In public good dilemmas, people often coordinate their decisions by applying the equality rule. Prior research has shown that if one member violates equality, negative emotions emerge among the other group members. In two experimental studies we investigated whether the presence of a violator also affects contribution decisions. A first experiment demonstrated that a violation of equality does not always influence people's contributions. Even after an equality violation, group members continued to base their decisions on the equality rule if they faced a social dilemma with the same group members. But when group members faced a social dilemma with only the violator of equality, contributions were lowered. Experiment 2 showed that this is especially true for low trusters.
Allison, S.T., McQueen, L.R., & Schaerfl, L.M. (1992). Social decision making processes and the equal partitionment of shared resources. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 28, 23-42.
2.
Allison, S.T., & Messick, D.M. (1990). Social decision heuristics in the use of shared resources. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 3, 195-204.
3.
Axelrod, R. (1984). The evolution of cooperation. New York: Basic Books.
4.
Baron, R.M., & Kenny, D.A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
5.
Chen, X.-P., & Bachrach, D.G. (2003). Tolerance of free riding: The effects of defection size, defection pattern, and social orientation in a repeated public goods dilemma. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 90, 139-147.
6.
Dawes, R.M. (1980). Social dilemmas. Annual Review of Psychology, 31, 169-193.
7.
De Cremer, D., Snyder, M., & Dewitte, S. (2001). `The less I trust, the less I contribute (or not)?' The effects of trust, accountability and self-monitoring in social dilemmas . European Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 93-107.
8.
De Kwaadsteniet, E.W., Van Dijk, E., Wit, A., & De Cremer, D. (2006). Social dilemmas as strong versus weak situations: Social value orientations and tacit coordination under resource uncertainty . Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 509-516.
9.
Kerr, N.L. (1983). Motivation losses in small groups: A social dilemma analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 819-828.
10.
Komorita, S.S., & Parks, C.D. (1994). Social dilemmas. Dubuque, IA : Brown & Benchmark.
11.
Kramer, R.M. (1996). Paranoia, distrust and suspicion within social groups: A social categorization perspective. Advances in Group Process, 13, 1-32.
12.
Lahno, B. (1995). Trust, reputation, and exit in exchange relationships . Journal of Conflict Resolution, 39, 495-510.
13.
Ledyard, J.O. (1995). Public goods: A survey of experimental research . In J. H. Kagel & A. E. Roth (Eds.), The handbook of experimental economics (pp. 111-194). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
14.
Leventhal, G.S., Karuza, J., Jr., & Fry, W.R. (1980). Beyond fairness: A theory of allocation preferences . In G. Mikula (Ed.), Justice and social interaction. New York: Springer-Verlag.
15.
Mayer, R.C., Davis, J.H., & Schoorman, F. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20, 709-734.
16.
Messick, D.M. (1993). Equality as a decision heuristic. In B. A. Mellers & J. Baron (Eds.), Psychological perspectives on justice: Theory and applications (pp. 11-31). New York: Cambridge University Press.
17.
Miller, D.T. (2001). Disrespect and the experience of injustice. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 527-553.
18.
Ouwerkerk, J.W., Kerr, N.L., Van Lange, P.A.M., & Gallucci, M. (2005). Avoiding the social death penalty: Threat of ostracism and cooperation in social dilemmas. In K. D. Williams, J. P. Forgas, & W. von Hippel (Eds.), The social outcast: Ostracism, social exclusion, rejection, and bullying (pp. 321-332). New York: Psychology Press.
19.
Parks, C.D., Henager, R.F., & Scamahorn, S.D. (1996). Trust and reactions to messages of intent in social dilemmas. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 40, 134-151.
20.
Parks, C.D., & Hulbert, L.G. (1995). High and low trusters' responses to fear in a payoff matrix. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 39, 718-730.
21.
Ring, P.S., & Van de Ven, A.H. (1994). Developmental processes of cooperative interorganizational relationships. Academy of Management Review, 19, 90-118.
22.
Samuelson, C.D., & Allison, S.T. (1994). Cognitive factors affecting the use of social decision heuristics in resource-sharing tasks. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 58, 1-27.
23.
Schelling, T.C. (1980). The strategy of conflict. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
24.
Stouten, J., De Cremer, D., & Van Dijk, E. (2005). All is well that ends well, at least for proselfs: Emotional reactions to equality violation as a function of social value orientation . European Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 767-783.
25.
Stouten, J., De Cremer, D., & Van Dijk, E. (2006). Violating equality in social dilemmas: Emotional and retributive reactions as a function of trust, attribution, and sincerity . Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 894-906.
26.
Stouten, J., De Cremer, D., & Van Dijk, E. (2007). Managing equality in social dilemmas: Emotional and retributive implications. Social Justice Research, 20, 53-67.
27.
Tinsley, C.H., O'Connor, K.M., & Sullivan, B.A. (2002). Tough guys finish last: The perils of a distributive reputation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 88, 621-642.
28.
Van Dijk, E., & De Cremer, D. (2006). Tacit coordination and social dilemmas: On the importance of self-interest and fairness. In D. De Cremer, M. Zeelenberg, & J. K. Murnighan (Eds.), Social psychology and economics (pp. 141-154). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
29.
Van Dijk, E., De Cremer, D., Mulder, L., & Stouten, J. (2008). How do we react to feedback in social dilemmas? In A. Biel, D. Eek, T. Gärling, & M. Gustafsson (Eds.), New issues and paradigms in research on social dilemmas (pp. 43-56). New York: Springer.
30.
Van Dijk, E., & Wilke, H. (1995). Coordination rules in asymmetric social dilemmas: A comparison between public good dilemmas and resource dilemmas. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 31, 1-27.
31.
Van Lange, P.A.M., Ouwerkerk, J.W., & Tazelaar, M.J.A. (2002). How to overcome the detrimental effects of noise in social interaction: The benefits of generosity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 768-780.
32.
Yamagishi, T., & Yamagishi, M. (1994). Trust and commitment in the United States and Japan. Motivation and Emotion, 18, 129-166.
