Two well-established predictors of collective action are perceptions of group efficacy and feelings of anger. The current research investigates the extent to which the relative impact of these variables differs when fear is or is not also included as a predictor of collective action. The results of two experiments indicate that when fear is not assessed, the importance of anger as a predictor of action is underestimated while the importance of group efficacy is overestimated. The results further indicate that fear, in addition to affecting the impact of known causes of collective action (anger and group efficacy), is a powerful inhibitor of collective action. The implications for current theoretical models of collective action instigators are discussed.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W.H. Freeman.
4.
Bandura, A. (2000). Exercise of human agency through collective efficacy . American Psychological Society, 9, 75-78.
5.
Baron, R.M., & Kenny, D.A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
6.
Barrett, L.F., Mesquita, B., Ochsner, K.N., & Gross, J.J. (2007). The experience of emotion. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 373-403.
7.
Beiner, T., & O'Connor, M. (2007). When an individual finds herself to be the victim of sex discrimination. In F. J. Crosby , M. S. Stockdale, & S. A. Ropp (Eds.), Sex discrimination in the workplace: Multidisciplinary perspectives (pp. 19-56). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
8.
Bergman, M.E., Langhout, R.D., Palmieri, P.A., Cortina, L.M., & Fitzgerald, L.F. (2002). The (un)reasonableness of reporting: Antecedents and consequences of reporting sexual harassment . Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 230-242.
9.
Crosby, F. (1976). A model of egoistical relative deprivation. Psychological Review, 83, 85-113.
10.
Crosby, F. (1984). The denial of personal discrimination. American Behavioral Scientist, 27, 371-386.
11.
Devos, T., Silver, L.A., Mackie, D.M., & Smith, E.R. (2003). Experiencing intergroup emotions. In D. M. Mackie & E. R. Smith (Eds.), Beyond prejudice: From outgroup hostility to intergroup emotions (pp. 111-134). Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
12.
Ellemers, N., Spears, R., & Doosje, B. (1997). Sticking together or falling apart: In-group identification as a psychological determinant of group commitment verses individual mobility . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 617-626.
13.
Feagin, J., & Sikes, M.P. (1994). Living with racism: The Black middle-class experience . Boston: Beacon Press.
14.
Folger, R. (1987). Reformulating the conditions of resentment: A referent cognition model. In J. C. Masters & W. P. Smith (Eds.), Social comparison, social justice, and relative deprivation (pp. 183-215). London: Erlbaum.
15.
Garcia, D.M., Horstman Reser, A., Amo, R.B., Redersdorff, S., & Branscombe, N.R. (2005). Perceivers' responses to in-group and out-group members who blame a negative outcome on discrimination . Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 1-12.
16.
Grant, P.R., & Brown, R. (1995). From ethnocentrism to collective protest: Responses to relative deprivation and threats to social identity. Social Psychology Quarterly, 58, 195-211.
17.
Guimond, S., & Dube-Simard, L. (1983). Relative deprivation theory and the Quebec nationalist movement: The cognition-emotion distinction and the personal-group deprivation issue. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 44, 526-535.
18.
Gurney, J., & Tierney, K. (1982). Relative deprivation and social movements: A critical look at twenty years of theory and research. Sociological Quarterly, 23, 33-47.
19.
Hornsey, M.J., Blackwood, L., Louis W., Fielding, K., Mavor, K., Morton, T., O'Brien, A., Paasonen, K.E., Smith, J., & White, K.M. (2006). Why do people engage in collective action? Revisiting the role of perceived effectiveness. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36, 1701-1722.
20.
Kaiser, C.R., & Miller, C.T. (2001). Stop complaining! The social costs of making attributions to discrimination. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin , 27, 254-263.
21.
Klandermans, B. (1989). Grievance interpretation and success expectancies: The social construction of protest. Social Behavior, 4, 113-125.
22.
Klandermans, B. (1997). The social psychology of protest. Oxford: Blackwell.
23.
Koss, M. P.,Goodman, L. A.,Browne, A.,Fitzgerald, L. F.,Keita, G. P., & Russo, N. F. (Eds.) (1994). No safe haven: Male violence against women at home, at work, and in the community. Washington, DC : American Psychological Association.
24.
Kowalski, R.M. (1996). Complaints and complaining: Functions, antecedents, and consequences. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 176-196.
25.
Kramnick, I. (1972). Reflections of revolution: Definition and explanation in recent scholarship. History and Theory, 11, 26-63.
26.
Kunda, Z. (1999). Social cognition: Making sense of people. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
27.
Lazarus, R.S. (1991). Progress on a cognitive-motivational-relational theory of emotion. American Psychologist, 46, 819-834.
28.
LeBon, G. (1947). The crowd: A study of the popular mind. London: Ernest Benn. (Original work published 1895)
29.
Mackie, D.M., Devos, T., & Smith, E.R. (2000). Intergroup emotions: Explaining offensive action tendencies in an intergroup context. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 602-616.
30.
MacKinnon, D.P., Krull, J.L., & Lockwood, C.M. (2000). Equivalence of the mediation, confounding and suppression effect. Journal of Prevention Science, 1, 173-181.
31.
Mark, M., & Folger, R. (1984). Response to relative deprivation: A conceptual framework. Review of Personality and Social Psychology, 5, 192-218.
32.
Martin, J., Brickman, P., & Murray, A. (1984). Moral outrage and pragmatism: Explanations for collective action. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology , 20, 484-496.
33.
McCarthy, J.D., & Zald, M.N. (1977). Resource mobilization and social movements: A partial theory. American Journal of Sociology, 82, 1212-1241.
34.
McPhail, C. (1971). Civil disorder participation: A critical examination of recent research. American Sociological Review, 36, 1058-1073.
35.
Muller, D., Judd, C.M., & Yzerbyt, V.Y. (2005). When moderation is mediated and mediation is moderated . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 852-863.
36.
O'Connor, K., Hallam, R., & Rachman, S. (1985). Fearlessness and courage: A replication experiment . British Journal of Psychology, 76, 187-197.
37.
Preacher, K.J., & Hayes, A.F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 36, 717-731.
38.
Preacher, K.J., & Hayes, A.F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879-891.
39.
Roseman, I.J. (1984). Cognitive determinants of emotion: A structural theory. Review of Personality and Social Psychology, 5, 11-36.
40.
Smith, C.A., Haynes, K.N., Lazarus, R.S., & Pope, L.K. (1993). In search of the `hot' cognitions: Attributions, appraisals, and their relation to emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 916-929.
41.
Smith, H.J., Cronin, T., & Kessler, T. (2008). Anger, fear, or sadness: Faculty members' emotional reactions to collective pay disadvantage. Political Psychology , 29, 221-246.
42.
Smith, H.J., & Kessler, T. (2004). Group-based emotions and intergroup behavior: The case of relative deprivation. In L. Z. Tiedens & C. W. Leach (Eds.), The social life of emotions (pp. 292-313). New York: Cambridge University Press.
43.
Snyder, C.R., & Lopez, S.J. (2006) Positive psychology: The scientific and practical explorations of human strengths. London: Sage.
44.
Stangor, C., Swim, J.K., Van Allen, K.L., & Sechrist, G.B. (2002). Reporting discrimination in public and private contexts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 69-74.
45.
Swim, J.K., & Hyers, L.L. (1999). Excuse me-What did you just say?!: Women's public and private responses to sexist remarks. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 68-88.
46.
Tougas, F., & Veilleux, F. (1988). The influence of identification, collective relative deprivation, and procedure of implementation on women's response to affirmative action: A causal modeling approach. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 20, 15-27.
47.
Tropp, L.R., & Wright, S.C. (1999). Ingroup identification and relative deprivation: An examination across multiple social comparisons. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 707-724.
48.
van Zomeren, M., Postmes, T., & Spears, R. (in press). Toward an integrative Social Identity Model of Collective Action: A quantitative research synthesis of three socio-psychological perspectives . Psychological Bulletin.
49.
van Zomeren, M., Spears, R., Fischer, A., & Leach, C.W. (2004). Put your money where your mouth is! Explaining collective action tendencies through group-based anger and group efficacy . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 649-664.
50.
Walker, I., & Pettigrew, T.F. (1984). Relative deprivation theory: An overview and conceptual critique. British Journal of Social Psychology, 23, 300-310.
51.
Walker I., & Smith, H. J. (Eds.). (2002). Relative deprivation: Specification, development and integration. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
52.
Wright, S. (1997). Ambiguity, social influence, and collective action: Generating collective protest in response to tokenism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 1277-1290.
53.
Wright, S.C., Taylor, D.M., & Moghaddam, F. (1990). Responding to membership in a disadvantaged group: From acceptance to collective protest. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 994-1003.
54.
Wright, S.C., & Tropp, L.R. (2002). Collective action in response to disadvantage: Intergroup perceptions, social identification, and social change. In H. J. Smith & I. Walker (Eds.), Relative deprivation theory: Specification, development and integration (pp. 200-235). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
