Social status and the pursuit of positive social identity: Systematic domains of intergroup differentiation and discrimination for high- and low-status groups
Restricted accessOtherFirst published online July, 2010
Social status and the pursuit of positive social identity: Systematic domains of intergroup differentiation and discrimination for high- and low-status groups
Research on intergroup discrimination has focused on the cognitive and motivational mechanisms involved, but the role of stereotype content has been neglected. Drawing on social identity theory and stereotype content research, the current studies investigated the role of stereotype content in intergroup differentiation and discrimination. Across two studies, students from high- and low-status groups differentiated themselves positively on stereotypes of competence and warmth respectively, and in allocations of resources in domains relevant to competence (academics, research) and warmth (sports, community outreach). Furthermore, there was evidence that discrimination by high- and low-status groups was driven by their respective stereotypes of competence and warmth. It is argued that stereotypes of competence and warmth, derived from status and power relations between groups, define the domains in which groups pursue positively distinct identities.
Abrams, D., & Hogg, M.A. ( 1988). Comments on the motivational status of self-esteem in social identity and intergroup discrimination. European Journal of Social Psychology,18, 317-334.
2.
Berger, J., Cohen, B.P., & Zelditch, M. ( 1972). Status characteristics and social interaction. American Sociological Review,37, 241-255.
3.
Bettencourt, B.A., Dorr, N., Charlton, K., & Hume, D.L. ( 2001). Status differences and in-group bias: A meta-analytic examination of the effects of status stability, status legitimacy, and group permeability. Psychological Bulletin,127, 520-542.
4.
Bourhis, R.Y., & Sachdev, I. ( 1986). The Tajfel matrices as an instrument for conducting intergroup research. Mimeo, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario.
5.
Bourhis, R.Y., Sachdev, I., & Gagnon, A. ( 1994). Intergroup research with the Tajfel matrices: Methodological notes. In M. P. Zanna & J. M. Olson (Eds.), The psychology of prejudice: The Ontario symposium (Vol. 7, pp. 209-232). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
6.
Brewer, M.B. ( 1979). In-group bias in the minimal intergroup situation: A cognitive-motivational analysis. Psychological Bulletin,86, 307-324.
7.
Buss, D.M. ( 1981). Sex differences in the evaluation and performance of dominant acts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology ,40, 147-154.
8.
Cuddy, A.J.C., Fiske, S.T., & Glick, P. (2008). Competence and warmth as universal trait dimensions of interpersonal and intergroup perception: The stereotype content model and the BIAS map. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 40, pp. 61-149). New York: Academic Press.
9.
Cuddy, A.J.C., Fiske, S.T., Kwan, V.S.Y., Glick, P., Demoulin, S., Leyens, J.-P., et al. (2009). Is the stereotype content model culture-bound? A cross-cultural comparison reveals systematic similarities and differences. British Journal of Social Psychology, 48, 1-33.
10.
Doosje, B., Ellemers, N., & Spears, R. ( 1995). Perceived intragroup variability as a function of group status and identification. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,31, 410-436.
11.
Eagly, A.H. ( 1987). Sex differences in social behaviour: A social role interpretation . Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
12.
Eagly, A.H., & Steffen, V.J. ( 1984). Gender stereotypes stem from the distribution of women and men into social roles. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,46, 735-754.
13.
Fiske, S.T., Cuddy, A.J.C., & Glick, P. ( 2007). Universal dimensions of social cognition: Warmth and competence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences,11, 77-83.
14.
Fiske, S.T., Cuddy, A.J.C., Glick, P., & Xu, J. ( 2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,82, 878-902.
15.
Fiske, S.T., Xu, J., Cuddy, A.C., & Glick, P. ( 1999). (Dis)respecting versus (dis)liking: Status and interdependence predict ambivalent stereotypes of competence and warmth. Journal of Social Issues, 55, 473-489.
16.
Glick, P., & Fiske, S.T. ( 2001a). Ambivalent stereotypes as legitimizing ideologies: Differentiating paternalistic and envious prejudice. In J. T. Jost & B. Major (Eds.), The psychology of legitimacy: Emerging perspectives on ideology, justice, and intergroup relations(pp. 278-306). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
17.
Glick, P., & Fiske, S.T. ( 2001b). An ambivalent alliance: Hostile and benevolent sexism as complementary justifications for gender inequality. American Psychologist,56, 109-118.
18.
Hayes, A.F. ( 2009). Beyond Baron and Kenny: Statistical mediation analysis in the new millenium. Communication Monographs, 76, 408-420.
19.
Hinkle, S., & Brown, R. ( 1990). Inter-group comparisons and social identity: Some links and lacunae. In D. Abrams & M. Hogg (Eds.), Social identity theory: Constructive and critical advances (pp. 48-70). New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
20.
Jost, J.T., & Banaji, M.R. ( 1994). The role of stereotyping in system-justification and the production of false consciousness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 1-27.
21.
Judd, C.M., James-Hawkins, L., Yzerbyt, V., & Kashima, Y. ( 2005). Fundamental dimensions of social judgment: Understanding the relations between judgments of competence and warmth. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,89, 899-913.
22.
Kay, A.C., & Jost, J.T. ( 2003). Complementary justice: Effects of "poor but happy" and "poor but honest" stereotype exemplars on system justification and implicit activation of the justice motive. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,85, 823-837.
23.
Kay, A.C., Jost, J.T., & Young, S. ( 2005). Victim derogation and victim enhancement as alternative routes to system justification. Psychological Science,16, 240-246.
24.
Kelly, C. ( 1993). Group identification, intergroup perceptions and collective action. European Review of Social Psychology,4, 59-83.
25.
Kervyn, N., Yzerbyt, V.Y., Demoulin, S., & Judd, C.M. ( 2008). Competence and warmth in context: The compensatory nature of stereotypic views of national groups. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 1175-1183.
26.
Leach, C.W., Ellemers, N., & Barreto, M. ( 2007). Group virtue: The importance of morality (vs. competence and sociability) in the positive evaluation of in-groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,93, 234-249.
27.
Lemaine, G. ( 1974). Social differentiation and social originality. European Journal of Social Psychology, 4, 17-52.
28.
Mullen, B., Brown, R.J., & Smith, C. ( 1992). Ingroup bias as a function of salience, relevance and status: An integration. European Journal of Social Psychology , 22, 103-122.
29.
Muller, D., Judd, C.M., & Yzerbyt, V.Y. ( 2005). When moderation is mediated and mediation is moderated . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 852-863.
30.
Preacher, K.J., & Hayes, A.F. ( 2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in simple and multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers,40, 879-891.
31.
Reichl, A.J. ( 1997). Ingroup favouritism and out-group favouritism in low status minimal groups: Differential responses to status-related and status-unrelated measures. European Journal of Social Psychology,27, 617-633.
32.
Sachdev, I., & Bourhis, R.Y. ( 1985). Social categorization and power differentials in group relations. European Journal of Social Psychology,15, 415-434.
33.
Sachdev, I., & Bourhis, R.Y. ( 1987). Status differentials and intergroup behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology,17, 277-293.
34.
Sachdev, I., & Bourhis, R.Y. ( 1991). Power and status differentials in minority and majority group relations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 21, 1-24.
35.
Sherif, M., Harvey, O.J., White, B.J., Hood, W.R., & Sherif, C.W. ( 1961). Intergroup conflict and cooperation: The robbers’cave experiment. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press.
36.
Tajfel, H. ( 1981). Social stereotypes and social groups. In J. C. Turner & H. Giles (Eds.), Intergroup behaviour (pp. 144-167). Oxford: Blackwell.
37.
Tajfel, H., Billig, M.G., Bundy, R.P., & Flament, C. ( 1971). Social categorization and intergroup behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology,1, 149-178.
38.
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J.C. ( 1979). An integrative theory of social conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33-47). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
39.
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J.C. ( 1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7-24). Chicago : Nelson Hall.
40.
Tausch, N., Kenworthy, J.B., & Hewstone, M. ( 2007). The confirmability and disconfirmability of trait concepts revisited: Does content matter? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,92, 542-556.
41.
Turner, J.C. ( 1999). Some current issues in research on social identity and self-categorization theories. In N. Ellemers , R. Spears, & B. Doosje (Eds.), Social identity: Context, commitment, content(pp. 6-34). Oxford: Blackwell.
