Two studies, conducted in Northern Ireland (N = 266) and Croatia (N = 261), examined the role of constructive adolescents-parents conflict management style (CAPCMS) in predicting inter-group reconciliation attitudes. We hypothesized that CAPCMS would be a unique and positive predictor of reconciliation attitudes over and above other common predictors of reconciliation attitudes, such as inter-group contact quantity and quality, and the experience of inter-group conflict. Findings from Study 1 supported this hypothesis. Study 2 replicated these findings in a different cultural context and extended them by examining the robustness of the relationship between CAPCMS and reconciliation attitudes in the presence of an individual difference measure (self-confidence in social interactions). Furthermore, both studies revealed that for adolescents with high CAPCMS the relationships between intergroup contact (quantity and quality) and reconciliation attitudes were more accentuated, and their reconciliation attitudes were less affected by their experience of conflict, relative to those with low CAPCMS.
Abu-NimerM. (2004). Education for coexistence and Arab-Jewish encounters in Israel: Potential and challenges. Journal of Social Issues, 60, 405–422.
2.
AllportG. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
3.
BanduraA. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191–215.
4.
Bar-TalD. (2007). Socio-psychological foundations of intractable conflicts. American Behavioral Scientist, 50, 1430–1453.
5.
Bar-TalD.BenninkG. H. (2004). The nature of reconciliation as an outcome and as a process. In Bar-Siman-TovY. (Ed.), From conflict resolution to reconciliation (pp. 11–38). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
6.
BekermanZ. (2009). Education programs for improving inter-group relations between Palestinians and Jews in Israel. In BanksJ. (Ed.), The Routledge international companion to multicultural education (pp. 210–222). New York, NY: Routlege.
7.
BettencourtB. A.BrewerM. B.CroakM. R.MillerN. (1992). Cooperation and the reduction of intergroup bias: The roles of reward structure and social orientation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 28, 301–319.
8.
BoalF. W.KeaneM. C.LivingstoneD. N. (1997). Them and us? Attitudinal variation among churchgoers in Belfast. Belfast: Institute of Irish Studies, Queen’s University of Belfast.
9.
BrewerM. B.MillerN. (1984). Beyond the contact hypothesis: Theoretical perspectives on desegregation. In MillerN.BrewerM. B. (Eds.), Groups in contact: The psychology of desegregation (pp. 281–302). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
10.
BrownR.CehajicS. (2008). Dealing with the past and facing the future: Mediators of collective guilt and shame in Bosnia and Herzegovina. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 669–684.
CairnsE.DarbyJ. (1998). The conflict in Northern Ireland: Causes, consequences, and controls. American Psychologist, 53, 754–760.
13.
CairnsE.HewstoneM. (2002). The impact of peacemaking in Northern Ireland on inter-group behaviour. In SalomonG.NevoB. (Eds.), The nature and study of peace education (pp. 217–228). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
CehajicS.BrownR. (2010). Silencing the past: Effect of intergroup contact on acknowledgment of ingroup atrocities. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 1, 190–196.
16.
DaddsM. R.AtkinsonE.TurnerC.BlumsG. J.LendichB. (1999). Family conflict and child adjustment: Evidence for a cognitive contextual model of intergenerational transmission. Journal of Family Psychology, 13, 194–208.
17.
FayM-T.MorrisseyM.SmythM. (1999). Northern Ireland’s troubles: The human costs. London: Pluto Press.
18.
FurrR. M.FunderD. C. (1998). A multi-modal analysis of personal negativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1580–1591.
19.
GallagherT. (2004). After the war comes peace?: An examination of the impact of the Northern Ireland conflict on young people. Journal of Social Issues, 60, 629–642.
20.
GalvinK. M.BrommelB. J. (1996). Family communication: Cohesion and change (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Harper Collins.
21.
GudykunstW. B. (1995). Anxiety/uncertainty management (AUM) theory: Current status. In WisemanR. L. (Ed.), Intercultural communication theory (pp. 8–58). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
22.
GudykunstW. B.ShapiroR. (1996). Communication in everyday intergroup encounters. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 20, 19–45.
23.
HanssonU. (2005). Troubled youth? Young people, violence and disorder in Northern Ireland. Belfast: Institute for Conflict Research.
24.
HewstoneM.CairnsE.KenworthyJ.HughesJ.TauschN.VociA.. (2008). Stepping stones to reconciliation in Northern Ireland: Inter-group contact, forgiveness and trust. In NadlerA.MalloyT.FisherJ. D. (Eds.), The social psychology of inter-group reconciliation (pp. 199–226). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
25.
HewstoneM.CairnsE.VociA.HamburgerJ.NiensU. (2006). Inter-group contact, forgiveness, and experience of ‘The Troubles’ in Northern Ireland. Journal of Social Issues, 62, 99–120.
26.
HewstoneM.CairnsE.VociA.PaoliniS.McLernonF.CrispR.NiensU.CraigJ. (2005). Inter-group contact in a divided society: Challenging segregation in Northern Ireland. In AbramsD.HoggM. A.MarquesJ. M. (Eds.), The social psychology of inclusion and exclusion (pp. 265–292). Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
27.
HewstoneM.CairnsE.VociA.McLernonF.NiensUNoorM. (2004). Intergroup forgiveness and guilt in Northern Ireland: Social psychological dimensions of ‘The Troubles’. In BranscombeN. R.DoosjeB. (Eds.), Collective guilt international perspectives (pp. 193–215). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
28.
JohnsonD.W.JohnsonR. (1995). Why violence prevention programs don’t work and what does. Educational Leadership, 52, 63–67.
29.
KosicA. (2011). The relationships between conflict management styles within the family and prejudice towards immigrants. Unpublished manuscript.
30.
KurdekL. A. (1994). Conflict resolution styles in gay, lesbian, heterosexual, nonparent, and heterosexual parent couples. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57, 705–722.
31.
LederachJ. P. (1997). Building peace: Sustainable reconciliation in divided societies. Washington, DC: Unites States Institute of Peace Press.
32.
MoeschbergerS. LDixonD. N.NiensU.CairnsE. (2005). Forgiveness in Northern Ireland: A model for peace in the midst of ‘The Troubles’. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 11, 199–214.
33.
MorganM.AlexanderA.ShanahanJ.HarrisC. (1990). Adolescents, VCRs, and the family environment. Communication Research, 17, 83–106.
34.
MurtaghB. (2002). The politics of territory: Policy and segregation in Northern Ireland. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
35.
NadlerA. (2002). Post-resolution processes: Instrumental and socio-emotional routes to reconciliation. In SalomonG.NevoB. (Eds.), Peace education: The Concept, Principles, and Practices around the World (pp. 127–142). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
36.
NadlerA.MalloyT.FisherJ. D. (Eds.) (2008). Social psychology of intergroup reconciliation. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
37.
NadlerA.ShnabelN. (2008). Intergroup reconciliation: The instrumental and socio-emotional paths and the need based model of socio-emotional reconciliation. In NadlerA.MalloyT.FisherJ. D. (Eds.), Social psychology of intergroup reconciliation (pp. 37–56). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
38.
NavesA. (2006). Power principles for peaceful living: through anger management, conflict resolution, effective communication and destructive behavior elimination. Bloomington, IN: Author House.
39.
NoorM.BrownJ. R.PrenticeG. (2008). Precursors and mediators of intergroup reconciliation in Northern Ireland: A new model. Journal of British Social Psychology, 47, 481–495.
40.
NoorM.BrownJ. R.GonzalezRManziJ.LewisC. A. (2008). On positive psychological outcomes; what helps groups with a history of conflict to forgive and reconcile with each other?Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 819–832.
41.
NoorM.BrownR.TaggartL.FernandezA.CoenS. (2010). Intergroup identity perceptions and their implications for intergroup forgiveness: The Common Ingroup Identity Model and its efficacy in the field. The Irish Journal of Psychology, 31, 151–171.
42.
NoorM.ShnabelN.HalabiS.NadlerA. (2010). When suffering begets suffering: The psychology of intergroup victimhood. Unpbulished Manuscript.
43.
PaoliniS.HewstoneM.CairnsE. (2007). Direct and indirect inter-group friendship effects: Testing the moderating role of the affective-cognitive bases of prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 1406–1420.
44.
PaoliniS.HewstoneM.CairnsE.VociA. (2004). Effects of direct and indirect cross group friendships on judgments of Catholics and Protestants in Northern Ireland: The mediating role of an anxiety-reduction mechanism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 770–786.
45.
PetrovicN. (2005). Psiholoske osnove pomirenja izmedju Srba, Hrvata i Bosnjaka [Psychological basis of reconciliation among Serbs, Croats, and Bosnians]. Institut za psihologiju. Beograd: Dokumentacioni Centar.
46.
PettigrewT. F. (1998). Inter-group contact theory. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 6585.
47.
PettigrewT.TroppL. (2006). A meta-analytic test of inter-group contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 751–783.
48.
ReillyJ.MuldoonO.ByrneS. (2004). Young men as victims and perpetrators of violence in Northern Ireland: A qualitative analysis. Journal of Social Issues, 60, 469–484.
49.
RobinA. L. (1985). Parent-adolescent conflict: A developmental problem of families. In McMahonR. J.PetersR. D. (Eds.), Childhood disorders: Behavioral-developmental approaches (pp. 244–265). New York, NY: Brunner/Mazel.
50.
RobinA. L. (1981). A controlled evaluation of problem-solving communication training with parent-adolescent conflict. Behavior Therapy, 12, 593–609.
51.
RobinA. LKentR. N.O’LearyK. D.FosterS.PrinzR. (1977). Teaching parents and adolescents problem-solving communication skills. Behavior Therapy, 8, 639–643.
52.
SchubotzD.RobinsonG. (2006). Cross-community integration and mixing: Does it make a difference?Research Update, 43. Northern Ireland Life and Times Survey 2004. Retrieved September 4, 2010from www.ark.ac.uk/publications/updates/update43.pdf
53.
ShnabelN.NadlerA. (2008). A needs-based model of reconciliation: Satisfying the differential emotional needs of victim and perpetrator as a key to promoting reconciliation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 116–132.
54.
TannerM. (1997). Croatia: A nation forged in war. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
55.
TwengeJ.CrockerJ. (2002). Race, ethnicity, and self-esteem: Meta-analyses comparing Whites, Blacks, Hispanics, Asians, and Native Americans, including a commentary on Gray-Little and Hafdahl (2000). Psychological Bulletin, 128, 371–408.
56.
Van de VliertE. (1997). Complex interpersonal behavior: Theoretical frontiers. Hove: Psychology Press.
57.
VociA.HewstoneM. (2003). Inter-group contact and prejudice toward immigrants in Italy: The mediational role of anxiety and the moderational role of group salience. Group Processes and Inter-group Relations, 6, 37–52.
