It is now known that organization-based self-esteem (OBSE) correlates consistently with employee attributes that are important to the success of organizations, such as in-role and extra-role job performance, job satisfaction, organization commitment, and turnover intentions (see Bowling, Eschelman, Wang, Kirkendall, & Alarcon, 2010; Pierce & Gardner, 2004). The three major categories of OBSE antecedents (organization systems, messages from significant others, and experiences of success) have also been well studied, with one major exception. We do not know if, or how the experience of working in a group (team) environment affects employees’ OBSE level, and how OBSE might affect attitudes towards and the effectiveness of that group environment. This study develops hypotheses about the genesis of OBSE in work groups, and its relationships with work group satisfaction and perceptions of group member effectiveness. In three different organizations we found that OBSE correlates with coworker and team satisfaction, as well as perceived team member effectiveness. Theoretical and managerial implications of the results are discussed.
AbersonC. L. (1999). Low self-esteem and ingroup bias. Social Behavior and Personality, 27, 17–28. doi:10.2224/sbp.1999.27.1.17
2.
AbersonC. L.HealyM.RomeroV. (2000). Ingroup bias and self-esteem: A meta-analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4, 157–173. doi:10.1207/S15327957PSPR0402_04
3.
BickelR. (2007). Multilevel analysis for applied research: It’s just regression. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
4.
BlackhartG. C.NelsonB. C.KnowlesM. L.BaumeisterR. F. (2009). Rejection elicits emotional reactions but neither causes immediate distress nor lowers self-esteem: A meta-analytic review of 192 studies on social exclusion. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13, 269–309. doi:10.1177/1088868309346065
5.
BowlingN. A.EschelmanK. J.WangQ.KirkendallC.AlarconG. (2010). A meta-analysis of the predictors and consequences of organization-based self-esteem. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 3, 601–626. doi:10.1348/096317909X454382
6.
BrecklerS. J.GreenwaldA. G. (1986). Motivational facets of the self. In SorrentinoR. M.HigginsE. T. (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition: Foundations of social behavior (pp. 145–164). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
7.
BrocknerJ. (1988). Self-esteem at work: Research, theory, and practice, Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
8.
CampionA. M.MedskerG. J.HiggsA. C. (1993). Relations between work group characteristics and effectiveness: Implications for designing effective work groups. Personnel Psychology, 46, 823–850. doi:10.1111/j.1744–6570.1993.tb01571.x
9.
CarlessS. A.De PaolaC. (2000). The measurement of cohesion in work teams. Small Group Research, 31, 71–88. doi:10.1177/104649640003100104
10.
ChanS. C. H.HuangX.SnapeE.LamC.K. (2013). The Janus face of paternalistic leaders: Authoritarianism, benevolence, subordinates’ organization-based self-esteem, and performance.Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34, 108–128. doi:10.1002/job.1797
11.
ChangA.BordiaP. (2001). A multidimensional approach to the group cohesion–group performance relationship. Small Group Research, 32, 379–405. doi:10.1177/104649640103200401
12.
CooleyC. H. (1956). Human nature and the social order. New York, NY: Free Press. (Original work published 1902)
13.
CoopersmithS. (1967). The antecedents of self-esteem. San Francisco, CA: Freeman.
14.
De CremerD.OosterwegelA. (1999). Collective self-esteem, personal self-esteem, and collective efficacy in in-group and outgroup evaluations. Current Psychology: A Journal for Diverse Perspectives on Diverse Psychological Issues, 18, 326–339. doi:10.1007/s12144–999–1007–1
15.
DenissenJ. J. A.PenkeL.SchmittD. P.van AkenM. A. G. (2008). Self-esteem reactions to social interactions: Evidence for sociometer mechanisms across days, people, and nations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 181–196. doi:10.1037/0022–3514.95.1.181
16.
DipboyeR. L. (1977). A critical review of Korman’s self-consistency theory of work motivation and occupational choice. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 18, 108–126. doi:10.1016/0030–5073(77)90021–6
17.
EllemersN.DoosjeB.SpearsR. (2004). Sources of respect: The effects of being liked by ingroups and outgroups. European Journal of Social Psychology, 34, 155–172. doi:10.1002/ejsp.196
18.
EpsteinS. (1979). The stability of behavior: On predicting most of the people much of the time. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1097–1126. doi:10.1037/0022–3514.37.7.1097
19.
FarhC. I. C.ChenZ. (2014). Beyond the individual victim: Multilevel consequences of abusive supervision in teams. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99, 1074–1095. doi:10.1037/a0035679
20.
FitzgeraldM. P. (1965). The relationship between expressed self-esteem and assumed similarity. The Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 60, 181–191. doi:10.1080/00223980.1965.10544766
21.
GardnerD. G.CummingsL. L.DunhamR. B.PierceJ. L. (1998). Single-item versus multiple-item measurement scales: An empirical comparison. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 58, 898–915. doi:10.1177/0013164498058006003
22.
GardnerD. G.PierceJ. L. (1998). Self-esteem and self-efficacy within the organizational context: An empirical comparison. Group and Organization Management, 23, 48–70. doi:10.1177/1059601198231004
23.
GardnerD. G.PierceJ. L. (2011). A question of false self-esteem: Organization-based self-esteem and narcissism in organizational contexts. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 26, 682–699. doi:10.1108/02683941111181770
24.
HeckR. H.ThomasS. L.TabataL. N. (2010). Multilevel and longitudinal modeling with IBM SPSS. New York, NY: Routledge.
25.
JamesW. (1950). The principles of psychology. New York, NY: Dover. (Original work published 1890)
26.
KellerB. G.BishopR. (1985). Self-esteem as a source of rater’s bias in peer evaluations. Psychological Reports, 56, 995–1000. doi:10.2466/pr0.1985.56.3.995
27.
KormanA. H. (1970). Toward an hypothesis of work behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 54, 31–41. doi:10.1037/h0028656
28.
KormanA. K. (1971). Organizational achievement, aggression and creativity: Some suggestions toward an integrated theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 6, 593–613. doi:10.1016/S0030–5073(71)80009–0
29.
KormanA. K. (1976). Hypothesis of work behavior revisited and an extension. Academy of Management Review, 1, 50–63. doi:10.5465/AMR.1976.4408762
30.
KormanA. K. (2001). Self-enhancement and self-protection: Toward a theory of work motivation. In ErezM.KleinbeckU.ThierryH. (Eds.), Work motivation in the context of a globalizing economy (pp. 121–130). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
31.
KuipersB. S.StokerJ. I. (2009). Development and performance of self-managing work teams: A theoretical and empirical examination. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 20, 399–419. doi:10.1080/09585190802670797
32.
MarmaroshC. L.CheriL.CorazziniJ. G. (1997). Putting the group in your pocket: Using collective identity to enhance personal and collective self-esteem. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 1, 65–74. doi:10.1037/1089–2699.1.1.65
33.
MathieuJ. E.KukenbergerM. R.D’InnocenzoL.ReillyG. (2015). Modeling reciprocal team cohesion–performance relationships, as impacted by shared leadership and members’ competence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100, 713–734. doi:10.1037/a0038898
34.
MossholderK. W.BedeianA. G.ArmenakisA. A. (1982). Group process–work outcome relationships: A note on the moderating impact of self-esteem. Academy of Management Journal, 25, 575–585. doi:10.2307/256081
35.
PierceJ. L.GardnerD. G. (2004). Self-esteem within the work and organizational context: A review of the organization-based self-esteem literature. Journal of Management, 30, 591–622. doi:10.1016/j.jm.2003.10.001
36.
PierceJ. L.GardnerD. G. (2009). Relationships of personality and job characteristics with organization-based self-esteem. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 24, 392–409. doi:10.1108/02683940910959735
37.
PierceJ. L.GardnerD. G.CummingsL. L.DunhamR. B. (1989). Organization-based self-esteem: Construct definition, operationalization, and validation. Academy of Management Journal, 32, 622–648. doi:10.2307/256437
38.
PierceJ. L.GardnerD. G.DunhamR. B.CummingsL. L. (1993). Moderating effects of organization-based self-esteem on role condition–employee response relationships. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 271–288. doi:10.2307/256523
39.
PierceJ. L.KostovaT.DirksK. (2001). Towards a theory of psychological ownership in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 26, 298–310. doi:10.1037/1089–2680.7.1.84
40.
ScottK. L.ZagenczykT. J.SchippersM.PurvisR. L.CruzK. S. (2014). Coworker exclusion and employee outcomes: An investigation of the moderating roles of perceived organizational support. Journal of Management Studies, 51, 1235–1256. doi:10.1111/joms.12099
41.
SimJ. J.GoyleA.McKedyWEidelmanS.CorrellJ. (in press). How social identity shapes the working self-concept. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 55, 271–277. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2014.07.015
42.
SlotterE. B.GardnerW. L. (2014). Remind me who I am: Social interaction strategies for maintaining the threatened self-concept. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40, 1148–1161. doi:10.1177/0146167214537685
43.
SpectorP. E. (2006). Method variance in organizational research: Truth or urban legend?Organizational Research Methods, 9, 221–232. doi:10.1177/1094428105284955
44.
SpörrleM.BekkM. (2014). Meta-analytic guidelines for evaluating single-item reliabilities of personality instruments. Assessment, 21, 272–285. doi:10.1177/1073191113498267
45.
SwannW. (1984). Self-verification: Bringing social reality into harmony with the self. In. SulsJ.GreenwaldA. (Eds.), Psychological perspectives on the self (pp. 33–66). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
46.
TharenouP. (1979). Employee self-esteem: A review of the literature. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 15, 1–29. doi:10.1016/0001–8791(79)90028–9
47.
Van MierloH.RutteC. G.KompierM. A. J.DoorewaardH. A. C. M. (2005). Self-managing teamwork and psychological well-being: Review of a multilevel research domain. Group and Organization Management, 30, 211–135. doi:10.1177/1059601103257989
48.
WanousJ. P.ReichersA. E.HudyM. J. (1997). Overall job satisfaction: How good are single-item measures?Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 247–252. doi:10.1037/0021–9010.82.2.247
49.
WeissD. J.DawisR. V.EnglandG. W.LofquistL. H. (1967). Manual for the Minnesota Satisfaction Questionnaire. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.
50.
WilliamsK. D.ShoreW. J.GraheJ. E. (1998). The silent treatment: Perceptions of its behaviors and associated feelings. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 1, 117–141. doi:10.1177/1368430298012002
