This research demonstrates that group membership instability tends to raise self-related concerns that make it less likely that people value and accept constructive task contributions offered by newcomers. In Study 1 (N = 88), unstable group membership heightened self-related concerns. Participants indicated increased intentions to make unique task contributions and lowered the evaluations of others’ contributions, particularly those from a newcomer. Study 2 (N = 81) used an online minimal group paradigm to obtain behavioral outcomes. Unstable group membership again heightened self-related concerns and gave rise to unique task contributions, even when a newcomer had just offered a high-quality task solution that benefitted the group. Because of their self-related concerns, members with an unstable position also evaluated other members—and the newcomer in particular—more negatively than did members with a stable position. In this way, workgroup instability can undermine (rather than foster) change and innovation.
AjzenI. (2002). Perceived behavioral control, self-efficacy, locus of control, and the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32, 665–683. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2002.tb00236.x
2.
AmabileT. M.ContiR. (1999). Changes in the work environment for creativity during downsizing. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 630–640. doi:10.2307/256984
3.
AshfordS. J.LeeC.BobkoP. (1989). Content, causes, and consequences of job insecurity: A theory-based measure and substantive test. Academy of Management Journal, 32, 803–829. doi:10.2307/256569
4.
BarkerR. G. (1968). Ecological psychology: Concepts and methods for studying the environment of human behavior. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
5.
BarnettW. P.MinerA. S. (1992). Standing on the shoulders of others: Career interdependence in job mobility. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37, 262–281. doi:10.2307/2393224
6.
BaumeisterR. F.CampbellJ. D.KruegerJ. I.VohsK. D. (2003). Does high self-esteem cause better performance, interpersonal success, happiness, or healthier lifestyles?Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 4, 1–44. doi:10.1111/1529-1006.01431
7.
BettencourtB. A.DorrN.CharltonK.HumeD. L. (2001). Status differences and in-group bias: A meta-analytic examination of the effects of status stability, status legitimacy, and group permeability. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 520–542. doi:10.1037//0033-2909.127.4.520
8.
BorosS.CurseuP. L. (2014). Is it here where I belong? An integrative model of turnover intentions. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 1, 1553–1562. doi:10.1111/jasp.12104
9.
BroschakJ. P.Davis-BlakeA. (2006). Mixing standard work and nonstandard deals: The consequences of heterogeneity in employment arrangements. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 371–393. doi:10.5465/AMJ.2006.20786085
10.
BuhrmesterM.KwangT.GoslingS. D. (2011). Amazon’s Mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data?Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 3–5. doi:10.1177/1745691610393980
11.
ByrneD. (1961). Interpersonal attraction as a function of affiliation need and attitude similarity. Human Relations, 14, 283–289.
12.
ChattopadhyayP.GeorgeE. (2001). Examining the effects of work externalization through the lens of social identity theory. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 781–788. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.89.5.892
13.
ChristensenR. (1997). Log-linear models and logistic regression (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
14.
CiminoA.DeltonA. W. (2010). On the perception of newcomers: Toward an evolved psychology of intergenerational coalitions. Human Nature, 21, 186–202. doi:10.1007/s12110-010-9088-y
15.
CohenW. M.LevinthalD. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 128–152. doi:10.2307/2393553
16.
CrockerJ.KnightK. M. (2005). Contingencies of self-worth. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 200–203. doi:10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00364.x
17.
CrockerJ.ParkL. E. (2004). The costly pursuit of self-esteem. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 392–414. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.130.3.392
18.
Davis-BlakeA.BroschakD.GeorgeE. (2003). Happy together? How using nonstandard workers affects exit, voice and loyalty among standard employees. Academy of Management Journal, 46, 475–485. doi:10.2307/30040639
19.
De CremerD.van DijkeM.MayerD. M. (2010). Cooperating when “You” and “I” are treated fairly: The moderating role of leader prototypicality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 1121–1133. doi:10.1037/a0020419
20.
De DreuC. K.W.WestM. A. (2001). Minority dissent and team innovation: The importance of participation in decision making. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 1191–1201. doi:10.1037//0021-9010.86.6.1191
21.
DunningD.LeuenbergerA.ShermanD. A. (1995). A new look at motivated interference – Are self-serving theories of success a product of motivational forces. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 58–68. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.69.1.58
22.
EllemersN.De GilderD.HaslamS. A. (2004). Motivating individuals and groups at work: A social identity perspective on leadership and group performance. Academy of Management Review, 29, 459–478. doi:10.2307/20159054
23.
EllemersN.De GilderD.van den HeuvelH. (1998). Career-oriented versus team-oriented commitment and behavior at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 717–730. doi:10.1037//0021-9010.83.5.717
24.
EllemersN.KortekaasP.OuwerkerkJ. W. (1999). Self-categorisation, commitment to the group and group self-esteem as related but distinct aspects of social identity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 2, 371–389. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199903/05)29:2/3<371::AID-EJSP932>3.0.CO;2-U
25.
EllemersN.van KnippenbergA.De VriesN.WilkeH. (1988). Social identification and permeability of group boundaries. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18, 497–513. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2420180604
26.
FrostT.StimpsonD. V.MaughanM. R. (1978). Some correlates of trust. The Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 99, 103–108. doi:10.1080/00223980.1978.9921447
27.
GeorgeE.ChattopadhyayP.ZhangL. L. (2012). Helping hand or competition? The moderating influence of perceived upward mobility on the relationship between blended workgroups and employee attitudes and behaviors. Organization Science, 23, 355–372. doi:10.1287/orsc.1100.0606
28.
GordijnE. H.De VriesN. K.De DreuC. K. W. (2002). Minority influence on focal and related attitudes: Change in size, attribution, and information processing. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1315–1326. doi:10.1177/014616702236819
29.
GreenhalghL.RosenblattZ. (2009). Job insecurity: Toward conceptual clarity. The Academy of Management Review, 9, 438–448. doi:10.2307/258284
30.
GuilfordJ. P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
31.
HaslamS. A. (2004). Psychology in organizations: The social identity approach (2nd ed.). London, UK: Sage.
32.
HayesA. F. (2012). PROCESS: A versatile computational tool for observed variable mediation, moderation, and conditional process modeling (White paper). Retrieved from http://www.afhayes.com/
33.
HeathertonT. E.PolivyJ. (1991). Development and validation of a scale for measuring state self-esteem. Journal or Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 895–910. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.60.6.895
34.
HindsP. JCarleyK. M.KrackhardtD.WholeyD. (2000). Choosing work group members: Balancing similarity, competence and familiarity. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 81, 226–251. doi:IO.1006/obhd.1999.2875
35.
HornseyM. J.GriceT.JettenJ.PaulsenN.CallanV. (2007). Group-directed criticisms and recommendations for change: Why newcomers arouse more resistance than old-timers. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 1036–1048. doi:10.1177/0146167207301029
36.
HysumS. J. (2009). Status valued goal objects and performance expectations. Social Forces, 87, 1623–1648. doi:10.1353/sof.0.0160
37.
IlgenD. R. I.HollenbeckJ. R.JohnsonM.JundtD. (2005). Teams in organizations: From input-process-output models to IMOI models. Annual Review Psychology, 56, 517–543. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070250
38.
JettenJ.BranscombeN. R.SpearsR. (2002). On being peripheral: Effects of identity insecurity on personal and collective self-esteem. European Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 105–123. doi:10.1002/ejsp.64
39.
KraimerM. L.WayneS. J.LidenR. C.SparroweR. T. (2005). The role of job security in understanding the relationship between employees’ perceptions of temporary workers and employees’ performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 389–398. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.90.2.389
40.
LandisR. J.KochG. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreements for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 159–174 doi:10.2307/2529310
41.
LevineJ. M.ChoiH.-S. (2010). Newcomers as change agents: Minority influence in task groups. In MartinR.HewstoneM. (Eds.), Minority influence and innovation: Antecedents, processes, and consequences (pp. 229–262). New York, NY: Psychology Press
42.
LevineJ. M.ChoiH.-S. (2011). Minority influence in interacting groups: The impact of newcomers. In JettenJ.HornseyM. J. (Eds.), Rebels in groups: Dissent, deviance, difference and defiance (pp. 73–92). Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
43.
LountR. B.JrPettitN. J. (2012). The social context of trust: The role of status. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 117, 15–23. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.07.005
44.
MayerR. C.DavisJ. H.SchoormanF. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. The Academy of Management Review, 20, 709–734 doi:10.2307/258792
45.
MorelandR. L. (1985). Social categorization and the assimilation of “new” group members. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 1173–1190. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.48.5.1173
46.
MorelandR. L.ArgoteL. (2003). Transactive memory in dynamic organizations. In PetersonR.MannixE. (Eds.), Leading and managing people in the dynamic organization (pp. 135–162). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
47.
MorelandR. L.LevineJ. L. (2006). Socialization in organizations and work groups. In LevineJ. M.MorelandR. L. (Eds.), Small groups (pp. 469–499). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
48.
PetersonR. S.BehfarK. J. (2003). The dynamic relationship between performance feedback, trust, and conflict in groups: A longitudinal study. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 92, 102–112. doi:10.1016/S0749-5978(03)00090-6
49.
PfefferJ.BaronJ. N. (1988). Taking the workers back out: Recent trends in the structuring of employment. In CummingsL. L.StawB. M. (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 10, pp. 257–303). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
50.
PostmesT.SpearsR.LeeA. T.NovakR. J. (2005). Individuality and social influence in groups: Inductive and deductive routes to group identity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 747–763. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.89.5.747
51.
RietzschelE. F.NijstadB. A.StroebeW. (2006). Productivity is not enough: A comparison of interactive and nominal brainstorming groups on idea generation and selection. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 244–251. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2005.04.005
52.
RietzschelE. F.NijstadB. A.StroebeW. (2007). Relative accessibility of domain knowledge and creativity: The effects of knowledge activation on the quantity and originality of generated ideas. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 933–946. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2006.10.014
53.
RinkF.EllemersN. (2010). Benefiting from informational differences: How diversity can help focus on common group goals. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 13, 345–359. doi:10.1177/1368430209344866
54.
RinkF.KaneA.EllemersN.van der VegtG. S. (2013). Team receptivity to newcomers: Evidence and future research themes. Academy of Management Annals, 7, 1– 47 doi:10.1080/19416520.2013.766405
55.
SleebosE.EllemersN.De GilderD. (2006a). The paradox of the disrespected: Disrespected group members’ engagement in group-serving effort. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 413–427. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2005.06.002
56.
SleebosE.EllemersN.De GilderD. (2006b). The carrot and the stick: Affective commitment and acceptance anxiety as motives for discretionary group efforts by respected and disrespected group members. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 244–255. doi:10.1177/0146167205282147
57.
TajfelH.TurnerJ. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In WorchelS.AustinW. G. (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (2nd ed., pp. 7–24). Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall.
58.
ThompsonJ. D. (1967). Organizations in action. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
59.
TverskyA.KahnemanD. (1992). Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5, 297–323. doi:10.1007/BF00122574
60.
TylerT. R.BladerS. L. (2000). Cooperation in groups: Procedural justice, social identity, and behavioral engagement. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
61.
UzziB.BarsnessZ. I. (1998). Contingent employment in British establishments: Organizational determinants of the use of fixed-term hires and part-time workers. Social Forces, 76, 967–1007. doi:10.2307/3005700
62.
WeberB.HertelG. (2007). Motivation gains of inferior group members: A meta-analytical review. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 973–993. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.93.6.973
63.
WilliamsK. D. (2007). Ostracism. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 425–452. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085641
64.
WirthJ. H.WilliamsK. D. (2009). They don’t like our kind: Consequences of being ostracized while possessing a group membership. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 12, 111–127. doi:10.1177/1368430208098780
65.
WrightS. C. (2001). Strategic collective action: Social psychology and social change. In BrownR.GaertnerS. (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Intergroup processes (pp. 409–430). Oxford, UK: Blackwell Press.
66.
ZillerR. C. (1965). Toward a theory of open and closed groups. Psychological Bulletin, 64, 164–182. doi:10.1037/h0022390
67.
ZillerR. C.BehringerR. D.JansenM. J. (1961). The newcomer in open and closed groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 45, 55–58. doi:10.1037/h0048008
