Period drama was the predominant domestic fiction genre on Flemish TV until the late
1 980s. It was very popular, but the press reviews were mostly negative,
complaining, above all, about its low quality. 7 his article investigates the press
discourse on television quality and situates it Within several relevant contexts:
academic writinog on television quality; the Flemish broadcasting and social
context; and broader discourses about cultural value. Two major lines of thought can
be found in reviews of Flemish period drama. On the one hand, -they criticize its
professional qualilty and its low level; on the other hand, they laud its Flermish
character and cnsider it to be 'typically Flemish'. These mixed reviews can be
linked to the prevailing cultural nationalism, aiming to culturally elevate the
Flemish and to formn a national identity. Thus, the press take part in the wider
process of the discursive construction of national identity.
Abercrorribie, N.
(1997) Television and Society.
Cambridge: Polity Press
.
2.
Albers, R.
(1996) 'Quality in Television from the Perspective of the
Professional Programme Maker', in
S. Ishikawa
(ed.) Quality Assessment of Television, pp.
101-144.
Lutorn: University of Luton Press
.
3.
Alvarado, NI
. (2000)
'The "Value" of TV Drama: Why Bother to Produce It?'
, Television & Neuw MIUedia1(3):
307-319
.
4.
Bechtelloni, G.
(1999) 'Introductior', in
MI. Buonanno
(ed.) Shijiing Landscapes: Television Fiction in Europe, pp.
xv-xix.
Luton: University of Lu ton Press
.
5.
Beerten, L.
(2000) Interview, Brussels (14 Jan.).
6.
Biernatzki, V.
and
J. Crowley
(1995)
'Qualityin Television Programrming'
, Comnmunication Research Trends15(1):
3-26
.
7.
Brants, K.
and
E. de Bens
(2000) 'The Status of TV Broadcasting in Europe',
in
J. Wieten
,
G. Murdock
and
P. Dtahlgren
(eds) Television across Europe: A Comparative Introduction, pp.
7-22.
London: Sage
.
8.
BRT
(1969) Enkele algemene vaststellingen en ontwikkelingen van
het kilk: en luisterondercoek (audience research report).
Brussels: BRT
.
9.
BRT
(1975) Annual Report.
Brussels: BUT
.
10.
BRT
(1978) 25 jaar televisie.
Brussels: BRT
.
11.
Brurnsdon, C.
(1990a) 'Television: Aesthetics and Audiences',
in
P. Mellencamp
(ed.) Logics of Television: Essays in Cultural Criticism, pp.
59-72.
Bloomington: Indiana University Press
.
12.
Brunsdon, C.
(1990b)
'Problemis with Quality'
, Screen31(1):
67-90
.
13.
Buonanno, NM
. (ed.) (1998) Eurofiction: Television Fiction in Europe
-Second Report 1998.
Strasbourg: Observatoire Europeen de I'Auuliovisuel
.
14.
Burke, P.
(1992) 'We, the People: Popular Culture and Popular
Identity in Modern Europe', in
S. Lash
and
J. Friedman
(eds) MIodernity and Identity, pp. 293-308.
Oxford. Blackwell
.
15.
Cameron, K.
(ed.) (1999) INationalldentity.
Exeter: Intellect
.
16.
Caughiie, J.
(2000) Television Drama: Realism, MWodernismn and British
Culture.
Oxford: Oxford University Press
.
17.
Collins, R.
(1990) Culture, Communication and IVational
Jdentity. The Case c(f) Canadian Television.
Toronto: University of Toronto Press
.
18.
Corner, J.
(1995) Television Form and Public Address.
London: Edward Arnold
.
19.
Corner, J.
(1998) Studying M/edia: Problenms of Theory and
Mfethod.
Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press
.
20.
de Bens, E.
(1998) 'Television Programming: More Diversity, lMore
Convergence',, in
K. Bran-ts
,
J. I lermes
and
L. van Zoonen
(eds) The l ledia in Question: Popular Cultures and Public
Interests, pp. 27-37.
London: Sage
.
21.
De Meyer, G.
(1995) Populaire cultuur.
Leuven: Garant
.
22.
Deprez, K.
and
J. Vos
(eds) (1998) Vationalisrn in Belgiun: Shifting [den tities,
1780-1995.
Hiourndmills: Macmillan
.
23.
Dhoest, A.
(2001a)
'National Identity as Normality: Representation and Typing in Flemish
Television Fiction'
, InterSections1 (2):
1.5-26
.
24.
Dhoest, A.
(2001b)
'Peasants in Clogs: Imagining Flanders in Television Fiction'
, Studies in Popular Culture23(3):
11-24
.
25.
Dhoest, A.
(2003)
'Reconstructing Flanders: The Representation of the Nation in Flemish
Period Drama'
, Comrnunications28:
253-274
.
26.
Dhoest, A.
(2004)
'Negotiating Images of the Nation: The Production of Flernish TV Drama. 1953-1989'
. Media, Culture & Society26(3):
401-416
.
27.
Easthope, A.
(1999) Englishness and]Vational (Culture.
London: Routledge
.
28.
Everaerts, J.P.
(2000) Filnm in Belgiie: een perm7anente revolte.
Brussels: Mediadoc
.
29.
Fairclough, N.
(1995) Media Discourse.
London: Edward Arnold
.
30.
Fiske, J.
(1992) 'British Cultural Studies and Television',
in
R. Allen
(ed.) Channels of Discourse, Reassembled: Television and Contenmporary
Criticismn (2nd edn), pp. 284-326.
Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press
.
31.
Gellner, E.
(1983) NIVations and NXationalism.
Oxford: Blackwell
.
32.
George, A.
(1959) 'Quantitative arnd Qualitative Approaches to
Content Analy-sis', in
I. de Sola Pool
(ed.) Trends in Content Analysis, pp. 7-32.
1
rbana: Un miversity of Illinois Press
.
33.
Geraghty, C.
and
D. Lusted
(eds) (1998) The Television Studies Book.
TLond-on: Arnold
.
34.
Goodall, P.
(1995) High Culture, Popular Culture. The
Long Debate.
St Leonards: Allen & Unwin
.
35.
Gripsrud, J.
(1989)
' "High Culture" Revisited'
, Cultural Studies3(2):
1941---208
.
36.
Gripsrud, J.
(1995) The Dynasty Years: lollywood Television and Critical
Mledia Studies.
London: Routledge
.
37.
Grossey, R. (1993) Goedenavond, beste kijkers: de televisie in zwart-wit, van
31 oktober 1953 tot 31 december 1970. Antwerpen: Standaard.
38.
Hall, S.
(1992) 'The Question of Cultural Identity', in
S. I-Tall
,
D. held
and
TF. Mc("rew
(eds) ML odernity and its Futures, pp.
273-325.
Cambridge: Polity lress/Open University Press
.
39.
Hall, S.
(ed.) (1997) Representation: Cultural Representation and
Signifying Practices.
London: Sage
.
40.
Hansen, A.
,
S. Cottle
,
R. Negrine
and
C. Newbold
(1998) M1lass Comnmnunication R esearch Mlethods.
Basingstoke: Macmillan
.
41.
Hagson, A.
(1993) 'Representing the National Past: Nostalgia and
Pastiche in the Heritage Filmn', in
L. Friedman
(ed.) British Cinema and
Thatcherisrn,pp.109-129.
London:University Collage of Londan Press
.
42.
Hlilve, P.
,
P Majanen
and
K. Rosengren
(1997)
'Aspects of Quality irn TV Programming: Structural Diversity Compared over
Time and Space'
, European Journal of Communication12(3):
291-318
.
43.
Hoggart, R.
(1989) Quality in Television: Programmes, Prograrnme-makers,
Systemns.
London: John Libbey
.
44.
Isliikawa, S.
(ed.) (1996) Quality Assessment of Television.
Luton: University of Luton Press
.
45.
Jacobs, J.
(2001)
'Issues of Judgement and Value in Television Studies'
, International Journal of Cultural Studies4(4):
427-447
.
46.
Kracauer, S.
(1952)
'The Challenge of Qualitative Content Analysis'
, Public (pinion Quarterly16(4):
631-642
.
47.
Legatt, T
(1996) 'Quality in Television: The Views of
Professionals', in
S. Islhikawa
(ed.) Quality Assessment of Television, PP
145-167.
1 uton: U niversitv of Luton Press
.
48.
Mephamn, J.
(1990) 'The Ethics of Quality in Television', in
G. Mulgan
(ed.) The Question of Quality: The Broadcasting Debate nr. 6, pp.
56-72.
1ondon: BF
.
49.
Monaco, P
] (1998) UTnderstanding Society, Culture and Television.
Westport, CT: Praeger
.
50.
Monk, C.
(2002) LThe British Heritage-film Debate
Revisited', in
C. Monk
aid
A. Sargearit
(eds) British.Jlistorical Cinema, pp.
176-198.
London: Routledge
.
51.
Mosley, P.
(2001) Split Screen: Belgian Cinema and Cultural
identity.
New York: State University of New York Press
.
52.
Mulgan, G.
(ed.) (1990) 'Television's Holy Grail: Seven Types of
Quality', In The Question of Quality. The Broadcasting Debate nr.
6. pp. 4-32.
London: BFI
.
53.
Newcomb, H.
(ed.) (1982) 'Toward a Television Aesthetic', in
Television: The Critical lView, pp. 478-494.
Oxford: Oxford University- Press
.
54.
Newcomnb, H.
(1988) 'One Night of Prime Time: An Analysis of
Television's Multiple Voices', in
J.W. Carey
(ed.) Mledia, Ml1yths and Narratives: Television and the Press,
pp. 88-112.
Newbury Park, CA: Sage
.
55.
Paterson, R.
(1997) 'Evidence of Identities', in
G. Bechelloni
and
M. Buonanno
(eds) Television Fiction and Identities: America, Europe,
7Vaationrs, pp. 21-23(.
Napoli: Iperynediuln
.
56.
Poole, MI
. (1984)
"The Cult of the Generalist: British Television Criticism 1936-83'
, Screen25(2):
41-61
.
57.
Roseiigren, K.
,
M. Carlsson
and
Y. Tagerud
(1996) 'Quality in Programming: Views from the
North', in
S. Ishikawa
(edI) QualiiAssessrnent of Television. pp.
3-48.
Luton: University of Luton Press
.
58.
Schroder, K.C.
(1992) 'Cultural Quality: Search for a
Phantomn?', in
M. Skovmnand
and
K.C. Schroder
(eds) Reappraising Transnational lfledia, pp.
199-219.
London: Routledge
.
59.
Smith, A.
(1990) 'Introduction', in
G. Mulgan
(ed.) The Question of Quality: The Broadcasting Debate nr. 6, pp.
1-3.
London: BFI
.
60.
Striati
, 1. (1995).An fIntroduction to Theories of Popular
Culture.
London: Routledge
.
61.
Titschber, S.
,
M. Meyer
,
PR. Wodak
and
E. Vetter
(2000) Maethods of Text and Discourse Analysis.
London: Sage
.
62.
van Cuilenburg, J.
(1998) 'Diversity Revisited: Towards a Critical Rational
Modd of Medlia Diversity', in
K. Bran-ts
,
J. Hermes
and
L. van Zoonen
(eds) The illedia in Question: Popular Cultures and Public
Interests, pp. 38-49.
London: Sage
.
63.
Van den Buick, H
(2001)
'Public Service Television arnd National Identity as a Project of
Modernity: The Example of Flemish 'Television'
, Media, Culturc & Society23(1):
53-69
.
64.
Wester, F. (1995) 'Inhoudsanalyse als kwali-ta-tief-interpreterende
werkwijze', in H. Hiittner, K. Renckstorf and Id Wester (eds) Onderzoekstypen in de
communicatieu'etenschap, pp. 624-649. Houten: Bohn Stafleu Van Loghum.
65.
Wodak, R.
,
R. de Cillia
,
M. Reisigl
and
K. T.Liebhart
(1999) The Discursive Construction of National
Identity.
Edinburgh: Edin burgh University Press
.
66.
Wollen, T.
(1991) 'Over Our Shoulders: Nostalgic Screen Fiction for
the t98l-)s', in
J. Corner
and
S. Harvey
(ed.s) Enterprise and Her-itage: Crosscurr-ents of .Vational
Culture, pp. 178-193.
London: Routledge
.
