This article presents an analysis of life-political themes in online discussions about the hikikomori phenomenon, acute social withdrawal. In a Finnish online image-board, socially withdrawn individuals anonymously take part in conversations concerning, for example, welfare and the difficulties of working life. The aim of this study is to bring new perspectives to the discussion about anonymous online communication, and especially its relationship with social exclusion and anti-social behaviour. In the article, I examine how ‘the anti-social’ is produced and understood in this anonymously used forum. Through a thematically constructed textual analysis of online discussions, the following questions are answered: What kinds of life-political themes are found in the discussion concerning social withdrawal? How is the feeling of being an outsider in one’s own society voiced in this online community? What kind of space for public discussion does this specific forum provide? In the online space, an intimate public is formed around shared narratives and the conversations seem to offer at least a space of expressive politics and social criticism for the participants in a situation that is labelled by precariousness.
BerardiF (2015) Heroes: Mass Murder and Suicide. London and New York: Verso.
4.
BerlantL (2007) Cruel optimism: On Marx, loss and the senses. New Formations63: 33–51.
5.
BerlantL (2008) The Female Complaint: The Unfinished Business of Sentimentality in American Culture. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
6.
BerlantL (2011) Cruel Optimism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
7.
BerlantLProsserJ (2011) Life writing and intimate publics: A conversation with Lauren Berlant. Biography: An Interdisciplinary Quarterly34(1): 180–187.
8.
ColemanG (2014) Hacker, Hoaxer, Whistleblower, Spy: The Many Faces of Anonymous. London: Verso.
9.
DahlgrenP (2005) The internet, public spheres, and political communication: Dispersion and deliberation. Political Communication22(2): 147–162.
10.
Firer-BlaëssS (2016) The collective identity of anonymous: Web of meanings in a digitally enabled movement. Doctoral thesis, Uppsala University.
11.
GiddensA (1991) Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Cambridge: Polity Press.
12.
GrahamT (2008) Needles in a haystack: A new approach for identifying and assessing political talk in non-political discussion forums. Javnost: The Public15(2): 17–36.
13.
GrahamTHarjuA (2011) Reality TV as a trigger of everyday political talk in the net-based public sphere. European Journal of Communication26(1): 18–32.
14.
HineC (2015) Ethnography for the Internet: Embedded, Embodied and Everyday. London: Bloomsbury.
15.
HochschildAR (2016) Strangers in Their Own Land: Anger and Mourning on the American Right. New York and London: The New Press.
16.
JokinenE (2015) Precarious everyday agency. European Journal of Cultural Studies19(1): 85–99.
17.
KortteinenM (1992) Kunnian kenttä. Suomalainen palkkatyö kulttuurisena muotona [Field of honour. Finnish paid work as a cultural form]. Helsinki: Hanki ja jää.
18.
ManivannanV (2013) Tits or GTFO: The logics of misogyny on 4chan’s random – /b. Fibreculture Journal22: 109–132.
19.
MårtensM (2015) Pako työmarkkinoilta näkyvyyden kentässä [Escape from the work market in the field of visibility]. In: AuttoJNygårdM (eds) Hyvinvointivaltion kulttuurintutkimus [Cultural studies of the welfare state]. Rovaniemi: Lapland University Press, pp.110–135.
20.
MarwickALewisR (2017) Media manipulation and disinformation online. Research report, Data & Society Research Institute, New York, 15May.
21.
MassanariA (2015) Participatory Culture, Community, and Play: Learning from Reddit. New York: Peter Lang.
22.
NagleA (2017) Kill All Normies: Online Culture Wars from 4Chan and Tumblr to Trump and the Alt-Right. Winchester and Washington, DC: Zero Books.
23.
OchsECappsL (1996) Narrating the self. Annual Review of Anthropology25: 19–43.
PhillipsW (2015) This Is Why We Can’t Have Nice Things: Mapping the Relationship between Online Trolling and Mainstream Culture. Cambridge, MA and London: The MIT Press.
26.
SaitoT (2013) Hikikomori: Adolescence without End (trans. AnglesJ). Minneapolis, MN and London: University of Minnesota Press.
27.
SandbergO (2015) Hallittu syrjäytyminen [Controlled social exclusion]. Doctoral thesis, Tampere: Tampere University Press.
28.
SiegmannKASchiphorstF (2016) Understanding the globalizing precariat: From informal sector to precarious work. Progress in Development Studies16(2): 111–123.
29.
SvenssonJ (2014) Political participation frames in a gay community. In: ParycekPEdelmannN (eds) CeDem 2014: Conference on E-Democracy and Open Government. Krems: Edition Donau-Universität Krems, pp.155–168.
30.
TeoAFettersMStufflebamK, et al. (2015) Identification of the hikikomori syndrome of social withdrawal: Psychosocial features and treatment preferences in four countries. International Journal of Social Psychiatry61(1): 64–72.
31.
ToivonenTNorasakkunkitVUchidaY (2011) Unable to conform, unwilling to rebel? Youth, culture, and motivation in globalizing Japan. Frontiers in Psychology2: 207.
32.
ValaskiviKHoikkalaT (2006) Vauraat vanhemmat ja kuluttajalapset [Affluent parents and consumer kids]. In: ValaskiviK (ed.) Vaurauden Lapset: Näkökulmia japanilaiseen ja suomalaiseen nykykulttuuriin [Children of Affluence. Approaches to Japanese and Finnish Contemporary Culture]. Tampere: Vastapaino, pp.211–232.
33.
WrightS (2012) From ‘third place’ to ‘third space’: Everyday political talk in non-political online spaces. Javnost: The Public19(3): 5–20.
