This study investigates language attitudes and practices among first-generation Ukrainian migrants in Naples (Italy) after the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine. It examines how war-related experiences reshape the symbolic and affective values of Russian and Ukrainian within speakers’ repertoires.
Methods:
The study adopts a mixed-methods approach, combining sociolinguistic questionnaires and the language portrait technique. Data from Ukrainian-speaking migrants in Naples were analyzed qualitatively and quantitatively, focusing on metalinguistic commentary and visual representations of linguistic repertoires.
Results:
The findings show a process of sociolinguistic realignment. Despite high proficiency, Russian is often associated with trauma, stigma, and political aggression, and positioned as a language to be rejected. Ukrainian, by contrast, gains affective and symbolic value as a marker of identity and resistance. The study highlights how geopolitical events reshape language practices and contribute to the renegotiation of individual and collective identities in the diaspora.
AalberseS.BackusA.MuyskenP. (2019). Heritage languages: A language contact approach. John Benjamins Publishing Company.
2.
BambergM.De FinaA.SchiffrinD. (Eds.) (2007). Selves and identities in narrative and discourse. John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/sin.9
3.
BrinkmanI. (2004). Language, names, and war: The case of Angola. African Studies Review, 47, 143–163.
4.
BuschB. (2010). School language profiles: Valorizing linguistic resources in heteroglossic situations in South Africa. Language and Education, 24(4), 283–294.
5.
BuschB. (2012). The linguistic repertoire revisited. Applied Linguistics, 33(5), 503–523.
6.
BuschB. (2013). Mehrsprachigkeit Wien [Multilingualism in Vienna]. UTB/Facultas.
7.
BuschB. (2017). Expanding the notion of the linguistic repertoire: On the concept of Spracherleben—The lived experience of language. Applied Linguistics, 38, 340–358.
8.
BuschB. (2018). The language portrait in multilingualism research: Theoretical and methodological considerations. Urban Language & Literacies, 236, 1–22.
9.
CoffeyS. (2015). Reframing teachers’ language knowledge through metaphor analysis of language portraits. The Modern Language Journal, 99(3), 500–514.
10.
CognigniE. (2007). Vivere la migrazione tra e con le lingue: Funzioni del racconto e dell’analisi biografica nell’apprendimento dell’italiano come lingua seconda [Experiencing Migration Between and Through Languages: The Functions of Narrative and Biographical Analysis in Learning Italian as a Second Language]. Wizart.
Dedalus (Cooperativa Sociale). (2023). Modelli insediativi e livelli di integrazione dei cittadini immigrati nella Città di Napoli [Settlement Patterns and Levels of Integration among Immigrant Populations in the City of Naples].
Della PuttaP. (2021). Acquisire il contatto: Dialetto, Italiano regionale e italiano standard nel repertorio di cittadine ucrainofone residenti a Napoli [Acquiring Contact: Dialect, Regional Italian, and Standard Italian in the Repertoire of Ukrainian-speaking Women Residing in Naples]. In FavillaE.MachettiS. (Eds.), Lingue in contatto e linguistica applicata: Individui e società [Languages in Contact and Applied Linguistics: Individuals and Society] (pp. 155–169). Officineventuno.
15.
Di SalvoM. (2017). Heritage language and identity in old and new Italian migrants in Toronto. In Di SalvoM.MorenoP. (Eds.), Italian communities abroad: Multilingualism and migration (pp. 75–95). Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
16.
Di SalvoM. (2018). Heritage language, identity, and education in Europe: Evidence from the UK. In TrifonasP. P.AravossitasT. (Eds.), Handbook of research and practice in heritage language education (pp. 155–164). Springer International Handbooks of Education.
17.
GarrettP.CouplandN.WilliamsA. (2003). Investigating language attitudes: Social meanings of dialect, ethnicity and performance. University of Wales Press.
18.
GogolinI.NeumannU. (1991). Sprachliches Handeln in der Grundschule [Linguistic Action in Primary School]. Die Grundschulzeitschrift [The Primary School Journal], 43, 6–13.
19.
HentschelG. (2024). Ukrainian and Russian in the lexicon of Ukrainian Suržyk: Reduced variation and stabilisation in Central Ukraine and on the Black Sea coast. Russian Linguistics, 48, 2–29.
20.
HentschelG.PalinskaO. (2022). The linguistic situation on the Ukrainian Black Sea coast—Ukrainian, Russian and Suržyk as “native language,” “primary code,” frequently used codes and codes of linguistic socialization during childhood. Russian Linguistics, 46, 259–290. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11185-022-09259-4
21.
HentschelG.TaranenkoO. (2021). Bilingualism or tricodalism: Ukrainian, Russian and “Suržyk” in Ukraine. Analysis and linguistic-geographical mapping. Die Welt Der Slaven, 66(2), 268–299. https://doi.org/10.13173/WS.66.2.268
22.
KrummH.-J.JenkinsE.-M. (2001). Kinder und ihre Sprachen–lebendige Mehrsprachigkeit: Sprachenportraits gesammelt und kommentiert von Hans-Jürgen Krumm [Children and Their Languages – Living Multilingualism: Language Portraits Collected and Commented on by Hans-Jürgen Krumm]. Eviva.
23.
KulykV. (2017). Identity in transformation: Russian-speakers in post-Soviet Ukraine. Europe-Asia Studies, 71, 156–178.
24.
KulykV. (2018). Shedding Russianness, recasting Ukrainianness: The post-Euromaidan dynamics of ethnonational identifications in Ukraine. Post-Soviet Affairs, 34(2–3), 119–138. https://doi.org/10.1080/1060586X.2018.1451232
25.
Le PageR. B.Tabouret-KellerA. (1985). Acts of identity: Creole-based approaches to language and ethnicity. Cambridge University Press.
26.
Mac Giolla ChríostD. (2003). Language, identity and conflict: A comparative study of language in ethnic conflict in Europe and Eurasia. Routledge.
27.
MakarovaV.HryshynaY. (2025). Language use and attitudes among Ukrainian refugees in Canada: Do they differ by participants’ age?Languages, 10(12), 292. https://doi.org/10.3390/languages10120292
McGroartyM. E. (2010). Language and ideologies. In HornbergerN. H.McKayS. L. (Eds.), Sociolinguistics and language education (pp. 3–39) Multilingual Matters.
30.
MoroF.Di SalvoM. (2026). The “Hello Campania” project and corpus: Documenting language practices of linguistic minorities in Campania, Italy. Ethnorema.
31.
MykhaylyakT. (2023). Lavoratrici ucraine a Napoli e provincia: Esperienze lavorative, contesto abitativo e problematiche inclusive [Ukrainian Female Workers in Naples and Its Province: Work Experiences, Housing Context, and Inclusion Challenges]. Palaver, 12(2), 141–164.
32.
MykhaylyakT. (2024). Rifugiati ucraini a Napoli. Strategie di accoglienza, mediazione culturale e assistenza medica [Ukrainian Refugees in Naples: Reception Strategies, Cultural Mediation, and Medical Assistance]. Etnoantropologia, 12(1), 69–86.
33.
NeldeP. H. (1987). Language contact means language conflict. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 8(1–2), 33–42.
34.
PlatzgummerV. (2021). Positioning the self: A subject-centred perspective on adolescents’ linguistic repertoires and language ideologies in South Tyrol [Doctoral dissertation, Universität Wien, Vienna].
35.
ProtassovaE.GolubevaA.MikelsoneI. (2021). Russian as a home language in early childhood education. In SchwartzM. (Ed.), Handbook of early language education (pp. 373–402). Springer.
36.
ProtassovaE.YelenevskayaM. (2024). Changes in the immigrant Russian-speaking family language policy during the war in Ukraine. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, 1385420.
37.
RacekD.DavidsonB. I.ThurnerP. W. (2024). The Russian war in Ukraine increased Ukrainian language use on social media. Communications Psychology, 2, 1.
38.
RemottiF. (1997). Contro l’identità [Against identity]. Laterza.
39.
RubinoA. (2014). Trilingual talk in Sicilian-Australian migrant families: Playing out identities through language alternation. Palgrave Macmillan.
40.
SavyR. (2006). Specifiche per la trascrizione annotata ortografica dei testi [Specifications for the Orthographic Annotated Transcription of Texts]. In Albano LeoniF.GiordanoR. (Eds.), Italiano parlato. Analisi di un dialogo [Spoken Italian: Analysis of a Dialogue] (pp. 1–37). Liguori.
41.
SoaresC. T.DuarteJ.Günther-van der MeijM. (2021). ‘Red is the colour of the heart’: Making young children’s multilingualism visible through language portraits. Language and Education, 35(1), 22–41.
42.
Tullio-AltanC. (1996). Ethnos e civiltà. Feltrinelli.
43.
TurchettaB. (Ed.). (2003). Le comunità linguistiche di frontiera [Border Linguistic Communities]. In Atti Della Società Italiana Di Linguistica [In Proceedings of the Italian Linguistic Society] (pp. 494–505). Bulzoni.
44.
WarditzV.MeirN. (2024). Ukrainian-Russian bilingualism in the war-affected migrant and refugee communities in Austria and Germany: A survey-based study on language attitudes. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, Article 1364112. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1364112
45.
YaremkoL.LevchukP. (2023). Language consciousness and Ukrainian students’ attitudes towards the Ukrainian language in a time of war. Cognitive Studies/Études Cognitives, 2023(1), 1–12.
