Prior work has shown that the experience of group-based emotions can motivate disadvantaged group members to engage in collective action. In the current research, we tested whether such action can also be driven by the motivation to induce certain emotions among the outgroup to the extent that disadvantaged group members believe this would help them attain their social change goals. We tested this hypothesis in three studies (two correlational and one experimental) within the context of the Israeli–Palestinian conflict. Study 1 showed that individuals’ motivation to induce outgroup regret was associated with nonviolent collective action tendencies, whereas the motivation to induce outgroup fear was related to violent action. Study 2 moved beyond Study 1 by assessing corrective and punitive goals of social change. We found that preferences for inducing outgroup regret mediated the relationship between endorsement of corrective goals and nonviolent action tendencies, whereas preferences for outgroup fear mediated the relationship between punitive goals and violent action. Study 3 provided experimental support for the causal effect of goals on emotion motivations and collective action tendencies. Together, our findings are in line with the notion of instrumental emotion regulation as applied to collective action.
BeckerJ. C.TauschN. (2015). A dynamic model of engagement in normative and non-normative collective action: Psychological antecedents, consequences and barriers. European Review of Social Psychology, 26, 143–192. doi:10.1080/10463283.2015.1094265
2.
BerndsenM.van der PligtJ.DoosjeB.MansteadA. (2004). Guilt and regret: The determin-ing role of interpersonal and intrapersonal harm. Cognition and Emotion, 18, 55–70. doi:10.1080/02699930244000435
3.
CarverC. S. (2001). Affect and the functional bases of behavior: On the dimensional structure of affective experience. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5, 345–356. doi:10.1207/ S15327957PSPR0504_4
4.
EllemersN. (2012). The group self. Science, 336, 848–852. doi:10.1126/science.1220987
5.
FernándezS.SaguyT.HalperinE. (2015). The paradox of humiliation: The acceptance of an unjust devaluation of the self. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41, 976–988. doi:10.1177/0146167215586195
6.
FischerA. H.RosemanI. J. (2007). Beat them or ban them: The characteristics and social functions of anger and contempt. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 103–115.
7.
FrijdaN. H. (1986). The emotions. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
8.
GoldenbergA.HalperinE.van ZomerenM.GrossJ. J. (2016). The process model of group-based emotion: Integrating intergroup emotion and emotion regulation perspectives. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 20, 118–141. doi:10.1177/1088868315581263
9.
GrossJ. J. (1998). The emerging field of emotion regulation: An integrative review. Review of General Psychology, 2, 271–299. doi:10.1037/1089-2680.2.3.271
10.
GrossJ. J. (2002). Emotion regulation: Affective, cognitive, and social consequences. Psychophysiology, 39, 281–291. doi:10.1017.S0048577201393198
11.
HalperinE. (2008). Group-based hatred in intractable conflict in Israel. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 52, 713–736. doi:10.1177/0022002708314665
12.
HalperinE. (2016). Emotions in conflict: Inhibitors and facilitators of peace making. New York, NY: Routledge.
13.
HayesA. F. (2013).Methodology in the social sciences. Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
14.
HayesA. F.PreacherK. J. (2014). Statistical mediation analysis with a multicategorical independent variable. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 67, 451–470. doi:10.1111/bmsp.12028
15.
HornseyM. J.BlackwoodL.LouisW.FieldingK.MavorK.MortonT.. . .WhiteK. M. (2006). Why do people engage in collective action? Revisiting the role of perceived effectiveness. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36, 1701–1722. doi:10.1111/j.0021–9029.2006.00077
16.
ImhoffR.BilewiczM.ErbH. P. (2012). Collective guilt versus collective regret: Different emotional reactions to ingroup atrocities. European Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 729–742. doi:10.1002/ejsp.1886
17.
MarkusH. R.KitayamaS. (1994). A collective fear of the collective: Implications for selves and theories of selves. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 568–579. doi:10.1177/0146167294205013
18.
NetzerL.HalperinE.TamirM. (2018). Toying with the enemy’s emotions: Motivated intergroup emotion regulation. Manuscript in preparation.
19.
NetzerL.van KleefG. A.TamirM. (2015). Interpersonal instrumental emotion regulation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 58, 124–135. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2015.01.006
20.
ParrottW. G. (2001). Implications of dysfunctional emotions for understanding how emotions function. Review of General Psychology, 5, 180–186. doi:10.1037/1089–2680.5.3.180
21.
PoratR.HalperinE.TamirM. (2016). What we want is what we get: Group-based emotional preferences and conflict resolution. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 110, 167–190. doi:10.1037/pspa0000043
22.
ReicherS. D.SpearsR.PostmesT. (1995). A social identity model of deindividuation phenomena. European Review of Social Psychology, 6, 161–198. doi:10.1080/14792779443000049
23.
RoccasS.SagivL.SchwartzS. H.HalevyN.EidelsonR. (2008). Towards a unifying model of identification with groups: Integrating theoretical perspectives. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12, 280–306. doi:10.1177/1088868308319225
24.
RosemanI. J. (1984). Cognitive determinants of emotions: A structural theory. Review of Personality and Social Psychology, 5, 11–36.
25.
SchererK. R. (1988). Criteria for emotion-antecedent appraisal: A review. In HamiltonV.BowerG. H.FrijdaN. (Eds.), Cognitive perspectives on emotion and motivation (Vol. 44, pp. 173–191). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer.
26.
ShumanE.Cohen-ChenS.Hirsch-HoeflerS.HalperinE. (2016). Explaining normative versus non-normative action: The role of implicit theories. Political Psychology, 37, 835–852. doi:10.1111/pops.12325
27.
SmithE. R. (1993). Social identity and social emotions: Toward new conceptualizations of prejudice. In MackieD. M.HamiltonD. L. (Eds.), Affect, cognition, and stereotyping: Interactive processes in group perception (pp. 297–315). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
28.
SmithE. R.MackieD. M. (2008). Intergroup emotions. In LewisM.Haviland-JonesJ.BarrettL. F. (Eds.), Handbook of emotions (3rd ed., pp. 428–439). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
29.
SweetmanJ.LeachC. W.SpearsR.PrattoF.SaabR. (2013). “I have a dream”: Typology of social change goals. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 1, 293–320. doi:10.5964/jspp.v1i1.85
30.
TamirM. (2016). Why do people regulate their emotions? A taxonomy of motives in emotion regulation. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 20, 199–222. doi:10.1177/1088868315586325
31.
TamirM.BigmanY.RhodesE.SalernoJ.SchreierJ. (2015). An expectancy-value model of emotion regulation: Implications for motivation, emotional experience, and decision making. Emotion, 15, 90–103. doi:10.1037/emo0000021
32.
TamirM.FordB. Q. (2009). Choosing to be afraid: Preferences for fear as a function of goal pursuit. Emotion, 9, 488–497. doi:10.1037/a0015882
33.
TamirM.MitchellC.GrossJ. J. (2008). Hedonic and instrumental motives in anger regulation. Psychological Science, 19, 324–328. doi:10.1111/j.1467–9280.2008.02088
34.
TauschN.BeckerJ.SpearsR.ChristO.SaabR.SingP.SiddiquiP. (2011). Explaining radical group behavior: Developing emotion and efficacy routes to normative and non-normative collective action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 129–148. doi:10.1037/a0022728
35.
ThomasE. F.LouisW. R. (2014). When will collective action be effective? Violent and non-violent protests differentially influence perceptions of legitimacy and efficacy among sympathizers. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 40, 263–276. doi:10.1177/0146167213510525
36.
TurnerJ. C.HoggM. A.OakesP. J.ReicherS. D.WetherellM. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell.
37.
Van ZomerenM. (2013). Four core social-psychological motivations to undertake collective action. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 7, 378–388. doi:10.1111/spc3.12031
38.
Van ZomerenM. (2015). Psychological processes in social action. In DovidioJ. F.SimpsonJ. (Eds.), APA handbook of personality and social psychology. Vol. 2: Group processes (pp. 507–533). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
39.
Van ZomerenM.LeachC. W.SpearsR. (2012). Protesters as “passionate economists”: A dynamic dual pathway model of approach coping with collective disadvantage. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 16, 180–198. doi:10.1177/1088868311430835
40.
Van ZomerenM.PostmesT.SpearsR. (2008). Toward an integrative social identity model of collective action: A quantitative research synthesis of three socio-psychological perspectives. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 504–535. doi:10.1037/0033–2909.134.4.504
41.
Van ZomerenM.SpearsR. (2009). Metaphors of protest: A classification of motivations for collective action. Journal of Social Issues, 65, 661–679. doi:10.1111/j.15404560.2009.01619
42.
Van ZomerenM.SpearsR.FischerA. H.LeachC. W. (2004). Put your money where your mouth is!: Explaining collective action tendencies through group-based anger and group efficacy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 649–664. doi:10.1037/0022–3514.87.5.649
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
