The imaginative dimension of digital disinformation: Fake news,political trolling,and the entwined crises of Covid-19 and inter-Asian racism in a postcolonial city

Abstract

This article uses the concept of the ‘imaginative dimension of digital disinformation’ to explore how inter-Asian racism in a postcolonial city matters to the way people engage with racially tinged Covid-19 digital disinformation. It pays attention to two key socialities that fake news and political trolling online seek to weaponise: people's existing social narratives as well as their relationally embedded practices of media consumption. Drawing on 15 life story interviews with locals from the Philippines capital of Manila, this article characterises their interpretations of online disinformation campaigns that aim to amplify their shared social narrative of resentment towards China and bank on their communicative practices surrounding this. It also aims to show the value of empirical research that possesses a transnational sensibility in assessing the interpretive and social dynamics surrounding such racist Covid-19 digital disinformation.

Keywords

Covid-19 pandemic fake news inter-Asian racism political trolling social media social narratives

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Albert

Santos

Vizmanos

(2018) Profile and Determinants of the Middle-income Class in the Philippines. Quezon City: Philippine Institute of Development Studies.

Ang See

(2019) The rise of China, new immigrants and changing policies on Chinese overseas: Impact on the Philippines. In: Singh D and Cook M (eds) Southeast Asian Affairs 2019. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 275–294. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/26939700 (accessed 31 July 2021).

Arugay

Slater

(2018) Polarization without poles: Machiavellian conflicts and the Philippines’ lost decade of democracy, 2000–2010. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 681(1): 122–136. doi: 10.1177/0002716218810385.

Cabañes

Jason Vincent A

(2020) Digital disinformation and the imaginative dimension of communication. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 97(2): 435–452. doi: 10.1177/1077699020913799.

Chu

(2010) Chinese and Chinese Mestizos of Manila: Family, Identity, and Culture, 1860s–1930s. Leiden: Brill.

Chu

(2021) From ‘sangley’ to ‘chinaman’, ‘Chinese mestizo’ to ‘tsinoy’: Unpacking ‘Chinese’ identities in the Philippines at the turn of the twentieth-century. Asian Ethnicity 1–31. Online first. doi: 10.1080/14631369.2021.1941755.

Chua

(2021) Philippines. Reuters Institute. Available at: https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/digital-news-report/2021/philippines (accessed 31 July 2021).

Connaughton

Pimlott

Anderson

(1995) The Battle for Manila: The Most Devastating Untold Story of World War II. Novato, CA: Presidio Press.

Cook

(2020) The politics of racism as the Philippines struggles with coronavirus. Lowry Institute. Available at: https://www.lowyinstitute.org/the-interpreter/politics-racism-philippines-struggles-coronavirus (accessed 31 July 2021).

10.

Curato

(2018) We are not a polarized nation. Rappler. Available at: https://www.rappler.com/voices/thought-leaders/philippines-not-polarized-nation (accessed 31 July 2021).

11.

Dang

(2021) Social media, fake news, and the COVID-19 pandemic: Sketching the case of Southeast Asia. Austrian Journal of South-East Asian Studies 14(1): 37–57.

12.

David

San Pascual

MRS

Torres

MES

(2019) Reliance on Facebook for news and its influence on political engagement. PLOS ONE 14(3): e0212263.

13.

Dreisbach

(2019) Philippine–China relations, territorial disputes, and threats to ASEAN stability. Malaysian Journal of International Relations 7(1): 107–115.

14.

Duffy

Tandoc

Ling

(2019) Too good to be true, too good not to share: The social utility of fake news. Information, Communication & Society 23(13): 1965–1979.

15.

Gao

Liu

(2020) Stand against anti-Asian racial discrimination during COVID-19: A call for action. International Social Work 64(2): 261–264.

16.

Georgiou

(2020) Racism, postracialism and why media matter. Ethnic and Racial Studies 43(13): 2379–2385.

17.

Gillespie

(2005) Media Audiences. Maidenhead: Open University Press.

18.

Harbath

(2018) 360/OS: Facebook’s Katie Harbath on protecting election integrity. YouTube. Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dJ1wcpsOtS4 (accessed 31 July 2021).

19.

Hau

(2017) Elites and Ilustrados in Philippine Culture. Quezon City: Ateneo de Manila University Press.

20.

Hochschild

(2016) Strangers in Their Own Land: Anger and Mourning on the American Right. New York: The New Press.

21.

Ireton

Posetti

(2018) Handbook for Journalism Education and Training. Paris: UNESCO. Available at: https://en.unesco.org/sites/default/files/journalism_fake_news_disinformation_print_friendly_0.pdf (accessed 31 July 2021).

22.

Irving

DRM

(2010) Colonial Counterpoint : Music in Early Modern Manila. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

23.

Jameson

(1981) The Political Unconscious: Narrative as a Socially Symbolic Act. London: Routledge.

24.

Jereza

Perrino

(2020) ‘They are just a danger’: Chronotopic worlds in digital narratives of the far-right. Journal of Language and Politics 19(5): 809–830. doi: 10.1075/jlp.19073.jer.

25.

Kemp

(2021) Digital in the Philippines: All the statistics you need in 2021. Data Report Portal. Available at: https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2021-philippines (accessed 31 July 2021).

26.

Kim

(2016) Geographical imagination and intra-Asian hierarchy between Filipinos and South Korean retirees in the Philippines. Philippine Studies: Historical and Ethnographic Viewpoints 64(2): 237–264.

27.

Kreiss

Barker

Zenner

(2017) Trump gave them hope: Studying the strangers in their own land. Political Communication 34(3): 470–478. doi: 10.1080/10584609.2017.1330076.

28.

Laforteza

(2015) The Somatechnics of Whiteness and Race: Colonialism and Mestiza Privilege. Farnham: Ashgate.

29.

Lentin

Titley

(2011) The Crises of Multiculturalism: Racism in a Neoliberal Age. London: Zed Books.

30.

Livingstone

(2018) Audiences in an age of datafication: Critical questions for media research. Television & New Media 20(2): 170–183.

31.

Long

Moore

(2012) Sociality revisited: Setting a new agenda. Cambridge Journal of Anthropology 30(1): 40–47. doi: 10.3167/ca.2012.300105.

32.

Miller

Costa

Haynes

et al. (2016) How the World Changed Social Media. London: UCL Press.

33.

Mulder

(2011) The crux is the skin: Reflections on Southeast Asian personhood. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs 30(1): 95–116.

34.

Norris

Inglehart

(2019) Cultural Backlash: Trump, Brexit, and Authoritarian Populism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

35.

Oliver

(2006) Purposive sampling. In: Jupp

(ed) The Sage Dictionary of Social Research Methods. London: Sage, 244–245.

36.

Ong

Curato

Tapsell

(2019) Tracking digital disinformation in the 2019 Philippine midterm election. Available at: https://www.newmandala.org/disinformation (accessed 31 July 2021).

37.

Ong

Lin

(2017) Plague in the city: Digital media as shaming apparatus toward mainland Chinese ‘locusts’ in Hong Kong. In: Aiello

Tarantino

Oakley

(eds) Communicating the City: Meanings, Practices, Interactions. New York: Peter Lang, pp. 149–164.

38.

Patton

(2015) Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods: Integrating Theory and Practice. 4th edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

39.

Pilkington

(2016) Loud and Proud: Passion and Politics in the English Defence League. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

40.

PNS (2010) Teodoro calls for unity amid cultural diversity. Philippine News. Available at: http://philippinenews.com/article.php?id=7105 (accessed 31 July 2021).

41.

Rafael

(2015) Racism in the Philippines: Does it matter? Rappler. Available at: https://www.rappler.com/voices/thought-leaders/racism-philippines (accessed 31 July 2021).

42.

Ruiz

(2021) When you become the target of racist disinformation. Mashable. Available at: https://sea.mashable.com/culture/16372/when-you-become-the-target-of-racist-disinformation (accessed 31 July 2021).

43.

Silverstone

(2013) Media and Morality: On the Rise of the Mediapolis. Cambridge: Polity.

44.

Tan

(2021) Friend or foe: Explaining the Duterte administration’s China policy in the South China Sea. Cornell International Affairs Review 14(2): 4–47.

45.

Thapan

(2002) Sindhi Diaspora in Manila, Hong Kong, and Jakarta. Quezon City: Ateneo de Manila University Press.

46.

Tolentino

Ham

(2015) The entrapment of asymmetry: The Philippines between the US and China. Bandung: Journal of the Global South 2(1): 1–15.

47.

Uy-Tioco

(2019) ‘Good enough’ access: Digital inclusion, social stratification, and the reinforcement of class in the Philippines. Communication Research and Practice 5(2): 156–171.

48.

Wagner

Boczkowski

(2019) The reception of fake news: The interpretations and practices that shape the consumption of perceived misinformation. Digital Journalism 7(7): 870–885.

49.

Walton

Harris

Iwabuchi

(2020) Introduction: Everyday multiculturalism in/across Asia. Ethnic and Racial Studies 43(5): 807–815.

50.

WHO (World Health Organization) (2021) Situation reports. World Health Organization Western Pacific Region. Available at: https://www.who.int/westernpacific/emergencies/covid-19/situation-reports (accessed 31 July 2021).

51.

Wickberg

(2002) The Chinese in Philippine Life, 1850–1898. Quezon City: Ateneo de Manila University Press.

52.

Wilson

(2004) Ambition and Identity: Chinese Merchant Elites in Colonial Manila, 1880–1916. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii Press.

53.

Yen

Cappellini

Yang

(Sophie) et al. (2021) Coping with coping: International migrants’ experiences of the Covid-19 lockdown in the UK. British Journal of Management 32(4): 1219–1249. doi: 10.1111/1467-8551.12512.