Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

In the first examination of the accuracy of metaperceptions of sexism among White, Asian, and Black women and men (N = 308), results showed that regardless of ethnicity, both genders were similarly inaccurate, but in opposing ways. Women overestimated men’s hostile sexism (HS) and underestimated men’s benevolent sexism (BS), whereas men overestimated women’s BS and underestimated women’s HS. Further, metaperceptions of HS were negatively related to metaperceptions of BS, for both genders. Individual differences in sexism informed metaperceptions only for men (not women). In concert, the findings support an illusion of antagonism between HS and BS. Viewing HS and BS as oppositional is an illusion because, cross-culturally, they are positively correlated in men and women alike (e.g., Glick et al., 2000), and both forms of sexism reinforce the gender hierarchy (Rudman & Glick, 2008). Therefore, disarming the illusion of antagonism is an overlooked key to advancing gender equality.

Keywords

benevolent sexism gender relations hostile sexism intergroup relations metaperception accuracy metaperceptions sexism social cognition

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Barreto

Ellemers

(2005). The burden of benevolent sexism: How it contributes to the maintenance of gender inequalities. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 633–642. doi:10.1002/ejsp.270

Becker

J. C.

Swim

J. K.

(2012). Reducing endorsement of benevolent and modern sexist beliefs: Differential effects of addressing harm versus pervasiveness of benevolent sexism. Social Psychology, 43(3), 127–137. doi:10.1027/1864-9335/a000091

Becker

J. C.

Wright

S. C.

(2011). Yet another dark side of chivalry: Benevolent sexism undermines and hostile sexism motivates collective action for social change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 62–77. doi:10.1037/a0022615

Calogero

R. M.

Jost

J. T.

(2011). Self-subjugation among women: Exposure to sexist ideology, self-objectification, and the protective function of the need to avoid closure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 211–228. doi:10.1037/a0021864

Carlson

E. N.

Furr

R. M.

(2013). Resolution of meta-accuracy: Should people trust their beliefs about how others see them? Social Psychological and Personality Science, 4, 419–426. doi:10.1177/1948550612461653

Carlson

E. N.

Furr

R. M.

Vazire

(2010). Do we know the first impressions we make? Evidence for idiographic meta-accuracy and calibration of first impressions. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 1, 94–98. doi:10.1177/1948550609356028

Clement

R. W.

Krueger

(2002). Social categorization moderates social projection. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 219–231. doi:10.1016/jesp.2011.1503

Dardenne

Dumont

Bollier

(2007). Insidious dangers of benevolent sexism: Consequences for women’s performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 764–779. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.93.5.764

Finchilescu

(2010). Intergroup anxiety in interracial interaction: The role of prejudice and metastereotypes. Journal of Social Issues, 66, 334–351. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.2010.01648.x

10.

Frey

F. E.

Tropp

L. R.

(2006). Being seen as individuals versus as group members: Extending research on metaperception to intergroup contexts. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 265–280. doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr1003_5

11.

Glick

Diebold

Bailey-Werner

Zhu

(1997). The two faces of Adam: Ambivalent sexism and polarized attitudes toward women. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 1323–1334. doi:10.1177/01461672972312009

12.

Glick

Fiske

S. T.

(1996). The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491–512. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.491

13.

Glick

Fiske

S. T.

(2001). An ambivalent alliance: Hostile and benevolent sexism as complementary justifications for gender inequality. American Psychologist, 56, 109–118. doi:10.1037/10003-066x.56.2.109

14.

Glick

Fiske

S. T.

Mladinic

Saiz

J. L.

Abrams

Masser

… López López

(2000). Beyond prejudice as simple antipathy: Hostile and benevolent sexism across cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 763–775. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.79.5.763

15.

Good

J. J.

Rudman

L. A.

(2010). When female applicants meet sexist interviewers: The costs of being a target of benevolent sexism. Sex Roles, 62(7), 481–493. doi:10.1007/s11199-009-9685-6

16.

Hebl

M. R.

King

Glick

Singletary

S. L.

Kazama

S. M.

(2007). Hostile and benevolent reactions toward pregnant women: Complementary interpersonal punishments and rewards that maintain traditional roles. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1499–1511. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.6.1499

17.

Jackman

M. R.

(1994). The velvet glove: Paternalism and conflict in gender, class, and race relations. Berkeley: University of California Press.

18.

Jost

J. T.

Kay

A. C.

(2005). Exposure to benevolent sexism and complementary gender stereotypes: Consequences for specific and diffuse forms of system justification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 498–509. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.88.3.498

19.

Judd

C. M.

Park

Yzerbyt

Gordijn

E. H.

Muller

(2005). Attributions of intergroup bias and outgroup homogeneity to ingroup and outgroup others. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 677–704. doi:10.1002/ejsp.281

20.

Kilianski

S. E.

Rudman

L. A.

(1998). Wanting it both ways: Do women approve of benevolent sexism? Sex Roles, 39, 333–353. doi:10.1023/A:1018814924402

21.

Kruger

Gilovich

(1999). “Naive cynicism” in everyday theories of responsibility assessment: On biased assumptions of bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 743–753. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.76.5.743

22.

Krueger

Zeiger

J. S.

(1993). Social categorization and the truly false consensus effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 670–680. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.65.4.670

23.

Lammers

Gordijn

E. H.

Otten

(2008). Looking through the eyes of the powerful: Power (or lack thereof) and metastereotyping. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 1229–1238. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2008.03.015

24.

MacInnis

C. C.

Hodson

(2013). Expecting racial outgroups to see “us” as biased: A social projection explanation of Whites’ bias meta-stereotypes. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 16(5), 545–559. doi:10.1177/1368430212463454

25.

Mallett

R. K.

Wilson

T. D.

Gilbert

D. T.

(2008). Expect the unexpected: Failure to anticipate similarities leads to an intergroup forecasting error. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 265−277. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.94.2.94.2.265

26.

Martin

C. L.

(1987). A ratio measure of sex stereotyping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 489–499. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.52.3.489

27.

Miller

D. T.

(1999). The norm of self-interest. American Psychologist, 54, 1053–1060. doi: 10.1016/S1529-2096(01)03013-9

28.

Miller

D. T.

Ratner

R. K.

(1998). The disparity between the actual and assumed power of self-interest. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 53–62. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.74.1.53

29.

Moya

Glick

Expósito

de Lemus

Hart

(2007). It’s for your own good: Benevolent sexism and women’s reactions to protectively justified restrictions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 1421–1434. doi:10.1177/0146167207304790

30.

Pinel

E. C.

(1999). Stigma consciousness: The psychological legacy of social stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 114–128. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.76.1.114

31.

Pinel

E. C.

(2002). Stigma consciousness in intergroup contexts: The power of conviction. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 178–185. doi:10.1006/jesp.2001.1498

32.

Pinel

E. C.

(2004). You’re just saying that because I’m a woman: Stigma consciousness and attributions to discrimination. Self and Identity, 3, 39–51. doi: doi:10.1080/13576500342000031

33.

Pinel

E. C.

Paulin

(2005). Stigma consciousness at work. Basic and Applied Social Psychology,27, 345–352. doi:10.1207/s15324834basp2704_7

34.

Ratner

R. K.

Miller

D. T.

(2001). The norm of self-interest and its effect on social action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 5–16. doi:10.1U37//0022-3514.81.1.5

35.

Robbins

J. M.

Krueger

J. I.

(2005). Social projection to ingroups and outgroups: A review and meta-analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 9, 32–47. doi:0.1207/s15327957pspr0901_3

36.

Rudman

L. A.

Fairchild

(2004). Reactions to counterstereotypic behavior: The role of backlash in cultural stereotype maintenance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 157–176. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.87.2.157

37.

Rudman

L. A.

Fetterolf

J. C.

Sanchez

D. T.

(2013). What motivates the sexual double standard? More support for male versus female control theory. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 251–263. doi:10.1177/0146167212472375

38.

Rudman

L. A.

Glick

(2008). The social psychology of gender: How power and intimacy shape gender relations. New York, NY: Guilford.

39.

Rudman

L. A.

Mescher

(2012). Of animals and objects: Men’s implicit dehumanization of women and male sexual aggression. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 734–746. doi:10.1177/0146167212436401

40.

Saguy

Kteily

(2011). Inside the opponent’s head: Perceived losses in group position predict accuracy in metaperceptions between groups. Psychological Science,22, 951–958. doi:10.1177/0956797611412388

41.

Shelton

J. N.

Richeson

J. A.

(2005). Intergroup contact and pluralistic ignorance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 91–107. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.88.1.91

42.

Son

Shelton

J. N.

(2011). Stigma consciousness among Asian Americans: Impact of positive stereotypes in interracial roommate relationships. Asian American Journal of Psychology, 2(1), 51–60. doi:10.1037/a0022651

43.

Stout

J. G.

Dasgupta

Hunsinger

McManus

(2011). STEMing the tide: Using ingroup experts to inoculate women’s self-concept and professional goals in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 255–270. doi:10.1037/a0021385

44.

Swim

J. K.

Hyers

L. L.

Cohen

L. L.

Ferguson

M. J.

(2001). Everyday sexism: Evidence for its incidence, nature, and psychological impact from three daily diary studies. Journal of Social Issues, 57(1), 31–53. doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00200

45.

Vescio

T. K.

Gervais

S. J.

Snyder

Hoover

(2005). Power and the creation of patronizing environments: The stereotype-based behaviors of the powerful and their effects on female performance in masculine domains. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 658–672. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.88.4.658

46.

Viki

G. T.

Abrams

Hutchison

(2003). The “true” romantic: Benevolent sexism and paternalistic chivalry. Sex Roles, 49(9–10), 533–537. doi:0.1023/A:1025888824749

47.

Young

D. M.

Rudman

L. A.

Buettner

H. M.

McLean

M. C.

(2013). The influence of female role models on women’s implicit science cognitions. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 37(3), 283–292. doi:10.1177/0361684313482109

How accurate are metaperceptions of sexism? Evidence for the illusion of antagonism between hostile and benevolent sexism

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References