Gender (in)equality is typically studied as a women’s issue to be addressed via systemic measures (e.g., government policy). As such, research focusing on mobilising men (and women) towards achieving gender equality is rare. In contrast, this paper examines the mobilisation of both men and women towards gender equality as common cause. Experiment 1 shows that men’s collective action intentions increase after reading messages that position men as agents of change towards gender equality, compared to messages that frame this issue as stemming from inadequate government policy. Experiments 2 and 3 demonstrate that messages framing gender equality as an issue for both men and women increase men’s collective action intentions, compared to when gender inequality is framed as primarily concerning women. However, this effect emerges primarily under conditions where the source of message is male (Experiment 3). Practical and theoretical implications for mobilising political solidarity in gender equality contexts are discussed.
AyresM. M.FriedmanC. K.LeaperC. (2009). Individual and situational factors related to young women’s likelihood of confronting sexism in their everyday lives. Sex Roles, 61, 449–460. doi:10.1007/s11199–009–9635–3
3.
BeckerJ. C.BarretoM. (2014). Ways to go: Men’s and women’s support for aggressive and nonaggressive confrontation of sexism as a function of gender identification. Journal of Social Issues, 70, 653–667. doi:10.1111/josi.12085
4.
BeckerJ. C.SwimJ. K. (2011). Seeing the unseen: Attention to daily encounters with sexism as a way to reduce sexist beliefs. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 35, 227–242. doi:10.1177/0361684310397509
5.
BeckerJ. C.WrightS. C.LubenskyM. E.ZhouS. (2013). Friend or ally: Whether cross-group contact undermines collective action depends on what advantaged group members say (or don’t say). Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 442–455. doi:10.1177/0146167213477155
6.
BeckerJ. C.ZawadzkiM. J.ShieldsS. A. (2014). Confronting and reducing sexism: A call for research on interventions. Journal of Social Issues, 70, 603–614. doi:10.1111/josi.12081
7.
BranscombeN. R. (1998). Thinking about one’s gender group’s privileges or disadvantages: Consequences for well-being in women and men. British Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 167–184. doi:10.1177/0146167202282006
8.
CameronJ. E. (2004). A three-factor model of social identity. Self and Identity, 3, 239–262. doi:10.1080/13576500444000047
9.
ConnellR. W. (2005). Change among the gatekeepers: Men, masculinities, and gender equality in the global arena. Signs, 30, 1801–1825. doi:10.1086/427525
10.
CzoppA. M.MonteithM. J.MarkA. Y. (2006). Standing up for a change: Reducing bias through interpersonal confrontation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 784–803. doi:10.1037/0022–3514.90.5.784
11.
DinolfoS.PrimeJ.Foust-CummingsH. (2013). Anatomy of change: How inclusive cultures evolve. New York, NY: Catalyst.
12.
DixonJ.LevineM.ReicherD.DurrheimK. (2012). Beyond prejudice: Are negative evaluations the problem and is getting us to like one another more the solution?Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 35, 411–425. doi:10.1017/S0140525X11002214
13.
DruryB.KaiserC. R. (2014). Allies against sexism: Men as allies in confronting sexism. Journal of Social Issues, 70, 637–652. doi:10.1111/josi.12083
14.
DruryJ.ReicherS. D. (2005). Explaining enduring empowerment: A comparative study of collective action and psychological outcomes. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 35–58. doi:10.1002/ejsp.231
15.
EllemersN.BarretoM. (2009). Collective action in modern times: How modern expressions of prejudice prevent collective action. Journal of Social Issues, 65, 749–768. doi:10.1111/j.1540–4560.2009.01621.x
16.
GarciaD. M.SchmittM. T.BranscombeN. R.EllemersN. (2010). Women’s reactions to ingroup members who protest discriminatory treatment: The importance of beliefs about inequality and response appropriateness. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 733–745. doi:10.1002/ejsp.644
17.
GlasfordD. E.CalcagnoJ. (2012). The conflict of harmony: Intergroup contact, commonality and political solidarity between minority groups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 323–328. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2011.10.001
18.
HaslamS. A.ReicherS. D. (2011). When prisoners take over the prison: A social psychology of resistance. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 16, 154–179. doi:10.1177/1088868311419864
19.
HaslamS. A.ReicherS. D.PlatowM. J. (2011). The new psychology of leadership: Identity, influence and power. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
20.
HayesA. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
21.
HekmanD.JohnsonS. K.FooM.YangW. (2017). Does diversity-valuing behavior result in diminished performance ratings for non-White and female leaders?Academy of Management Journal, 60, 771–797. doi:10.5465/amj.2014.0538
22.
IyerA.RyanM. K. (2009). Challenging gender inequality in the workplace: Men’s and women’s pathways to collective action. Journal of Social Issues, 65, 791–814. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.2009.01625.x
23.
JettenJ.BranscombeN. R.IyerA.AsaiN. (2013). Appraising gender discrimination as legitimate or illegitimate: Antecedents and consequences. In RyanM. K.BranscombeN. R. (Eds.), Handbook of gender and psychology (pp. 306–322). London, UK: SAGE.
24.
JettenJ.IyerA.BranscombeN. R.ZhangA. (2013). How the disadvantaged appraise group-based exclusion: The path from legitimacy to illegitimacy. European Review of Social Psychology, 24, 194–224. doi:10.1080/10463283.2013.840977
25.
KellyC.BreinlingerS. (1995). Identity and injustice: Exploring women’s participation in collective action. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 5, 41–57. doi:10.1002/casp.2450050104
26.
LeachC. W.van ZomerenM.ZebelS.VlickM. L. W.PennekampS. F.DoosjeB.. . . SpearsR. (2008). Group self-definition and self-investment: A hierarchical (multidimension) model of in-group identification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 144–165. doi:10.1037/0022–3514.95.1.144
27.
McAdamD.McCarthyJ. D.ZaldM. N. (Eds.). (1996). Comparative perspectives on social movements: Political opportunities, mobilizing structures, and cultural framings. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
28.
McGartyC.BliucA.-M.ThomasE. F.BongiornoR. (2009). Collective action as the material expression of opinion-based group membership. Journal of Social Issues, 65, 839–857. doi:10.1111/j.1540–4560.2009.01627.x
29.
MironA. M.BranscombeN. R.SchmittM. T. (2006). Collective guilt as distress over illegitimate intergroup inequality. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 9, 163–180. doi:10.1177/1368430206062075
30.
MoradiB. (2012). Feminist social justice orientation: An indicator of optimal functioning?Counselling Psychologist, 40, 1133–1148. doi:10.1177/0011000012439612
31.
PedullaD. S.ThebaudS. (2015). Can we finish the revolution? Gender, work–family ideals and institutional contrast. American Sociological Review, 80, 116–139. doi:10.1177/0003122414564008
32.
RadkeH. R. M.HornseyM. J.BarlowF. K. (2016). Barriers to women engaging in collective action to overcome sexism. American Psychologist, 71, 863–874. doi:10.1037/a0040345
33.
ReicherS.HaslamS. A.HopkinsN. (2005). Social identity and the dynamics of leadership: Leaders and followers as collaborative agents in the transformation of social reality. The Leadership Quarterly, 16, 547–568. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2005.06.007
34.
ReynoldsK. J.SubašićE.BatalhaL.JonesB. M. (2017). From prejudice to social change: A social identity perspective. In SibleyC. G.BarlowF. K. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of the psychology of prejudice (pp. 47–64). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
35.
RudmanL. A.Moss-RacusinC. A.PhelanJ. E.NautsS. (2012). Status incongruity and backlash effects: Defending the gender hierarchy motivates prejudice against female leaders. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 165–179. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2011.10.008
36.
RyanM. K.BranscombeN. R. (Eds.). (2013). Handbook of gender and psychology. London, UK: SAGE.
ScamborE.BergmannN.WojnickaK.Belghiti-MahutS.HearnJ.HolterØ. G.. . . WhiteA. (2014). Men and gender equality: European insights. Men and Masculinities, 17, 552–577. doi:10.1177/1097184X14558239
39.
SchmittM. T.EllemersN.BranscombeN. R. (2003). Perceiving and responding to gender-based discrimination in organizations. In HaslamS. A.van KnippenbergD.PlatowM. J.EllemersN. (Eds.), Social identity at work: Developing theory for organizational practice (pp. 277–292). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
40.
SnowD. A.BenfordR. D. (1992). Master frames and cycles of protest. In MorrisA. D.MuellerC. M. (Eds.), Frontiers in social movement theory (pp. 133–155). Binghamton, NY: Vail-Ballou Press.
41.
SubašićE.ReynoldsK. J.KlandermansB.ReicherS. D. (2012). Where to from here for the psychology of social change? Future directions for theory and practice. Political Psychology, 33, 61–74. doi:10.1111/j.1467–9221.2011.00864.x
42.
SubašićE.ReynoldsK. J.MohamedM. S. (2015). Changing identities to change society: Leadership as a contest for influence and collective mobilization. In ReynoldsK.BranscombeN. (Eds.), The psychology of change: Life contexts, experiences and identities (pp. 246–263). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
43.
SubašićE.ReynoldsK. J.TurnerJ. C. (2008). The political solidarity model of social change: Dynamics of self-categorization in intergroup power relations. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12, 330–352. doi:10.1177/1088868308323223
Van BreenJ. A.SpearsR.KuppensT.de LemusS. (2017). A multiple identity approach to gender: Identification with women, identification with feminists, and their interaction. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1–21. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01019
47.
Van ZomerenM.PostmesT.SpearsR. (2008). Toward an integrative social identity model of collective action: A quantitative research synthesis of three socio-psychological perspectives. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 504–535. doi:10.1037/0033–2909
48.
Van ZomerenM.SpearsR.FischerA. H.LeachC. W. (2004). Put your money where your mouth is! Explaining collective action tendencies through group-based anger and group efficacy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 649–664. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.87.5.649
49.
WhiteA. M. (2006). Racial and gender attitudes as predictors of feminist activism among self-identified African American feminists. Journal of Black Psychology, 32, 455–478. doi:10.1177/0095798406292469
50.
WileyS.SrinivasanR.FinkeE.FirnhaberJ.ShilinskyA. (2012). Positive portrayals of feminist men increase men’s solidarity within feminists and collective action intentions. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 37, 61–71. doi:10.1177/0361684312464575
WrightS. C.BarayG. (2012). Models of social change in social psychology: Collective action or prejudice reduction, conflict or harmony. In DixonJ.LevineM. (Eds.), Beyond prejudice: Extending the social psychology of intergroup conflict, inequality and social change (pp. 225–247). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
53.
YoderJ. D.TobiasA.SnellA. F. (2011). When declaring “I am a feminist” matters: Labeling is linked to activism. Sex Roles, 64, 9–18. doi:10.1007/s11199–010–9890–3
