Current attention on improving intergroup relations and participation in diverse societies compels us to understand the requisite values and skills for such participation. An action research approach examined an applied model of engagement across differences—intergroup dialogues that are facilitated in face-to-face encounters of college students from diverse social backgrounds meeting over a sustained period of time. Results show that overall program effects are evident only for racial identity outcomes—importance and centrality. However, regression analyses show students’ valuing of the dialogic learning process (e.g. peer facilitation, sharing experiences, and asking questions) is significantly related to increase in frequency of thinking about racial group membership, perspective-taking ability, comfort in communicating across differences, positive beliefs about conflict, and interest in bridging differences.
Adair, M. , & Howell, S. (1997). Breaking old patterns, weaving new ties. San Francisco: Tools for Change.
2.
Allport, G. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley.
3.
Alperin, D. J. (1990). Social diversity and the necessity of alliances: A developing feminist perspective. In L. Albrecht & R. M. Brewer (Eds.), Bridges of power: Women’s multicultural alliances (pp. 23-33). Santa Cruz, CA: New Society.
4.
Berry, J. W. (2001). A psychology of immigration. Journal of Social Issues, 57 (3), 615-631.
5.
Burbules, N. C. (1993). Dialogue in teaching: Theory and practice. New York: Teachers College Press.
6.
Cochran-Smith, M. , & Lytle, S.L. (1993). Inside/outside: Teacher research and knowledge. New York: Teachers College Press.
7.
Collins, P. H. (1996). Toward a new vision: Race, class and gender as categories of analysis and connection. In K. E. Rosenblum & T. M. Travis (Eds.), The meaning of difference: American constructions of race, sex, and gender, social class and sexual orientation (pp. 213-223). New York: McGraw-Hill.
8.
Dalton, H. (1995). Racial healing: Confronting the fear between blacks and whites. New York: Doubleday.
9.
Davis, M. (1983). Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44 (1), 113-126.
10.
Duster, T. (1993). The diversity of California at Berkeley: An emerging reformulation of competence in an increasingly multicultural world. In B. W. Thompson & S. Tyagi (Eds.), Beyond a dream deferred: Multicultural education and the politics of excellence (pp. 238-255). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
11.
Fletcher, G. J. O. , Danilovics, P., Fernandez, G., Peterson, D., & Reeder, G. D. (1986). Attributional complexity: An individual differences measure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51 (4), 875-884.
12.
Fredrickson, G. (1999). Models of American ethnic relations: A historical perspective. In D. Prentice & D. Miller (Eds.), Cultural divides: Understanding and overcoming group conflict (pp. 23-34). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
13.
Freire, P. (1972). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Continuum Books.
14.
Geranios, C. (1997). Cognitive, affective and behavioral outcomes of multicultural courses and intergroup dialogues in higher education. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Arizona State University.
15.
Gurin, P. , & Markus, H. (1988). Group identity: The psychological mechanisms of durable salience. Revue Internationale de Psycologie Sociale, 1 (2), 257-274.
16.
Gurin, P. , Peng, T., Lopez, G. E., & Nagda, B. A. (1999). Context, identity and intergroup relations. In D. Prentice & D. Miller (Eds.), Cultural divides: Understanding and overcoming group conflict (pp. 133-170). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
17.
Hurtado, S. (1992). The campus racial climate: Contexts of conflict. Journal of Higher Education, 63 (5), 539-569.
18.
Hurtado, S. (2001). Research and evaluation on intergroup dialogue. In D. Schoem & S. Hurtado (Eds.), Intergroup dialogue: Deliberative democracy in school, college, community and workplace (pp. 22-36). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
19.
Hurtado, S. , Nelson-Laird, T., Landreman, L., Engberg, M., & Fernandez, E. (2002, April). College students preparation for a diverse democracy. Paper presented at the American Association of Educational Research Annual Meeting, New Orleans, LA.
20.
Lopez, G. , Abboushi, M., & Reifman, A. (1992). Interest in social and political thinking. Unpublished manuscript. University of Michigan.
21.
Lopez, G. E. , Gurin, P., & Nagda, B. A. (1998). Education and understanding structural causes for group inequalities. Journal of Political Psychology, 19 (2), 305-329.
22.
Nagda, B. A. , & Derr, A. S. (in press). Intergroup dialogue: Embracing difference and conflict, engendering community. In W. Stephan & P. Vogt (Eds.), Learning together: Intergroup relations programs. New York: Teachers College Press.
23.
Nagda, B. A. , Gurin, P., & Lopez, G. E. (in press). Transformative pedagogy for democracy and social justice. Race Ethnicity & Education.
24.
Nagda, B. A. , Spearmon, M., Holley, L. C., Harding, S., Balassone, M. L., Moise-Swanson, D.et al. (1999). Intergroup dialogues: An innovative approach to teaching about diversity and justice in social work programs. Journal of Social Work Education, 35 (3), 433-449.
25.
Pettigrew, T. (1998). Intergroup contact theory. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 65-85.
26.
Pettigrew, T. , & Tropp, L. (2000). Does intergroup contact reduce prejudice? Recent meta-analytic findings. In S. Oskamp (Ed.), Reducing prejudice and discrimination (pp. 93-114). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
27.
Pharr, S. (1996). In the time of the right. Berkeley, CA: Chardon.
28.
Schoem, D. , & Hurtado, S. (2001). Intergroup dialogue: Deliberative democracy in school, college, community and workplace. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
29.
Solorzano, D. , Ceja, M., & Yosso, T. (2000). Critical race theory, racial microaggressions, and campus racial climate: The experiences of African American college students. Journal of Negro Education, 69 (1-2), 60-73.
30.
Stephan, W. G. , & Finlay, K. (1999). The role of empathy in improving intergroup relations. Journal of Social Issues, 55 (4), 729-743.
31.
Stephan, W. G. , & Stephan, C. W. (2001). Improving intergroup relations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
32.
Tatum, B. D. (1997). ‘Why are all the Black kids sitting together in the cafeteria?’ and other conversations about race. New York: Basic Books.
33.
Torres, A. (1995). Between melting pot and mosaic. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
34.
Vasques-Scalera, C. (1999). Democracy, diversity and dialogue: Education for critical multicultural citizenship. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan.
35.
Yeakley, A. (1998). The nature of prejudice change: Positive and negative change processes arising from intergroup contact experiences. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan.
36.
Young, I. M. (1990). Justice and the politics of difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
37.
Zúñiga, X. , & Nagda, B. A. (1993). Dialogue groups: An innovative approach to multicultural learning. In D. Schoem, L. Frankel, X. Zúñiga, & E. Lewis (Eds.), Multicultural teaching in the university (pp. 233-248). Westport, CT: Praeger.
38.
Zúñiga, X. , Nagda, B. A., & Sevig, T. D. (2002). Intergroup dialogues: An educational model for cultivating student engagement across differences. Equity and Excellence in Education, 35 (1), 7-17.
39.
Zúñiga, X. , Nagda, B. A., Sevig, T., Thompson, M., & Dey, E. (1995, November). Speaking the unspeakable: Student learning outcomes in intergroup dialogues on a college campus. Paper presented at the Association for the Study of Higher Education Conference, Orlando, FL.
40.
Zúñiga, X. , Vasques, C., Scalera, C. V., Sevig, T. D., & Nagda, B. A. (1997, March). Exploring and bridging race/ethnic differences: Developing intergroup dialogue competencies in a co-learning environment. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, Chicago, IL.
41.
Zúñiga, X. , & Sevig, T. D. (1997). Bridging the ‘us/them’ divide through intergroup dialogues and peer leadership. Diversity Factor, 6 (2), 23-28.
