b). Article 51: Protocol additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, relating to the protection of victims of international armed conflicts (Protocol I), 8 June, 1977. Retrieved from https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/applic/ihl/ihl.nsf/Article.xsp?action=openDocument&documentId=4BEBD9920AE0AEAEC12563CD0051DC9E

37.

Iraqi Body Count. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.iraqbodycount.org/

38.

Kasher

Yadlin

(2005). Military ethics of fighting terror: An Israeli perspective. Journal of Military Ethics, 4, 3–32. doi:10.1080/15027570510014642

39.

Klay

(2014). Redeployment. New York, NY: Penguin Books.

40.

Kutz

(2005). The difference uniforms make: Collective violence in criminal law and war. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 33, 148–180. doi:10.1111/j.1088–4963.2005.00028.x

41.

Landy

J. F.

Piazza

Goodwin

G. P.

(2016). When it’s bad to be friendly and smart: The desirability of sociability and competence depends on morality. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 42, 1272–1290. doi:10.1177/0146167216655984

42.

Leidner

Castano

(2014). Toward a comprehensive taxonomy of dehumanization: Integrating two senses of humanness, mind perception theory, and stereotype content model. Testing, Psychometrics, Methodology in Applied Psychology, 21, 285–300. doi:10.4473/TPM21.3.4

43.

Maddow

(2013). Drift: The unmooring of American military power. New York, NY: Crown.

44.

McMahan

. (2010). The just distribution of harm between combatants and noncombatants. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 38, 342–379. doi:10.1111/j.1088–4963.2010.01196.x

45.

McVeigh

(2017, November 24). Rules of war “need urgent review” as civilian deaths hit record high. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2017/nov/24/rules-of-war-urgent-review-civilian-deaths-record-high

46.

Merritt

A. C.

Effron

D. A.

Monin

(2010). Moral self-licensing: When being good frees us to be bad. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4, 344–357. doi:10.1111/j.1751–9004.2010.00263.x

47.

Mikhail

(2007). Universal moral grammar: Theory, evidence and the future. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 143–152. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2006.12.007

48.

Moseley

(n.d.). Just war theory. In The Internet encyclopedia of philosophy. Retrieved from https://www.iep.utm.edu/justwar/

49.

Office of the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense (Military Community and Family Policy). (2013). 2013 demographics: Profile of the military community. Retrieved from http://download.militaryonesource.mil/12038/MOS/Reports/2013-Demographics-Report.pdf

50.

Ogilvie

(2013). The social neuroscience of justified violence (Unpublished honour’s thesis). The University of Queensland, Queensland, Australia.

51.

Orend

(2005). War. In Zalta

E. N.

(Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Retrieved from http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2008/entries/war/

52.

Orend

(2013). The morality of war. Buffalo, NY: Broadview Press.

53.

Pfanner

(2004). Military uniforms and the law of war. International Review of the Red Cross, 86, 93–123. doi:10.1017/S1560775500180113

54.

Piazza

Landy

J. F.

Goodwin

G. P.

(2014). Cruel nature: Harmfulness as an important, overlooked dimension in judgments of moral standing. Cognition, 131, 108–124. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2013.12.013

55.

Press

S. J.

Wilson

(1978). Choosing between logistic regression and discriminant analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 73, 699–705. doi:10.1080/01621459.1978.10480080

56.

Simpson

Laham

S. M.

Fiske

A. P.

(2016). Wrongness in different relationships: Relational context effects on moral judgment. The Journal of Social Psychology, 156, 594–609. doi:10.1080/00224545.2016.1140118

57.

Tännsjö

(2015). Killing in war. In Tännsjö

(Ed.), Taking life: Three theories on the ethics of killing (pp. 213–238). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

58.

Traven

(2015). Moral cognition and the law and ethics of armed conflict. International Studies Review, 17, 556–587. doi:10.1111/misr.12230

59.

Traven

D. J.

(2013). The universal grammar of the laws of war: A theory of moral discourse and international norms (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from OhioLINK (Document No. osu1355489166).

60.

U.S. Army. (n.d.). Living the Army values: It means you live up to a higher standard. Retrieved from https://www.goarmy.com/soldier-life/being-a-soldier/living-the-army-values.html

61.

Walker

L. J.

Hennig

K. H.

(2004). Differing conceptions of moral exemplarity: Just, brave, and caring. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 629–647. doi:10.1037/0022–3514.86.4.629

62.

Walzer

(2006). Just and unjust wars. A moral argument with historical illustrations (4th ed.). New York, NY: Basic Books.

63.

Ward

A. F.

Olsen

A. S.

Wegner

D. M.

(2013). The harm-made mind observing victimization augments attribution of minds to vegetative patients, robots, and the dead. Psychological Science, 24, 1437–1445. doi:10.1177/0956797612472343

64.

Watkins

H. M.

(2016). The moral psychology of killing in war (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.

65.

Watkins

H. M.

Goodwin

(2017). A fundamental asymmetry in judgments of soldiers at war. Advance online publication of manuscript in preparation. Retrieved from https://osf.io/m7kvc

66.

Watkins

H. M.

Laham

(2018). The influence of war on moral judgments about harm. European Journal of Social Psychology. Advance online publication. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2393

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.25 MB

The principle of discrimination: Investigating perceptions of soldiers

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material