A commitment framework based on Moreland and Levine's theory of socialization in groups (Levine & Moreland, 1994; Moreland & Levine, 1982, 2000) is applied to the previously neglected problem of group exit. Specifically, an ex-member's desire to rejoin a former group is predicted from two factors: (1) the ex-member's commitment to his or her former group; and (2) the ex-member's perception of his or her former group's commitment to him or her. This framework is tested using both recollections of real-life experiences and experimentally constructed groups. Results suggest that an ex-member's desire to rejoin a former group is determined most proximally by the ex-member's commitment to the former group, but that the ex-member's commitment can be affected by perceptions of the former group's commitment. These results suggest that Moreland and Levine's framework provides a viable theory-based starting point for more extensive study of group exit.
Abelson, R.P. (1995) Statistics as principled argument. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
2.
Agnew, C.R. (2000). Cognitive interdependence and the experience of relationship loss. In J. H. Harvey & E. D. Miller (Eds.), Loss and trauma: General and close relationship perspectives (pp. 385-398). New York: Brunner-Routledge.
3.
Baron, R.M., & Kenny, D.A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
4.
Baumeister, R.F., DeWall, C.N., Ciarocco, N.J., & Twenge, J.M. (2005). Social exclusion impairs self-regulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 589-604.
5.
Cohen, A. (1993). Organizational commitment and turnover: A meta-analysis . The Academy of Management Journal, 36, 1140-1157.
6.
Drigotas, S.M., & Rusbult, C.E. (1992). Should I stay or should I go?: A dependence model of breakups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 62, 62-87.
7.
Ellemers, N., Spears, R., & Doosje, B. (1997). Sticking together or falling apart: Ingroup identification as a psychological determinant of group commitment versus individual mobility . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 617-626.
8.
Gaertner, S.L., Mann, J., Murrell, A., & Dovidio, J.F. (1989). Reducing intergroup bias: The benefits of recategorization . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 239-249.
9.
Hart, C., & van Vugt, M. (2006). From fault line to group fission: Understanding membership changes in small groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 392-404.
10.
Johnson, D.W., & Johnson, F.P. (1975). Joining together: Group theory and group skills . Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall .
11.
Kelley, H.H. (1983). Love and commitment. In H. H. Kelley, E. Berscheid, A. Christensen, J. H. Harvey, T. L. Huston, G. Levinger, E. McClintock , L. A. Peplau, & D. R. Peterson (Eds.), Close relationships (pp. 265-314). New York: W. H. Freeman and Company.
12.
Le, B., & Agnew, C.R. (2003). Commitment and its theorized determinants: A meta-analysis of the Investment Model. Personal Relationships, 10, 37-57.
13.
Levine, J.M., & Moreland, R.L. (1994). Group socialization: Theory and research. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology (Vol. 5, pp. 305-336). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
14.
Levine, J.M., Moreland, R.L., & Ryan, C. (1997). Group socialization and intergroup relations. In C. Sedikides, J. Schopler, & C. Insko (Eds.), Intergroup cognition and intergroup behavior (pp. 283-308). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
15.
Martell, R.F., & Guzzo, R.A. (1991). The dynamics of implicit theories of group performance: When and how do they operate? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 51-74.
16.
Moreland, R.L., & Levine, J.M. (1982). Socialization in small groups: Temporal changes in individual-group relations. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 15, pp. 137-192). New York: Academic Press.
17.
Moreland, R.L., & Levine, J.M. (2000). Socialization in organizations and work groups . In M. Turner (Ed.), Groups at work: Theory and research (pp. 69-112). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
18.
Moreland, R.L., & McMinn, J.G. (1999). Gone, but not forgotten: Loyalty and betrayal among ex-members of small groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 1484-1494.
19.
Preacher, K.J., & Hayes, A.F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 36, 717-731.
20.
Rhoades, L., Eisenberger, R., & Armeli, S. (2001). Affective commitment to the organization: The contribution of perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 825-836.
21.
Rosenthal, R., & Rosnow, R.L. (1995). Some things you learn aren't so: Cohen's paradox, Asch's paradigm, and the interpretation of interaction. Psychological Science, 6, 3-9.
22.
Rosnow, R.L., & Rosenthal, R. (1996). Contrasts and interactions redux: Five easy pieces . Psychological Science, 7, 253-257.
23.
Rusbult, C.E. (1983). A longitudinal test of the investment model: The development (and deterioration) of satisfaction and commitment in heterosexual involvements. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 45, 101-117.
24.
Rusbult, C.E., & Arriaga, X.B. (1997). Interdependence theory. In S. Duck (Ed.), Handbook of personal relationships (2nd ed., pp. 221-251). New York: Wiley.
25.
Rusbult, C.E., & Martz, J.M. (1995). Remaining in an abusive relationship: An investment model analysis of non-voluntary dependence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 558-571.
26.
Rusbult, C.E., Martz, J.M., & Agnew, C.R. (1998). The investment model scale: Measuring commitment level, satisfaction level, quality of alternatives, and investment size. Personal Relationships, 5, 357-391.
27.
Sani, F. (2005). When subgroups secede: Extending and refining the social psychological model of schism in groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 1074-1086.
28.
Sani, F., & Todman, J. (2002). Should we stay or should we go? A social psychological model of schisms in groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1647-1655.
29.
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J.C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior . In W. G. Austin, & S. Worchel (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7-24). Chicago: Nelson Hall.
30.
Thibaut, J.W., & Kelley, H.H. (1959). The social psychology of groups. New York: Wiley.
31.
Twenge, J.M., Catanese, K.R., & Baumeister, R.L. (2003). Social exclusion and the deconstructed stat: Time perception, meaninglessness, lethargy, lack of emotion, and self-awareness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 85, 409-423.
32.
van Beest, I., & Williams, K.D. (2006). When inclusion costs and ostracism pays, ostracism still hurts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 918-928.
33.
van Vugt, M., & Hart, C. (2004). Social identity as social glue: The origins of group loyalty. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 86, 585-598.
34.
Williams, K.D. (2001). Ostracism: The power of silence. New York: Guilford Press.
35.
Zadro, L., Williams, K.D., & Richardson, R. (2003). How long can you go?: Ostracism by a computer is sufficient to lower self-reported levels of belonging, control, self-esteem, and meaningful existence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 560-567.
36.
Zdaniuk, B., & Levine, J.M. (2001). Group loyalty: Impact of members' identification and contributions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology , 37, 502-509.
