Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2017-6
Conflict Initiating Factors and Management Styles in Family and Nonfamily Intergenerational Relationships: Young Adults’ Retrospective Written Accounts
Using a content analytic approach, this study examined young adults’ retrospective written accounts about their perceived communication with family and nonfamily elders in conflict situations to uncover conflict initiating factors and management styles. Results revealed that old-to-young criticism (especially in nonfamily contexts) and competition were the most frequently reported conflict initiating factor and management style in intergenerational relationships. Also, results indicated that family elders’ use of the competing and avoiding styles were reciprocated by young adults.
BankerB. S.GaertnerS. L. (1998). Achieving stepfamily harmony: An intergroup-relations approach. Journal of Family Psychology, 12, 310-325.
2.
BergstromM. J.NussbaumJ. F. (1996). Cohort differences in interpersonal conflict: Implications for the older partied-younger care provider interaction. Health Communication, 8, 233-248.
3.
Blanchard-FieldsF.MienaltowskiA.SeayR. B. (2007). Age differences in everyday problem-solving effectiveness: Older adults select more effective strategies for interpersonal problems. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 62, 61-64.
4.
CaiD.FinkE. L. (2002). Conflict style differences between individualists and collectivists. Communication Monographs, 69, 67-87.
5.
CanaryD. J.CupachW. R. (1988). Relational and episodic characteristics associated with conflict tactics. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 5, 305-322.
6.
CanaryD. J.SpitzbergB. H. (1990). Attribution biases and associations between conflict strategies and competence outcomes. Communication Monographs, 57, 139-151.
7.
CarstensenL. L.GottmanJ. M.LevensonR. W. (1995). Emotional behavior in long-term marriage. Psychology and Aging, 10, 140-149.
8.
CichyK. E.LefkowitzE. S.FingermanK. L. (2012). Conflict engagement and conflict disengagement during interactions between adults and their parents. Journals of Gerontology, 68, 31-40.
9.
CicirelliV. G. (1981). Helping elderly parents: The role of adult children. Boston, MA: Auburn House.
10.
FingermanK. L.CharlesS. T. (2010). It takes two to tango: Why older people have the best relationships. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19, 172-176.
11.
FoxS.GilesH. (1993). Accommodating intergenerational contact: A critique and theoretical model. Journal of Aging Studies, 7, 423-451.
12.
GaertnerS. L.DovidioJ. F. (2000). Theoretical background and the common ingroup identity model. In GaertnerS. L.DovidioJ. F. (Eds.), Reducing intergroup bias: The common ingroup identity model (pp. 33-52). Ann Arbor, MI: Taylor & Francis.
13.
GilesH.DavisS.GasiorekJ.GilesJ. L. (2013). Successful aging: A communication guide to empowerment. Barcelona, Spain: Editorial Aresta.
14.
GilesH.NoelsK.WilliamsA.LimT.-S.NgS.-H.RyanE.… SomeraL. (2003). Intergenerational communication across cultures: Young people’s perceptions of conversations with family elders, nonfamily elders, and same age peers. Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology, 18, 1-30.
15.
GilesH.WilliamsA. (1994). Patronizing the young: Forms and evaluations. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 39, 33-53.
16.
HarwoodJ.RyanE. B.GilesH.TysokiS. (1997). Evaluations of patronizing speech and three response styles in a non-service-providing context. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 25, 170-195.
17.
HarwoodJ.McKeeJ.LinM.-C. (2000). Younger and older adults’ schematic representations of intergenerational communication. Communication Monographs, 67, 20-41.
18.
HummertM. L. (1990). Multiple stereotypes of elderly and young adults: A comparison of structure and evaluations. Psychology and Aging, 5, 182-193.
19.
KimK. J.CongerR. D.LorenzF. O.ElderG. H. (2001). Parent-adolescent reciprocity in negative affect and its relationship to early adult social development. Developmental Psychology, 37, 775-790.
20.
NewtonD. A.BurgoonJ. K. (1990). The use and consequences of verbal influence strategies during interpersonal disagreements. Human Communication Research, 16, 477-518.
21.
PetersonD. R. (1983). Conflict. In KelleyH. H.BerscheidE.ChristensenA.HarveyJ. H.HustonT. L.LevingerG.Petersen. . . D. R. (Eds.), Close relationships (pp. 360-396). New York, NY: Freeman.
22.
RyanE. B.GilesH.BartolucciG.HenwoodK. (1986). Psycholinguistic and social psychological components of communication by and with the elderly. Language & Communication, 6, 1-24.
23.
SchwarzB. (2010). Reciprocity in intergenerational support: A comparison of Chinese and German adult daughters. Journal of Family Issues, 31, 234-256.
24.
SolizG.GilesH. (2014). Relational and identity processes in communication: A contextual and meta-analytical review of communication accommodation theory. In CohenE. (Ed.), Communication Yearbook 38 (pp. 106-143). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
25.
SolizJ.HarwoodJ. (2006). Shared family identity, age salience, and intergroup contact: Investigation of the grandparent-grandchild relationship. Communication Monographs, 73, 87-107.
26.
SongY.ZhangY. B. (2012). Husbands’ conflict styles in Chinese mother/daughter-in-law conflicts: Daughters-in-law’s perspectives. Journal of Family Communication, 12, 57-47.
27.
WilliamsA.GilesH. (1996). Intergenerational conversations: Young adults’ retrospective accounts. Human Communication Research, 23, 220-250.
28.
WittemanH. (1992). Analyzing interpersonal conflict: Nature of awareness, type of initiating event, situational perceptions, and management styles. Western Journal of Communication, 56, 248-280.
29.
ZhangY. B. (2004). Initiating factors of Chinese intergenerational conflict: Young adults’ written accounts. Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology, 19, 299-319.
30.
ZhangY. B.HarwoodJ.HummertM. L. (2005). Perceptions of conflict management styles in Chinese intergenerational dyads. Communication Monographs, 72, 71-91.
31.
ZhangY. B.LinM.-C. (2009). Conflict-initiating factors in intergenerational relationships. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 28, 343-363.
