The study adopted a group status perspective to examine the relationships between social dominance orientation (SDO), prejudice, and “Vladimir’s choice” tendency. It was hypothesized that for high-status group members (Israeli Jews), high SDO levels will be followed by increases in prejudice and “Vladimir’s choice” tendency, while for the low-status group (Israeli Arabs), a negative relationship should appear between SDO and the intergroup measures. The research sample comprising 100 Israeli Jews and 85 Israeli Arabs completed SDO and prejudice questionnaires, and performed a resource allocation task. As hypothesized, group status moderated the relationship between SDO and group prejudice. Contrary to our expectations, however, both samples exhibited a positive relationship between SDO and negative group prejudice. A positive relationship was also found between SDO and the positive prejudice factor in the Jewish sample, while no significant relationship was found between SDO and the positive prejudice factor in the Arab sample. Only group status correlated with Vladimir’s choice preferences.
AikenL. S.WestS. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
2.
Al-HajM. (2000). Identity and orientation among the Arabs in Israel: A situation of dual periphery. In GavinsonR.HekerD. (Eds.), The Jewish-Arab rift in Israel: A reader (pp. 13–33). Jerusalem, Israel: The Israeli Democracy Institution.
3.
BrewerM. B. (1979). In-group bias in the minimal intergroup situation: A cognitive-motivational analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 86(2), 307–324. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.307
4.
JostJ. T.BanajiM. R.NosekB. A. (2004). A decade of system justification theory: Accumulated evidence of conscious and unconscious bolstering of the status quo. Political Psychology, 25, 881–919. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2004.00402.x
5.
JostJ. T.ThompsonE. P. (2000). Group-based dominance and opposition to equality as independent predictors of self-esteem, ethnocentrism, and social policy attitudes among African Americans and European Americans. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36, 209–232. doi: 10.1006/jesp.1999.1403
6.
KretzmerD. (1990). The legal status of Arabs in Israel. Series: Westview Special Studies on the Middle East. Boulder, CO: Westview.
7.
LevinS.FedericoC. M.SidaniusJ.RabinowitzJ. L.(2002). Social dominance orientation and intergroup bias: The legitimation of favoritism for high status groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(2), 144–157. doi: 10.1177/0146167202282002
8.
LevinS.SidaniusJ. (1999). Social dominance and social identity in the United States and Israel: In-group favoritism or out-group derogation?Political Psychology, 20(1), 99–126. doi: 10.1111/0162-895X.00138
9.
MaruyamaG. M. (1998). Basics of structural equation modeling. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
10.
MullenB.BrownR.SmithC. (1992). In-group bias as a function of salience, relevance, and status: An integration. European Journal of Social Psychology, 22(2), 103–122. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.2420220202
11.
NavarreteC. D.McDonaldM. M.MolinaL. E.SidaniusJ. (2010). Prejudice at the nexus of race and gender: An outgroup male target hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(6), 933–945. doi: 10.1037/a0017931
12.
PrattoJ.SidaniusJ.LevinS. (2006). Social dominance theory and the dynamics of intergroup relations: Taking stock and looking forward. European Review of Social Psychology, 17, 271–320. doi: 10.1080/10463280601055772
13.
PrattoF.SidaniusJ.StallworthL. M.MalleB. F. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 741–763.doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.67.4.741
14.
PrattoF.TatarD. G.Conway-LanzS. (1999). Who gets what and why: Determinants of social allocations. Political Psychology, 20(1), 127–150. doi: 10.1111/0162-895X.00139
15.
RubinM.HewstoneM. (2004). Social identity, system justification, and social dominance: Commentary on Reicher, Jost et al., and Sidanius et al. Political Psychology, 25, 823–844. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2004.00400.x
16.
SchmittM. T.BranscombeN. R.KappenD. (2003). Attitudes toward group-based inequality: Social dominance or social identity?British Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 161–186. doi: 10.1348/014466603322127166
17.
SchwarzwaldJ.Tur-KaspaM. (1997). Perceived threat and social dominance as determinants of prejudice toward Russian and Ethiopian immigrants in Israel [Hebrew]. Megamot, 38, 504–527.
18.
SidaniusJ. (1993). The psychology of group conflict and the dynamics of oppression: A social dominance perspective. In IyengarS.McGuireW. J. (Eds.), Explorations in political psychology (pp. 183–219). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
19.
SidaniusJ.HaleyH.MolinaL.PrattoF. (2007). Vladimir’s choice and the distribution of social resources: A group dominance perspective. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 10, 259–268. doi: 10.1177/1368430207074732
20.
SidaniusJ.LevinS.FedericoC. M.PrattoF. (2001). Legitimizing ideologies: A social dominance approach. In JostJ. T.MajorB. (Eds.), The psychology of legitimacy (pp. 307–331). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
21.
SidaniusJ.PrattoF. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
22.
SidaniusJ.PrattoF.MitchellM. (1994). In-group identification, social dominance orientation, and differential intergroup social allocation. Journal of Social Psychology, 134(2), 151–167. doi: 10.1080/00224545.1994.9711378
23.
SmoohaS.(1993).Class, ethnic, and national cleavages and democracy in Israel. In SprinzakE.DiamondL. (Eds.), Israeli democracy under stress. (pp. 309–341). Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
24.
StephanW. G.YbarraO.BachmanG. (1999). Prejudice toward immigrants: An integrated threat theory. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29,2221–2237. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1999.tb00107.x
25.
StruchN.SchwartzS. H. (1989). Intergroup aggression: Its predictors and distinctness from in-group bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(3), 364–373. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.56.3.364
26.
TajfelH. (1978). Differentiation between social groups. London, UK: Academic Press.
27.
TajfelH.BilligM. G.BundyR. P.FlamentC. (1971). Social categorization and intergroup behavior. European Journal of Social Psychology, 1, 149–177. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.2420010202
28.
TajfelH.TurnerJ. C. (1986). The social identity theory of inter-group behavior. In WorchelS.AustinL. W. (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7–24). Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall.
