This article explores the performance of heterosexual masculinity in the Yahoo! Taiwan dating site via a discourse analysis of daters’ self-introductions. Seeing the collective representations of masculinities as ‘masculine fronts’, the research finds that tender, domestic, emotional, passive and victimized fronts dominate the site; in comparison, tough and virile fronts, which reflect hegemonic Taiwanese masculinities, are much less performed. The dating site is argued to act as a heterotopia: it reflects the social imaginaries of appropriate masculinities in women’s perspectives; being quasi-anonymous and female-gaze-only, it compensates for the imperfect daily social spaces by allowing the public performance of marginalized masculinities; moreover, it manifests the illusory aspect of hegemonic masculinities, which are presumed to be ‘natural’, rather than acted out in accordance with the situated social relations and spectatorships.
AlbrightJM (2007) How do I love thee and thee and thee: self-presentation, deception, and multiple relationships online. In WhittyBJamesA (eds) Online Matchmaking. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 81–93.
2.
BakhtinMM (1986) The problem of text in linguistics, philosophy, and the human sciences: an experiment in philosophical analysis, trans. McGee VW. In: EmersonGHolquistM (eds) Speech Genre and Other Late Essays. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press, pp. 103–131.
3.
BarraketJHenry-WaringMS (2008) Getting it on(line): sociological perspectives on e-dating. Journal of Sociology44(2): 149–165.
4.
BassettC (1997) Virtually gendered: life in an on-line world. In GelderKThorntonS (eds) The Subcultures Readers. London: Routledge, 537–550.
5.
ChangY-K (2003) The gay right movement in the internet: is it possible or not?Journal of Cyber Culture and Information Society4: 53–86.
DavisMHartGBoldingGSherrLElfordJ (2006) E-dating, identity and HIV prevention: theorising sexualities, risk and network society. Sociology of Health & Illness28(4): 457–478.
8.
EllisonNHeinoRGibbsJ (2006) Managing impressions online: self-presentation processes in the online dating environment. Journal ofComputer-Mediated Communication11(2): article 2. Available at: http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol11/issue2/ellison.html
9.
FarrellW (1974) The Liberated Man. New York: Berkley Books.
10.
FoucaultM (1986) Of other spaces, trans. MiskowiecJ. Diacritics16(1): 22–27.
11.
GoffmanE (1990 [1959]) The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. London: Penguin.
12.
GuertinC (2002) Gliding bodies: cyberfeminism, interactivity and Slattery’s Collabyrinth. Cyberfeminism: Special Issue in Artwomen.org. Available at: http://www.artwomen.org/cyberfems/index.htm
13.
HarawayD (1990) A manifesto for cyborgs: science, technology and socialist feminism in the 1980s. In: NicholsonL (ed.) Feminism/Postmodernism. New York: Routledge, 190–233.
14.
HarcourtW (2004) Worldwide women and the web. In: GauntlettDHorsleyR (eds) Web. Studies, 2nd edn. London: Arnold, 243–253.
15.
HawthornSKleinR (1999) Cyberfeminism: introduction. In HawthornSKleinR (eds) Cyberfeminism: Connectivity, Critique and Creativity. North Melbourne: Spinifex, 1–18.
16.
HoJ (2001) Sex, power and the erotic dance pubs of Taiwan: a field observation. Radical Quarterly in Social Studies44: 167–199.
17.
Hsin-Dai (1995) The New Good Man. Taipei: She-Bao.
18.
HwangS-L (2003) Masculinity and Taiwan’s flower-drinking culture. Taiwanese Sociology5: 73–132.
19.
IgnacioE (2000) Ain’t I a Filipino (woman)? An analysis of authorship/authority through the construction of ‘Filipina’ on the net. Sociological Quarterly41(4): 551–572.
20.
KennedyH (2006) Beyond anonymity, or future directions for internet identity research. New Media & Society18(6): 859–876.
21.
KieslingSA (2005) Homosocial desire in men’s talk: balancing and re-creating cultural discourses of masculinity. Language in Society34: 695–726.
22.
KolkoBNakamuraLRodmanGB (eds) (2000) Race in Cyberspace. New York: Routledge.
23.
KuoY-L (2004) A pleasant sensation from rubbing? The masculinity construction of Aluba. Master’s thesis submitted to Graduate Institute of Building and Planning, National Taiwan University.
24.
LeeM-LYangY-CYiC-C (2000) The division of household labour: employment reality or egalitarian ideology?Taiwanese Journal of Sociology24: 59–88.
25.
LinC-J (2007) Identity differences among women in patrilineal families: a cross-generational comparison of the division of domestic labor of the middle-class working women. Radical Quarterly in Social Studies68: 1–73.
26.
LinH-WYouM-H (2010) Examining the family representations in textbooks. Curriculum & Instruction Quarterly13(2): 47–76.
27.
LiuC-H (2009) The story of boosting virility in Taiwan: a cultural approach to the rhetoric of virility boosting. Master’s thesis submitted to Graduate Institute for Social Research and Cultural Studies, National Chiao Tung University.
28.
LouieK (2002) Theorising Chinese Masculinity: Society and Gender in China. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
29.
MeadGH (1934) Mind, Self and Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
30.
NakamuraL (2000) Race in/for cyberspace: identity tourism and racial passing on the internet. In: BellDKennedyBM (eds) The Cybercultures Reader. London: Routledge, 712–720.
31.
NakamuraL (2001) Race. In: SwissT (ed.) Unspun: Key Concepts for Understanding the World Wide Web. New York: New York University Press, 39–50.
32.
NakamuraL (2002) Cybertypes: Race, Ethnicity, and Identity on the Internet. New York: Routledge.
33.
O’RiordanKPhillipsDJ (eds) (2007) Queer Online: Media Technology and Sexuality. New York: Peter Lang.
34.
PlantS (1996) On the matrix: cyberfeminist simulations. In ShieldsR (ed.) Cultures of Internet. London: Sage, 170–183.
35.
PleckJ (1980) Men’s power with women, other men, and society. In: PleckHEPleckJH (eds) The American Man. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 417–433.
36.
RobinsonL (2007) The cyberself: the self-ing project goes online, symbolic interaction in the digital age. New Media & Society9(1): 93–110.
37.
SchauerT (2005) Women’s porno: the heterosexual female gaze in porn sites ‘For Women’. Sexuality & Culture9(2): 42–64.
38.
ShawPSuC-S (2002) Discourse of mist of romantic love in Taiwan’s popular music: 1989–1998. Mass Communication Research70: 167–195.
39.
SommerMH (2002) Dangerous males, vulnerable males, and polluted males. In BrownellSWasserstromJN (eds) Chinese Femininities/Chinese Masculinities: A Reader. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, pp. 67–88.
40.
StoneAR (1995) The War of Desire and Technology at the Close of the Mechanical Age. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
41.
TurkleS (1995) Life on the Screen: Identity in the Age of the Internet. New York: Simon and Schuster.
42.
Van CompernolleRA (2007) Second-person pronoun use of address strategies in on-line personal ads from Quebec. Journal of Pragmatics40(12): 2062–2076.
43.
WangY-J (2010) Women’s self-narratives and gender performatives on the Internet dating site. Journal of Women’s and Gender Studies27: 201–249.
44.
WestCZimmermanD H (1987) Doing gender. Gender & Society1(2): 125–151.
45.
WhittyMT (2007) The art of selling one’s self on an online dating site: the BAR approach. In: WhittyMTBakerAJamesA (eds) Online Matchmaking. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 57–69.
46.
WhittyMT (2008) Revealing the ‘the real’ me, searching the ‘actual’ you: presentation of self on an internet dating site. Computers in Human Behavior24(4): 1707–1723.
47.
YangC-FJGrayPPopeHG (2005) Male body image in Taiwan versus the West: yanggang zhiqi meets the Adonis complex. American Journal of Psychiatry162(2): 263–269.
48.
YurchisinJWatchravesringkanMccabeDB (2005) An exploration of identity re-creation in the context of internet dating. Social Behaviour and Personality33(8): 735–750.
