How do people learn to trust or distrust others? In a repeated trust game setting, we investigated the development of trust within repeated interactions. We assessed the development of relation-specific trust across different age groups, ranging from late childhood to young adulthood. The results demonstrated that within relations the older participants showed lower levels of negative reciprocity. Additionally, with increasing age both the anger towards, and punishment of, noncooperative players decreased. Further analyses showed that the differential willingness to punish violations of trust was mediated by feelings of anger. Overall, the data provide initial evidence for the role of emotion regulation in the development of interpersonal trust.
BarneyJ. B.HansenM. H. (1994). Trustworthiness as a source of competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 15, 175–190.
2.
BergJ.DickhautJ.McCabeK. (1995). Trust, reciprocity, and social history. Games and Economic Behavior, 10, 122–142.
3.
BernathM. S.FeshbachN. D. (1995). Children’s trust: Theory, assessment, development, and research directions. Applied and Preventive Psychology, 4, 1–19.
4.
BoonS. D.HolmesJ. G. (1991). The dynamics of interpersonal trust: Resolving uncertainty in the face of risk. In HindeR. A.GroebelJ. (Eds.), Cooperation and prosocial behavior (pp. 167–182). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
5.
BoyleR.BonacichP. (1970). The development of trust and mistrust in mixed-motives games. Sociometry, 33, 123–139.
6.
CamererC. F.HoT. (1999). Experience-weighted attraction in games. Econometrica, 64, 827–874.
7.
CaseyB. J.JonesR. M.HareT.A. (2008). The adolescent brain. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1124(1), 111–126.
8.
ColmanA. M. (2003). Cooperation, psychological game theory, and limitations of rationality in social interaction. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 26, 139–198.
9.
ConnorD. F.SteingardR. J.CunninghamJ. A.AndersonJ. J.MelloniR. H. (2004). Proactive and reactive aggression in referred children and adolescents. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 74, 129–136.
10.
CoxJ. C. (2002). Trust, reciprocity, and other-regarding preferences: Groups vs. individuals and males vs. females. In ZwickR.RapoportA. (Eds.), Advances in experimental business research. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
11.
DanheiserP. R.GrazianoW. G. (1982). Self-monitoring and cooperation as a self- presentational strategy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42(3), 497–505.
12.
DelgadoM. R.FrankR. H.PhelpsE. A. (2005). Perceptions of moral character modulate the neural systems of reward during the trust game. Nature Neuroscience, 8, 1611–1618.
13.
DodgeK. A.CoieJ. D. (1987). Social-information processing factors in reactive and proactive aggression in children’s peer groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 1146–1158.
14.
DufwenbergM.GneezyU. (2000). Measuring beliefs in an experimental lost wallet game. Games and Economic Behavior, 30, 163–182.
15.
DumontheilI.ApperlyI. A.BlakemoreS. J. (2010). Online usage of theory of mind continues to develop in late adolescence. Developmental Science, 13(2), 331–338.
16.
DunnJ. R.SchweitzerM. E. (2005). Feeling and believing: The influence of emotion on trust. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(5), 736–748.
17.
EisenbergN. (2000). Emotion, regulation, and moral development. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 665–697.
18.
EisenbergN.FabesR. A. (1998). Prosocial development. In DamonW. (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology. Vol. 3: Social, emotional, and personality development (pp. 701–778). New York, NY: Wiley.
19.
ErevI.RothA. E. (1998). Predicting how people play games: Reinforcement learning in games with unique strategy equilibrium. American Economic Review, 88, 848–881.
20.
FehrE. (2002). The nature of human altruism. Nature, 415, 269–272.
21.
FehrE.FischbacherU. (2003). The nature of human altruism. Nature, 425, 785–791.
22.
FukuyamaF. (1995). Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity. New York, NY: Free Press.
23.
GouldnerA. (1960). The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. American Sociological Review, 25, 161–178.
24.
GulatiR. (1995). Does familiarity breed trust? The implications of repeated ties for contractual choice in alliances. The Academy of Management Journal, 38(1), 85–112.
25.
GüroğluB.van den BosW.CroneE. A. (2009) Fairness considerations: Increasing understanding of intentionality in adolescence. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 104, 398–409.
26.
HarbaughW. T.KrauseK.LidayS. G.VesterlundL. (2002). Trust in children. In OstromE.WalkerJ. (Eds.), Trust, reciprocity and gains from association: Interdisciplinary lessons from experimental research (pp. 302–332). New York, NY: Sage.
27.
HuangL.MurnighanJ. K. (2010). What’s in a name? Subliminally activating trusting behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 111(1), 62–70.
28.
ImberS. (1973). Relationship of trust to academic performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 28, 145–150.
29.
KahnE. H.TurielE. (1988). Children’s conceptions of trust in the context of social expectations. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 34, 403–419.
30.
KellyJ. R. (2001). Mood and emotion in groups. In HoggM. A.TindaleR. S. (Eds.), The Blackwell handbook of social psychology, Vol. 3: Group processes (pp. 164–181). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
31.
King-CasasB.SharpC.Lomax-BreamL.LohrenzT.FonagyP.MontagueP. R. (2008). The rupture and repair of cooperation in borderline personality disorder. Science, 321, 806–810.
32.
King-CasasB.TomlinD.AnenC.CamererC. F.QuartzS. R.MontagueP. R. (2005). Getting to know you: Reputation and trust in a two-person economic exchange. Science, 308, 78–83.
33.
KuglerT.BornsteinG.KocherM. G.SutterM. (2007). Trust between individuals and groups: Groups are less trusting than individuals but just as trustworthy. Journal of Economic Psychology, 28(6), 646–657.
34.
MayerR. C.DavisJ. H.SchoormanF. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. The Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709–734.
35.
McAllisterD. J. (1995). Affect- and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 24–59.
36.
McCabeK.HouserD.RyanL.SmithV.TrouardT. (2001). A functional imaging study of cooperation in two-person reciprocal exchange. Proceedings National Academy Science United States of America, 98(20), 11832–11835.
37.
MohrP.HowellsK.GeraceA.DayA.WhartonM. (2007). The role of perspective taking in anger arousal. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 507–517.
38.
MurnighanJ. K.SaxonM. S. (1998). Ultimatum bargaining by children and adults. Journal of Economic Psychology, 19, 415–445.
39.
PillutlaM. M.MurnighanJ. K. (1996). Unfairness, anger, and spite: Emotional rejections of ultimatum offers. Organizational Behavioral Human Decision Processes, 68, 208–224.
40.
PreacherK. J.HayesA. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 36, 717–731.
41.
RotenbergK. J. (1980). “A promise kept, a promise broken”: Developmental bases of trust. Child Development, 31, 614–617.
42.
RotenbergK. J.PilipenkoT. A. (1983–1984). Mutuality, temporal consistency, and helpfulness in children’s trust in peers. Social Cognition, 2, 235–255.
43.
RotterJ. B. (1967). A new scale for the measurement of interpersonal trust. Journal of Personality, 53, 651–655.
44.
RotterJ. B. (1971). Generalized expectancies for interpersonal trust. American Psychologist, 26, 443–452.
45.
SeipE.van DijkW. W.RotteveelM. (2009). On hotheads and Dirty Harries: The primacy of anger in altruistic punishment. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1167, 190–196.
46.
ShroutP. E.BolgerN. (2002). Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods, 7, 422–445.
47.
SpoorJ. R.KellyJ. R. (2004). The evolutionary significance of affect in groups: Communication and group bonding. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 7(4), 398–412.
48.
StoutenJ.De CremerD.van DijkE. (2009). Behavioral (in)tolerance of equality violation in social dilemmas: When trust affects contribution decisions after violations of equality. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 12, 517–531.
49.
SullivanJ. L.TransueJ. E. (1999). The psychological underpinnings of democracy: A selective review of research on political tolerance, interpersonal trust, and social capital. Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 625–650.
50.
SutterM. (2007). Outcomes versus intentions: On the nature of fair behavior and its development with age. Journal of Economic Psychology, 28, 69–78.
51.
SutterM.KocherM. G. (2007). Trust and trustworthiness across different age groups. Games and Economic Behavior, 59(2), 364–382.
52.
van den BosW.van DijkE.WestenbergP. M.RomboutsS. A.R. B.CroneE. A. (2011). Changing brains, changing perspectives. Psychological Science, 22(1), 60–70.
53.
van den BosW.WestenbergP. M.van DijkE.CroneE. A. (2010). Development of trust and reciprocity in adolescence. Cognitive Development, 25(1), 90–102.
54.
WentzelK. R. (1991). Relations between social competence and academic achievement in early adolescence. Child Development, 62(5), 1066–1078.
55.
WinstokZ. (2009). From self-control capabilities and the need to control others to proactive and reactive aggression among adolescents. Journal of Adolescence, 32(3), 455–466.
56.
WrightT. L.KirmaniA. (1977). Interpersonal trust, trustworthiness and shoplifting in high school. Psychological Reports, 41, 1165–1166.
57.
YamagishiT.CookK. S.WatabeM. (1998). Uncertainty, trust, and commitment formation in the United States and Japan. American Journal of Sociology, 104, 165–194.
58.
ZakS.KnackP. (2001). Trust and growth. Economic Journal, 111, 295–321.
