The coronavirus disease (COVID)-19 pandemic was expected to be particularly detrimental for performing artists, given the nature of their work. The scarce literature on the precarity experiences of performers following the COVID-19 pandemic has predominantly focused on Western and Central Europe. The present article contributes to the literature by investigating the experience of Romanian performers before and after the COVID-19 outbreak through in-depth semi-structured interviews. Romania is a valuable case study, given its peculiarities in terms of cultural policy. After the fall of communism, cultural policy was characterised by a constant dominant strategic focus on (mostly religious) heritage, while the cultural funding model is particularly detrimental to smaller independent artists and organisations. By focusing on it, the study shows that research on precarity needs to be embedded in the local (cultural) policy context, as it shapes the precarity experiences of artists. Without a proper understanding of the policy context, research will likely fail to offer effective policy recommendations.
AlacovskaAGillR (2019) De-westernizing creative labour studies: The informality of creative work from an excentric perspective. International Journal of Cultural Studies22(2): 195–212.
2.
BainAMcLeanH (2013) The artistic precariat. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society6: 93–111.
3.
BanksM (2007) The Politics of Cultural Work. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
4.
BanksM (2020) The work of culture and C-19. European Journal of Cultural Studies23(4): 648–654.
5.
BecuțAG (2016) Dynamics of creative industries in a post-communist society. The Development of Creative Sector in Romanian Cities. City, Culture and Society7(2): 63–68.
6.
BelitskiMKalyuzhnovaYKhlystovaO (2021) The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the creative industries: A literature review and future research agenda. Journal of Business Research139: 1192–1210.
7.
BennettD (2009) Academy and the real world: Developing realistic notions of career in the performing arts. Arts & Humanities in Higher Education8(3): 309–327.
8.
BetzlerDLootsEProkůpekM, et al. (2020) COVID-19 and the arts and cultural sectors: Investigating countries’ contextual factors and early policy measures. International Journal of Cultural Policy7(6): 796–814.
9.
BridgesLE (2018) Flexible as freedom? The dynamics of creative industry work and the case study of the editor in publishing. New Media & Society20(4): 1303–1319.
10.
ChafeDKaidaL (2020) Harmonic dissonance: Coping with employment precarity among professional musicians in St John’s, Canada. Work, Employment and Society34(3): 407–423.
11.
CohenNS (2012) Cultural work as a site of struggle: Freelancers and exploitation. Triplec10(2): 141–155.
12.
ComunianREnglandL (2020) Creative and cultural work without filters: Covid-19 and exposed precarity in the creative economy. Cultural Trends29(3): 112–128.
13.
CoulsonS (2012) Collaborating in a competitive world: Musicians’ working lives and understandings of entrepreneurship. Work, Employment and Society26(2): 246–261.
14.
CrosbyPMcKenzieJ (2021) Survey evidence on the impact of COVID-19 on Australian musicians and implications for policy. International Journal of Cultural Policy28(2): 166–186.
15.
DinardiCWortmanbanAHernándezMM (2023) It’s been a roller coaster”: Insights from performing artists on the COVID-19 pandemic and cultural policy. Cultural Trends. Epub ahead of print 12 July. DOI: 10.1080/09548963.2023.2227865.
16.
ElstadBDøvingEJanssonD (2022) Precariousness during an ongoing crisis. Cultural Workers and the Corona Pandemic. Industrial Relations Journal53(5): 466–483.
17.
Emergency Ordinance 132/2020 regarding support measures intended for employees and employers in the context of the epidemiological situation determined by the spread of the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus, as well as to stimulate employment growth. Available at: https://legislatie.just.ro/Public/DetaliiDocument/229026
EY (2021) Rebuilding Europe: The cultural and creative economy before and after the COVID-19 crisis. https://www.rebuilding-europe.eu/ (accessed 15 October 2023)
20.
FrithSMarshallL (2004) Making sense of copyright. In: FrithSMarshallL(eds) Music and Copyright (2nd edn). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, pp.1–18.
21.
GarnhamN (2005) From cultural to creative industries. International Journal of Cultural Policy11(1): 15–29.
22.
GeeKYeowP (2021) A hard day’s night: Building sustainable careers for musicians. Cultural Trends30(4): 338–354.
23.
GillRPrattA (2008) Precarity and cultural work in the social factory? Immaterial labour, precariousness and cultural work. Theory, Culture & Society25(7–8): 1–30.
HancockPTylerMGodivaM (2021) Thursday night and a sing- along ‘sung alone’: The Experiences of a self-employed performer during the pandemic. Work, Employment and Society35(6): 1155–1166.
26.
HesmondhalghD (2009) The digitalisation of music. In: PrattACJeffcuttP (eds) Creativity, Innovation and the Cultural Economy. London: Rutledge, pp.57–73.
27.
KarakioulafiC (2022) The Covid-19 pandemic as a catalyst of art workers mobilisation and unionisation: The case of Greek actors. Spanish Journal of Sociology31(4): a129.
28.
KuehnKCorriganTF (2013) Hope labor: The role of employment prospects in online social production. The Political Economy of Communication1(1): 9–25.
29.
LavangaMMartoranaMFLootsE, et al. (2021) Designed for the job? An empirical study on the determinants of design graduates’ work choices. Cultural Trends30(4): 321–337.
MackenzieEMcKinlayA (2021) Hope labour and the psychic life of cultural work. Human Relations74(11): 1841–1863.
33.
Minister Order 2231/2011 for the approval of the Methodological Norms regarding the organization and operation of the commissions, the selection procedure of cultural projects in order to grant non-refundable funding from the National Cultural Fund, as well as the resolution of appeals. Available at: https://legislatie.just.ro/Public/DetaliiDocument/128118
34.
MorganGNelliganP (2015) Labile labour–Gender, flexibility and creative work. The Sociological Review63(1): 66–83.
35.
MorganGWoodJ (2014) Creative accommodations. Journal of Cultural Economy7(1): 64–78.
PopaNPopA-MMarian- PotraA-C, et al. (2021) The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on independent creative activities in two large cities in Romania. International Journal of Environmental Research of Public Health18: 7674.
40.
PrattAC (2015) Resilience, locality and the cultural economy. City, Culture and Society6(3): 61–67.
SerinoM (2020) Continuity, change and transitions of artistic professions in the Italian theatre industry. Sociologia del Lavoro157(2020): 186–205.
45.
ShorttHIzakM (2020) The contested home. In: ParkerM (ed.) Life after COVID-19. Bristol: Bristol University Press, pp.43–52.
46.
SmithCMcKinlayA (2009) Creative labour: Content, contract and control. In: McKinlayASmithC (eds) Creative Labour: Working in the Creative Industries. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp.29–50.
47.
SpiroNPerkinsRKayeS, et al. (2021) The effects of COVID-19 lockdown 1.0 on working patterns, income, and wellbeing among performing arts professionals in the United Kingdom. Frontiers in Psychology11: 594086.
48.
StuckeyMRichardVDeckerA, et al. (2021) Supporting holistic wellbeing for performing artists during the COVID-19 pandemic and recovery: Study protocol. Frontiers in Psychology12: 577882.
Tønnessen DhirØAFlåtenBT (2021) Digital knowledge sharing and creative performance: Work from home during the COVID-19 pandemic. Technological Forecasting & Social Change170(1): 120866.
51.
TanghettiJComunianRDentT (2022) Covid-19 opened the pandora box’ of the creative city: Creative and cultural workers against precarity in Milan. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society15: 615–634.
52.
TerranovaT (2000) Free labor: Producing culture for the digital economy. Social Text18(2): 33–58.
53.
TurriniMChicchiF (2013) Precarious subjectivities are not for sale: The loss of the measurability of labour for performing arts workers. Global Discourse: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Current Affairs and Applied Contemporary Thought3(3–4): 507–521.
54.
UmneyC (2016) The labour market for jazz musicians in Paris and London: Formal regulation and informal norms. Human Relations69(3): 711–729.
55.
UmneyCKretsosL (2014) Creative labour and collective interaction: The working lives of young jazz musicians in London. Work, Employment and Society28(4): 571–588.
WarranKMayTFancourtandD, et al. (2022) Understanding changes to perceived socioeconomic and psychosocial adversities during COVID-19 for UK freelance cultural workers. Cultural Trends32: 449–473.
58.
WelshM (2014) Resilience and responsibility: Governing uncertainty in a complex world. The Geographical Journal180(1): 15–26.
59.
ZhangQNegusK (2021) Stages, platforms, streams: The economies and industries of live music after digitalization. Popular Music and Society44(5): 539–557.
60.
ZhangSXMillerSOXuW, et al. (2022) Meta-analytic evidence of depression and anxiety in Eastern Europe during the COVID-19 pandemic. European Journal of Psychotraumatology13(1): 2000132.
