The effect of stereotype content on anger versus contempt in “day-to-day” conflicts

Abstract

Depending on how involved parties appraise day-to-day conflicts, they either may feel angry or contemptuous toward the other party, which, in turn, may result in stronger confronting or avoiding intentions. In this paper we investigated how the content of stereotypes associated with the group to which an outgroup perpetrator belongs affects appraisals, emotions, and behavior. In two experiments, we demonstrated that stereotyping an outgroup as less warm resulted in increased feelings of anger, and tendencies to react forcefully toward an outgroup party in a conflict. Specifically, this effect of low stereotype warmth was explained by increased appraisals of negative intentions. Stereotyping an outgroup as less competent in the same situation elicited increased feelings of contempt, and tendencies to avoid an outgroup party in a conflict. This effect of stereotype incompetence was due to decreased appraisals of control over the other party.

Keywords

anger conflict contempt intergroup emotions stereotype content

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Arbuckle

J. L.

(2003). Amos 5.0: Update to the Amos user’s guide. Chicago, IL: Smallwaters Corporation.

Baumgartner

M. P.

(1988). The moral order of a suburb. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Brewer

M. B.

Alexander

M. G.

(2002). Intergroup emotions and images. In Mackie

D. M.

Smith

E. R.

(Eds.), From prejudice to intergroup emotions: Differential reactions to social groups (pp. 209–227). New York, NY: Psychology Press.

Chaurand

Brauer

(2008). What determines social control? People’s reactions to counter normative behaviors in urban environments. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 38, 1689–1980.

Cislak

Wojciske

(2008). Agency and communion are inferred from actions serving interests of self or others. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 1103–1110. doi:10.1002/ejsp.55410.1002/ejsp.554

Cottrell

C. A.

Neuberg

S. L.

(2005). Different emotional reactions to different groups: A sociofunctional threat-based approach to “prejudice”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 770–789. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.88.5.77010.1037/0022-3514.88.5.770

Cuddy

A. J. C.

Fiske

S. T.

Glick

(2007). The BIAS map: Behaviors from intergroup affect and stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 631–648. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.92.4.63110.1037/0022-3514.92.4.631

Cuddy

A. J. C.

Fiske

S. T.

Glick

(2008). Warmth and competence as universal dimensions of social perception: The stereotype content model and the BIAS map. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 61–149. doi: 10.1016/S0065-2601(07)00002-010.1016/S0065-2601(07)00002-0

Fazio

R. H.

Towles-Schwen

(1999). The MODE model of attitude-behavior processes. In Chaiken

Trope

(Eds.), Dual-process theories in social psychology (pp. 97–116). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

10.

Fischer

A. H.

Roseman

I. J.

(2007). Beat them or ban them: The characteristics and social functions of anger and contempt. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 103–115. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.93.1.10310.1037/0022-3514.93.1.103

11.

Fiske

S. T.

Cuddy

A. J. C.

Glick

(2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 878–902. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.82.6.87810.1037//0022-3514.82.6.878

12.

Frijda

N. H.

(1986). The emotions. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

13.

Frijda

N. H.

Kuipers

Ter Schure

(1989). Relations among emotion, appraisal, and emotional action readiness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 212–228.

14.

Hoffman

Hurst

(1990). Gender stereotypes: Perception or rationalization? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 197–208.

15.

Bentler

P. M.

(1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1.

16.

Hutcherson

C. A.

Gross

J. J.

(2011). The moral emotions: A social–functionalist account of anger, disgust, and contempt. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 719–737. doi: 10.1037/a002240810.1037/a0022408

17.

Izard

C. E.

(1977). Human emotions. New York, NY: Plenum.

18.

Kline

R. B.

(2010). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York, NY: Guildford Press.

19.

Lazarus

R. S.

Folkman

(1984). Stress, appraisal and coping. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.

20.

Mackie

D. M.

Devos

Smith

E. R.

(2000). Intergroup emotions: Explaining offensive action tendencies in an intergroup context. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 602–616. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.79.4.60210.1037//0022-3514.79.4.602

21.

Phalet

Poppe

(1997). Competence and morality dimensions of national and ethnic stereotypes: A study in six eastern-European countries. European Journal of Social Psychology, 27, 703–723.

22.

Preacher

K. J.

Hayes

A. F.

(2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879–891. doi: 10.3758/BRM.40.3.87910.3758/BRM.40.3.879

23.

Roseman

I. J.

Antoniou

A. A.

Jose

P. E.

(1996). Appraisal determinants of emotions: Constructing a more accurate and comprehensive theory. Cognition and Emotion, 10, 241–277.

24.

Roseman

I. J.

Spindel

M. S.

Jose

P. E.

(1990). Appraisals of emotion-eliciting events: Testing a theory of discrete emotions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 899–915. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.59.5.89910.1037/0022-3514.59.5.899

25.

Rozin

Lowery

Imada

Haidt

(1999). The cad triad hypothesis: A mapping between three moral emotions (contempt, anger, disgust) and three moral codes (community, autonomy, divinity). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 574–586.

26.

Scherer

K. R.

(1988). Criteria for emotion-antecedent appraisal: A review. In Hamilton

Bower

G. H.

Frijda

N. H.

(Eds.), Cognitive perspectives on emotion and motivation (pp. 89–126). Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic.

27.

Scherer

K. R.

Schorr

Johnstone

(2001). Appraisal processes in emotion: Theory, methods, research. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

28.

Shrout

P. E.

Bolger

(2002). Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods, 7, 422–455. doi: 10.1037//1082-989X.7.4.42210.1037//1082-989X.7.4.422

29.

Smith

E. R.

(1993). Social identity and social emotions: Toward new conceptualizations of prejudice. In Mackie

D. M.

Hamilton

D. L.

(Eds.), Affect, cognition, and stereotyping: Interactive processes in group perception (pp. 297–315). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

30.

Smith

C. A.

Lazarus

R. S.

(1993). Appraisal components, core relational themes, and the emotions. Cognition and Emotion, 7, 233–269.

31.

Tajfel

(1974). Social identity and intergroup behaviour. Social Science Information, 13, 65–93. doi: 10.1177/05390184740130020410.1177/053901847401300204

32.

Turner

J. C.

(1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford: Blackwell.

33.

Van de Vliert

(1997). Complex interpersonal conflict behaviour: Theoretical frontiers. Hove: Psychology Press.

34.

Van Zomeren

Spears

Fischer

A. H.

Leach

C. W.

(2004). Put your money where your mouth is! Explaining collective action tendencies trough group-based anger and group efficacy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 649–664. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.87.5.64910.1037/0022-3514.87.5.649

35.

Weiner

(1980). A cognitive (attribution)-emotion-action model of motivated behavior: An analysis of judgments of help-giving. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 186–200.

36.

Wojciszke

(1994). Multiple meanings of behaviour: Construing actions in terms of competence and morality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 222–232.