This article explores the concept of ‘queerbaiting’, a term employed by media fans to criticise homoerotic suggestiveness in contemporary television when this suggestiveness is not actualised in the program narrative. I confront the negative connotations of the term and point to the agency of audiences, using the practices of ‘slash fans’ within the Merlin fandom as my case study. I trace definitions of queerbaiting in recent scholarly work and suggest comparison with another term, ‘hoyay’, which has more positive connotations. My central argument is that as this concept begins its inevitable permeation into academic work, worth considering are the queer readings that ‘queerbaiting’ in fact make possible, even plausible, which is an understanding of the term that is in line with the ‘poaching’ and ‘playful’ spirit of media fandom.
BrennanJ (2014a) ‘Fandom is full of pearl clutching old ladies’: nonnies in the online slash closet. International Journal of Cultural Studies17(4): 363–380.
7.
BrennanJ (2014b) Not ‘from my hot little ovaries’: how slash manips pierce reductive assumptions. Continuum28(2): 247–264.
8.
BrennanJ (2015a) ‘You could shame the great Arthur himself’: a queer reading of Lancelot from BBC’s Merlin with respect to the character in Malory, White, and Bradley. Arthuriana25(2): 20–43.
9.
BrennanJ (2015b) ‘You gave me no choice’: a queer reading of Mordred’s journey to villainy and struggle for identity in BBC’sMerlin. Refractory26. Available at: http://refractory.unimelb.edu.au/2015/10/07/brennan/ (accessed October 2015).
BurgerGKrugerSF (2001) Introduction. In: BurgerGKrugerSF (eds) Queering the Middle Ages. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, pp. i–xxiii.
12.
BurnsEJ (2002) Courtly Love Undressed: Reading through Clothes in Medieval French Culture. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
13.
CollierCM (2015) The Love that Refuses to Speak its Name: Examining Queerbaiting and Fan-Producer Interactions in Fan Cultures. Master’s thesis, University of Louisville. Available at: http://ir.library.louisville.edu/etd/2204 (accessed October 2015).
14.
DavidsonR (2012) When King Arthur is PG 13. Arthuriana22(3): 5–20.
15.
DrakeGN (2008) Queer medieval: uncovering the past. GLQ14(4): 639–658.
16.
FathallahJ (2015) Moriarty’s ghost: or the queer disruption of the BBC’sSherlock. Television & New Media16(5): 490–500.
17.
FiskeJ (1987) Television Culture. London: Routledge.
GoldynL (1981) Gratuitous language in appellate cases involving gay people: ‘queer baiting’ from the bench. Political Behavior3(1): 31–48.
22.
GrossbergL (1992) Is there a fan in the house? The affective sensibility of fandom. In: LewisLA (ed.) The Adoring Audience: Fan Culture and Popular Media. London: Routledge, pp. 50–65.
23.
HallS (1981) Encoding and decoding in television discourse. In: HallSHobsonDLoweAWillisP (eds) Culture, Media, Language. London: Hutchinson, pp. 128–138.
24.
HarawayD (1992) Otherworldly conversations: terran topics; local terms. Science as Culture3(1): 64–98.
25.
HarrisWC (2006) ‘In my day it used to be called a limp wrist’: flip-floppers, nelly boys, and homophobic rhetoric in the 2004 US presidential campaign. Journal of American Culture29(3): 278–295.
26.
HartleyJ (1999) Uses of Television. London: Routledge.
HattM (1993) The male body in another frame: Thomas Eakins’ The Swimming Hole as a homoerotic image. In: BenjaminA (ed.) The Body: Journal of Philosophy and the Visual Arts4: 9–21.
29.
HillsM (2004) Defining cult tv: texts, inter-texts, and fan audiences. In: AllenRCHillA (eds) The Television Studies Reader. London: Routledge, pp. 509–523.
30.
HubbsN (2009) Bernstein, homophobia, historiography. Women and Music13(1): 24–42.
JenkinsH (1992) Textual Poachers: Television Fans and Participatory Culture. London: Routledge.
33.
JenkinsH (2006) Convergence Culture. New York: New York University Press.
34.
KinsmanG (2004) Men loving men: the challenge of gay liberation. In: MurphyPF (ed.) Feminism and Masculinities. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 165–181.
35.
KohnenME (2008) The adventures of a repressed farm boy and the billionaire who loves him: queer spectatorship in Smallville fandom. In: RossSMSteinLE (eds) Teen Television: Essays on Programming and Fandom. Jefferson, NC: McFarland, pp. 207–223.
36.
LarsenKZubernisL (2012) Fandom at the Crossroads: Celebration, Shame and Fan/Producer Relationships. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
37.
MacDonaldM (2006) Harry Potter and the fan fiction phenom. The Gay & Lesbian Review13(1): 28–30.
38.
MachatS (2012) ‘Prince Arthur spotted exiting Buckingham Palace!’ The re-imagined worlds of fanfic trailers. In: LoockKVerevisC (eds) Film Remakes, Adaptations and Fan Productions: Remake/Remodel. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 197–214.
39.
McKeeA (2004) How to tell the difference between production and consumption: a case study in Doctor Who fandom. In: Gwenllian-JonesSPearsonRE (eds) Cult Television. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 167–185.
40.
MeyerMD (2013) Slashing Smallville: the interplay of text, audience and production on viewer interpretations of homoeroticism. Sexuality & Culture17(3): 476–493.
41.
MeyerMDETuckerMHL (2007) Textual poaching and beyond: fan communities and fandoms in the age of the internet. Review of Communication7(1): 103–116.
42.
MeyerMDWoodMM (2013) Sexuality and teen television: emerging adults respond to representations of queer identity onGlee. Sexuality & Culture17(3): 434–448.
43.
MillerT (2005) A metrosexual eye on queer guy. GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies11(1): 112–117.
44.
MorleyD (1980) The Nationwide Audience: Structure and Decoding. London: British Film Institute.
45.
NordinE (2015) From Queer Reading to Queerbaiting: The Battle over the Polysemic Text and the Power of Hermeneutics. Master’s thesis, Stockholm University. Available at: http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:839802/FULLTEXT01.pdf (accessed October 2015).
46.
PascoeCJ (2005) ‘Dude, you’re a fag’: adolescent masculinity and the fag discourse. Sexualities8(3): 329–346.
47.
PaulM (1992) Becoming a Man: Half a Life Story. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
48.
RadwayJ (1984) Reading the Romance: Women, Patriarchy, and Popular Literature. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.
49.
RambukkanaN (2007) Is slash an alternative medium? ‘Queer’ heterotopias and the role of autonomous media spaces in radical world building. Affinities1(1): 69–85.
50.
RubinGS (1993) Thinking sex: notes for a radical theory of the politics of sexuality. In: AbeloveHBaraleMAHalperinDM (eds) The Lesbian and Gay Studies Reader. New York: Routledge, pp. 3–44.
51.
SchultzJA (2006) Heterosexuality as a threat to medieval studies. Journal of the History of Sexuality15(1): 14–29.
52.
SedgwickEK (1985) Between Men: English Literature and Male Homosocial Desire. New York: Columbia University Press.
53.
SedgwickEK (1990) Epistemology of the Closet. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
54.
ShainessN (1993) Ruminations on chivalry. Contemporary Psychoanalysis29(1): 144–151.
55.
SheehanC (2015) Queer-baiting on the BBC’s Sherlock: addressing the invalidation of queer identities through online fan fiction communities. Undergraduate Research Posters122, available at: http://scholarscompass.vcu.edu/uresposters/122 (accessed October 2015).
56.
ShermanJ (2015) Source, authority, and audience in the BBC’sMerlin. Arthuriana25(1): 82–100.
57.
SmithBH (1991) Contingencies of Value: Alternative Perspectives for Critical Theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
58.
SmithKA (2008) Saints in shining armor: martial asceticism and masculine models of sanctity, ca. 1050–1250. Speculum83(3): 572–602.
59.
SmolA (2004) ‘Oh … oh … Frodo!’ Readings of male intimacy in The Lord of the Rings. MFS50(4): 949–979.
60.
SteinLE (2005) ‘They cavort, you decide’: transgenericism, queerness, and fan interpretation in teen tv. Spectator25(1): 11–22.
61.
TorreyKT (2014) Writing with the Winchesters: metatextual Wincest and the provisional practice of happy endings. Journal of Fandom Studies2(2): 163–180.
