Intergroup Comparisons within the Context of Nested Self-Categorizations: Effects of Regional and National Comparisons on the Acceptance of the European Union
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online April, 2002
Intergroup Comparisons within the Context of Nested Self-Categorizations: Effects of Regional and National Comparisons on the Acceptance of the European Union
The effects of intergroup comparisons on the acceptance (i.e. identification with and evaluation) of a superordinate group were examined. Sardinian students were assigned to four conditions, in which either regional and national comparisons within the European Union (EU), national comparisons across the EU border, or interpersonal comparisons were induced. As predicted, EU acceptance was lower after intergroup than interpersonal comparisons. Only little support was found for the prediction that EU acceptance was lower after within-EU than border-crossing comparisons. Moreover, correlational results pointed to the mediating role of perceived intergroup distinctiveness. Implications for research are discussed.
Abrams, D. (1999). Social identity, social cognition, and the self: The flexibility and stability of self-categorization. In D. Abrams & M. A. Hogg (Eds.), Social identity and social cognition (pp. 197-229). Oxford: Blackwell.
2.
Blanz, M. , Mummendey, A., Mielke, R., & Klink, A. (1998). Wechselseitige Differenzierung zwischen sozialen Gruppen: Ein Vorhersagemodell der Theorie der sozialen Identität [Mutual differentiation between social groups: A predictive model from social identity theory]. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 29, 239-259.
3.
Breckler, S. J. (1984). Empirical validation of affect, behavior, and cognition as distinct components of attitude. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 1191-1205.
4.
Brewer, M. B. (1979). Ingroup bias in the minimal intergroup situation: A cognitive-motivational analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 307-324.
5.
Brewer, M. B. (1991). The social self: On being the same and different at the same time. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 475-482.
6.
Brewer, M. B. , Manzi, J., & Shaw, J. S. (1993). Ingroup identification as a function of depersonalization, distinctiveness, and status. Psychological Science, 4, 88-92.
7.
Brown, R. (1978). Divided we fall: An analysis of relations between sections of a factory workforce. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Differentiation between social groups (pp. 395-430). London: Academic Press.
8.
Brown, R. (2000). Social identity theory: Past achievements, current problems, and future challenges. European Journal of Social Psychology, 30, 745-778.
9.
Brown, R. , & Haeger, G. (1999). ‘Compared to what?’ Comparison choice in an international context. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 31-42.
10.
Cinnirella, M. (1997). Towards a European identity? Interactions between the national and European social identities manifested by university students in Britain and Italy. British Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 19-31.
11.
Cinnirella, M. (1998). Manipulating stereotype rating tasks: Understanding questionnaire context effects on measures of attitudes, social identity and stereotypes. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 8, 345-362.
12.
Ellemers, N. , Kortekaas, P., & Ouwerkerk, J. W. (1999). Self-categorisation, commitment to the group and group self-esteem as related but distinct aspects of social identity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 371-389.
13.
Eurobarometer. Brussels: European Commission. (Published semi-annually since 1973.)
14.
Gaertner, S. L. , Dovidio, J. F., Anastasio, P. A., Bachman, B. A., & Rust, M. C. (1993). The common ingroup identity model: Recategorization and the reduction of intergroup bias. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European Review of Social Psychology (Vol. 4, pp. 1-26). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
15.
Gaertner, S. L. , Dovidio, J. F., & Bachman, B. A. (1996). Revisiting the contact hypothesis: The introduction of a common ingroup identity. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 20, 271-290.
16.
Haslam, S. A. , Turner, J. C., Oakes, P. J., & McGarty, C. (1992). Context-dependent variation in social stereotyping 1: The effects of intergroup relations as mediated by social change and frame of reference. European Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 3-20.
17.
Haubrich, H. (1996). Territoriale Identität Studierender in Europa [Territorial identity of students in Europe]. In H. Haubrich & U. Schiller, Europawahrnehmung Jugendlicher in 21 europäischen Ländern mit geographiedidaktischen Konsequenzen (pp. 23-35). Freiburg: Pädagogische Hochschule.
18.
Hewstone, M. , & Brown, R. (1986). Contact is not enough: An intergroup perspective. In M. Hewstone & R. Brown (Eds.), Contact and conflict in intergroup encounters (pp. 1-44). Oxford: Blackwell.
19.
Hogg, M. A. , & Mullin, B.-A. (1999). Joining groups to reduce uncertainty. In D. Abrams, & M. A. Hogg (Eds.), Social identity and social cognition (pp. 249-279). Oxford: Blackwell.
20.
Hopkins, N. , Regan, M., & Abell, J. (1997). On the context dependence of national stereotypes: Some Scottish data. British Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 553-563.
21.
Hornsey, M. J. , & Hogg, M. A. (2000a). Subgroup relations: A comparison of mutual intergroup differentiation and common ingroup identity models of prejudice reduction. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 242-256.
22.
Hornsey, M. J. , & Hogg, M. A. (2000b). Intergroup similarity and subgroup relations: Some implications for assimilation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 948-958.
23.
Huici, C. , Ros, M., Cano, I., Hopkins, N., Emler, N., & Carmona, M. (1997). Comparative identity and evaluation of socio-political change: Perceptions of the European Community as a function of the salience of regional identities. European Journal of Social Psychology, 27, 97-113.
24.
Lindberg, L. N. , & Scheingold, S. A. (1970). Europe’s would-be polity. Patterns of change in the European Community. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
25.
Mlicki, P. P. , & Ellemers, N. (1996). Being different or being better? National stereotypes and identifications of Polish and Dutch students. European Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 97-114.
26.
Mummendey, A. , & Wenzel, M. (1999). Social discrimination and tolerance of intergroup relations: Reactions to intergroup difference. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3, 158-174.
27.
Niedermayer, O. (1991). Bevölkerungsorientierungen gegenüber dem politischen System der Europäischen Gemeinschaft [Popular attitudes toward the political system of the European Community]. In R. Wildenmann (Ed.), Staatswerdung Europas? Optionen für eine Europäische Union (pp. 272-280). Baden-Baden: Nomos.
28.
Otten, S. , & Wentura, D. (2001). Self-anchoring and ingroup favoritism: An individual-profiles analysis. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 525-532.
29.
Rutland, A. , & Cinnirella, M. (2000). Context effects on Scottish national and European self-categorization: The importance of category accessibility, fragility and relations. British Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 495-519.
30.
Simon, B. , Kulla, C., & Zobel, M. (1995). On being more than just a part of the whole: Regional identity and social distinctiveness. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 325-340.
31.
Spears, R. , Doosje, B., & Ellemers, N. (1997). Self-stereotyping in the fact of threats to group status and distinctiveness: The role of group identification. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 538-553.
32.
Tajfel, H. (Ed.). (1978). Differentiation between social groups. Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations. London: Academic Press.
33.
Tajfel, H. , Billig, M., Bundy, R., & Flament, C. (1971). Social categorization in intergroup behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology, 1, 149-178.
34.
Tajfel, H. , & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (2nd ed., pp. 7-24). Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall.
35.
Turner, J. C. (1987). A self-categorization theory. In J. C. Turner, M. A. Hogg, P. J. Oakes, S. D. Reicher, & M. S. Wetherell (Eds.), Rediscovering the social group (pp. 42-67). Oxford: Blackwell.
36.
Verplanken, B. , Hofstee, G., & Janssen, H. J. W. (1998). Accessibility of affective versus cognitive components of attitudes. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 23-35.
