Based on subjective group dynamics theory (SGDT; e.g., Marques, Paez, & Abrams, 1998), we examine the effects of a group’s ability to effectively control its deviant members on participants’ ingroup identification. In Studies 1 and 2 (N = 79 and N = 173) participants were informed that the ingroup (vs. outgroup) dealt with deviant occurrences in an effective (vs. ineffective) way. As predicted, induced ingroup effectiveness generated higher ingroup identification, trust in the ingroup’s social control system, and more positive emotional climate, whereas induced ingroup ineffectiveness generated more negative emotional climate or anomie and weaker ingroup identification as compared to outgroup conditions. In Study 3 (N = 115), perceived ingroup effectiveness predicted ingroup identification, via emotional climate, ingroup anomie, confidence in the group’s social control system, and ingroup emotions. We discuss the results in light of SGDT and the role of perceived ingroup social control in promoting ingroup identification.
AbramsD.MarquesJ. M.RandsleydeMouraG.HutchinsonP.BownN. J. (2004). The maintenance of entitativity: A subjective group dynamics approach. In YzerbytV. Y.JuddC. M.CorneilleO. (Eds.), The psychology of group perception: Contributions to the study of homogeneity, entitativity, and essentialism (pp. 361–380). Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
2.
Bar-TalD.HalperinE.de RiveraJ. (2007). Collective emotions in conflict situations: Societal implications. Journal of Social Issues, 63, 441–460. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.2007
3.
BeckerH. S. (1963). Outsiders: Studies in the sociology of deviance. New York, NY: The Free Press.
4.
Ben-YehudaN. (1985). Deviance and moral boundaries: Witchcraft, the occult, science fiction, deviant sciences and scientists. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
5.
BranscombeN. R.WannD. L.NoelJ. G.ColemanJ. (1993). In-group or out-group extremity: Importance of the threatened social identity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 381–388. doi:10.1177/0146167293194003
6.
CarlsmithK. M. (2006). The roles of retribution and utility in determining punishment. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 4, 437–451. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2005.06.007
7.
CarlsmithK. M.DarleyJ. M.RobinsonP. H. (2002). Why do we punish? Deterrence and just deserts as motives for punishment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 284–299. doi:10.1037/0022–3514.83.2.284
8.
ClinardM. B.MeierR. F. (2004). Sociology of deviant behavior (12th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
DavisC. L.CampR. A.ColemanK. M. (2004). The influence of party systems on citizens’ perceptions of corruption and electoral response in Latin America. Comparative Political Studies, 37(6), 677–703. doi:10.1177/0010414004265879
11.
De RiveraJPaezD. (2007). Emotional climate, human security and culture of peace. Journal of Social Issues, 63, 233–253. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.2007.00506.x
12.
De SousaL. (2008). I don’t bribe, I just pull strings: Assessing the fluidity of social representations of corruption in Portuguese society. Perspectives on European Politics and Society, 9(1), 8–23. doi:10.1080/15705850701825402
13.
DurkheimE. (1982). The rules of sociological method. New York, NY: The Free Press. (Original work published 1895)
14.
DurkheimE. (1997). The division of labor in society. New York, NY: The Free Press. (Original work published 1893)
15.
EriksonK. (1964). Notes on the sociology of deviance. In BeckerH. S. (Ed.), The other side (pp. 9–22). New York, NY: The Free Press.
16.
FischerA. H.MansteadA. S. R. (2008). Intergroup emotions. In LewisM.HavilandandJ. M.FeldmanL. (Eds.), Handbook of emotions (3rd ed., pp. 428–439). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
17.
FredricksonB. (2009). Positivity. New York, NY: Crown.
18.
GarlandD. (1996). Social control. In KuperA.KuperJ. (Eds.), The social science encyclopedia (pp. 780–783). London, UK: Routledge.
19.
GibbsJ. P. (1977). Social control, deterrence, and perspectives on social order. Social Forces, 56, 408–423. doi:10.1093/sf/56.2.408
20.
HamiltonV. L.RaumaD. (1995). Social psychology of deviance and law. In CookK. S.FineG. A.HouseJ. S. (Eds.), Sociological perspectives on social psychology (pp. 524–547). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
21.
HarrisA. R.HillG. D. (1982). The social psychology of deviance: Toward a reconciliation with social structure. Annual Review of Sociology, 8, 161–184. doi:10.1146/annurev.so.08.080182.001031
22.
HayesF. (2013).Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
23.
HeidenheimerA. J. (2002). Perspectives on the perception of corruption. In HeidenheimerA. J.JohnstonM. (Eds.), Political corruption: Concepts and contexts (pp. 141–154). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
24.
HoggM. A.AbramsD. (1988). Social identifications: A social psychology of intergroup relations and group processes. London, UK: Routledge.
25.
HutchisonP.AbramsD. (2003). Ingroup identification moderates stereotype change in reaction to ingroup deviance. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 497–506. doi:10.1002/ejsp.157
26.
HutchisonP.AbramsD.GutierrezR.VikiG. T. (2008). Getting rid of the bad ones: The relationship between group identification, deviant derogation, and identity maintenance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 874–881. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2007.09.001
27.
InverarityJ. (1980). Theories of the political creation of deviance: Legacies of conflict theory, Marx, and Durkheim. In LauderdaleP. (Ed.), A political analysis of deviance (pp. 175–219). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
28.
JettenJ.HornseyM. J. (2014). Deviance and dissent within groups. Annual Review of Psychology, 65, 461–485. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115151
29.
LevineJ. M. (1989). Reactions to opinion deviance in small groups. In PaulusP. B. (Ed.), Psychology of group influence (pp. 187–231). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
30.
MarquesJ. M.AbramsD.PaezD.TaboadaC. (1998). The role of categorization and ingroup norms in judgments of groups and their members. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 976–988. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.75.4.976
31.
MarquesJ. M.AbramsD.SerôdioR. (2001). Being better by being right: Subjective group dynamics and derogation of in-group deviants when generic norms are undermined. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 436–447. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.81.3.436
32.
MarquesJ. M.PaezD. (1994). The black sheep effect: Social categorisation, rejection of ingroup deviates, and perception of group variability. In StroebeW.HewstoneM. (Eds.), European review of social psychology (Vol. 5, pp. 38–68). New York, NY: Wiley.
33.
MarquesJ. M.PaezD.AbramsD. (1998). Social identity and intra-group perception. In MoralesJ. F.PaezD.DeschampsJ. C.WorchelS. (Eds.), Current perspectives on social identity and social categorization (pp. 124–141). New York, NY: Sage.
34.
MarquesJ. M.RobaloM.RochaS. A. (1992). Ingroup bias and the black sheep effect: Assessing the impact of cognitive-motivational and informational antecedents of judgemental extremity towards ingroup members. European Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 331–352. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2420220403
35.
MarquesJ. M.YzerbytV. Y.LeyensJ.-P. (1988). The black sheep effect: Judgmental extremity towards ingroup members as a function of ingroup identification. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18, 1–16. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2420180102
36.
MertonR. (1938). Social structure and anomie. New York, NY: Irvington.
37.
MertonR. (1968). Social theory and social structure. New York, NY: Free Press.
38.
O’MaraE. M.JacksonL. E.BatsonD.GaertnerL. (2011). Will moral outrage stand up? Distinguishing among emotional reactions to a moral violation. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 173–179. doi:10.1002/ejsp.754
39.
OrcuttJ. D. (1973). Societal reaction and the reaction to deviation in small groups. Social Forces, 52, 259–267. doi:10.2307/2576380
40.
PaezD.EspinosaA.BobowikM. (2013). Emotional climate: How is it shaped, fostered, and changed? In HermansD.RiméB.MesquitaB. (Eds.), Changing emotions (pp. 113–119). London, UK: Psychology Press.
41.
PaezD.RiméB. (2014). Collective emotional gatherings: Their impact upon identity fusion, shared beliefs and social integration. In SalmelaM.von ScheveC. (Eds.), Collective emotions (pp. 204–216). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
42.
PintoI. R.MarquesJ. M.LevineJ. M.AbramsD. (2010). Membership status and subjective group dynamics: Who triggers the black sheep effect?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 107–119. doi:10.1037/a0018187
43.
PoeschlG.RibeiroR. (in press). Everyday opinions on grand and petty corruption: A Portuguese study. InTeixeiraPimentaC.MaiaA.MoreiraJ. A. (Eds.), Corruption, economic growth and globalization. London, UK: Routledge.
44.
PrenticeD. A.MillerD. T.LightdaleJ. R. (1994). Asymmetries in attachments to groups and their members: Distinguishing between common-identity and common-bond groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 484–493. doi:10.1177/0146167294205005
45.
RosenthalR.RosnowR. L.RubinD. B. (2000). Contrasts and effect sizes in behavioral research: A correlational approach. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
46.
SeemanM. (1991). Alienation and anomie. In RobinsonJ. P.ShaverP. R.WrightsmanL. S. (Eds.), Measures of personality and social psychological attitudes (pp. 291–371). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
47.
SimmelG. (1955). Conflict and the web of group affiliations. New York, NY: The Free Press.
48.
SwannW. B.Jr.GómezÁ.SeyleD. C.MoralesJ. F.HuiciC. (2009). Identity fusion: The interplay of personal and social identities in extreme group behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 995–1011. doi:10.1037/a0013668
49.
TajfelH. (1978). Interindividual behaviour and intergroup behaviour. In TajfelH. (Ed.), Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 27–60). London, UK: Academic Press.
50.
TangneyJ.StuewigJ.MashekD. (2007). Moral emotions and moral behavior. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 345–372. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070145
51.
ThomasE. F.McGarthyC.MavorK. I. (2009). Aligning identities, emotions and beliefs to create commitment to sustainable social and political action. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 13, 194–218. doi:10.1177/1088868309341563
52.
TurnerJ. C. (1975). Social comparison and social identity: Some prospects for intergroup behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology, 5(1), 1–34. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2420050102
53.
TurnerJ. C. (1981). The experimental social psychology of intergroup behaviour. In TurnerJ. C.GilesH. (Eds.), Intergroup behaviour (pp. 66–101). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
54.
TurnerJ. C.HoggM. A.OakesP. J.ReicherS. D.WetherellM. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
