Empirical research on code-switching acceptability tends to focus on structural differences and has only recently begun to focus on social motivations of what is considered grammatical/acceptable in bilingual speech. We study perceptions of code-switching grammaticality with a focus on the social identity of the perceiver.
Methodology:
A modified Acceptability Judgment Task was designed and implemented via Qualtrics, and data were collected from Latinx Spanish–English bilinguals across five U.S. states (California, Florida, Illinois, New York, Texas). Participants responded to four grammaticality judgment questions for 40 code-switched sentences adapted from reggaetón music lyrics. Half the grammatical and ungrammatical sentences were labeled “(source: reggaetón).”
Data and analysis:
Data were analyzed using linear mixed-effects regression in R. The fixed effects were place of birth, state of residence, family national origin, gender, age, and contextual label, while the random effects were participant and item (sentence).
Findings:
U.S.-born participants had significantly lower AJT ratings for ungrammatical sentences, which were significantly lower when the label was present. Participants from California demonstrated the highest AJT ratings for grammatical and ungrammatical sentences. Interaction effects between state of residence and label status are found only for participants from Florida in the ungrammatical category.
Originality:
This paper presents one of the first studies to address the social and regional variation of AJT results in the U.S. concerning Spanish–English code-switching, and it is one of the first to emphasize the role of context in acceptability judgments.
Implications:
The results of this study make connections to sociolinguistic theory on the listener’s identity and its effects on language perception. Furthermore, the study highlights the importance of considering context-based information in acceptability judgment testing.
AlfarazG. (2014). Dialect perceptions in real time: A restudy of Miami Cuban perceptions. Journal of Linguistic Geography, 2(2), 74–86.
2.
AndersonT. K.ToribioA. J. (2007). Attitudes towards lexical borrowing and intra-sentential code-switching among Spanish-English bilinguals. Spanish in Context, 4(2), 217–240. https://doi.org/10.1075/sic.4.2.05and
3.
BackusA. (2015). A usage-based approach to code-switching: The need for reconciling structure and function. In StellG.YakpoK. (Eds.), Code-switching between structural and sociolinguistic perspectives (pp. 19–38). De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110346879.19
4.
BadiolaL.DelgadoR.SandeA.StefanichS. (2018). Code-switching attitudes and their effects on acceptability judgment tasks. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 8(1), 5–24. https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.16006.bad
5.
BalamO.Parafita CoutoM. D. C.Stadthagen-GonzálezH. (2020). Bilingual verbs in three Spanish/English code-switching communities. International Journal of Bilingualism, 24(5–6), 952–967. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006920911449
6.
BarnesS. (2015). Perceptual salience and social categorization of contact features in Asturian Spanish. Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics, 8(2), 213–241. https://doi.org/10.1515/shll-2015-0009
7.
BatesD.MächlerM.BolkerB.WalkerS. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01
8.
BelaziH.RubinE. J.ToribioA. J. (1994). Code-switching and X-bar theory: The functional head constraint. Linguistic Inquiry, 25(2), 221–237.
9.
BybeeJ. (2023). What is usage-based linguistics?. In Díaz-CamposM.BalaschS. (Eds.), The handbook of usage-based linguistics (1st ed., pp. 7–29). John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119839859.ch1
10.
CallesanoS.CarterP. M. (2019). Latinx perceptions of Spanish in Miami: Dialect variation, personality attributes and language use. Language & Communication, 67, 84–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2019.03.003
11.
CallesanoS.CarterP. M. (2023). Unidirectional language bias: The Implicit Association Test with Spanish and English in Miami. International Journal of Bilingualism, 27(6), 960–977. https://doi.org/10.1177/13670069221121159
12.
CallesanoS.DelgadoR.MaW.TrybulecE.ReyesG. (2025). Contextualizing code-switching: Testing the effects of reggaetón labels and listening frequency in an Acceptability Judgment Task. Frontiers in Communication, 9, Article 1490299. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2024.1490299
13.
CallesanoS. J. (2020). Perceptual dialectology, mediatization, and idioms: Exploring communities in Miami [Doctoral dissertation]. The University of Texas at Austin. https://doi.org/10.26153/TSW/12316
14.
CarterP. M.CallesanoS. (2018). The social meaning of Spanish in Miami: Dialect perceptions and implications for socioeconomic class, income, and employment. Latino Studies, 16(1), 65–90. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41276-017-0105-8
15.
CarterP. M.LynchA. (2015). Multilingual Miami: Current trends in sociolinguistic research. Language and Linguistics Compass, 9(9), 369–385. https://doi.org/10.1111/lnc3.12157
16.
ChappellW.BarnesS. (2023). Stereotypes, language, and race: Spaniards’ perception of Latin American immigrants. Journal of Linguistic Geography, 11(2), 104–118. https://doi.org/10.1017/jlg.2023.5
17.
ChappellW.KanwitM. (2022). Do learners connect sociophonetic variation with regional and social characteristics?: The case of L2 perception of Spanish aspiration. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 44(1), 185–209. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0272263121000115
18.
CheshireJ.Gardner-ChlorosP. (1998). Code-switching and the sociolinguistic gender pattern. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 129(1), 5–34. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijsl.1998.129.5
19.
DavidM. K.TienW. Y. M.MengN. Y.HuiG. K. (2009). Language choice and code switching of the elderly and the youth. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 2009(200), Article 44. https://doi.org/10.1515/IJSL.2009.044
GiancasproD.SánchezL. (2021). Me, mi, my: Innovation and variability in heritage speakers’ knowledge of inalienable possession. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics, 6(1), Article 31. https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.1240
23.
González-VilbazoK.KoronkiewiczB. (2016). Tú y yo can codeswitch, nosotros cannot: Pronouns in Spanish-English codeswitching. In MazakC. M.Guzzardo TamargoR. E.Carmen Parafita CoutoM. (Eds.), Spanish-English codeswitching in the Caribbean and the US (pp. 237–260). John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/ihll.11.10gon
24.
GriesS. T. (2021). Statistics for linguistics with R: A practical introduction (2nd ed.). De Gruyter Mouton.
25.
GuyG. R. (2011). Sociolinguistics and formal linguistics. In WodakR.JohnstoneB.KerswillP. E. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of sociolinguistics (pp. 249–264). SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446200957.n19
26.
Guzzardo TamargoR. E.Loureiro-RodríguezV.AcarE. F.Vélez AvilésJ. (2019). Attitudes in progress: Puerto Rican youth’s opinions on monolingual and code-switched language varieties. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 40(4), 304–321. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2018.1515951
27.
HäusslerJ. S.JuzekT. (2021). Variation in participants and stimuli in acceptability experiments. In GoodallG. (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of experimental syntax (1st ed., pp. 97–117). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108569620.005
HayJ.NolanA.DragerK. (2006). From fush to feesh: Exemplar priming in speech perception. The Linguistic Review, 23(3), Article 14. https://doi.org/10.1515/TLR.2006.014
30.
HofweberJ.MarinisT.Treffers-DallerJ. (2019). Predicting executive functions in bilinguals using ecologically valid measures of code-switching behavior. In SekerinaI. A.SpradlinL.ValianV. (Eds.), Studies in bilingualism (Vol. 57, pp. 181–206). John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.57.12hof
31.
KoronkiewiczB. (2014). Pronoun categorization: Evidence from Spanish/English code-switching [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Illinois at Chicago; UIC Indigo. https://hdl.handle.net/10027/19014
32.
KoronkiewiczB. (2022). Adverbs in Spanish–English code-switching: Comparing verb raising and non-raising. International Journal of Bilingualism, 26(2), 227–254. https://doi.org/10.1177/13670069211057955
33.
LambertW. E.HodgsonR. C.GardnerR. C.FillenbaumS. (1960). Evaluational reactions to spoken languages. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 60(1), 44–51. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0044430
LynchA. (2017). The social diffusion of English-based lexical innovations in Miami Cuban Spanish. In CuzaA. (Ed.), Cuban Spanish dialectology: Variation, contact, and change (pp. 163–186). Georgetown University Press.
36.
MacSwanJ. (2005). Codeswitching and generative grammar: A critique of the MLF model and some remarks on modified minimalism. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 8(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728904002068
Myers-ScottonC. (1997). Duelling languages: Grammatical structure in codeswitching (Report). Clarendon.
39.
NiedzielskiN. (1999). The effect of social information on the perception of sociolinguistic variables. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 18(1), 62–85. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X99018001005
40.
Parafita CuotoM. C.Greidanus RomeliM.BellamyK. (2021). Code-switching at the interface between language, culture, and cognition. Lapurdum: Basque Studies Review. https://shs.hal.science/halshs-03280922/
41.
PoplackS. (1980). Sometimes I’ll start a sentence in Spanish y termino en español: Toward a typology of code-switching. Linguistics, 18(7–8), Article 581. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1980.18.7-8.581
42.
PoplackS. (1988). Contrasting patterns of codeswitching in two communities. In HellerM. (Ed.), Codeswitching: Anthropological and sociolinguistic perspectives (pp. 215–244). De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110849615.215
43.
PrestonD. (1993). The uses of folk linguistics. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 3(2), 181–259.
44.
RangelN.Loureiro-RodríguezV.MoynaM. I. (2015). Is that what I sound like when I speak?: Attitudes towards Spanish, English, and code-switching in two Texas border towns. Spanish in Context, 12(2), 177–198. https://doi.org/10.1075/sic.12.2.01ran
45.
R Core Team. (2024). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/
ReganB.MartinezJ. L. (2023). The indeterminacy of social meaning linked to Mexico and Texas Spanish: Examining monoglossic language ideologies among heritage and L2 Spanish listeners. Languages, 8(4), Article 266. https://doi.org/10.3390/languages8040266
48.
Rivera-RideauP. R. (2015). Remixing reggaetón: The cultural politics of race in Puerto Rico. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822375258
49.
Rodrigo-TamaritM.Loureiro-RodríguezV. (2024). Exploring attitudes towards French, English, and code-switching in Manitoba (Canada). International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 27(6), 793–808. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2023.2242562
50.
RosaJ. (2016). Racializing language, regimenting Latinas/os: Chronotope, social tense, and American raciolinguistic futures. Language & Communication, 46, 106–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2015.10.007
51.
SprouseJ. (2018). Acceptability judgements and grammaticality, prospects and challenges. In HornsteinN.LasnikH.Patel-GroszP.YangC. (Eds.), Syntactic structures after 60 years (pp. 195–224). De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501506925-199
52.
SprouseJ.AlmeidaD. (2017). Design sensitivity and statistical power in acceptability judgment experiments. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics, 2(1), 14. https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.236
53.
ToribioA. J. (2002). Spanish-English code-switching among US Latinos. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 158, 89–119. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijsl.2002.053
