This article examines the hybrid documentary series Who Do You Think You Are?, The Monastery and The Convent in relation to their ability to update the documentary format. It asks if new forms of engagement with documentary subjects are enabled by the impact of light entertainment and reality television genres. It argues that although the generic mix contributes to the situation of truth in the tension between the public and the private, it is a set of static images, used particularly often in reflective moments, that facilitate a more introspective and intrinsic form of learning. These images resemble closely those used in popular anthologies of poetry or meditation books, in that they foreground their poetic function and hence appear to offer something to look at rather than primarily conveying additional meaning.
Aslama M. and Pantti M. ( 2006) Talking alone: Reality TV, emotions and authenticity . European Journal of Cultural Studies9(2): 167-84.
2.
Barthes R. ( 2000) Camera Lucida. Reflections on Photography. London: Vintage.
3.
Bennett T. ( 1979) Formalism and Marxism. London : Routledge.
4.
Bignell J. ( 2008) An Introduction to Television Studies (2nd edn). London: Routledge .
5.
Brown T. ( 2008) Spectacle/gender/history: The case of Gone with the Wind . Screen49(2): 157-78.
6.
Brunsdon C. ( 1990) Problems with quality. Screen32(1): 67-90.
7.
Caldwell JT ( 1995) Televisuality. Style, Crisis, and Authority in American Television. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
8.
Cormack P. ( 2005) Angels, bells, television and Ireland: The place of the Angelus broadcast in the Republic. Media, Culture & Society27(2): 271-87.
9.
Corner J. ( 1995) Television and Public Address. London : Edward Arnold.
10.
Corner J. ( 1999) Documentary: The transformation of a social aesthetic . In: Gripsrud J (ed.) Television and Common Knowledge. London: Routledge, 173-84.
11.
Corner J. ( 2006) Archive aesthetics and the historical imaginary: Wisconsin Death Trip. Screen47(3): 291-306.
12.
Cunningham V. ( 2007) Why exphrasis?Classical Philology102(1): 57-71.
13.
Donelly K. ( 2001) Educational programming. In: Greeber G (ed.) The Television Genre Book . London: BFI Publishing, 139-40.
14.
Döring T. ( 2008) Double exposure. Uses of photography in Ted Hughes’ Birthday Letters. Textual Practice22(4): 679-704.
15.
Dovey J. ( 2000) Freakshow: First Person Media and Factual Television . London: Pluto Press.
16.
Dyer R. ( 1973) Light Entertainment. London: BFI .
17.
Dyer R. ( 1992) Only Entertainment. London: Routledge.
18.
Feuer J. ( 1992) Genre Study and Television. In: Allen RC (ed.) Channels of Discourse, Reassembled. Television and Contemporary Television. London: Routledge, 138-60.
19.
Föllmi D. and Föllmi O. ( 2003) Buddhist Offerings. London: Thames & Hudson.
20.
Foucault M. ( 1978) The History of Sexuality. London : Penguin.
21.
Fry H., Ketteridge S. and Marshall S. ( 2003) A Handbook for Teaching and Learning in Higher Education . London: Kogan Page.
22.
Furedi F. ( 2004) Therapy Culture: Cultivating Vulnerability in an Uncertain Age. London: Routledge .
23.
Furuhata Y. ( 2007) Returning to actuality: Fûkeiron and the landscape film. Screen48(3): 345-62.
24.
Geraghty C. ( 2006) Discussing quality: Critical vocabularies and popular television drama. In: Curran J and Morley D (eds) Media and Cultural Theory. London: Routledge, 221-32.
25.
Gibbs J. ( 2001) Mise-en-Scène: Film Style and Interpretation . London: Wallflower.
26.
Harsthotte S. and Pedri N. ( 2008) Introduction: Photographic Interventions. Poetics Today29(1): 1-29.
27.
Hills M. ( 2005) Who wants to be a fan of Who Wants to Be a Millionaire? Scholarly television criticism, popular aesthetics and academic tastes. In: Johnson C and Turnock R (eds) ITV Cultures: Independent Television over Fifty Years. London: McGraw-Hill , 177-95.
28.
Holdsworth A. ( 2006) ‘Slow Television’ and Stephen Poliakoff’s Shooting the Past. Journal of British Cinema and Television3(1): 128-33.
29.
Jakobson R. ( 1990) Language in Literature. Boston, MA : Harvard University Press.
30.
Jakobson R. and Halle M. ( 2002) Fundamentals of Language. Berlin : Mouton de Gruyter.
31.
Kant I. ( 1998[1785]) Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
32.
Lealand G. ( 2007) The problem of quality television: Television schedules, audience demographics and cultural policy in New Zealand. In: McCabe J and Akass K (eds) Quality TV: Contemporary American Television and Beyond. London: I.B. Tauris, 129-42.
33.
Livingstone S. and Lunt PK ( 1994) Talk on Television: Audience Participation and Public Debate. London: Routledge .
34.
Louvel L. ( 2008): Photography as critical idiom and intermedial criticism . Poetics Today29(1): 31-48.
35.
Lowenstein T. ( 2007) Classic Haiku. The Greatest Japanese Poetry from Bashō, Buson, Issa, Shiki and their Followers. London : Duncan Baird Publishers.
36.
Lury K. ( 2005): Interpreting Television. London : Hodder Arnold.
37.
Lusted D. ( 1998) The popular culture debate and light entertainment on television. In: Geraghty C and Lusted D (eds) The Television Studies Book . London: Hodder Arnold, 175-90.
38.
McCabe J. ( 2005) Creating ‘quality’ audiences for ER on Channel Four. In: Mazdon L and Hammond M (eds) The Contemporary Television Series. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 207-23.
39.
Meyer M. ( 1997) Introduction. In: Meyer M (ed.) Educational Television: What do People Want?Proceedings of a European Conference. Luton : University of Luton Press, 1-23.
40.
Mulvey L. ( 1975) Visual pleasure and narrative cinema. Screen16(3): 6-18.
41.
Nelson R. ( 2007) State of Play: Contemporary High-end TV Drama. Manchester: Manchester University Press .
42.
Nunn H. and Biressi A. ( 2003) Silent Witness: Detection, femininity and the post-mortem body. Feminist Media Studies3(2): 193-206.
43.
Rindge D. and Leahy A. ( 2006) ‘Become what you must’: Trethewey’s poems and Bellocq’s photographs. English Language Notes44(2): 291-306.
44.
Shattuc J. ( 1997) The Talking Cure: Women and Daytime Talkshows. London: Routledge.
45.
Sontag S. ( 1977) On Photography. London: Penguin Books.
46.
Strand M. ( 2000) On becoming a poet. In: Strand M and Boland E (eds) The Making of a Poem: A Norton Anthology of Poetic Forms. New York: Norton, iii-xxv.
47.
Waugh LR ( 1980) The poetic function in the theory of Roman Jakobson . Poetics Today2(1): 57-82.
48.
Watson C.(2009) Picturing validity: Autoethnography and the representation of self ? Qualitative Inquiry15(3): 526-44.
49.
White M. ( 1992) Tele-advising: Therapeutic Discourse in American Television . Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.
