In Experiment 1 we investigated size estimates and requests from an uncertain resource in a common-pool resource dilemma. In Experiment 2, we examined contributions in a public-good dilemma with an uncertain provision threshold when participants were informed about others’ pessimistically biased estimates of the resource size or provision threshold. Supporting an individual outcome-desirability bias, but refuting a perceptual bias and an egoism bias, participants in Experiment 1 did not estimate size differently, and they cooperated more, rather than less, when they were informed about others’ estimates. Likewise, participants contributed more in Experiment 2 when they were informed about others’ estimates. These results were replicated in Experiment 3, where the outcome did not depend on others’ requests or contributions.
Axelrod, R. (1984). The evolution of cooperation. New York: Basic Books.
2.
Biel, A. , & Gärling, T. (1995). The role of uncertainty in resource dilemmas. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 15, 221-233.
3.
Biel, A. , Eek, D., & Gärling, T. (1997). Distributive justice and willingness to pay for municipality child care. Social Justice Research, 10, 63-80.
4.
Brewer, M. B. , & Kramer, M. R. (1986). Choice behavior in social dilemmas: Effects of social identity, group size and decision framing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 543-549.
5.
Buckley, T. , & Sniezek, J. (1992). Passion, preference, and predictability in judgmental forecasting. Psychological Reports, 70, 1022.
6.
Budescu, D. V. , & Bruderman, M. (1995). The relationship between the illusion of control and the desirability bias. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 8, 109-125.
7.
Budescu, D. V. , Rapoport, A., & Suleiman, R. (1990). Resource dilemmas with environmental uncertainty and asymmetric players. European Journal of Social Psychology, 20, 475-487.
8.
Chapman, G. B. , & Johnson, E. J. (1994). The limits of anchoring. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 7, 223-242.
9.
Dawes, R. M. (1980). Social dilemmas. Annual Review of Psychology, 31, 169-193.
10.
Dawes, R. M. , McTavish, J., & Shaklee, H. (1977). Behavior, communication, and assumptions about other people’s behavior in a common dilemma situation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 1-11.
11.
De Vries, S. , & Wilke, H. (1992). Constrained egoism and resource management under uncertainty. In W. Liebrand, D. M. Messick, & H. Wilke (Eds.), Social dilemmas: Theoretical issues and research findings (pp. 81-99). Oxford: Pergamon.
12.
Fischer, I. , & Budescu, D. V. (1995). Desirability and hindsight biases in predicting results of a multiparty election. In J.-P. Caverni, M. Bar Hillel, F. H. Barron, & H. Jungerman (Eds.), Contributions to decision making (pp. 193-211). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
13.
Gardner, R. , Ostrom, E. & Walker, J. (1990) The nature of common-pool resource problems. Rationality and Society, 2, 335-358.
14.
Gustafsson, M. , Biel, A., & Gärling, T. (1999a). Outcome-desirability bias in resource management problems. Thinking and Reasoning, 5, 327-337.
15.
Gustafsson, M. , Biel, A., & Gärling, T. (1999b). Overharvesting of resources of unknown size. Acta Psychologica, 103, 47-67.
16.
Hardin, G. R. (1968) The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162, 1243-1248.
17.
Hogarth, R. M. , & Einhorn, H. J. (1990). Venture theory: A model of decision weights. Management Science, 36, 780-803.
18.
Kahneman, D. , & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 269-291.
19.
Kelley, H. H. , & Thibaut, J. W. (1978). Interpersonal relations: A theory of interdependence. New York: Wiley.
20.
Kerr, N. L. , & Kaufman-Gilliland, C. M. (1994). Communication, commitment and cooperation in social dilemmas. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 513-529.
21.
Komorita, S. S. (1976). A model of the N-person dilemma-type game. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 12, 357-373.
22.
Komorita, S. S. , & Barth, J. M. (1985). Components of reward in social dilemmas. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 364-373.
23.
Komorita, S. S. , & Parks, C. D. (1995). Interpersonal relations: Mixed-motive interaction. Annual Review of Psychology, 46, 183-207.
24.
Liebrand, W. B. G. , Messick, D. M., & Wilke, H. A. M. (1992). Current theoretical issues. In W. Liebrand, D. M. Messick, & H. Wilke (Eds.), Social dilemmas: Theoretical issues and research findings (pp. 29-43). Oxford: Pergamon.
25.
McCusker, C. , & Carnevale, P. J. (1995). Framing in resource dilemmas: Loss aversion and the moderating effects of sanctions. Organizational Behavior and Decision Processes, 61, 190-201.
26.
Messick, D. , & Brewer, M. B. (1983). Solving social dilemmas: A review. In L. Wheeler & P. Shaver (Eds.), Review of personality and social psychology (Vol. 4, pp. 11-44). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
27.
Messick, D. M. , & McClelland, C. L. (1983). Social traps and temporal traps. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 9, 105-110.
28.
Messick, D. M. , & Schell, H. (1992). Evidence for an equality heuristic in social decision making. Acta Psychologica, 80, 311-323.
29.
Messick, D. M. , Wilke, H., Brewer, M. B., Kramer, R. M., Zemke, P. E., & Lui, L. (1983). Individual adaptations and structural change as solutions to social dilemmas. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 294-309.
30.
Northcraft, G. B. , & Neale, M. A. (1987). Experts, amateurs, and real estate: An anchoring-and-adjustment perspective on property pricing decisions. Organizational Behavior and Decision Processes, 39, 84-97.
31.
Olsen, R. A. (1997). Desirability bias among professional investment managers: Some evidence from experts. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 10, 65-72.
32.
Orbell, J. M. , Van De Kragt, A. J. C., & Dawes, R. M. (1988). Explaining discussion-induced cooperation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 811-819.
33.
Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions of collective action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
34.
Ostrom, E. , Gardner, R., & Walker, J. (1994). Rules, games, and common-pool resources. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
35.
Rapoport, A. , Budescu, D. V., Suleiman, R., & Weg, E. (1992). Social dilemmas with uniformly distributed resources. In W. Liebrand, D. M. Messick, & H. Wilke (Eds.), Social dilemmas: Theoretical issues and research findings (pp. 43-57). Oxford: Pergamon.
36.
Schroeder, D. A. , Sibicky, M. E., & Irwin, M. E., (1995). A framework for understanding decisions in social dilemmas. In D. A. Schroeder (Ed.), Social dilemmas: Perspectives on individuals and groups (pp. 183-200). Westport, CT: Praeger.
37.
Slovic, P. , & Lichtenstein, S. (1971). Comparison of Bayesian and regression approaches to the study of information processing in judgement. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 6, 649-744.
38.
Suleiman, R. , & Rapoport, A. (1988). Environmental and social uncertainty in single-trial resource dilemmas. Acta Psychologica, 68, 99-112.
39.
Tversky, A. , & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judging under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 5, 1124-1131.
40.
Van Lange, P. A. M. , Liebrand, W. B. G., Messick, D. M., & Wilke, H. A. M. (1992). Introduction and literature review. In W. Liebrand, D. M. Messick, & H. Wilke (Eds.), Social dilemmas: Theoretical issues and research findings. (pp. 3-28). Oxford: Pergamon.
41.
Weinsten, N. D. (1980). Unrealistic optimism about future life events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 5, 806-820.
42.
Wilke, H. A. M. (1991). Greed, efficiency and fairness in resource management situations. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 165-187). London: Wiley.
43.
Wit, A. , & Wilke, H. (1998). Public good provision under environmental and social uncertainty. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 249-256.
44.
Wright, W. F. , & Anderson, U. (1989). Effects of situation familiarity and financial incentives on use of the anchoring and adjustment heuristic for probability assessment. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 44, 68-82.
45.
Zakay, D. (1983). The relationship between the probability assessor and the outcomes of an event as a determiner of subjective probability. Acta Psychologica, 53, 271-280.
