This study investigated how feelings of closeness at initial acquaintance encourage the development of shared stereotypic impressions of others through conversation. At least early in a relationship, closer dyads may be especially inclined to get along with one another. In order to satisfy this goal, they should focus their conversations around easily agreed upon stereotypic attributes and spontaneously express agreement about those attributes. As a consequence, the shared impressions that they form should be relatively stereotypic. In this study, closeness was manipulated in previously unacquainted college-age dyads, who then discussed their impressions of an elderly woman. Closer dyads allocated more discussion time to stereotypic attributes, expressed agreement about those attributes, invoked stereotypic exemplars, and ultimately formed more stereotypic shared impressions. The discussion considers study limitations and possible boundary conditions of the effects, as well as implications for the transmission of outgroup stereotypes during socialization to a new ingroup.
Allport, G. W. (1954/1989). The nature of prejudice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley .
2.
Aron, A. , Melinat, E. , Aron, E. N. , Vallone, R. D. , & Bator, R. J. (1997). The experimental generation of interpersonal closeness: A procedure and some preliminary findings . Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 363-377 .
3.
Baron, R. M. , & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182 .
4.
Berger, J. , Fisek, M. H. , Norman, R. Z. , & Zelditch, M. (1977). Status characteristics and social interaction. New York: Elsevier .
5.
Craig, G. , & Duck, S. W. (1977). Similarity, interpersonal attitudes and attraction: The evaluative-descriptive distinction . British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 16, 15-21 .
6.
Duval, L. L. , Ruscher, J. B. , Welsh, K. , & Catanese, S. P. (2000). Bolstering and undercutting use of the elderly stereotype through communication of exemplars: The role of speaker age and exemplar stereotypicality . Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 22, 137-146 .
7.
Fein, S. , & Spencer, S. J. (1997). Prejudice as self-image maintenance: Affirming the self through derogating others . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 31-44 .
8.
Fiske, S. T. , & Neuberg, S. L. (1990). A continuum model of impression formation from category-based to individuating processes: Influence of information and motivation on attention and interpretation. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 1-74). New York: Academic Press .
9.
Fiske, S. T. , & von Hendy, H. M. (1992). Personality feedback and situational norms can control stereotyping processes . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 577-596 .
10.
Guimond, S. (2000). Group socialization and prejudice: The social transmission of intergroup attitudes and beliefs . European Journal of Social Psychology, 30, 335-354 .
11.
Harasty, A. S. (1997). The interpersonal nature of social stereotypes: Differential discussion patterns about in-groups and out-groups . Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 270-284 .
12.
Henderson-King, E. I. , & Nisbett, R. E. (1996). Anti-black prejudice as a function of exposure to the negative behavior of a single black person . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 654-664 .
13.
Kenny, D. A. (1988). The analysis of data from two-person relationships. In S. Duck & D. F. Hay (Eds.), Handbook of personal relationships: Theory, research and interventions (pp. 57-77). New York: Wiley .
14.
Kenny, D. A. , Kashy, D. , & Bolger, N. (1998). Data analysis in social psychology. In D. T. Gilbert , S. T. Fiske , & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (4th ed., pp. 233-265). New York: McGraw-Hill .
15.
MacKinnon, D. P. , Lockwood, C. M. , Hoffman, J. M. , West, S. G. , & Sheets, V. (2002). A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects . Psychological Methods, 7, 83-104 .
16.
Marks, G. , & Miller, N. (1987). Ten years of research on the false consensus effect: An empirical and theoretical review . Psychological Bulletin, 102, 72-90 .
17.
McCarthy, B. , & Duck, S. W. (1976). Friendship duration and responses to attitudinal agreement-disagreement . British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 15, 377-386 .
18.
Moreland, R. L. , & Levine, J. M. (1982). Socialization in small groups: Temporal changes in individual-group relations. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 137-192). New York: Academic Press .
19.
Noel, J. G. , Wann, D. L. , & Branscombe, N. R. (1995). Peripheral ingroup membership status and public negativity toward outgroups . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 127-137 .
20.
O’Farrell, K. J. , & Ruscher, J. B. (2000, February). Close friendship and information processing in response to overhearing self-relevant information . Poster presented at the meeting of the Society of Personality and Social Psychology, Nashville, TN.
21.
Preacher, K. J. , & Hayes, A. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models . Behavior research methods, instruments, and computers, 36, 717-731 .
22.
Ruscher, J. B. (2001). Prejudiced communication: A social psychological perspective. New York: Guilford .
23.
Ruscher, J. B. , & Duval, L. L. (1998). Multiple communicators with unique target information transmit less stereotypical impressions . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 329-344 .
24.
Ruscher, J. B. , & Hammer, E. D. (1994). Revising disrupted impressions through conversation . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 530-541 .
25.
Ruscher, J. B. , Hammer, E. Y. , & Hammer, E. D. (1996). Forming shared impressions through conversation: An adaptation of the Continuum Model . Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 705-720 .
26.
Ruscher, J. B. , & Hurley, M. M. (2000). Off-target verbosity evokes negative stereotypes of older adults . Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 19, 139-147 .
27.
Ruscher, J. B. , Santuzzi, A. M. , & Hammer, E. Y. (2003). Shared impression formation in the cognitively interdependent dyad . British Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 411-425 .
28.
Ryan, C. S. , & Bogart, L. M. (1997). Development of new group members’ in-group and out-group stereotypes: Changes in perceived group variability and ethnocentrism . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 719-732 .
29.
Schaller, M. , & Conway, L. G. (1999). Influence of impression-management goals on the emerging contents of group stereotypes: Support for a social-evolutionary process . Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 819-833 .
30.
Schaller, M. , Conway, L. G. , & Tanchuk, T. L. (2002). Selective pressures on the once and future contents of ethnic stereotypes: Effects of the communicability of traits . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 861-877 .
31.
Sedikides, C. , Campbell, W. K. , Reeder, G. D. , & Elliot, A. J. (1999). The relationship closeness induction task . Representative Research in Social Psychology, 23, 1-4 .
32.
Shrout, P. E. , & Bolger, N. (2002). Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations . Psychological Methods, 7, 422-445 .
33.
Stasser, G. , & Titus, W. (1985). Pooling of unshared information in group decision making: Biased information sampling during discussion . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 1467-1478 .
34.
Swann, W. B. , de la Ronde, C. , & Hixon, J. G. (1998) Authenticity and positivity strivings in marriage and courtship . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 857-869 .
35.
van Dijk, T. A. (1988). How ‘they’ hit the headlines: Ethnic minorities in the press. In G. Smitherman-Donaldson & T. A. van Dijk (Eds.), Discourse and discrimination (pp. 221-262). Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press .
36.
Wittenbaum, G. M. , Hubbell, A. P. , & Zuckerman, C. (1999). Mutual enhancement: Toward an understanding of the collective preference for shared information . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 967-978 .
37.
Wittenbaum, G. M. , & Stasser, G. (1996). Management of information in small groups. In J. L. Nye & A. M. Brower (Eds.), What’s social about social cognition? (pp. 3-28). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage .
38.
Yost, E. A. (1995, July). The role of motivation and cognitive capacity in transactive impression formation . Poster presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Society, New York.
39.
Zaccaro, S. J. , & McCoy, M. C. (1988). The effects of task and interpersonal cohesiveness on performance of a disjunctive group task . Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 18, 837-851 .
