COVID-19-related incidents of xenophobia have hit the headlines. We asked participants to read about a rejection episode targeting a foreigner and we manipulated whether the rejection was motivated by COVID-19 fears or by no specific reasons. In the COVID-19 condition, the perpetrator was perceived as moral but as experiencing shame and guilt, while the target was seen as experiencing social pain. Helping intentions were predicted by either the perceived victim's social pain or morality and blame associated with the perpetrator.
AbramsD.VikiG. T.MasserB.BohnerG. (2003). Perceptions of stranger and acquaintance rape: The role of benevolent and hostile sexism in victim blame and rape proclivity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(1), 111–125. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.1.111
2.
BanduraA.BarbaranelliC.CapraraG. V.PastorelliC. (1996). Mechanisms of moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(2), 364–374. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.71.2.364
3.
BerkowitzL. (1972). Social norms, feelings, and other factors affecting helping and altruism. In BerkowitzL. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 6, pp. 63–108). Academic Press.
4.
BishopG. D.AlvaA. L.CantuL.RittimanT. K. (1991). Responses to persons with AIDS: Fear of contagion or stigma?Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 21(23), 1877–1888. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1991.tb00511.x
5.
BlackhartG. C.NelsonB. C.KnowlesM. L.BaumeisterR. F. (2009). Rejection elicits emotional reactions but neither causes immediate distress nor lowers self-esteem: A meta-analytic review of 192 studies on social exclusion. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13(4), 269–309. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868309346065
6.
BrambillaM.RusconiP.SacchiS.CherubiniP. (2011). Looking for honesty: The primary role of morality (vs. sociability and competence) in information gathering. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41(2), 135–143. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.744
7.
BrambillaM.SacchiS.PagliaroS.EllemersN. (2013). Morality and intergroup relations: Threats to safety and group image predict the desire to interact with outgroup and ingroup members. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49(5), 811–821. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2013.04.005
8.
ChowR. M.TiedensL. Z.GovanC. L. (2008). Excluded emotions: The role of anger in antisocial responses to ostracism. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44(3), 896–903. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2007.09.004
9.
CohenT. R.MontoyaR. M.InskoC. A. (2006). Group morality and intergroup relations: Cross-cultural and experimental evidence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32(11), 1559–1572. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0146167206291673
FaulknerJ.SchallerM.ParkJ. H.DuncanL. A. (2004). Evolved disease-avoidance mechanisms and contemporary xenophobic attitudes. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 7(4), 333–353. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1368430204046142
12.
FaulknerN.BliucA. M. (2016). ‘It’s okay to be racist’: Moral disengagement in online discussions of racist incidents in Australia. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 39(14), 2545–2563. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30792-3
13.
GilesH.ReidS. A.HarwoodJ. (Eds.). (2010). The dynamics of intergroup communication. Peter Lang.
14.
GinoF.ShuL. L.BazermanM. H. (2010). Nameless+harmless=blameless: When seemingly irrelevant factors influence judgment of (un)ethical behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 111(2), 93–101. https://dx.https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1238661
15.
GómezÁ.MoralesJ. F.HartS.VázquezA.SwannW. B.Jr (2011). Rejected and excluded forevermore, but even more devoted: Irrevocable ostracism intensifies loyalty to the group among identity-fused persons. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(12), 1574–1586. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0146167211424580
16.
HarwoodJ.GilesH.PalomaresN. A. (2005). Intergroup theory and communication processes. In HarwoodJ.GilesH. (Eds.), Intergroup communication: Multiple perspectives (pp. 1–17). Peter Lang.
17.
HarwoodJ.RoyA. (2005). Social identity theory and mass communication research. In HarwoodJ.GilesH. (Eds.), Intergroup communication: Multiple perspectives (pp. 189–211). Peter Lang.
HayesA. F. (2017). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford Press.
20.
HeiderF. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. John Wiley.
21.
JoyceN.HarwoodJ. (2014). Improving intergroup attitudes through televised vicarious intergroup contact: Social cognitive processes of ingroup and outgroup information. Communication Research, 41(5), 627–643. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0093650212447944
22.
KeblusekL.GilesH.MaassA.GardikiotisA. (2018). Intersections of intergroup communication research. Atlantic Journal of Communication, 26(2), 75–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/15456870.2018.1432618
LeachC. W.BilaliR.PagliaroS. (2015). Groups and morality. In SimpsonJ.DovidioJ. F. (Eds.), APA handbook of personality and social psychology, Vol. 2: Interpersonal relationships and group processes (pp. 123–149). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/14342-019.
25.
LeidnerB.CastanoE. (2012). Morality shifting in the context of intergroup violence. European Journal of Social Psychology, 42(1), 82–91. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.846
MarschallD. E.SanftnerJ.TangneyJ. P. (1994). State shame and guilt scale. George Mason University.
28.
MastenC. L.EisenbergerN. I.PfeiferJ. H.DaprettoM. (2010). Witnessing peer rejection during early adolescence: Neural correlates of empathy for experiences of social exclusion. Social Neuroscience, 5(5-6), 496–507. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470919.2010.490673
29.
MerrittA. C.EffronD. A.MoninB. (2010). Moral self-licensing: When being good frees us to be bad. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4(5), 344–357. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2010.00263.x
PagliaroS.BrambillaM.SacchiS.D’AngeloM.EllemersN. (2013). Initial impressions determine behaviours: Morality predicts the willingness to help newcomers. Journal of Business Ethics, 117(1), 37–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1508-y
32.
PaluckE. L. (2009). Reducing intergroup prejudice and conflict using the media: A field experiment in Rwanda. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(3), 574–587. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0011989
33.
PersonB.SyF.HoltonK.GovertB.LiangA. (2004). Fear and stigma: The epidemic within the SARS outbreak. Emerging Infectious Diseases, 10(2), 358–363. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid1002.030750.
34.
PowerJ. G.MurphyS. T.CooverG. (1996). Priming prejudice: How stereotypes and counter-stereotypes influence attribution of responsibility and credibility among ingroups and outgroups. Human Communication Research, 23(1), 36–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1996.tb00386.x
35.
ReederG. D.KumarS.Hesson-McInnisM. S.TrafimowD. (2002). Inferences about the morality of an aggressor: The role of perceived motive. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(4), 789–803. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.83.4.789
36.
RivaP.WirthJ. H.WilliamsK. D. (2011). The consequences of pain: The social and physical pain overlap on psychological responses. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41(6), 681–687. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.837
37.
SmithR. D. (2006). Responding to global infectious disease outbreaks: Lessons from SARS on the role of risk perception, communication and management. Social Science & Medicine, 63(12), 3113–3123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.08.004
Van AsscheJ.PolitiE.Van DesselP.PhaletK. (2020). To punish or to assist? Divergent reactions to ingroup and outgroup members disobeying social distancing. British Journal of Social Psychology, 59(3), 594–606. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12395
40.
White-AjmaniM. L.BursikK. (2014). Situational context moderates the relationship between moral disengagement and aggression. Psychology of Violence, 4(1), 90–100. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/a0031728
41.
WillG. J.CroneE. A.van den BosW.GüroğluB. (2013). Acting on observed social exclusion: Developmental perspectives on punishment of excluders and compensation of victims. Developmental Psychology, 49(12), 2236–2244. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032299
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
