Emerging in the early 2000s, the lolcow is a vulnerable Internet persona whose digital presence is exploited by online audiences for entertainment and pleasure. Through a case study of one such lolcow, popular TikTok creator and livestreamer Joshua Block (@WorldOfTShirts), this short essay argues that the lolcow’s growing mainstream presence reflects a rise in authoritarian politics and eugenics where disabled people are openly dehumanized. Although disability as amusement object carries a long-standing history in western culture through the ‘fool’ and ‘freak’, the essay’s theoretical analysis and close reading of social media artifacts suggest digital affordances and audience practices render the lolcow into a ‘digital freakshow’.
AbidinC (2016) ‘Aren’t these just young, rich women doing vain things online?’: Influencer selfies as subversive frivolity. Social Media + Society2(2): 1–17.
2.
ArriagadaACraigDR (2025) Living my Latin American influencer dream: How racism and nationality shape Latin American influencers within the US. International Journal of Cultural Studies28(1): 168–184.
BucherTHelmondA (2016) The affordances of social media platforms. In: PoellTMarwickABurgessJ (eds) The SAGE Handbook of Social Media. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp.233–253.
5.
ClickMA (2019) Anti-Fandom: Dislike and Hate in the Digital Age. New York: NYU Press.
CunninghamSCraigDR (2016) Being ‘really real’ on YouTube: Authenticity, community, and brand culture in social media entertainment. Media International Australia164(1): 71–81.
8.
DuffyBEMeisnerC (2023) Platform governance at the margins: Social media creators’ experiences with algorithmic (in)visibility. Media, Culture, & Society45(2): 285–304.
9.
DuffyBEOnonyeASaweyM (2024) The politics of vulnerability in the influencer economy. European Journal of Cultural Studies27(3): 1–14.
10.
DuffyBEPinchASannonS, et al. (2021) The nested precarities of creative labor on social media. Social Media + Society7(2): 1–12.
11.
ErevellesN (2011) Disability and Difference in Global Contexts: Enabling a Transformative Body Politic. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
12.
Garland ThomsonR (1996) Freakery: Cultural Spectacles of the Extraordinary Body. New York: NYU Press.
13.
GlattZ (2024) The intimacy triple bind: Structural inequalities and relational labour in the influencer industry. European Journal of Cultural Studies27(3): 424–440.
14.
HallerB (2010) Representing Disability in an Ableist World: Essays on Mass Media. Louisville, KY: Advocado Press.
15.
HarrisBCFoxmanMPartinWC (2023) ‘Don’t make me ratio you again’: How political influencers encourage platformed political participation. Social Media + Society9(2): 1–15.
16.
HowellKA (2025) Disability and Fandom. Iowa City, IA: University of Iowa Press.
17.
JohnsonMR (2019) Inclusion and exclusion in the digital economy: Disability and mental health as a livestreamer on Twitch.tv. Information, Communication, & Society22(4): 506–520.
18.
KimJB (2020) Disability in an age of fascism. American Quarterly72(1): 265–276.
KreissDMcGregorSC (2024) A review and provocation: On polarization and platforms. New Media & Society26(1): 556–579.
22.
MeisnerC (2023) Networked responses to networked harassment? Creators’ coordinated management of ‘hate raids’ on Twitch. Social Media + Society9(2): 1–12.
23.
MilletA (2004) Exceeding the frame: The photography of Diane Arbus. Disability Studies Quarterly24(4): 1–11.
24.
MirrleesT (2019) The alt-right’s platformization of fascism and a new left’s digital united front. Democratic Communiqué28(2): 28–46.
25.
OonC (2025) Hole in the (pay) wall: Monetized access, content leaks, and community responsibility. International Journal of Communication19: 1794–1800.
26.
PhillipsW (2015) This Is Why We Can’t Have Nice Things: Mapping the Relationship between Online Trolling and Mainstream Culture. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
27.
PutováB (2018) Freak shows. Otherness of the human body as a form of public presentation. Anthropologie56(2): 91–102.
28.
RauchbergJ (2025) Articulating algorithmic ableism: The suppression and surveillance of disabled TikTok creators. Journal of Gender Studies. Epub ahead of print 8 March. DOI: 10.1080/09589236.2025.2477116.
29.
RauchbergJMaddoxJ (2024) ‘She’s my bitch eating crackers’: Influencer snark and the digital gossip economy. Feminist Media Studies. Epub ahead of print 18 November. DOI: 10.1080/14680777.2024.2430462.
30.
SchalkS (2018) BodyMinds Reimagined: (Dis)ability, Race, and Gender in Black Women’s Speculative Fiction. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
SobandeFHesmondhalghDSahaA (2023) Black, Brown and Asian cultural workers, creativity, and activism: The ambivalence of digital self-branding practices. The Sociological Review71(6): 1448–1466.
Van SchenckR (2024) Replatformization: Racial capitalism and the stack-consciousness of Kiwi farms. AoIR2024, University of Sheffield, 30 October–2 November.
36.
WilliamsJL (2017) Media, Performative Identity, and the New American Freakshow. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
