The memefication of Squid Game demonstrates the cultural dynamics of media reception in changing media environments. The dissemination of memes facilitates public participation and democratic use of media, however memes also aggravate cultural prejudice and contribute to the segregation of social groups. This study investigates ideological influences involved in spreading Squid Game memes. Squid Game and associated memes demonstrate the ambivalence of cultural dynamics at the global level and identity issues involved in consuming media and pop culture. Theories of postcolonialism and critical discourse analysis are applied to examine media production and distribution of Korean media, and its influence on the reproduction cultural prejudice in changing media environments. Online memes provide the particular impetus underlying contestations between cultural diversity and ideological conservation in our changing media environment.
Al ZidjalyN (2017) Memes as reasonably hostile laments: A discourse analysis of political dissent in Oman. Discourse & Society28(6): 573–594.
2.
AskKAbidinC (2018) My life is a mess: Self-deprecating relatability and collective identities in the memification of student issues. Information, Communication & Society21(6): 834–850.
3.
AskaniusIKellerN (2021) Murder fantasies in memes: Fascist aesthetics of death threats and the banalization of white supremacist violence. Information, Communication & Society24 (16): 2522–2539.
4.
AskaniusT (2021) On frogs, monkeys, and execution memes: Exploring the humor–hate nexus at the intersection of neo-Nazi and alt-right movements in Sweden. Television & New Media22(2): 147–165.
5.
BhabhaH (1994) The Location of Culture. London: Routledge.
6.
BoxmanLShifmanL (2014) Evasive targets: Deciphering polysemy in mediated humor. Journal of Communication64(5): 977–998.
7.
BuchananI (2010) Dictionary of Critical Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
8.
ChenK (2010) Asia as Method.Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
9.
ChenLAbuhilIBlackburnJ, et al. (2021) Dissecting the meme magic: Understanding indicators of virality in image memes. In: Proceedings of the ACM on Human–Computer Interaction5, CSCW1, 81.
10.
ChuaB (2012) Structure, Audience and Soft Power in East Asian Pop Culture. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
11.
CouldryN (2019) Data colonialism: Rethinking big data's relation to the contemporary subject. Television & New Media20(4): 336–349.
12.
DawkinsR (2014 [1976]) The Selfish Gene. New York: Princeton University Press.
13.
DobsonKKnezevicI(2017)‘Liking and sharing’ the stigmatization of poverty and social welfare: Representations of poverty and welfare through internet memes on social media. TripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique15(2): 777–795.
14.
DoerrN (2017) Bridging language barriers, bonding against immigrants: A visual case study of transnational network publics created by far-right activists in Europe. Discourse & Society28(1): –23.
15.
DuchschererKDovidioJF (2016) When memes are mean: Appraisals of and objections to stereotypic memes. Translational Issues in Psychological Science2(3): 335–345.
16.
ElsayedY (2016) Laughing through change: Subversive humor in online videos of Arab youth. International Journal of Communication10(2016): 5102–5122.
17.
Espinoza-RojasJNaranjoATristánM (2018) The mutual domestication of users and algorithmic recommendations on Netflix. Communication, Culture & Critique12: 99–518.
18.
FaircloughN (1993) Critical discourse analysis and the marketization of public discourse: The universities. Discourse & Society4(2): 133–168.
FominI (2019) Memes, genes, and signs: Semiotics in the conceptual interface of evolutionary biology and memetics. Semiotica20(1): 327–340.
21.
FoucaultM (1977) Discipline and Punish. New York: Vintage.
22.
FrazerRCarlsonB (2017) Indigenous memes and the invention of a people. Social Media + Society2017: 1–12.
23.
GalN (2019) Ironic humor on social media as participatory boundary work. New Media & Society21(3): 729–749.
24.
GramsciA (1992) Prison Notebooks. New York: Columbia University Press. (Original Edition 1949).
25.
GuentherLRuhrmannGBischoffJ, et al. (2020) Strategic framing and social media engagement: Analyzing memes posted by the German Identitarian movement on Facebook. Social Media + Society6(2): 1–13. doi:10.1177/2056305119898777.
26.
HakoköngäsEHalmesvaaraOSakkiI (2020) Persuasion through bitter humor: Multimodal discourse analysis of rhetoric in internet memes of two far-right groups in Finland. Social Media + Society6(2): 20–28.
27.
HallS (1980) Culture, Media and Langauge. London: Hutchison.
28.
HanS (2019) Confucianism and reflexive modernity. Post-Western Social Sciences and Global Knowledge3(1): 1–15.
29.
ItohM (2000) Globalization of Japan.New York: St. Martin’s Press.
30.
IwabuchiK (2002) Recentering Globalization: Popular Culture and Japanese Transnationalism.Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
31.
IwabuchiK (2006) Japanese popular Culture and Postcolonial desire for ‘Asia’. In: AllenMSakamotoR (eds) Popular Culture, Globalization and Japan. New York: Routledge, pp. 15–35.
32.
IwabuchiK (ed.) (2010) East Asian pop culture: Analyzing the Korean Wave.Hong Kong: HongKong University Press.
33.
JohannMBülowL (2019) One does not simply create a meme: Conditions for the diffusion of internet memes. International Journal of Communication13: 1720–1742.
34.
JohnsonD (2007) Mapping the meme: A geographical approach to materialist rhetorical criticism. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies4(1): 27–50.
35.
KatzYShifmanL (2017) Making sense? The structure and meanings of digital memetic non- sense. Information, Communication & Society20(6): 825–842.
36.
KimS (2006) Reception of East Asian pop culture and hybridity. Korean Journal of Journalism and Communication Studies50(1): 115–135.
37.
LaclauE (2005) On Populist Reason.London: Verso.
38.
LeachCWAllenAM (2017) The social psychology of the Black Lives Matter meme and movement. Current Directions in Psychological Science26(6): 543–547.
39.
LivingstoneS (2018) Audiences in an age of datafication: Critical questions for media research. Television & NewMedia20(2): 170–183.
40.
LobatoR (2019) Netflix Nations: The Geography of Digital Distribution. New York: New York University Press.
McDonaldK (2013) Digital dreams in a material world: the rise of Netflix and its impact on changing distribution and Exhibition patterns. Jump Cut. 55.
43.
McRobbieA (2009) The Aftermath of Feminism: Gender, Culture, and Social Change. London: Sage.
44.
McSwineyJVaughanMHeftAHoffmanM (2021) Sharing the hate? Memes and transnationality in the far right’s digital visual culture. Information Communication & Society24(16): 2502–2521.
45.
MilnerRM (2013) Pop polyvocality: Internet memes, public participation, and the Occupy Wall Street movement. International Journal of Communication7: 2357–2390.
46.
MilnerRM (2018) The World Made Meme: Public Conversations and Participatory Media. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
47.
MortensenMNeumayerC (2021) The playful politics of memes. Information, Communication & Society24(16): 2367–2377.
48.
MouffeC (2000) The Democratic Paradox. New York: Verso.
49.
MouffeC (2013) Agonistics: Thinking the World Politically. New York: Verso.
50.
MoussaBBenmessaoudSDouaiA (2020) Internet memes as ‘tactical’ social action: A multimodal critical discourse analysis approach. International Journal of Communication14(2020): 5920–5940.
51.
MurruMVicariS (2021) Memetising the pandemic: Memes, COVID-19 mundanity and political cultures. Information, Communication & Society24(16): 2422–2441.
52.
MyrickJGNabiRLEngNJ (2021) Consuming memes during the COVID pandemic: Effects of memes and meme type on COVID-related stress and coping efficacy. Psychology of Popular Media 316–323. DOI: 10.1037/ppm0000371.
53.
NissenbaumAShifmanL (2017) Internet memes as contested cultural capital: The case of 4chan’s/b/board. New Media & Society19(4): 483–501.
54.
OlesenT (2018) Memetic protest and the dramatic diffusion of Alan Kurdi. Media, Culture & Society40(5): 656–672.
55.
OtmazginNLyanI (2014) Hallyu across the desert: K-pop fandom in Israel and Palestine. Cross-Currents: East Asian History and Culture Review3(1): 32–55.
56.
PiataA (2016) When metaphor becomes a joke: Metaphor journeys from political ads to internet memes. Journal of Pragmatics106: 39–56.
57.
PotterA (2018) Creating children’s television for SVODs: The alignment of bottersnikes and gumbles: Global production practices with national screen policies in the Netflix original. Media Industries5(2): 111–127.
58.
PuzarA (2011) Asian dolls and the westernized gaze. Asian Women27(2): 81–105.
59.
RohitP (2014) Personalization, not House of Cards, is Netflix brand. WestSideToday. https://westsidetoday.com/2014/06/17/personalization-house-cards-netflix-brand// (accessed 17 June 2014).
60.
RoslyngMLarsenG (2021) Language and the language of power: Pro- and anti-vaccination memes and the discursive construction of knowledge. Journal of Language and Politics20(6): 894–912.
61.
RossASRiversDJ (2017) Digital cultures of political participation: Internet memes and the discursive delegitimization of the 2016 US presidential candidates. Discourse, Context & Media16: 1–11.
62.
ShanbingG (2014) Netflix innovation and development in the background of big data. J News2014(8): 66–69.
63.
ShifmanL (2014) Memes in Digital Culture.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
64.
ShimD (2006) Hybridity and the rise of Korean pop culture in Asia. Media, Culture and Society28(1): 25–44.
65.
TezukaY (2012) Japanese Cinema Goes Global. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
66.
TutersMHagenS (2020) ‘They’ rule: Memetic antagonism and nebulous othering on 4chan. New Media & Society22(12): 2218–2237.
67.
WangJiayu (2014) Criticizing images: Critical discourse analysis of visual semiosis in picture news. Critical Arts28(2): 264–286.
68.
WeiJingsi (2018) Analyze Netflix`s impact on TV production and viewing. Journal of Korea Entertainment Industry12(1): 141–148.
69.
WigginsBE (2019) The Discursive Power of Memes in Digital Culture: Ideology, Semiotics, and Intertextuality. New York: Routledge.
70.
WigginsBEBowersGB (2015) Memes as genres: A structurational analysis of the memescape. New Media & Society11(17): 1886–1906.
71.
WodakG (2003) Critical Discourse Analysis. New York: Springer.
72.
WongEHolyoakK (2021) Cognitive and motivational factors driving sharing of internet memes. Memory & Cognition49: 863–872.
73.
YoonI (2016) Why is it not just a joke? Analysis on internet memes associated with racism and hidden ideology of colorblindness. Journal of Cultural Research in Art Education33: 92–123. doi:10.2458/jcrae.4898.
74.
YoungR (1995) Colonial Desire. London: Routledge.
75.
ZidaniS (2021) Messy on the inside: Internet memes as mapping tools of everyday life. Information, Communication & Society24(16): 2378–2402.
