Rather than seeing outgroup members as targets of fear, conflict, or even tolerance, the self-expansion model proposes that outgroup members might be seen as attractive opportunities for self-growth. The current study utilizes an experimental manipulation to raise (or lower) self-expansion motivation prior to a positive interaction with a stranger from a different ethnic group. The results show that priming high self-expansion motivation leads to higher quality interactions, greater interpersonal closeness, greater feelings of self-growth, and higher feelings of self-efficacy. In addition, these outcomes show patterns of mediation consistent with the predictions of self-expansion theory. These findings point to a potentially valuable tool for improving the quality of cross-group contact experiences. More broadly, they focus attention on the genuinely positive functions that relationships with outgroup members can have for the self.
AllportG. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.
2.
AltemeyerB. (1996). The authoritarian specter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
3.
AronA. P.AronE. N. (1986). Love and the expansion of self: Understanding attraction and satisfaction. Washington, DC: Hemisphere.
4.
AronA. P.AronE. N.SmollanD. (1992). Inclusion of other in the Self Scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 596–612. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.63.4.596
5.
AronA.MelinatE.AronE. N.ValloneR.BatorR. (1997). The experimental generation of interpersonal closeness: A procedure and some preliminary findings. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 363–377. doi:10.1177/0146167297234003
6.
BergsiekerH. B.SheltonJ. N.RichesonJ. A. (2010). To be liked versus respected: Divergent goals in interracial interactions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 248–264. doi:10.1037/a0018474
7.
BrownR.HewstoneM. (2005). An integrative theory of intergroup contact. In ZannaM (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, (Vol. 37, pp. 255–343). San Diego, CA: Elsevier Academic Press.
8.
DaviesK.WrightS. C.AronA.ComeauJ. (2013). Intergroup contact through friendship: Intimacy and norms. In HodsonG.HewstoneM (Eds.), Advances in intergroup contact (pp. 221–229). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
9.
FestingerL. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Evanston, IL: Row Peterson.
10.
GordonC.LuoS. H. (2011). The Personal Expansion Questionnaire: Measuring one’s tendency to expand through novelty and augmentation. Personality and Individual Differences, 51, 89–94. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2011.03.015
11.
HaghighatR. (2007). The development of the Brief Social Desireability Scale. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 3. Retrieved from http://ejop.psychopen.eu/article/view/417
12.
HigginsE. T.FriedmanR. S.HarlowR. E.IdsonL. C.AydukO. N.TaylorA. (2001). Achievement orientations from subjective histories of success: Promotion pride versus prevention pride. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 3–23. doi:10.1002/ejsp.27
13.
HLM 7 for Windows [Computer software]. Skokie, IL: Scientific Software International, Inc.
14.
JerusalemM.SchwarzerR. (1992). Self-efficacy as a resource factor in stress appraisal processes. In SchwarzerR. (Ed.), Self-efficacy: Thought control of action (pp. 195–213). Washington, DC: Hemisphere.
15.
JohnO. P.SrivastavaS. (1999). The Big-Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In PervinL. A.JohnO. P (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (Vol. 2, pp. 102–138). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
16.
LewandowskiG. W.JrAronA. (2002, February). The Self-Expansion Scale: Construction and validation. Paper presented at the Third Annual Meeting of the Society of Personality and Social Psychology, Savannah, GA.
17.
NeubergS. L.NewsomJ. T. (1993). Personal need for structure: Individual differences in the desire for simple structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 113–131. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.65.1.113
18.
Page-GouldE.Mendoza-DentonR.TroppL. R. (2008). With a little help from my cross-group friend: Reducing anxiety in intergroup contexts through cross-group friendship. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 1080–1094. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.95.5.1080
19.
PettigrewT. F. (1998). Intergroup contact theory. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 65–85. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.49.1.65
20.
PettigrewT. F.TroppL. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 751–783. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.90.5.751
21.
PittinskyT. L. (2012). Us + Them: Tapping the positive power of difference. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Review Press.
22.
PreacherK. J.HayesA. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879–891. doi:10.3758/BRM.40.3.879
23.
RaudenbushS. W.BrykA. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
24.
RobitschekC. (1998). Personal growth initiative: The construct and its measure. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 30, 183–198. doi:10.13072/midss.76
25.
RoetsAvan HielA. (2011). Item selection and validation of a brief, 15-item version of the Need for Closure Scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 50, 90–94. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2010.09.004
26.
SheltonJ. N.DovidoJ. F.HeblM.RichesonJ. A. (2009). Prejudice and intergroup interaction. In DemoulinS.LevensJ. P.DovidioJ (Eds.), Intergroup misunderstandings: Impact of divergent social realities (pp. 21–38). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
27.
ShermanD. K.HartsonK. A.BinningK. R.Purdie-VaughnsV.GarciaJ.Taborsky-BarbaS.…CohenG. L. (2013). Deflecting the trajectory and changing the narrative: How self-affirmation affects academic performance and motivation under identity threat. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104, 591–618. doi:10.1037/a0031495
28.
SirgyJ. M. (1986). Self-congruity: Toward a theory of personality and cybernetics. New York, NY: Preager.
29.
TroppL. R.PettigrewT. F. (2005). Relationships between intergroup contact and prejudice among minority and majority status groups. Psychological Science, 16, 951–957. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01643.x
30.
TurnerR. N.HewstoneM.VociA.VonofakouC. (2008). A test of the extended intergroup contact hypothesis: The mediating role of intergroup anxiety, perceived ingroup and outgroup norms, and inclusion of the outgroup in the self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 843–860. doi:10.1037/a0011434
31.
VorauerJ. (2008). Unprejudiced and self-focused: When intergroup contact is experienced as being about the ingroup rather than the outgroup. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 912–919. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2007.10.002
32.
WrightS. W. (2009). Cross-group contact effects. In OttenS.SassenbergK.KesslerT. (Eds.), Intergroup relations: The role of motivation and emotion (pp. 262–283). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
33.
WrightS. W.AronA.TroppL. R. (2002). Including others (and their groups) in the self: Self-expansion theory and intergroup relations. In ForgasJ. P.WilliamsK. (Eds.), The social self: Cognitive, interpersonal and intergroup perspectives (pp. 343–363). Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
