Integral empathy (that stems from and is intrinsic to the outgroup) has been extensively studied in intergroup relations. In contrast, incidental empathy (that stems from factors unrelated and is extrinsic to the outgroup) still needs to be explored. In Study 1, we tested the effects of incidental empathy on outgroup perception, while in Study 2, we verified if the effects of incidental empathy on outgroup perception may be due to integral empathy felt toward it. Results show that evoking incidental empathy improves outgroup perception, which is perceived as more competent and sociable. Moreover, the positive effects of incidental empathy are partially due to the integral empathy felt toward the outgroup.
AppelbaumM.CooperH.KlineR. B.Mayo-WilsonE.NezuA. M.RaoS. M. (2018). Journal article reporting standards for quantitative research in psychology: The APA publications and communications board task force report. The American Psychologist, 73(1), 3–25. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000191
2.
Askevis-LeherpeuxF.SchiaraturaL.DouilliezC. (2012). The effect of mood on the expression of stereotypes as a function of normative pressure. Revue Internationale de Psychologie Sociale, 25(2), 41–57. https://shs.cairn.info/article/RIPSO_252_0041
3.
BatsonC. D. (1991). The altruism question: Toward a social-psychological answer. Erlbaum.
BatsonC. D.ChangJ.OrrR.RowlandJ. (2002). Empathy, attitudes, and action: Can feeling for a member of a stigmatized group motivate one to help the group?Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(12), 1656–1666. https://doi.org/10.1177/014616702237647
6.
BatsonC. D.EarlyS.SalvaraniG. (1997). Perspective taking: Imagining how another feels versus imaging how you would feel. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23(7), 751–758. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167297237008
7.
BatsonC. D.ShawL. L. (1991). Evidence for altruism: Toward a pluralism of prosocial motives. Psychological Inquiry, 2(2), 107–122. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327965pli0202_1
8.
BodenhausenG. V. (1993). Emotions, arousal, and stereotypic judgments: A heuristic model of affect and stereotyping. In MackieD. M.HamiltonD. L. (Eds.), Affect, cognition, and stereotyping: Interactive procvoc in group perception (pp. 13–37). Cambridge Academic Press.
9.
BorincaI.McAuliffeA.NightingaleA. (2024). Improving intergroup relation through humanization: The moderating role of negative direct contact and the mediating role of intergroup affect. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 27(1), 16–26. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajsp.12578
10.
BorincaI.Van AsscheJ.GronfeldtB.SainzM.AndersonJ.TaşbaşE. H. O. (2023). Dehumanization of outgroup members and cross-group interactions. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 50, 101247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2023.101247
11.
CanhamS. L.WeldrickR.ErismanM.McNamaraA.RoseJ. N.SiantzE.McFarlandM. M. (2024). A scoping review of the experiences and outcomes of stigma and discrimination towards persons experiencing homelessness. Health & Social Care in the Community, 2024(1), 2060619. https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/2060619
12.
CapozzaD.Di BernardoG. A.FalvoR. (2017). Intergroup contact and outgroup humanization: Is the causal relationship uni- or bidirectional?PLoS One, 12(1), Article e0170554. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0170554
13.
CaseyJ. P.VanmanE. J.BarlowF. K. (2025). Empathic conservatives and moralizing liberals: Political intergroup empathy varies by political ideology and is explained by moral judgment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 51(5), 678–700. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672231198001
14.
DasE.BushmanB. J.BezemerM. D.KerkhofP.VermeulenI. E. (2009). How terrorism news reports increase prejudice against outgroups: A terror management account. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(3), 453–459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2008.12.00
15.
DasguptaN.DeStenoD.WilliamsL. A.HunsingerM. (2009). Fanning the flames of prejudice: The influence of specific incidental emotions on implicit prejudice. Emotion, 9(4), 585–591. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015961
16.
DavisM. (1994). Empathy: A social psychological approach. Brown and Benchmark Publishers.
17.
DovidioJ. F.GaertnerS. L.IsenA. M.LowranceR. (1995). Group representations and intergroup bias: Positive affect, similarity, and group size. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21(8), 856–865. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167295218009
18.
DovidioJ. F.JohnsonJ. D.GaertnerS. L.PearsonA. R.SaguyT.Ashburn-NardoL. (2010). Empathy and intergroup relations. In MikulincerM.ShaverP. R. (Eds.), Prosocial motives, emotions, and behavior: The better angels of our nature (pp. 393–408). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/12061-020
19.
DovidioJ. F.Ten VergertM.StewartT. L.GaertnerS. L.JohnsonJ. D.EssesV. M.RiekB. M.PearsonA. R. (2004). Perspective and prejudice: Antecedents and mediating mechanisms. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(12), 1537–1549. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672042711
20.
EisenbergN.EggumN. D.Di GiuntaL. (2010). Empathy-related responding: Associations with prosocial behavior, aggression, and intergroup relations. Social Issues and Policy Review, 4(1), 143–180. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-2409.2010.01020.x
21.
EssesV. M.ZannaM. P. (1995). Mood and the expression of ethnic stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(6), 1052–1068. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.69.6.1052
22.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.LangA. G.BuchnerA. (2007). G* Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
23.
Fernández-PérezD.Toledano-GonzálezA.RosL.LatorreJ. M. (2022). Use of autobiographical stimuli as a mood manipulation procedure: Systematic mapping review. PLoS One, 17(6), Article e0269381. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0269381
24.
FinlayK. A.StephanW. G. (2000). Improving intergroup relations: The effects of empathy on racial attitudes. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30(8), 1720–1737. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2000.tb02464.x
25.
FiskeS. T.CuddyA. J. C.GlickP.XuJ. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(6), 878–902. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.878
26.
FiskeS. T.XuJ.CuddyA. C.GlickP. (1999). (Dis) respecting versus (dis) liking: Status and interdependence predict ambivalent stereotypes of competence and warmth. Journal of Social Issues, 55(3), 473–489. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00128
27.
FuochiG.VenezianiC. A.VociA. (2018). Exploring the social side of self‐compassion: Relations with empathy and outgroup attitudes. European Journal of Social Psychology, 48(6), 769–783. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2378
28.
GönültaşS.AyhanS. (2025). Promoting positive intergroup emotions toward refugees through perceived similarity, empathy, and justice sensitivity. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 105, 102127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2024.102127
29.
HayesA. F. (2009). Beyond Baron and Kenny: Statistical mediation analysis in the new millennium. Communication Monographs, 76(4), 408–420. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637750903310360
30.
HayesA. F. (2022). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (3rd ed.). Guilford publications.
31.
HayesA. F.ScharkowM. (2013). The relative trustworthiness of inferential tests of the indirect effect in statistical mediation analysis: Does method really matter?Psychological Science, 24(10), 1918–1927. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613480187
LernerJ. S.SmallD. A.LoewensteinG. (2004). Heart strings and purse strings: Carryover effects of emotions on economic decisions. Psychological Science, 15(5), 337–341. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00679.x
35.
LoewensteinG.LernerJ. S. (2002). The role of affect in decision making. In DavidsonR. J.SchererK. R.GoldsmithH. H. (Eds.), Handbook of affective sciences (pp. 619–642). Oxford University Press.
36.
MackieD. M.QuellerS.StroessnerS. J.HamiltonD. L. (1996). Making stereotypes better or worse: Multiple roles for positive affect in group impressions. In SorrentinoR. M.HigginsE. T. (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition, Vol. 3. The interpersonal context (pp. 371–396). The Guilford Press.
37.
PaoliniS.HarwoodJ.LogatchovaA.RubinM.MackiewiczM. (2021). Emotions in intergroup contact: Incidental and integral emotions’ effects on interethnic bias are moderated by emotion applicability and subjective agency. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 588944. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.588944
38.
PreacherK. J.HayesA. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879–891. https://doi.org/10.3758/brm.40.3.879
39.
RichinsM. T.BarretoM.KarlA.LawrenceN. (2021). Incidental fear reduces empathy for an out-group’s pain. Emotion, 21(3), 536–544. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000714
40.
SchwarzN. (2012). Feelings-as-information theory. In Van LangeP. A. M.KruglanskiA. W.HigginsE. T. (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (pp. 289–308). Sage Publication Ltd.
41.
SchwarzN.CloreG. L. (1983). Mood, misattribution, and judgments of well-being: Informative and directive functions of affective states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(3), 513–523. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.45.3.513
42.
SchwarzN.CloreG. L. (2007). Feelings and phenomenal experiences. In KruglanskiA. W.HigginsE. T. (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (2nd ed., pp. 385–407). The Guilford Press.
43.
StephanW. G.FinlayK. (1999). The role of empathy in improving intergroup relations. Journal of Social Issues, 55(4), 729–743. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00144
44.
StroessnerS. J.MackieD. M.MichalsenV. (2005). Positive mood and the perception of variability within and between groups. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 8(1), 5–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430205048619
45.
TamboriniR.HoferM.PrabhuS.GrallC.NovotnyE. R.HahnL.KlebigB. (2017). The impact of terrorist attack news on moral intuitions and outgroup prejudice. Mass Communication and Society, 20(6), 800–824. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2017.1342130
46.
ToddA. R.GalinskyA. D. (2014). Perspective‐taking as a strategy for improving intergroup relations: Evidence, mechanisms, and qualifications. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 8(7), 374–387. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12116
47.
TrifilettiE.CoccoV.PeciniC.Di BernardoG. A.CadamuroA.VezzaliL.TurnerR. N. (2019). ALongitudinal test of the bidirectional relationships between intergroup contact, prejudice, dispositional empathy, and social dominance orientation. Testing, Psychometrics, Methodology in Applied Psychology, 26(3) 385-400,. https://doi.org/10.4473/TPM26.3.5
VescioT. K.SechristG. B.PaolucciM. P. (2003). Perspective taking and prejudice reduction: The mediational role of empathy arousal and situational attributions. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33(4), 455–472. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.163
50.
VociA.PagottoL. (2009). Assunzione della prospettiva di una persona malata di AIDS. Effetti su empatia, vicinanza sé-altro e pregiudizio [Taking the perspective of a person with AIDS: Effects on empathy, self-other closeness and prejudice]. Psicologia Sociale, 4(3), 365–380. https://doi.org/10.1482/30690
51.
VohsK. D.BaumeisterR. F.LoewensteinG. (2007). Do emotions help or hurt decision making? A hedgefoxian perspective. Russell Sage Foundation Press.
52.
WangC.CoccoV. M.VezzaliL. (2022). Testing the association of positive and negative extended contact with intergroup contact intentions in China: The mediating role of intergroup anger, empathy, and happiness. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 52(5), 305–315. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12860
53.
WeinerB. (1980). A cognitive (attribution)-emotion-action model of motivated behavior: An analysis of judgments of help-giving. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(2), 186–200. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.39.2.186
54.
WeinerB.PerryR. P.MagnussonJ. (1988). An attributional analysis of reactions to stigma. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55(5), 738–748. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.55.5.738
55.
World Medical Association. (2013). World medical association declaration of helsinki: Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA, 310(20), 2191–2194. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2013.281053
