Commander in Chief is the first prime-time television drama to have a protagonist and an entire plot dedicated to a female U.S. president. Through a transversal discourse analysis, we explain how the series is a feminist artifact that valuably contributes to contemporary discourses of gender—but also of race. First, the study unpacks the show’s publicity that exaggerates essentialist views of White femininity. Second, the study considers ways that Commander in Chief offers protean but insufficiently intersectional representations. Third, the study examines how President Allen provides a third-wave feminist account of women.
AdamsM. (2011).
Is family a moral capital resource for female politicians? The case of ABC’s Commander in Chief. Media, Culture & Society,
33(2), 223–241. doi:10.1177/0163443710393383
2.
AhmedS. (2017). Living a feminist life.
Durham, NC:
Duke University Press.
3.
AndersonK. V. (2017).
Deflowering the voting virgin: Piety, political advertising, and the pleasure prerogative.Quarterly Journal of Speech,
103(1–2), 160–181. doi:10.1080/00335630.2016.1241891
4.
AndersonK. V. (2002).
From spouses to candidates: Hillary Rodham Clinton, Elizabeth Dole, and the gendered office of U.S. president.Rhetoric & Public Affairs,
5(1), 105–132.
5.
BellE. E.GolombiskyK. (2004).
Voices and silences in our classrooms: Strategies for mapping trails among sex/gender, race, and class.Women’s Studies in Communication,
27(3), 294–330. doi:10.1080/07491409.2004.10162478
6.
BillenA. (2006, April 4). Hail to the chief. The Times (London). Retrieved from ProQuest Newsstand.
7.
BlairD. M. (2008).
“I want you to write me”: Eleanor Roosevelt’s use of personal letters as a rhetorical resource.Western Journal of Communication,
72(4), 415–433. doi:10.1080/10570310802446064
8.
BochcoS. (Writer)PodeswaJ. (Director). (2005). Rubie Dubidoux and the Brown Bound Express [Commander in Chief, Television series episode]. Los Angeles: ABC.
9.
Bonilla-SilvaE. (2015).
The structure of racism in color-blind, “post-racial” America.American Behavioral Scientist,
59(11), 1358–1376. doi:10.1177/0002764215586826
10.
CalafellB. M. (2015). Monstrosity, performance, and race in contemporary culture.
New York, NY:
Peter Lang.
11.
CardoV. (2010).
The amazing Mrs. Politician: Television entertainment and women in politics.Parliamentary Affairs,
64(2), 311–325. doi:10.1093/pa/gsq056
12.
CobbS. (2011). Mother of the year: Kathy Hilton, Lynne Spears, Dina Lohan, and bad celebrity motherhood. In DinesG.HumezJ. M. (Eds.), Gender, race, and class in media: A critical reader (pp. 127–136).
Thousand Oaks, CA:
Sage.
13.
CoyneK. (2006, March 3). Geena Davis: From heartbreak to happiness. Good Housekeeping. Retrieved from ProQuest Newsstand.
14.
CrenshawK. (1989).
Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. The University of Chicago Legal Forum,
1989(1), 130–167.
15.
CrenshawK. (1991).
Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color.Stanford Law Review,
43(6), 1241–1299.
16.
CuklanzL. M.MoortiS. (2006).
Television’s “new” feminism: Prime-time representations of women and victimization. Critical Studies in Media Communication,
23(4), 302–321. doi:10.1080/07393180600933121
17.
CurtisN.CardoV. (2018).
Superheroes and third-wave feminism.Feminist Media Studies,
18(3), 381–396. doi:10.1080/14680777.2017.1351387
18.
DickinsonG.AndersonK. V. (2004).
Fallen: O.J. Simpson, Hillary Rodham Clinton, and the re-centering of white patriarchy.Communication & Critical/Cultural Studies,
1(3), 271–296. doi:10.1080/1479142042000244970
19.
DowB. J. (2004).
Fixing feminism: Women’s liberation and the rhetoric of television documentary.Quarterly Journal of Speech,
90(1), 53–80. doi:10.1080/0033563042000206817
20.
DubrofskyR. E.RyallsE. D. (2014).
The Hunger Games: Performing not-performing to authenticate femininity and whiteness. Critical Studies in Media Communication,
31(5), 395–409. doi:10.1080/15295036.2013.874038
21.
DyerR. (2017). White: Twentieth anniversary edition.
New York, NY:
Routledge.
22.
FriedlanderN. (2006, April 1). A president’s work is never done. The Times (London). Retrieved from ProQuest Newsstand.
23.
GomezS. L.McFarlaneM. D. (2016).
“It’s (not) handled”: Race, gender, and refraction in Scandal.Feminist Media Studies,
17(3), 362–376. doi:10.1080/14680777.2016.1218352
24.
HolbertR. L.ShahD. V.KwakN. (2003).
Political implications of prime-time drama and sitcom use: Genres of representation and opinions concerning women’s rights.Journal of Communication,
53(1), 45–60. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2003.tb030004.x.
25.
Horwitz, L., & Swyers, H. (2009). Why are all the presidents men? Televisual presidents and patriarchy. In L. J. Goren (Ed.), You've come a long way, baby: Women, politics, and popular culture (pp. 115–134). Lexington: University Press of Kentucky.
26.
IdatoM. (2006, February 27). Leading lady. The Sunday Morning Herald (Sydney). Retrieved from ProQuest Newsstand.
27.
KaklamanidouB.TallyM. (Eds.). (2017a). Politics and politicians in contemporary US television: Washington as fiction.
New York, NY:
Routledge.
28.
KaklamanidouB.TallyM. (2017b). The political TV shows of the 2010s: Showrunners, reality, and gender. In Politics and politicians in contemporary US television: Washington as fiction (pp. 17–33). New York, NY: Routledge.
29.
KennedyD. A. (2005).
Transversal feminism and transcendence.Review of Law and Women’s Studies,
15(1), 65–93.
30.
KahnJ. P. (2013, May 21). Davis returns to raise awareness of gender roles in media. Boston Globe, p. G4. Retrieved from ProQuest Newsstand.
31.
KroløkkeC.SørensenA. S. (2006). Gender communication theories & analyses: From silence to performance.
Thousand Oaks, CA:
Sage.
32.
LaneC. (2003). The White House culture of gender and race in The West Wing. In RollinsP. C.O'ConnorJ. E. (Eds.), The West Wing: The American presidency as television drama (pp. 32–41).
Syracuse, NY:
Syracuse University Press.
33.
LurieR.JohnsonD. (Writers)AttiasD. (Director). (2005). First scandal [Commander in Chief, Television series episode].
Los Angeles:
ABC.
34.
LurieR.JohnsonD. (Writers)LurieR. (Director). (2005). First strike [Commander in Chief, Television series episode].
Los Angeles:
ABC.
35.
MandziukR. M. (2017).
Whither the good wife? 2016 presidential spouses in the gendered spaces of contemporary politics.Quarterly Journal of Speech,
103(1–2), 136–159. doi:10.1080/00335630.2016.1221529
36.
McCabeJ. (2013). The West Wing.
Detroit, MI:
Wayne State University Press.
37.
McIntoshD. M. D. (2014).
White feelings, feeling straight: Cultivating affective attentivenesss for queer futurities. QED: A Journal of GLBTQ Worldmaking,
1(3), 154–158. doi:10.14321/qed.1.3.0154
38.
McIntoshD. M. D. (2017).
Victims, protectors, and possibilities for change: White womanhood and the violence of heteronormativity. QED: A Journal of GLBTQ Worldmaking,
4(2), 162–169.
39.
MurphyC. (2017). ‘Stand up, fight back’: Race and policing in The Good Wife and Scandal. In KaklamanidouB.TallyM. (Eds.), Politics and politicians in contemporary US television (pp. 47–60).
New York, NY:
Routledge.
40.
NakayamaT. K.KrizekR. L. (1995).
Whiteness: A strategic rhetoric.The Quarterly Journal of Speech,
81(3), 291–309. doi:10.1080/00335639509384117
41.
Nix-HinesC.ArthurR. (Writers)MisianoV. (Director). (2005). First disaster [Commander in Chief, Television series episode].
Los Angeles:
ABC.
42.
Parry-GilesT. (2006). The prime-time presidency: The West Wing and U.S. nationalism.
Urbana, IL:
University of Illinois Press.
43.
Parry-GilesT.Parry-GilesS. J. (2002).
The West Wing’s prime-time presidentiality: Mimesis and catharsis in a postmodern romance. Quarterly Journal of Speech,
88(2), 209–227.
44.
PhalenP. F.KimJ.OsellameJ. (2012).
Imagined presidencies: The representation of political power in television fiction.The Journal of Popular Culture,
45(3), 532–550. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5931.2011.00812.x
45.
Ramirez BergC. (2002). Latino images in film: Stereotypes, subversion, resistance.
Austin, TX:
University of Texas Press.
46.
ReynoldsC. (2018).
Building theory from media ideology: Coding for power in journalistic discourse.Journal of Communication Inquiry.
43(1), 47–69. doi:10.1177/0196859918774797
47.
RollinsP. C.O'ConnorJ. E. (Eds.). (2003). The West Wing: The American presidency as television drama.
Syracuse, NY:
Syracuse University Press.
48.
ShawA. (2014).
The internet is full of jerks, because the world is full of jerks: What feminist theory teaches us about the internet.Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies,
11(3), 1479–1420. doi:10.1080/14791420.2014.926245
49.
SheelerK. H.AndersonK. V. (2013). Fictional presidentiality: Presidential portrayals on the large and small screens. In Woman president: Confronting postfeminist political culture (pp. 39–88). College Station, TX: Texas A&M University Press.
50.
ShomeR. (2014). Diana and beyond: White femininity, national identity, and contemporary media culture.
Urbana, IL:
University of Illinois Press.
51.
StevensS.CohenS. A. (Writers)BlecknerJ. (Director). (2006). Happy birthday, Madam President [Commander in Chief, Television series episode].
Los Angeles:
ABC.
52.
TallyM. (2017). ‘Call it the Hillary effect’: Charting the imaginary of ‘Hillary-esque’ fictional narratives. In KaklamanidouB.TallyM. (Eds.), Politics and politicians in contemporary US television: Washington as fiction (pp. 121–136).
New York, NY:
Routledge.
53.
TongR.Fernandes BottsT. (2017). Feminist thought: A more comprehensive introduction (5th ed.).
Boulder, CO:
Westview.
54.
ValdiviaA. N. (Ed.). (2008). Latina/o communication studies today.
New York, NY:
Peter Lang.
55.
Van ZoonenL. (2003). ‘After Dallas and Dynasty we have … democracy’: Articulating soap, politics and gender. In CornerJ.PelsD. (Eds.), Media and the restyling of politics: Consumerism, celebrity and cynicism (pp. 99–116).
Thousand Oaks, CA:
Sage.
ZenovichJ. A.MoremanS. T. (2015).
Third wave feminist analysis of a second wave feminist’s art: A feminist oral history of an artist’s last performance.Departures in Critical Qualitative Research,
4(1), 57–80. doi:10.1525/dcqr.2015.4.1.57
