The mediation of parenting has recently occupied sociologists and media, communication and cultural studies scholars alike. This article locates itself within this developing strand of research, as it explores discourses of intensive motherhood on a Facebook discussion group that provides support and advice for a specific approach to and philosophy of childbirth. Presenting findings from an analysis of main posts and comments made on them, I tease out the brighter and darker sides of the performance of motherhood in anticipation of birth on social media - reading these against discussions about the self-managing, intensive mother who is responsible for making the very best decisions for her child.
ArendellT (2000) Conceiving and investigating motherhood: The decade’s scholarship. Journal of Marriage and Family62(4): 1192–1207.
2.
BambergMGeorgakopoulouA (2008) Small stories as a new perspective in narrative and identity analysis. Text & Talk, 28(3): 377–396.
3.
BarnesCPowerM (2012) Internalising discourses of parenting blame: Voices from the field. Studies in the Maternal4(2): 1–21.
4.
BradyEGuerinS (2010) Not the romantic, all happy, coochy coo experience: A qualitative analysis of interactions on an Irish parenting web site. Family Relations59: 14–27.
5.
BruerJT1999The Myth of the First Three Years. New York: Free Press
6.
ButlerK (2010) Intensive mothering in British Columbia: Understanding the impact of an ‘investing-in-children’ framework on mothering ideology. International Journal of Canadian Studies42: 243–253.
7.
ChaeJ (2015) Am I a better mother than you?Communication Research42(4): 503–525.
8.
ChanAH (2008) Life in happy land: Using virtual space and doing motherhood in Hong Kong. Gender, Place & Culture15(2): 169–188.
9.
ChenGM (2013) Don’t call me that: A techno-feminist critique of the term mommy blogger. Mass Communication and Society16(4): 510–532.
10.
ChenGM (2015) Why do women bloggers use social media? Recreation and information motivations outweigh engagement motivations. New Media & Society17(1): 24–40.
11.
ChereshevaI (2015) Food for thought: A comparative analysis of online narratives of maternal practices of infant feeding in Hungary and Bulgaria. Women’s Studies International Forum53: 147–158.
12.
ColtraneSShihKY (2010) Gender and the division of labor. In Handbook of Gender Research in Psychology. New York: Springer, pp. 401–422.
13.
CouldryN (2004) Theorising media as practice. Social Semiotics14: 114–132.
14.
DahlenHGHomerCSE (2013) Motherbirth or childbirth? A prospective analysis of vaginal birth after caesarean blogs. Midwifery29(2): 167.
15.
De BenedictisS (in press) Watching one born every minute: Negotiating the terms of the good birth. In: MoselyRWheatleyHWoodH (eds) Television for Women. London; New York: Taylor & Francis.
16.
ElliottSPowellRBrentonJ (2015) Being a good mom. Journal of Family Issues36(3): 351–370.
17.
FairclothC (2010) If they want to risk the health and well-being of their child, that’s up to them: Long-term breastfeeding, risk and maternal identity. Health, Risk & Society12(4): 357–367.
18.
FairclothC (2013) Militant Lactivism?Attachment Parenting and Intensive Motherhood in the UK and France (Vol. 24). New York: Berghahn Books.
19.
FoxB (2009) When Couples Become Parents: The Creation of Gender in the Transition to Parenthood. Toronto, ON, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
GadamerHG (2002) The Beginning of Knowledge. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
22.
GeorgakopoulouA (2007) Small Stories, Interaction and Identities. Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins Pub. Co.
23.
GillROrgadS (2016) The confidence cult(ure). Australian Feminist Studies30(86): 324–344.
24.
GrayJ (2013) Feeding on the web: Online social support in the breastfeeding context. Communication Research Reports30(1): 1–11.
25.
HausmanB (2005) Risky business: Framing childbirth in hospital settings. Journal of Medical Humanities26(1): 23–38.
26.
HaysS (1998) The Cultural Contradictions of Motherhood. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
27.
HollwayW (2001) From motherhood to maternal subjectivity. International Journal of Critical Psychology2: 13–38.
28.
HewittPLFlettGL (1991) Perfectionism in the self and social contexts: Conception, assessment, and the association with psychopathology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology60: 456–470.
29.
HoreckT (2016) The affective labour of one born every minute in its UK and US formats. Critical Studies in Television11(2): 164–176.
30.
JensenT (2012) Tough love in tough times. Studies in the Maternal4(2): 1–26.
31.
JohnsonSA (2015) ‘Intimate mothering publics’: Comparing face-to-face support groups and internet use for women seeking information and advice in the transition to first-time motherhood. Culture, Health and Sexuality17(2): 237–251.
32.
KitzingerS (2012) Rediscovering the social model of childbirth. Birth39(4): 301–304.
33.
LeeEJ (2008) Living with risk in the age of ‘intensive motherhood’: Maternal identity and infant feeding. Health, Risk & Society10(5): 467–477.
34.
LittlerJ (2013) The rise of the ‘yummy mummy’: Popular conservatism and the neoliberal maternal in contemporary British culture. Communication, Culture & Critique6(2): 227–243.
35.
LonghurstR (2009) Maternities: Genders, Bodies and Space. London: Routledge.
36.
LopezLK (2009) The radical act of ‘mommy blogging’: Redefining motherhood through the blogosphere. New Media & Society11(5): 729–747.
37.
LuceACashMHundleyV, et al. (2016) Is it realistic? The portrayal of pregnancy and childbirth in the media. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth16(1): 40.
38.
LuptonD (1999) Risk and the ontology of pregnant embodiment. In: LuptonD (ed.) Risk and Sociocultural Theory: New Directions and Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 59–85.
39.
MackAN (2016) The self-made mom: Neoliberalism and masochistic motherhood in homebirth videos on YouTube. Women’s Studies in Communication, 39(1): 47–68.
40.
MartinJSugarmanJThompsonJ (2003) Psychology and the Question of Agency. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
41.
McRobbieA (2013) Feminism, the family and the new ‘mediated’ maternalism. New Formations80: 119–137.
42.
MacvarishJ (2010) The effect of ‘risk-thinking’ on the contemporary construction of teenage motherhood. Health, Risk & Society12(4): 313–322.
43.
MadgeCO’ConnorH (2007) Parenting gone wired: Empowerment of new mothers on the internet?Social & Cultural Geography7(2): 199–220.
44.
MillerTBonasSDixon-WoodsM (2007) Qualitative research on breastfeeding in the UK: A narrative review and methodological reflection. Evidence & Policy3(2): 197–230.
45.
MurrayM (2013) ‘Staying with the baby’: Intensive mothering and social mobility in Santiago de Chile. In: FairclothCLayneLHoffmanD (eds) Parenting in Global Perspective: Negotiating Ideologies of Kinship, Self and Politics. Abingdon, UK: Routledge, 151–66.
46.
NadesanMH2002Engineering the entrepreneurial infant: Brain science, infant development toys, and governmentality. Cultural Studies16(3): 401–432.
47.
MorrisonA (2011) “Suffused by feeling and affect”: The intimate public of personal mommy blogging. Biography34(1): 37–55.
48.
OrgadSDe BenedictisS (2015) The ‘stay-at-home’ mother, postfeminism and neoliberalism: Content analysis of UK news coverage. European Journal of Communication30(4): 418–436.
49.
PageRE (2013) Stories and Social Media: Identities and interaction. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
50.
ParkerR (2009) Why study the maternal. Studies in the Maternal1(1): 1–4.
51.
PedersenS (2016) The good, the bad and the ‘good enough’ mother on the UK parenting forum mumsnet. Women’s Studies International Forum59: 32–38.
52.
PedersenSSmithsonJ (2013) Mothers with attitude – How the mumsnet parenting forum offers space for new forms of femininity to emerge online. Women’s Studies International Forum38: 97–106.
53.
PettigrewSArcherCHarriganP (2016) A thematic analysis of mothers’ motivations for blogging. Maternal and Child Health Journal20(5): 1025–1031.
54.
RadwayJ (1984) Reading the Romance. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.
55.
RiessmanCK (2008) Narrative Methods for the Human Sciences. Los Angeles, CA; London: Sage.
56.
RizzoKSchiffrinHLissM (2013) Insight into the parenthood paradox: Mental health outcomes of intensive mothering. Journal of Child and Family Studies22(5): 614–620.
57.
RogersM (2015) Beyond blogging: How mothers use creative non-fiction techniques in digital environments to dislodge the mask of motherhood. Journal of Family Studies21(3): 248–260.
58.
RomagnoliAWallG (2012) I know I’m a good mom: Young, low-income mothers experiences with risk perception, intensive parenting ideology and parenting education programmes. Health, Risk & Society14(3): 273–289.
59.
RuddickS (1989) Maternal Thinking: Towards a Politics of Peace. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
60.
SearsCAGodderisR (2011) Roar like a tiger on TV? Constructions of women and childbirth in reality TV. Feminist Media Studies11(2): 181–195.
61.
SilverstoneR (1999) Why Study the Media?London: Sage.
62.
SilverstoneR. (2007) Media and morality. Cambridge: Polity.
63.
StoeberJOttoK (2006) Positive conceptions of perfectionism: Approaches, evidence, challenges. Personality and Social Psychology Review10: 295–319.
64.
ThompsonJ (1995) The Media and Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
65.
TylerI (2000) Reframing pregnant embodiment. In: AhmedSKilbyJLuryC, et al (eds) Transformations: Thinking through Feminism. London; New York: Routledge, pp. 288–302.
66.
TylerI (2001) Skin-tight: Celebrity pregnancy and subjectivity. In: AhmedSStaceyJ (eds) Thinking through the Skin. London; New York: Routledge, pp. 69–83.
67.
TylerI (2009) Birth: An introduction. Feminist Review93: 1–7.
68.
TylerIBaraitserL (2013) Private view, public birth. Studies in the Maternal5(2): 1–27.
69.
WallG (2010) Mothers’ experiences with intensive parenting and brain development discourse. Women’s Studies International Forum33(3): 253–263.
70.
WhitemanN (2012) Undoing Ethics: Rethinking Practice in Online Research. Boston, MA: Springer.
