Feminine forms of job titles raise great interest in many countries. However, it is still unknown how they shape stereotypical impressions on warmth and competence dimensions among female and male listeners. In an experiment with fictitious job titles men perceived women described with feminine job titles as significantly less warm and marginally less competent than women with masculine job titles, which led to lower willingness to employ them. No such effects were observed among women.
AllportG. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Oxford, England: Addison-Wesley.
2.
Berryman-FinkC.VerderberK. S. (1985). Attributions of the term feminist: A factor analytic development of a measuring instrument. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 9, 51-64.
3.
BojarskaK. (2011). Wpływ androcentrycznych i inkluzywnych płciowo konstrukcji językowych na skojarzenia z płcią [Influence of androcentric and gender-inclusive lexical constructions on gender-associational responses]. Studia Psychologiczne, 49, 53-68.
4.
CuddyA. J. C.FiskeS. T.GlickP. (2008). Warmth and competence as universal dimensions of social perception: The stereotype content model and the BIAS map. In ZannaM. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 40, pp. 61-149). New York, NY: Academic Press.
5.
DealJ. J.StevensonM. A. (1998). Perceptions of female and male managers in the 1990s: Plus ça change. Sex Roles, 38, 287-300.
6.
DouglasK. M.SuttonR. M. (2014). “A giant leap for mankind” but what about women? The role of system-justifying ideologies in predicting attitudes toward sexist language. Journal of Language and Social Psychology. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0261927X14538638
7.
EllemersN.SpearsR.DoosjeB. (2002). Self and social identity. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 161-186.
8.
FiskeS. T.CuddyA. J. C.GlickP.XuJ. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 878-902.
9.
FormanowiczM.BedyńskaS.CisłakA.BraunF.SczesnyS. (2013). Side effects of gender-fair language: How feminine job titles influence the evaluation of female applicants. European Journal of Social Psychology, 43, 62-71.
10.
GlickP.FiskeS. T. (2003). An ambivalent alliance: Hostile and benevolent sexism as complementary justifications for gender inequality. American Psychologist, 56, 109-118.
11.
HardinG. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162, 1243-1248.
12.
HayesA. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
13.
JessellJ. C.BeymerL. (1992). The effects of job title vs. job description on occupational sex typing. Sex Roles, 27, 73-83.
14.
JostJ. T.KayA. C. (2005). Exposure to benevolent sexism and complementary gender stereotypes: Consequences for specific and diffuse forms of system justification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 498-509.
15.
KayA. C.JostJ. T. (2003). Complementary justice: Effects of ‘poor but happy’ and ‘poor but honest’ stereotype exemplars on system justification and implicit activation of the justice motive. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 823-837.
16.
LeeJ. F. K. (2007). Acceptability of sexist language among young people in Hong Kong. Sex Roles, 56, 285-295.
MerkelE.MaassA.FrommeltL. (2012). Shielding women against status loss: The masculine form and its alternatives in the Italian language. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 31, 311-320.
19.
PalomaresN. A. (2012). Gender and intergroup communication. In GilesH. (Ed.), The handbook of intergroup communication (pp. 197-210). New York, NY: Routledge.
20.
ParksJ. B.RobertonM. A. (2005). Explaining age and gender effects on attitudes toward sexist language. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 24, 401-411.
21.
RudmanL. A.GlickP. (1999). Feminized management and backlash toward agentic women: The hidden costs to women of a kinder, gentler image of middle managers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1004-1010.
22.
StahlbergD.BraunF.IrmenL.SczesnyS. (2007). Representation of the sexes in language. In FiedlerK. (Ed.), Social communication (pp. 163-187). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
23.
StahlbergD.SczesnyS.BraunF. (2001). Name your favorite musician: Effects of masculine generics and of their alternatives in German. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 20, 464-469.
24.
SterickerA. (1981). Does this “he or she” business really make a difference? The effect of masculine pronouns as generics on job attitudes. Sex Roles, 7, 637-641.
25.
TajfelH.TurnerJ. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In WorchelS.AustinW. G. (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7-24). Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall.
26.
WiniewskiH. M. (2010). Ciepło i kompetencja jako struktura treści stereotypów [Warmth and competence as a structure of stereotype content] (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.