An experiment was conducted to examine the situational flexibility of in-group-related attitudes at the implicit and explicit level. Seventy-one men and women with dual, Turkish-German, national identities were asked to think about positive aspects of either their German or their Turkish identity. Later, attitudes toward Germans and Turks were assessed using a single category implicit association test (SC-IAT) and self-report scales. Results showed that attitudes toward Turks were generally more positive than attitudes toward Germans, that SC-IAT scores reflecting attitudes toward Turks and Germans were unrelated, and that the identity priming affected men's, but not women's, SC-IAT scores. This finding is discussed in terms of men's greater flexibility in national identification. Explicit attitude measures were largely unaffected by the priming.
Ataca, B., & Berry, J.W. (2002). Psychological, sociocultural, and marital adaptation of Turkish immigrant couples in Canada. International Journal of Psychology, 37, 13-26.
2.
Baumeister, R.F., & Sommer, K.L. (1997). What do men want? Gender differences and two spheres of belongingness: Comment on Cross and Madson (1997). Psychological Bulletin, 122, 38-44.
3.
Beauftragte der Bundesregierung für Migration, Flüchtlinge und Integration (2004). Daten, Fakten, Trends: Strukturdaten der ausländischen Bevölkerung [Data, facts, and trends: Structural data on the immigrant population]. Bonn, Germany: Bundesbeauftragte. [Available online: http://www.integrationsbeauftragte.de/download/Strukturdaten.pdf]
4.
Berry, J.W. (1984). Cultural relations in plural societies: Alternatives to segregation and their sociopsychological implications. In N. Miller & M. B. Brewer (Eds.), Groups in contact: The psychology of desegregation . New York: Academic Press.
5.
Berry, J.W. (1999). Intercultural relations in plural societies. Canadian Psychology, 40, 12-21.
6.
Berry, J.W., Phinney, J.S., Sam, D.L., & Vedder, P. (2006). Immigrant youth: Acculturation, identity, and adaptation. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 55, 303-332.
7.
Blair, I.V. (2002). The malleability of automatic stereotypes and prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6, 242-261.
8.
Bless, H., Strack, F., & Schwarz, N. (1993). The informative functions of research procedures: Bias and the logic of conversation. European Journal of Social Psychology, 23, 149-165.
9.
Clark, H.H., & Haviland, S. (1977). Comprehension of the given-new contract. In R. Freedle (Ed.), Discourse production and comprehension (pp. 1-40). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
10.
Cota, A.A., & Dion, K.L. (1986). Salience of gender and sex composition of ad hoc groups: An experimental test of distinctiveness theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 770-776.
11.
Cross, S.E., & Madson, L. (1997). Models of the self: Self-construals and gender . Psychological Bulletin, 122, 5-37.
12.
Dasgupta, N., & Greenwald, A.G. (2001). On the malleability of automatic attitudes: Combating automatic prejudice with images of admired and disliked individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 800-814.
13.
Fazio, R.H., & Olson, M.A. (2003). Implicit measures in social cognition research: Their meaning and use. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 297-327.
14.
Fiske, S.T. (1998). Stereotyping, prejudice, and discrimination. In D. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (4th ed., Vol. 2, pp. 357-411). New York: McGraw-Hill.
15.
González, R., & Brown, R. (2003). Generalization of positive attitude as a function of subgroup and superordinate group identifications in intergroup contact . European Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 195-214.
16.
González, R., & Brown, R. (2006). Dual identities in intergroup contact: Group status and size moderate the generalization of positive attitude change. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 753-767.
17.
Greenwald, A.G. (2001). Health of the implicit association test at age 3. Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie, 48, 85-93.
18.
Greenwald, A.G., McGhee, D.E., & Schwartz, J.L.K. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464-1480.
19.
Haye, A., González, R., Ordóñez, G., Bohner, G., Siebler, F., Sirlopú, D. et al. (2007). System-perpetuating asymmetries between conscious and unconscious intergroup attitudes among indigenous and non-indigenous Chileans. Manuscript under review.
20.
Hewstone, M., Rubin, M., & Willis, H. (2002). Intergroup bias. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 575-604.
21.
Hofmann, W., Gawronski, B., Gschwendner, T., Le, H., & Schmitt, M. (2005). A meta analysis on the correlation between the Implicit Association Test and explicit self report measures. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 1369-1385.
22.
Hornsey, M.J., & Hogg, M.A. (2000). Assimilation and diversity: An integrative model of subgroup relations. Personality and Social Psychology Review , 4, 143-156.
23.
Karpinski, A., & Steinman, R.B. (2006). The single category implicit association test as a measure of implicit social cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 16-32.
24.
Kühnen, U., Schiessl, M., Bauer, N., Paulig, N., Pohlmann, C., & Schmidthals, K. (2001). How robust is the IAT? Measuring and manipulating implicit attitudes of East and West Germans. Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie, 48, 135-144.
25.
McGuire, W.J., McGuire, C.V., Child, P., & Fujioka, T. (1978). Salience of ethnicity in the spontaneous self-concept as a function of one's ethnic distinctiveness in the social environment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 511-520.
26.
Mummendey, A., & Otten, S. (1998). Positive- negative asymmetry in social discrimination . European Review of Social Psychology, 9, 107-143.
27.
Nosek, B.A., Greenwald, A.G., & Banaji, M.R. (2006). The implicit association test at age 7: A methodological and conceptual review. In J. A. Bargh (Ed.), Social psychology and the unconscious: The automaticity of higher mental processes (pp. 265-292). New York: Psychology Press.
28.
Pettigrew, T.F., & Meertens, R.W. (1995). Subtle and blatant prejudice in western Europe. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 57-75.
29.
Polat, Ü. (1998). Soziale und kulturelle Identität türkischer Migranten der zweiten Generation in Deutschland [Social and cultural identity of Turkish migrants of the second generation in Germany]. Hamburg : Kovac.
30.
Rudman, L.A. (2004). Sources of implicit attitudes. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13, 79-82.
31.
Rudman, L.A., Ashmore, R.D., & Gary, M.L. (2001). `Unlearning' automatic biases: The malleability of implicit prejudice and stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 856-868.
32.
Rudman, L.A., & Heppen, J.B. (2003). Implicit romantic fantasies and women's interest in personal power: A glass slipper effect? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 1357-1370.
33.
Schmukle, S.C., & Egloff, B. (2005). A latent state-trait analysis of implicit and explicit personality measures. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 21, 100-107.
34.
Schwarz, N., & Bohner, G. (2001). The construction of attitudes. In A. Tesser & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Vol. 1. Intraindividual processes (pp. 436-457). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
35.
Şen, F. (1999). Zur 40jährigen Geschichte der türkischen Migranten [On the 40-year history of Turkish migrants]. In G. Berger & P. Hartmann (Eds.), Soziologie in konstruktiver Absicht: Festschrift für Günter Endruweit [Sociology with constructive intent: Anniversary publication for Günter Endruweit] (pp. 255-282). Hamburg: Knut Reim.
36.
Şen, F., & Wierth, A. (1992). 1961-1991: Ein kritischer Rückblick auf die dreißigjährige Migrationsgeschichte der Türken in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland [1961-1991: A critical look back on the thirty-year migration history of Turks in the Federal Republic of Germany]. Zeitschrift für Ausländerrecht und Ausländerpolitik, 12, 75-80.
37.
Sidanius, J., Pratto, F., & Rabinowitz, J.L. (1994). Gender, ethnic status, and ideological asymmetry: A social dominance interpretation. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 25, 194-216.
38.
Siebler, F., González, R., Ordóñez, G., Bohner, G., Haye, A., Sirlopú, D. et al. (2007). The category-focus implicit association test. Manuscript under review.
39.
Strack, F., & Deutsch, R. (2004). Reflective and impulsive determinants of social behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 220-247.
40.
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior . In S. Worchel & W. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7-24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall .
41.
United Nations (2005). Human development report 2005. New York: United Nations Development Program. [Available online: http://hdr.undp.org/reports/global/2005/pdf/HDR05_complete.pdf ]
42.
Webb, E.J., Campbell, D.T., Schwartz, R.D., Sechrest, L., & Grove, J.B. (1981). Nonreactive measures in the social sciences (2nd ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
43.
Wigboldus, D.H.J., Holland, R.W., & van Knippenberg, A. (2006). Single-target implicit associations. Unpublished manuscript.
44.
Wilson, T.D., Lindsey, S., & Schooler, T.Y. (2000). A model of dual attitudes . Psychological Review, 107, 101-126.
45.
Wittenbrink, B., Judd, C.M., & Park, B. (2001). Spontaneous prejudice in context: Variability in automatically activated attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 815-827.
