The present research investigates the effects of social exclusion on attitudes toward ethnic and religious minorities. Native-born German participants who were socially excluded rather than included reported greater approval for stricter legislation regarding the naturalization of immigrants (Study 1), reported greater prejudice against openly observant Muslims (Studies 2 and 3), and stronger agreement with the view that immigrants are financial burdens to the state (Study 4). Social exclusion threatens the sense of personal control, which in turn leads to stronger rejection of stigmatized outgroups (Study 3). When perceived control was experimentally enhanced, the social exclusion effect disappeared (Study 4). The theoretical and practical implications of these findings are discussed.
AltemeyerB. (1996). The authoritarian specter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
5.
AydinN.FischerP.FreyD. (2010). Turning to God in times of ostracism: The impact of social exclusion on religiousness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 742–753. doi:10.1177/0146167210367491
6.
BalkeD.El-MenouarY.RastetterR. U. (2009). Einschätzungen von Kosten durch Zuwanderer [Assessment of costs caused by immigrants]. In Glöckner-RistA. (Ed.), Zusammenstellung sozialwissenschaftlicher Items und Skalen. ZISVersion 13.00. Bonn, Germany: GESIS.
7.
Bar-AnanY.NosekB. A.VianelloM. (2009). The sorting paired features task: A measure of association strengths. Experimental Psychology, 56, 329–343. doi:10.1027/1618-3169.56.5.329
8.
BaumeisterR. F.LearyM. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497–529. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497
9.
BaumeisterR. F.TwengeJ. M.NussC. K. (2002). Effects of social exclusion on cognitive processes: Anticipated aloneness reduces intelligent thought. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 817–827. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.83.4.817
10.
BernsteinM. J.ClaypoolH. M. (2012). Social exclusion and pain sensitivity: Why exclusion sometimes hurts and sometimes numbs. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 185–196. doi:10.1177/0146167211422449
11.
BuckleyK. E.WinkelR. E.LearyM. R. (2004). Reactions to acceptance and rejection: Effects of level and sequence of relational evaluation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 14–28. doi:10.1016/S0022-1031(03)00064-7
12.
Canetti-NisimD.HalperinE.SharvitK.HobfollS. E. (2009). A new stress-based model of political extremism. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 53, 363–389. doi:10.1177/0022002709333296
13.
Carter-SowellA. R.ChenZ.WilliamsK. D. (2008). Ostracism increases social susceptibility. Social Influence, 3, 143–153. doi:10.1080/15534510802204868
14.
CaseT. I.WilliamsK. D. (2004). Ostracism: A metaphor for death. In GreenbergJ.KooleS. L.PyszczynskiT. (Eds.), Handbook of experimental existential psychology (pp. 336–351). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
15.
CohenF.OgilvieD. M.SolomonS.GreenbergJ.PyszczynskiT. (2005). American roulette: The effect of reminders of death on support for George W. Bush in the 2004 presidential election. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 5, 177–187. doi:10.1111/j.1530-2415-2005-00063.x
16.
DeWallC. N.BaumeisterR. F. (2006). Alone but feeling no pain: Effects of social exclusion on physical pain tolerance and pain threshold, affective forecasting, and interpersonal empathy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 1–15. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.91.1.1
17.
DeWallC. N.ManerJ. K.RoubyD. A. (2009). Social exclusion and early-stage interpersonal perception: Selective attention to signs of acceptance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 729–741. doi:10.1037/a0014634
18.
DovidioJ. F.KawakamiK.JohnsonC.JohnsonB.HowardA. (1997). The nature of prejudice: Automatic and controlled processes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33, 510–540. doi:10.1006/jesp.1997.1331
19.
DuckittJ.FisherK. (2003). The impact of social threat on worldview and ideological attitudes. Political Psychology, 24, 199–222. doi:10.1111/0162-895X.00322
20.
EisenbergerN. I.LiebermanM. D.WilliamsK. D. (2003). Does exclusion hurt? An fMRI study of social exclusion. Science, 302, 290–292. doi:10.1126/science.1089134
21.
FazioR. H.SanbonmatsuD. M.PowellM. C.KardesF. R. (1986). On the automatic activation of attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 229–238. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.50.2.229
FritscheI.JonasE.AblasserC.BeyerM.KubanJ.MangerA.-M.SchutzM. (2013). The power of we: Evidence for group-based control restoration. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 19–32. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2012.07.014
24.
FritscheI.JonasE.FankhänelT. (2008). The role of control motivation in mortality salience effects on group support and defense. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 524–541. doi:10.1037/a0012666
25.
GreenawayK. H.LouisW. R.HornseyM. J.JonesJ. M. (2013). Perceived control qualifies the effects of threat on prejudice. British Journal of Social Psychology. Advance online publication. doi:10.1111/bjso.12049
26.
GreenbergJ.PyszczynskiT.SolomonS. (1986). The causes and consequences of a need for self-esteem: A terror management theory. In BaumeisterR. F. (Ed.), Public self and private self (pp. 189–212). New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
27.
HayesA. F.PreacherK. J. (in press). Statistical mediation analysis with a multicategorical independent variable. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology.
28.
HeitmeyerW. (2006). Deutsche Zustände. Folge 4 [German conditions. Series 4]. Frankfurt, Germany: Suhrkamp.
29.
HeitmeyerW. (2007). Deutsche Zustände. Folge 5 [German conditions. Series 5]. Frankfurt, Germany: Suhrkamp.
30.
HoggM. A. (2012). Uncertainty-identity theory. In van LangeP. A. M.KruglanskiA. W.HigginsE. T. (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (Vol.2, pp. 62–80). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
31.
HoggM. A.MeehanC.FarquharsonJ. (2010). The solace of radicalism: Self-uncertainty and group identification in the face of threat. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 1061–1066. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2010.05.005
32.
JamiesonJ. P.HarkinsS. G.WilliamsK. D. (2010). Need threat can motivate performance after ostracism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 690–702. doi:10.1177/0146167209358882
33.
JoinerT. (2011). Lonely at the top. New York, NY: Palgrave MacMillan.
34.
JostJ. T.GlaserJ.KruglanskiA. W.SullowayF. J. (2003). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 339–375. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.129.3.339
35.
KayA. C.GaucherD.NapierJ. L.CallanM. J.LaurinK. (2008). God and the government: Testing a compensatory control mechanism for the support of external systems. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 18–35. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.95.1.18
36.
KayA. C.WhitsonJ. A.GaucherD.GalinskyA. D. (2009). Compensatory control: Achieving order through the mind, our institutions, and the heavens. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18, 264–268. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01649.x
37.
KirkpatrickL. A.WaughC. E.ValenciaA.WebsterG. D. (2002). The functional domain specificity of self-esteem and the differential prediction of aggression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 756–767. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.82.5.756
38.
KruglanskiA. W.OrehekE. (2011). The role of the quest for personal significance in motivating terrorism. In ForgasJ. P.KruglanskiA. W.WilliamsK. D. (Eds.), Social conflict and aggression (pp.153–164). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
39.
LearyM. R. (2007). Motivational and emotional aspects of the self. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 317–344. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085658
40.
LearyM. R.KowalskiR. M.SmithL.PhillipsS. (2003). Teasing, rejection, and violence: Case studies of the school shootings. Aggressive Behavior, 29, 202–214. doi:10.1002/ab.10061
41.
LearyM. R.TwengeJ. M.QuinlivanE. (2006). Interpersonal rejection as a determinant of anger and aggression. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 111–132. doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr1002_2
42.
LefcourtH. M. (1982). Locus of control: Current trends in the theory and research. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
43.
ManerJ. K.DeWallC.BaumeisterR. F. (2007). Does social exclusion motivate interpersonal reconnection? Resolving the “porcupine problem.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 42–55. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.92.1.42
PickettC. L.GardnerW. L.KnowlesM. (2004). Getting a cue: The need to belong and enhanced sensitivity to social cues. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 1095–1107. doi:10.1177/0146167203262085
46.
RosenthalR.RosnowR. L. (1985). Contrast analysis: Focused comparisons in the analysis of variance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
47.
SapolskyR. M. (2001). A primate’s memoir. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
48.
SchaafsmaJ.WilliamsK. D. (2012). Exclusion, intergroup hostility, and religious fundamentalism. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 829–837. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2012.02.015
49.
SidaniusJ.PrattoF. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
TajfelH.TurnerJ. C. (1986). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In WorchelS.AustinW. (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 2–24). Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall.
53.
TwengeJ. M.BaumeisterR. F.DeWallC. N.CiaroccoJ. N.BartelsJ. M. (2007). Social exclusion decreases prosocial behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 56–66. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.92.1.56
54.
TwengeJ. M.BaumeisterR. F.TiceD. M.StuckeT. S. (2001). If you can’t join them, beat them: Effects of social exclusion on aggressive behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 1058–1069. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.81.6.1058
55.
WarburtonW. A.WilliamsK. D.CairnsD. R. (2006). When ostracism leads to aggression: The moderating effects of control deprivation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 213–220. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2005.03.005
56.
WatsonD.ClarkL. A.TellegenA. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063–1070. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063
57.
WilliamsK. D. (2007). Ostracism. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 425–452. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085641
58.
WilliamsK. D. (2009). Ostracism: A temporal need-threat model. In ZannaM. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol.41, pp. 279–314). New York, NY: Academic Press.
59.
WilliamsK. D.JarvisB. (2006). Cyberball: A program for use in research on interpersonal ostracism and acceptance. Behavior Research Methods, 38, 174–180. doi:10.3758/BF03192765
60.
WilliamsK. D.NidaS.A. (2011). Ostracism: Consequences and coping. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20, 71–75. doi:10.1177/0963721411402480
61.
ZadroL.WilliamsK. D.RichardsonR. (2004). How low can you go? Ostracism by a computer lowers belonging, control, self-esteem, and meaningful existence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 560–567. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2003.11.006
62.
ZickA.KüpperB.HövermannA. (2011). Intolerance, prejudice and discrimination. A European report. Berlin, Germany: Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung.
63.
ZickA.KüpperB.WolfH. (2010). Wie feindselig ist Europa? Ausmaße von Gruppenbezogener Menschenfeindlichkeit in acht Ländern [How hostile is Europe? Degrees of group-focused emnity in eight countries]. In HeitmeyerW. (Ed.), Deutsche Zustände (pp. 39–60). Berlin, Germany: Suhrkamp.
